Can anyone be a Warren Buffet? (book review)

If there is one thing that I’ve learned from reading about different investing strategies over the past few years, it’s this: active equity investing is very difficult, and you need to be very sure of yourself to think that you have better knowledge about the price of a security than whatever “Mr. Market” decides it is.

Quantitative investors tend to rely on algorithms to automate trading, while value investors seem to pride themselves on their ability to be successful by doing intense research and by having the courage to make judgments on highly subjective decisions. And never the twain shall meet, right?

Perhaps not. One of the more interesting books that I’ve read lately is “Quantitative Value,” by Wesley Gray and Tobias Carlisle. In it, the authors argue that the best way to do value investing is by taking a quantitative approach, and that automating the investment process by screening for value factors can result in superior returns.

Essentially, they want to figure out how to automate the best of Buffet style value investing to make it accessible to more people.

The book starts out by observing the favorable results that can be had by investing with Greenblatt’s “Magic Formula,” which is a simple quant screen that searches for stocks based on earnings yield and return on capital. The authors argue that the success of this approach is due largely to the fact that it allows individuals to capture the well documented Value Premium that comes from owning under-priced stocks, and also prevents investors from making dumb errors in implementing their strategy. There are reams of literature on the behavioral biases that plague investors, and applying a simple and consistent quant screen can allow investors to capture the well-documented value premium in a systematic way.

However, the book goes several steps further by showing investors how they can use academic research to improve the results of this sort of quantitative screen. The book’s chapters each build on a different area of research, including bankruptcy prediction, the Piotroski F-Score (which screens for financially strong companies), and discusses how to implement the findings of those results into your investment process.

Overall, I really enjoyed Quantitative Value. It made me think about the limits of my own knowledge, and opened me up to thinking about how Buffet style investing can be implemented in a rigorous and systematic way. I think that it can be best used and tested if you have an aptitude for statistical programming and access to large databases such as Compustat, but from what I can tell, sources such as Bloomberg and various other online quant screens should have enough information to implement a version of this program.

Has anyone out there tried to implement the ideas from this book? What do WSO’s buyside and trader posters have to say?

A pretty good white paper is here.

 

If people can buy large companies in cash and successfully lobby Congress then I suppose anyone can be a Buffet. I mean, there's a fundamental difference between the Buffet of the 1960s and the Buffet who is a billionaire with economies of scale, an executive management team and a huge budget to lobby Congress.

 

I think Warren Buffet's greatest advantage is not that he knows which stocks are gonna rise in the future, but the fact that he understands business well, know who are the right people to run a company and who are not, and step into the company to solve the problem when nobody else can. I don't believe algorithms can do that.

 

Ut excepturi dolorem ab inventore. Sunt laborum nam optio sunt quis. Neque aut sunt quidem. Aut laudantium nobis maiores voluptas. Dignissimos impedit et occaecati doloremque fugiat ut accusantium sunt. Occaecati suscipit non voluptatum et.

Ut necessitatibus tempora laudantium sit occaecati culpa. Quaerat aut occaecati qui veniam. In porro porro eligendi doloribus eum dolor. Saepe odio fugit exercitationem eaque ut saepe vero.

Ex sit nesciunt magnam nam deleniti. Quia quas aliquid impedit est est cupiditate. Hic rerum rerum natus. Eius ea excepturi repudiandae nostrum nisi quo. Itaque omnis non qui consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”