Bonus Bananas November 15, 2013
1) Investment Manager Explains Why 99.5% Of Americans Can Never Win (Business Insider) - This was pretty much the last thing I needed to read the day after learning that a 23-year old unapologetic douchebag turned his nose up at $3 BILLION cash for a nonsensical app he created less than two years ago. I'm probably wasting my appointment in the isolation tank tomorrow, because all I'm gonna think about is how rigged the system is and how much Haterade is flowing through my veins right now. And now there's this. Goddammit.
2) Guy Who Was In Charge Of Quantitative Easing Apologizes For Quantitative Easing (Consumerist) - Here's something you don't see every day (or, like, ever since Woodrow Wilson apologized for creating the Federal Reserve in 1913). Yup, it was a mistake, but it's one we all have to live with. Thanks, dick.
3) What rich men want (and don't want) in a woman (CNBC) - Some real shockers here. Young, hot, thin, blonde, big rack. Yup, that's some groundbreaking material, CNBC.
4) This is how much money people with your personality make (Career Assesment Site) - Do you know your Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator? Then here's a handy infographic that will let you know how much money you can expect to make, among other things.
5) Li-Fi Turns Every Lightbulb Into an Ultra-Fast Wireless Network (Mashable) - Can this be a thing, like, yesterday? This technology is promising 10x faster wi-fi due to the electromagnetic wave of light. It's especially critical in high polulation density areas like New York, where current wi-fi signals are stepping all over each other.
6) An Honest Grad School Application Essay (Post Grad Problems) - They say honesty is the best policy. Wouldn't it be great if you could submit something like this and have adcoms read it and laugh and give you a green light?
7) Five Things Every Self-Respecting Man Over 30 Needs. And 40 He Doesn’t. (The Good Men Project) - Here's a really good Fight Club-esque rant against male consumerism highlighting the things that are truly important in life. Well done.
8) How Disney Ruined Sex For Everyone (Mark Manson) - Huge hat tip to @karypto for finding this nugget of gold. If you only read one thing this week, make it this. You'll be the better man for it.
9) Adventures of a Serial Trespasser (The Atlantic) - I've been meaning to post this for over a month now. Just an epic photo essay of some of the strangest places on Earth taken by a guy who has made his living breaking into forbidden spaces with his camera. Really cool stuff.
10) There’s Something In This Peaceful Picture That You Don’t Realize. When You See It…OMG. (ViralNova) - Here's some nightmare fuel for ya. We have a similar problem with fire ants after a hurricane in New Orleans. Kill me now.
Video of the Week:
You don't have to be a dyed-in-the-wool Trekkie to appreciate the humor in the following Audi commercial. Zachary Quinto and Leonard Nimoy bend the space-time continuum in a race to the country club. Pretty funny hook at the end too. Enjoy:
Not to be outdone, Jean-Claude Van Damme is probably gonna sell a few Volvo 18-wheelers with this psycho move:
That's it for this week, monkeys! Let me know what you think about this week's Bananas in the comments and have an outrageous weekend!
America needs more commercial that are over one minute and play Enya in the background. I feel you capture so much more emotion in over 60 seconds. Great videos. And thanks for the mention!
I don't know why, but that song makes me want to drive 200+ mph....
4) I'm INTP, and that graphic makes me sad.
Don't understand how you can turn down $4B from Google for an app that doesn't generate revenue.
This just proves JCVD still has it
Re #4: I just noticed the inconsistent use of decimal points on the wheel that shows the breakdown of population by personality type. FML.
Did anyone else notice how those trucks are actually going in reverse?
I just took an online test and got ISTJ. It was pretty bunk test though, any one have a link to a good one?
I did mine through my university, along with the Strong Interest Inventory (SII) at the same time. In total I think it cost 30 bucks, and I spoke with some psychologist about my results.
They also pointed me to the book "Do What You Are" which gives a more detailed analysis.
Turns out I'm slightly interested in Computer Science, Finance, and Law, and I'm slightly interesting and slightly conventional.
I remember in high school I was right on the border of ENTJ and INTJ. So YEAH!
From #7:
I think a decent example of this is Nefarious's essays describing how you need to buy a straight razor in order to be an (alpha) man.
I went through a pretty comprehensive MBTI test at school (the one that's otherwise paid, took a long time to finish).
Got INTP. I and P were sorta borderline, NT very strong.
I would rather be eaten by a shark than spend 10 minutes in that nightmare spider field
I knew there would be at least one of us on WSO who would freak the fuck out over that. I don't have a fear of spiders and I still think that's skeevy as fuck.
@Cruncharoo ; This is the one I used --> http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
INTJ.
@Going Concern ; I was thinking the same thing.
I found that article pretty ridiculous. So anybody who owns stock now has a "close association with the financial industry"?
I think the outrage is that they got rich from the asset appreciation on the consideration, not the business they built. But you have to take risk to get asset appreciation - i.e. to get to the $3bn offer, they had to turn down the $1bn offer. The guy who sold for stock could have taken cash. The programmer could have sold their shares pre-IPO on SecondMarket. The CEO may or may not have had the option to divest their holdings, and may or may not have been overpaid, but most likely his company killed it during his tenure for him to amass that wealth.
Also, the anti-male consumerism rant is dumb because the article is calls out isn't even that foppish/consumerist. There is literally one thing on that list I consider a stupid hipster/luxury purchase - a record player, and honestly, music is important to modern living, so I would be OK with a set of headphones or something replacing it. The rest of the stuff if what you would call basic necessities in modern middle-class society (sheets, socks, an Korean car). It explicitly avoids the magazine conceit of picking absurdly expensive examples of basic items (the watch is cheap, the shoes shown are not but the caption makes it clear it is a joke).
In each case, the value they contributed was unlocked, multiplied by stock sales. Hence they appropiated value of future cash flows stemming from their stake in the company, not just current cash flows as they would have received from their income only.
Yes. The whole concept of an extremely lucrative "exit" for a business is largely a creation of the financial system. Without cheap debt, the expectation of flipping the business again in five years, or the need to placate the Street with some M&A activity, you wouldn't have someone become a decamillionaire overnight. Try running a buyout model where you don't have an exit in five years and you don't buy the company with a bunch of debt. Check out your returns. That's life without the financial system as currently constructed.
Everyone knows the whole game is rigged in favor of finance. And yeah, a lot of corporate profits are kept overseas. But I don't really fault people for taking advantage of finance's favored status or moving operations to a tax haven to maximize profits. To the continual shock of lawmakers and politicians, people respond to incentives, so these actions are, dare I say, logical. Maybe if we don't want the financial sector running our economy we shouldn't dump billions of dollars into the banks via the purchase and sale of government bonds. Maybe if we don't want private equity managers making $20mm a year we shouldn't have a tax code that favors debt and capital gains and penalizes ordinary income, and maybe if we don't want corporations shipping their profits overseas, we should re-visit our tax rates.
Take it easy, Eddie. Take a deep breath, pour yourself a nice tall glass of rum. The weekend's here!
Hasn't the Meyers Briggs been thoroughly debunked? Fairly sure you could take it twice and get two completely separate readings.
Was it? I've taken it and purposely changed a few of my answers that I was on the fence about, and certain factors always remain the same for me.
I think it has more to do with the fact that the longer tests ask the same question but give differently worded answers to. It is also a time based assumption. You are supposed to pick the first answer that best fits your views. So the time it takes you to answer factors into the results.
1) The article is fairly straight forward, however I don't think there is a cabal of people actively pursuing a policy to hold the rest of the 99% down. 9) Pretty cool. Reminds me of a joke I heard recently. "Do you know who Banksy is?" "The street artist?""No, the vandal."
Nice to know Van Damme's still got it.
You need to update your #s eddie, Google apparently offered 4 billin for Snap-whatever its called.
@ krauser - same exact thing for me, I and P borderline, NT very strong. I'm guessing that if I start jumping to conclusions because I start the day off with a drink or two, I should make it into the top tier of earners at some point?
@ evilbyaccident - realize also that the distribution is extremely segregated for NT types. Sure there's a bunch of losers sitting around parsing out stereotypical "Big Bang Theory" style crap, but this is also the designation of the highest level of genius possible. Guys like Enstein, Darwin, Hawkings, Adam Smith, Alan Greenspan, etc don't necessarily have a use for money given their influence. People kind of just give them what they want and do stuff for them.
Don't worry, we'll make it. High I and P types are the real slackers/procrastinators. High NT plus a decent amount of practicality and ambition = win all the way.
//www.youtube.com/embed/Jtz4Tzr9WJk
just did another one today, patrick asked if i'm a junkie :)
Eos velit est voluptate nihil. Cumque numquam eum repellendus non quis accusamus sapiente. Vitae accusantium animi sed omnis. Ut autem eaque dolor.
Suscipit inventore aut delectus sit quae. Error ipsam accusamus voluptatem natus dicta. Cumque consequatur sapiente provident magnam quam et nisi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Mollitia nobis quia magnam recusandae. Veritatis non voluptatem aperiam quis quas voluptas at eos. Sunt perspiciatis est omnis vel eos autem. Saepe labore harum minima dignissimos autem.
Dolorum excepturi sit iusto dolor in cumque doloribus. Molestiae voluptas consequuntur dolores rem.
Non consequuntur eveniet atque. Ratione sequi id eum aut aliquam dolore ut nesciunt. Veniam harum temporibus ut laboriosam.
Blanditiis omnis assumenda ab fugit eveniet fuga. Sunt necessitatibus aliquam sapiente sed. Et quas et dolores sunt ut atque quia.