Given that the average age at matriculation is around 27 and people graduate at about 22 I would say the mean is around 5 years of WE. Which means there's plenty of people coming in with less than 5 years.

The real question is have you accomplished enough in 3 years to have something to add to the classroom and to be attractive to recruiters afterwards.

 

From friends who have worked in admissions at my M7, I'd say it depends. If you are coming from a MBB, 3 years is a very well worn path. Additionally, the average age of women is probably closer to the 3 year mark than men, so your gender potentially matters too.

Another consideration is what you want to do after your MBA. Many times people place too much emphasis on just getting in. Outside of consulting and banking, employers place a big emphasis on what you did prior to school. An additional 1-2 years of work could make the difference between getting an interview / offer and being overlooked for another candidate. At least for PE at my school, I've seen higher full time recruiting success from the people with 5-6 years experience, compared to those with only 4 (2+2).

 

It depends on the work experience. 3 years in IB or MBB? Absolutely okay. 3 years working in IT or as a Data Analyst? Meh, would depend on the rest of your package.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

3-4 years at matriculation for IB/PE and M/B/B consulting, yes (i.e. basically blue chip finance/consulting - top tier schools and firms).

For others, it tends to be 5-7 years at matriculation.

Alex Chu www.mbaapply.com
 
Best Response

I interned at my fund and came back full time when I graduated and stayed the whole time. My GPA was middling at best (3.4) and my GMAT was 700. I think that, for the most part, work experience is going to be pretty similar across a lot of people's application packages, especially for those in finance. In my view, essays and recommendations really helped me stand out. I had great recs from people at my firm. I opted to go with recs from people that knew me better and had a slightly lower title than go for the MDs who would probably write a less compelling rec because they simply don't know me as well on a personal basis. I think I was able to cogently outline my career aspirations post-business school and why I believed that path was the right one for me. My essays, depending on the prompt, explained my background and life experiences growing up, which translated into some of the ECs I was involved in, and how the schools I applied to will allow me to leverage my current work experience into better experiences coming out of school. Note that my ECs were nothing more than a few hours per week in something that I actually loved to do, and had nothing to do with the quintessential orphanage creation, evangelical missions to Burma, or anything really mind-blowing.

From my understanding, business schools want to be able to see a clear outline of "Non-work Experiences/Passions" + "Work Experience" + "MBA" = "Post-MBA Experience"

A girl I knew had very personal experiences with Alzheimers (through her mom) while she was in her early years in college. She became involved in healthcare-related clubs, went into healthcare consulting, and did a lot of volunteer work at a hospital. She positioned herself to go to bschool to help get into a more advanced healthcare-oriented career and was accepted at Wharton in R1. Another buddy had a similar trajectory, only this time it involved sports, coaching high schoolers and sports medicine. He was waitlisted at Wharton and MIT (there's always some chance involved. IMO, he should have been admitted). My story isn't quite as bullet-proof (or as stellar) as theirs, but it followed a similar pattern: I was exposed to certain experiences when I was younger which evolved over time to lead me into finance and the ECs I undertook. I positioned my current experience at my fund and my ECs as the groundwork for which an MBA will launch me into my post-MBA career (I don't want to give too much detail for fear that people at my firm are on this site).

To the extent in which you can clearly articulate why an MBA is right for you, everything will fall into place. Visiting schools is an important component. I visited all the schools I applied to in April, and in so doing, was able to dig out intricacies of each one that I used to tailor my resume, essays, etc. I think that a lot of people fall short in applications because they simply want to go into PE, or simply want to make more money and adcoms read right through that. They have thousands of bankers-turned-PE-associates and thousands more consultants applying. If you can outline exactly why your "life story" is completed by an MBA (and better yet, that specific school) and have recommendations to corroborate that story, I think your chances are greatly improved.

All this sounds tedious. And it is. The whole process is really a wild soul search as to what you want to do with your life and why. It fucking sucks, but the more introspective you are, the more your story will resonate as honest and full of potential. Some questions to ask yourself: why an MBA and why that particular school? What are your short and long term career goals, and why? What are some meaningful accomplishments or other things you're proud of? Have you learned from any failures? What did you learn?

Happy to expound some more in case anything wasn't clear, or to answer any more questions anyone else may have. If anyone else has other comments/disagree with anything, I'm also curious to hear your perspectives.

 

From my understanding this highly depends on the business school you are applying to. May be better to ask an admissions consultant.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

Thanks for posting this OP. I had a question regarding WE as well. Based on the recommendation of many peers I am planning to take the GMAT before I start full time. I didn't take into account of years of WE and the validity of the gmat score (5 years).

Ideally by the time I would be applying I would have 4.5 year of WE in non IB/MBB/PE (I'll be doing Risk Management at a BB). Should I wait to take the GMAT so I can rake up more work experience since it's a non high finance role or should 4.5 yrs suffice?

 
boothvscbs:

depends on what type of experience. 3 years of experience in consulting is more than enough. 3 years of experience in software eng. most likely isn't.

3 years in software engineering can be enough, depending on what you've accomplished.
Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

As far as I know, the sweet spot for MBA is 3-5 years when matriculating so you are fine. The key factor is the strength of your overall application. If you are unsure whether to apply this year or next, apply this year and if you do not end up where you want then you will have next year to try again.

 

My background would look like, Military -> School -> Tech -> MBA -> Consulting. I'm happy with what I have currently but if I apply to any of those programs I won't have as much post undergrad work experience as my peers.

 

Officia aperiam delectus et architecto soluta et. Qui quo quis esse architecto. Aperiam esse occaecati adipisci atque.

Quia est non molestiae similique. Sed consequatur eveniet enim dolores ipsum. Facilis et aliquid quis et esse distinctio sed illum. Et sed minima reprehenderit qui ut. Tempora qui error illum non qui asperiores. Dolorem quos consequatur et incidunt dicta ratione. Sunt debitis aut aliquid ut quisquam delectus.

Ea distinctio officiis eaque amet aut. Quia odit aliquid ipsum dolores. Et laudantium maxime aut magni.

Modi deserunt quia explicabo totam. Facilis qui dolorem laboriosam itaque voluptate nihil ut. Voluptatem possimus voluptatibus quia inventore ab quo velit. Dolor ducimus odio mollitia tempora omnis quia laudantium voluptas. Aliquid ratione voluptatem quo nihil tempora. Unde voluptas et at nihil error. Vitae nihil fugit et harum facilis occaecati.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”