What banker careers really look like: real private data
The most common arguments on WSO are about what it really takes to make it to Wall Street... and then what your options are if you get there. Working professionals come here to engage in witty banter and relax, only to spend half our time here debunking bullshit and writing advice based on our (limited) personal experiences.
How can we cut to the chase and give these kids hard data on which to base their life decisions, as well as save ourselves some time so we can get back to important things like ass and titties?
The answer came to me as I was googling a few ex-coworkers from a long time ago, just to see how they’ve been doing and whether I’ve done better or worse (something people do far more than they’d like to admit). The data is out there.
Yeah, anyone with enough connections could throw a data set together from LinkedIn. But let’s face it: there are a lot of losers out there who did some shitty back-office role at GS five years ago and are now answering phones at Ameriprise. We don’t want them in the data set. We want certified ballers only, right?
Let’s just say that, thanks to some HR friends and a truly brilliant data miner, I now have a high-quality data set that contains details of education and career path (over the past 5-10 years) of hundreds of bulge-bracket investment bankers at every level from analyst to MD. (Yes, it has names and such as well, but obviously I’m not sharing those.) It is longitudinal, meaning that it follows these bankers from a certain point in their careers up until today. It also gives a sense as to comparative compensation levels, though no dollar figures there.
Just looking at the initial cut of the data, I see lots of surprises. (The last 10-15% of the data is still being compiled, so I’ll throw hard numbers behind these statements when I have them.)
- A lot of these people did their undergrad at good state schools. Far more than I expected, at every level. Maybe I shouldn’t worship quite so intently at the HYPS altar.
- Far more analysts got a direct promotion to associate than I expected.
- Canadians are everywhere. Some kind of secret fucking society. (Hey Canadians, if you love socialism so much, why did you cross the border to fuel the capitalist juggernaut? How’s that Visa status looking, by the way? Better keep your nose clean or you’ll be back in fucking Saskatchewan cutting lumber with your six brothers before you can say “Tim Hortons”.)
- Late career is more brutal than it looks. People who leave the firm over 50 almost always take a big step down. People who stay are either the 1/1000 who can ride that bull all the way to the top... or they gradually get put out to pasture. From what I can tell in the data set, it doesn’t look voluntary (i.e., comp/dealflow starts to wane, then two years later they’re either playing poker or they start a boutique shop with two buddies and an analyst and have no dealflow).
- More associates than I thought come from nontraditional paths (i.e., not straight from the analyst program or b-school.
- The concept of a two-year analyst program is just that: a concept. The actual tenure of people hired into traditional two-year programs varies from that ideal by quite a bit.
There are more surprises here, but I’ll get to them. Let me ask you: what sort of queries should we run on this to answer some of the eternal debates here?
Some examples of questions we could answer:
- Average/max age upon entering business school?
- Is business school necessary?
- What percent of people who start a two-year analyst program actually finish it?
- What percent of analysts actually accomplish a 2+2 banking/PE combo?
- Which b-schools will get you there? (So far, this looks pretty traditional. I think the point may go to Brady on this one.)
- How many chicks make it to MD, and is comp similar to males?
- How many chicks make it past analyst? Associate?
- Ditto Asians/Indians (would take some doing since I don't have ethnicity data in the set, but could be done).
- On average, how many Wall Street firms do people work for over their careers?
Thoughts?
EDIT: By the way, don't bother asking a question if you're not ready for the answer. This hasn't happened yet, but I fully expect someone to start dissing the data if the answer isn't what they want/expect to hear. (This ain't my first time at that particular rodeo, kids.)
Going deep into sampling methodology would risk burning my source, not to mention myself. So folks will have to take me at my word that the sampling method is sufficiently strong. If you don't take me at my word, don't ask the question.
The entire point of statistical sampling is to cut through existing bias, not confirm it. So if you just want some stats to confirm your belief, it's probably easier to just play senior banker (or WSO monkey) and make up some stats that sound right to you.






Comments
by 30, 90% washout rate.
by 30, 90% washout rate. among 20 personal IBD acquaintances, 2 made it to MD, 9 washed out at VP/associate level, the rest left as analysts. two left before their first year was up. VP GS salary, around 500K at the peak in '07. asians and indians don't do well in the long run. biggest successes skipped bschool.
- Racial make up of bankers
- Racial make up of bankers vs demographics of the country
- Where bankers live (do they all migrate to Greenwich?)
If you can do those two, that'll be great.
An insightful bankerella
An insightful bankerella post........................what's happening here
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
There is an urban myth at
There is an urban myth at Wharton that you don't beed an MBA after Wharton undergrad, does your data back that up ? Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that there isn't much point in going to an undergrad business school. How do Wharton undergrands compare to hyps grads (especially the HYPS grads that went back from an MBA) ?
Pie chart of Target,
Pie chart of Target, non-target, semi-target so that shit can be finally buried deep for another year. As well as MBA tier break down % so that shit can be buried for 6 months. And maybe for fun # of marriages on average per each level for shits and giggles plz (guessing MD would be like 2, 1st year analyst would be 0)
bankerella: Better keep your
Better keep your nose clean or you’ll be back in fucking Saskatchewan cutting lumber with your six brothers before you can say “Tim Hortons”.)
haha
monyet: There is an urban
There is an urban myth at Wharton that you don't beed an MBA after Wharton undergrad, does your data back that up ? Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that there isn't much point in going to an undergrad business school. How do Wharton undergrands compare to hyps grads (especially the HYPS grads that went back from an MBA) ?
Now there's a very good set of questions. I'm aware of that myth on the street as well.
My hunch from personal experience is that Wharton undergrads do become direct-promotes at higher rates but peter out in mid-career. (However, one thing that this exercise has shown me is that years of personal observations are still nowhere near as accurate as a real data set, because we tend to observe and remember things that confirm the beliefs we started with.)
There is a substantial subset of Wharton undergrads in this sample, so I'll look at 'em and tell you guys what I find.
See my other WSO blog posts
ladubs111: Pie chart of
Pie chart of Target, non-target, semi-target so that shit can be finally buried deep for another year. As well as MBA tier break down % so that shit can be buried for 6 months. And maybe for fun # of marriages on average per each level for shits and giggles plz (guessing MD would be like 2, 1st year analyst would be 0)
I like the pie chart idea. Do you guys care about the whole population or just the analysts? I ask because it looks like analysts are more likely to be from a target than MDs. This could be a function of the fact that recruiting standards (and percent/number of Americans going to college) have changed a lot over the last twenty years.
Also, please, somebody throw me a clue on semi-targets. WTF is a semi-target? I've been peripherally involved with recruiting in one way or another for my whole fucking career, and I still don't comprehend the semi-target distinction.
Target school: has a team of alumni working at the firm who go back to recruit. We do EISs and talks, conduct first rounds on campus, and generally try to get as many of our people in the door as possible, whether summer or full-time.
Non-target school: Maybe a resume drop, maybe nothing. We don't go there, we don't have an alumni team, etc.
Semi-target school: Everything in between? Or we might go do first-rounds there in order to round out our full-time program?
Someone break it down for me in a way my miniscule reptilian brain can comprehend. Or upload a list. Or just admit that nobody really knows how to define semi-target, and that the whole population of colleges is a spectrum with HYPS on one end and DeVry on the other.
See my other WSO blog posts
Riddle me this...how many
Riddle me this...how many people leave the biz to open places like Double or Muffin?
bankerella: Now there's a
Now there's a very good set of questions. I'm aware of that myth on the street as well.
My hunch from personal experience is that Wharton undergrads do become direct-promotes at higher rates but peter out in mid-career. (However, one thing that this exercise has shown me is that years of personal observations are still nowhere near as accurate as a real data set, because we tend to observe and remember things that confirm the beliefs we started with.)
There is a substantial subset of Wharton undergrads in this sample, so I'll look at 'em and tell you guys what I find.
Thx. Pls do
would be awesome if the pie
would be awesome if the pie chart is just analyst level. Most people here don't even want to make it up to MD on the sell-side.
S&T, ER pie charts would be cool also if you had the data
Are you only looking at IBD
Are you only looking at IBD or does it include other areas of the bank? If including other areas, I would love to see if Quants have lower career ceilings than others. Most people believe this to be true.
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
you got some balls dropping
you got some balls dropping the gloves at canadians like that. of all the different groups trying to get visas, youre gunna chirp canadians? word to the wise if i wanted to keep my nose clean and i met someone with 6 lumberjack brothers i would probably shut up. dont ever again let me catch you speaking the words tim hortons... we have people everywhere, now you know
Would be interesting to
Would be interesting to see:
1. School break down
2. Number of analysts who make it to PE, then differentiate between megafund, large MM, MM, lower MM
3. Number of analysts who make it to HF
great post bankerella...this
great post bankerella...this is the type of thread that is extremely valuable for the WSO community.
bankerella: Semi-target
"A man generally has two reasons for doing anything. One that sounds good, and the real one." - J.P. Morgan
Best post in months, really
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
bankerella: ladubs111: Pie
capitalizeddisinterest: you
See my other WSO blog posts
Hey, great thread! What about
Colourful TV, colourless Life.
Now most of them Canadians
I going to assume the CDN
Check out my Blog
Bravo. Would love to see an
"Social cohesion and puritanical morality place roughly on my list of concerns between whether I'll pick up jock itch at the gym this week (not likely, since I don't go the gym) and whether it'll rain in Christchurch, New Zealand next Tuesday."
-Eddie
area chart showing percentage
And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time
duffmt6: Bravo. Would love
See my other WSO blog posts
bankerella: Thoughts? bank
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
UFOinsider: bankerella: Tho
See my other WSO blog posts
bankerella: UFOinsider: b
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
You clearly know nothing
UFOinsider: Ok, so fairly
See my other WSO blog posts
double
bankerella: UFOinsider: Ok,
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
UFOinsider: bankerella: U
See my other WSO blog posts
bankerella: Edit: Sorry, I
Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
bankerella: capitalizeddisi
double
Pancakes: bankerella: cap
Pancakes: Clearly, you have
See my other WSO blog posts
monyet: Pancakes: bankere
And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time
bankerella: Pancakes: Clea
Turbo leverage for capital explosion -- BD Capital
My WSO Blog
double post.
All Whartonites have access
bankerella: capitalizeddisi
how many have no college at
alpha currency trader wanna-be
how many have no college at
alpha currency trader wanna-be
watersign: how many have no
See my other WSO blog posts
Going
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
Well, what a nice post,
Valor is of no service, chance rules all, and the bravest often fall by the hands of cowards. - Tacitus
Dr. Nick Riviera: Hey, don't worry. You don't have to make up stories here. Save that for court!
UFOinsider: Going
And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time
Correlation between comp and
Leadership can be defined in two words: "Follow Me"