Where Do GOOG & GOOGL Finish Today?

Well, today is the big day for Google shareholders. I just got the new shares dropped into my account. I'm showing a pre-market on GOOG at $565.16 a share. GOOGL looks set to open at $571 at the moment. The most ironic thing I'm seeing so far is that GOOG is reading down 49.79% from yesterday's close. I wonder if it's going to print like that all day? It almost stands to reason that it would, being that it's a new class of shares backed into an existing symbol.

I thought it might be fun to see what the consensus on WSO was about today's close. It seems clear so far that each class of shares is going to open around $570, but where are they going to close? As an owner, I'd love to see the stock cross $600 today, but that might be wishful thinking. It's hard to imagine that it would sell off today, though (reason being: if you were going to sell you probably would have done it yesterday and not put yourself through the rigamarole of a complicated stock split).

Here's the deal: Tell me where you think each class of shares will close today and why, and the monkey closest to the pin gets a Silver Banana and a special shout-out next week on Monday @Mentions. I'll go first: GOOG (the new Class C non-voting shares) closes at $587.50, and GOOGL (the high-octane voting stock) closes at $596, both due to the emotional post-split pop.

Your turn.

 
Best Response

This is kind of a strange situation. Existing shareholders are getting hosed in this deal. You might gain some asset value however the company essentially said well all of you plebeians out there well we are cutting your say in half. If I was a stake holder in Google I would have told them to go fuck themselves and dumped my shares before the split. This dual class system that is gaining popularity in the technology space is something to watch out for. I have a feeling there will be a lot of investors getting cold water poured on them in the future when small groups of people have absolute directional control over a company to do what ever they want with shareholder value.

I'm not saying that tiered share systems are bad or good, just saying its something to watch out for and in this case a bit disingenuous on the part of Google to do this. If you set up your shares that way from the get go, everyone knows what they are buying. If you cut their feet out from under them 10 years later and just change the rules on people who paid for voting shares, well that's bullshit.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

I agree on principle; it's messed up. Other than some capital allocation decisions on GOOG's part (Moto deal), I'm pretty impressed with Larry & Co as a management team, but it is a bit jarring that they're blatantly telling minority shareholders to go fuck themselves. However, the pre-split GOOG stock barely had any voting rights as it is, no? The Class B stock had something like 60% of voting rights.

If I remember correctly, you needed a massive stake (enough to file a 13-d) to even have any resemble of voting power.

 

I don't really care enough to look up the pre split structure. I do know they had a multi-class system however the principal is the same they are taking shares that had voting rights (regardless of how small) and cutting their votes out. They could have just split the shares, it really doesn't matter how much the diluted the shares because everyone would still have the same reduced voting power. But to just ax it in half is total bull shit, they have essentially restructured the class system and gave no compensation for it. I won't be at all surprised if they end up facing a massive class action lawsuit over this.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 

Bought some shares, would like to buy more, but i'm a poor bastard.

You killed the Greece spread goes up, spread goes down, from Wall Street they all play like a freak, Goldman Sachs 'o beat.
 

Looks like I am going to be WAY, WAY, WAY off on GOOGL, but I didn't go low enough on GOOG. Bummer. That's why we make the trades.

"Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money." - Mickey Bergman - Heist (2001)
 

Libero sapiente totam itaque et. Ut qui et deleniti aut beatae nam. Molestias autem doloribus nihil id sapiente. Quis dolores et ea doloremque illo voluptatem. Consectetur laudantium ullam iure in consequatur voluptas. Iste laboriosam dolor voluptates libero.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”