Four myths that b-school shattered for me

If the most valuable type of learning is learning you're wrong, this is the most valuable section of the $250k notebook:

Revenue synergies are like unicorns. If someone says he’s seen one, he’s probably never been fucked.

The triple bottom line: The number on the third bottom line is usually subtracted from the other two.

Health insurance can't make health care affordable. It isn't even supposed to. As a whole, health insurance has to cost people more money than it saves for them. If it didn’t, companies couldn’t afford to stay in business. (I have no excuse for why I didn't realize this until business school, except perhaps that I'd never really had reason to think about it. Auntie Bankerella expects some good flames about this one from you big swinging douchebags in the comments section.)

Condom use is not necessarily more prevalent among top MBA candidates than the national average. Use of hormonal birth control definitely is. (PSA: Don't be a dumbass; you still gotta wrap it up. Just because that girl/guy is super-nice and used to work in PE, you think this is the first time they've had unprotected sex in their lives? What do you think they were doing in Germany last month? And what are the chances that someone they slept with has slept with someone who banged Thai h****rs?)

Natural and normal are opposites. So we should probably stop conflating them. In support of this statement, I offer the three following bullets:

 

 

  • In order to get ready for work, survive work, relax from work, and sleep, most people rely on at least one psychoactive substance. Going all-natural is abnormal.
  • I once attended one of those warm, fuzzy, caring/sharing events for female MBAs. There were 15 women in the mid-late stage of their careers who had a family. I asked them to be honest and reveal how many of them had had IVF. The answer: 9 out of 15. (One additional person had adopted without doing IVF, but she was in a domestic partnership with another woman.) So for this population, natural reproduction is abnormal.
  • And finally, my favorite example: for millenia, a normal human 26-year-old was married, had a family, and was mature and established after spending ten to fifteen years progressing in their career. On the other hand, let's look at what's normal for the average 26-year-old MBA at a top program. They are cutting class, drinking all night, working on their tans, working on their abs, going to Thailand or Germany on the weekends, still thinking about what career they want, still at least somewhat reliant on parents, and a long way from marriage and commitment. In this population, we can posit that normal adolescence lasts 15+ years.

    Nothing wrong with aiming to land in this culture, as long as you remember that prolonging your adolescence naturally shortens the years you could be living your adulthood, and that many people find full adulthood richer and more rewarding than adolescence.

 

Now, please post some of the myths about attending b-school. Some people here believe it will transform them from Super-dweeb to Superman while the opposite sex drops trou every time they learn they go to 'HBS' or whatever. You are the perfect person to give them a reality check.

 
bankerella:
Revenue synergies are like unicorns. If someone says he’s seen one, he’s probably never been fucked.

but... but... but... i read about revenue synergies in the CFA curriculum. surely they must be real.

:-(

Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
 

I'm gonna stab you to death and play around with your blood, bankarella.

[quote]The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males.[/quote]
 

What's more upsetting than anything is that all these things are actually believed by most people.

And of course people in business school have no clue what they want to do... why else would they be there?

Edit: And I thought that one phrase was "cutting glass" which I was going to say actually applied to me, but it was "cutting class." Other than that, no concerns.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 

interesting picture you chose for the post

[quote=rufiolove]When evaluating whether or not to post something on WSO, I think to myself, "would an idiot post this" and if the answer is yes, I do not post that thing...[/quote]
 

Several things came to mind while scanning your latest cranial bombardment:

1) What's the point of M/A, cross-marketing, and rebranding if revenue synergies don't exist? Serious question, I need the answer so I can eventually be fucked. 2) Who the fuck goes to Thailand or Germany for a weekend? This one's important, as your proximity to these places is a key indicator of your heritage. As I've stated in early posts, I believe there is a slim chance you are white, and an overwhelming chance you have two dads. 3) When referring to your female MBA fuzzy events, you mentioned IVFs. I think the acronym you are searching for is "IBD." I would agree that 9/15 women in IBD seems abnormal. As a banker, you should know better. Silly Bankerella!

I was taught that the human brain was the crowning glory of evolution so far, but I think it's a very poor scheme for survival.
 

Who is the Bankerella? Like WTF are these posts I keep seeing? Myths of Bschool are no condom usage and synergies don't exist? I mean c'mon.

I used to think endless posts about drug tests and arguing about what is a target were bad. I now know the true meaning of what bad can be.

 
TNA:
Who is the Bankerella? Like WTF are these posts I keep seeing? Myths of Bschool are no condom usage and synergies don't exist? I mean c'mon.

I used to think endless posts about drug tests and arguing about what is a target were bad. I now know the true meaning of what bad can be.

lolz...to be fair, bish didn't say synergies dont exist, just not revenue synergies...synergies if any are more likely to be on the cost side

 
Going Concern:
TNA:
Who is the Bankerella? Like WTF are these posts I keep seeing? Myths of Bschool are no condom usage and synergies don't exist? I mean c'mon.

I used to think endless posts about drug tests and arguing about what is a target were bad. I now know the true meaning of what bad can be.

lolz...to be fair, bish didn't say synergies dont exist, just not revenue synergies...synergies if any are more likely to be on the cost side

but... but... but... what about leveraging existing distribution channels to introduce an acquired product to new markets. surely this would work... i read it in a textbook!

:-(

Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
 
TNA:
Who is the Bankerella? Like WTF are these posts I keep seeing? Myths of Bschool are no condom usage and synergies don't exist? I mean c'mon.

I used to think endless posts about drug tests and arguing about what is a target were bad. I now know the true meaning of what bad can be.

I lol'd.

 

Fwiw, I think Bankerella is one of the better things to happen to WSO from a traffic POV. I mean, how many legit websites linked to that article about how she prefers to fuck traders. I don't recall any of those websites discussing how everyone here predicted the post-IPO FB collapse, or any other "relevant" discussions we've had like that. I think she secretly knows damn well what she's doing. Haters gonna hate, slaters gonna slate.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

GBS
 
but... but... but... what about leveraging existing distribution channels to introduce an acquired product to new markets. surely this would work... i read it in a textbook!
Is there a reason why these things work in theory and not in practice? And why they're continually taught at business schools even though they're completely irrelevant in practice?

Not to be a wet mop, but this can actually work. Promotional management teams just tend to overstate it in order to justify the excessive price they just paid to close the deal. One reason you don't see a lot of NET revenue synergies in practice is because of cannibalization of other products. Another is that generally the acquired company would be selling their products in every market available to them, so there has to actually be something unique about the distribution model that can drive incremental sales.

But you don't really learn that in business school.

 
tempaccount:
but... but... but... what about leveraging existing distribution channels to introduce an acquired product to new markets. surely this would work... i read it in a textbook!
Is there a reason why these things work in theory and not in practice? And why they're continually taught at business schools even though they're completely irrelevant in practice?

Not to be a wet mop, but this can actually work. Promotional management teams just tend to overstate it in order to justify the excessive price they just paid to close the deal. One reason you don't see a lot of NET revenue synergies in practice is because of cannibalization of other products. Another is that generally the acquired company would be selling their products in every market available to them, so there has to actually be something unique about the distribution model that can drive incremental sales.

But you don't really learn that in business school.

Ok that makes sense. Two US based internet retailers merging won't really get a high valuation because they're both already selling their products online in the US. A company with very good refineries for sour crude oil , buying a company with shit refineries but access to fields of sour crude - might be more justifiable. The greater the cost saving/merging gain , the greater the "synergy"

That seems like common sense actually.

 

When I read your posts I envision a younger, colder Meryl Streep. This of course has absolutely nothing to do with business school, however I do believe that it is important for a writer to hear feedback from her readers about things other than content.

 

Getting off the finance geekery for a second , the bloody B school application process is so annoying. I consider myself a mildly self involved man - but even I've never written bloody 10 pages about myself in aggregate. I swear if I hear the word leadership one more time , I'm going to strangle someone.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
Getting off the finance geekery for a second , the bloody B school application process is so annoying. I consider myself a mildly self involved man - but even I've never written bloody 10 pages about myself in aggregate. I swear if I hear the word leadership one more time , I'm going to strangle someone.

I feel your pain.

One thing I remember figuring out during the process was that they really do want you to just lay it all out there and brag your heart out in those essays. Think of someone whose job it is to read hundreds of pages of bragging per day. You want your bragging to stand out. If you try to be nuanced or allusive, the readers won't get it. The thesis the whole thing rests on has got to be, "I am one of the greatest individuals alive today; here's what I've done that no one else has done."

The result may make you groan (mine certainly did), but remember that the folks who read this stuff are seriously squishy. These are academics and administrators. Think of someone who goes home at 5:30 PM and watches ample quantities of reality TV. Wring a few tears out of them and the deal is sealed.

It may make you feel kind of dirty, but just think of it as one more skill-based hurdle, like the GMAT.

 

After work I will spend 10-15 minutes writing a post that absolutely shreds business school and the value of an MBA to bits, making it sound more like a glorified day care for the self-absorbed and career-lethargic, and ultimately scaring a great number of youngins on this site though that will not be my actual intention. Like all things in life, it will be part truth, part satire, and all hysterical. Stay tuned kiddies.

And whoever said Black-Scholes was the best way to value a stock, I lol'd a little bit.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
BlackHat:
After work I will spend 10-15 minutes writing a post that absolutely shreds business school and the value of an MBA to bits, making it sound more like a glorified day care for the self-absorbed and career-lethargic, and ultimately scaring a great number of youngins on this site though that will not be my actual intention. Like all things in life, it will be part truth, part satire, and all hysterical. Stay tuned kiddies.

I anxiously await your critical post.

I post all over the various GMAT/MBA forums (GMATClub, College Confidential, BW, etc.) in order to dissuade smart people from applying to top schools. I do this to (hopefully) reduce the overall number of qualified applicants. Every bit helps, baby. Every bit helps.

 
holla_back:
BlackHat:
After work I will spend 10-15 minutes writing a post that absolutely shreds business school and the value of an MBA to bits, making it sound more like a glorified day care for the self-absorbed and career-lethargic, and ultimately scaring a great number of youngins on this site though that will not be my actual intention. Like all things in life, it will be part truth, part satire, and all hysterical. Stay tuned kiddies.

I anxiously await your critical post.

I post all over the various GMAT/MBA forums (GMATClub, College Confidential, BW, etc.) in order to dissuade smart people from applying to top schools. I do this to (hopefully) reduce the overall number of qualified applicants. Every bit helps, baby. Every bit helps.

We gotta cut the competition down if we ever want a shot at the best 2 years of our life dawg, keep at it.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
BlackHat:
After work I will spend 10-15 minutes writing a post that absolutely shreds business school and the value of an MBA to bits, making it sound more like a glorified day care for the self-absorbed and career-lethargic
did you write this yet and I missed it?
 
SirTradesaLot:
BlackHat:
After work I will spend 10-15 minutes writing a post that absolutely shreds business school and the value of an MBA to bits, making it sound more like a glorified day care for the self-absorbed and career-lethargic
did you write this yet and I missed it?

That was a troll post, but after reading those two by Brady I might actually have to lmao

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/resources/skills/finance/going-concern>Going Concern</a></span>:
lol brady is trollin you guys so hard, theres no way his posts are serious
I hope you are right. If so, I have definitely been trolled very hard.
 
bankerella:
  • I once attended one of those warm, fuzzy, caring/sharing events for female MBAs. There were 15 women in the mid-late stage of their careers who had a family. I asked them to be honest and reveal how many of them had had IVF. The answer: 9 out of 15. (One additional person had adopted without doing IVF, but she was in a domestic partnership with another woman.) So for this population, natural reproduction is abnormal.
  • holy fuck call me clueless but.. why so many in vitros.. just too busy? waited too long ? no actual husbands?

     
    she_monkey:
    bankerella:
  • I once attended one of those warm, fuzzy, caring/sharing events for female MBAs. There were 15 women in the mid-late stage of their careers who had a family. I asked them to be honest and reveal how many of them had had IVF. The answer: 9 out of 15. (One additional person had adopted without doing IVF, but she was in a domestic partnership with another woman.) So for this population, natural reproduction is abnormal.
  • holy fuck call me clueless but.. why so many in vitros.. just too busy? waited too long ? no actual husbands?

    My guess is: waited too long.

    All these chicks running around single in their late 20's, doing what the culture tells them to do, are looking at the outliers and the celebrities who reproduce at 40 and saying, "Oh, no problem, everyone waits until their early thirties to get married and their late thirties to have kids." The data that says that female fertility begins its decline at around age 27 is much more subtle and pretty easy to ignore. So people do.

    Of course, your average chick who waits until 35 won't have problems. But say it takes a couple years, suddenly she's 37, statistical chances of successful reproduction declining several percent per month... bam, IVF starts to get pretty normal in the population.

     

    i'm working my way through all these posts - gold. 1. can you answer, did you have kids? 2. how do young female bankers handle having kids in their late twenties/early thirties right out of school? 3. is it possible without screwing up your career track? 4. what is the average/recommended time for maternity leave?

     

    That 9 out of 15 IVF statistic scares me. Seems like freezing your eggs during your mid twenties would be a really smart move for those that want to do an MBA during their late 20s and have a solid career.

    Also interested in the questions @"investorina" asked.

     
    Best Response

    Commodi et necessitatibus consequuntur sunt. Exercitationem error reprehenderit quas. Dolore et beatae nihil necessitatibus sunt accusantium est illo. Et nihil dignissimos sed et repellendus nulla eos.

    Career Advancement Opportunities

    April 2024 Investment Banking

    • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
    • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
    • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
    • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
    • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

    Overall Employee Satisfaction

    April 2024 Investment Banking

    • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
    • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
    • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
    • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
    • William Blair 03 97.1%

    Professional Growth Opportunities

    April 2024 Investment Banking

    • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
    • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
    • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
    • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
    • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

    Total Avg Compensation

    April 2024 Investment Banking

    • Director/MD (5) $648
    • Vice President (19) $385
    • Associates (87) $260
    • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
    • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
    • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
    • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
    • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
    notes
    16 IB Interviews Notes

    “... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

    Leaderboard

    1
    redever's picture
    redever
    99.2
    2
    Betsy Massar's picture
    Betsy Massar
    99.0
    3
    BankonBanking's picture
    BankonBanking
    99.0
    4
    Secyh62's picture
    Secyh62
    99.0
    5
    CompBanker's picture
    CompBanker
    98.9
    6
    kanon's picture
    kanon
    98.9
    7
    dosk17's picture
    dosk17
    98.9
    8
    GameTheory's picture
    GameTheory
    98.9
    9
    Linda Abraham's picture
    Linda Abraham
    98.8
    10
    Jamoldo's picture
    Jamoldo
    98.8
    success
    From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

    “... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”