Best Double Major with Finance?

I will be entering non-target college (UMD Smith) this fall, and I planned my classes for freshman fall semester. After doing some calculations of stacking classes that met multiple requirements and coming in with quite a few AP and IB credits, I realized that I could pretty much be done with my major/graduation requirements with 33 credits to spare (in other words like a 11 classes to spare).

Should I Double Major?

I read on these forums that I should single major, get a high gpa and spend most of my free time networking, but I feel that I can easily throw in a double major (a double major within business school adds 18-24 credits) and still have a fairly relaxed schedule to network/ do EC's/ enjoy life and maintain at least a 3.5 GPA.

My school offers these business concentrations/minors:

  • Management
  • Operations Management
  • Information Systems
  • Accounting
  • Marketing
  • Actuarial Science Minor (bunch of higher level stats classes)

WSO Community Advice

WSO users recommend researching the career fields you’re interested in and tailoring your education from there. Corporate finance, IB, PE, hedge funds, asset management, etc are all very different from each other. Although OP is still early in his education, having a little more clarity around potential career paths can help with course selection.

What Are the Best Double Majors with Finance?

Again, this depends on your prospective career path. Any double major will show that you work harder than most university and college students. Picking up courses that teach you relevant knowledge that you will actually use in the field is best. WSO community members suggest the following double majors with finance for different careers:

Additional Q&A

  • Is Operations management specifically related to the Operations divisions of BO roles?
  • From @Twigga"

    No. Despite everything you read here, operations is way more than just back office duties at a bank. Ops covers logistics, inventory turnover management, etc...basically the study of maximizing productivity and cost efficiency. It's actually pretty useful. In my grad program, all of the people that went on to management consulting at the Bains and McKinseys of the world concentrated on operations.
  • Does anyone know the placement numbers of UMD in IBD/S&T/F500 corp fin, etc.? I know they place very well for Accounting (hence why BusinessWeek shows that the 4 main employers are all the Big 4), but BusinessWeek doesn't have the stats for Finance and exactly what roles the hired students are at.
    • WSO Industry Reports contain a university statistics section to see what undergraduate institutions firms recruit and hire from most frequently. Even if your school isn’t listed, these reports can give you an idea of what firms are looking for.
    • Searching the WSO forum for your school name can help you identify other posts that discuss your school and career prospects.
    • Specific to UMD, @Twigga" shares
      I know that the placement rate in IB isn't great, but it is doable. Your chances are as good there as any other non target. I know Terps that work/worked in IB and S&T. The thing is, you're not going to have the on campus recruiting events that the people at target schools have. You'll have to make it happen through your own networking efforts and by actually being aware of how to pursue those opportunities independent of school assistance.
  • At UMD I can elect to have AP Calculus (the lowest level of calculus) replace all the math I need to take (besides basic stat), should I be worried about this and try to take more advanced math courses?
    • Testing out of lower level math classes is great, but you may need to take more advanced depending on which additional majors or minors you take or which career you decide to pursue. Make sure you don’t forget the math you’ve tested out of.
 

You need certain accounting knowledge. As regards soft stuff like "management", "marketing", "information systems" or "operations management", I highly doubt the majority of non-target school will teach you anything beneficial you can't read in a book. As regards accounting, at least you'll go through and learn stuff you'll inevitably need. Either that or the actuarial with statistics - I taught a statistics-based course to undergrads two semesters at a non-target school, and I can't believe how uneducated the kids were on average. While "Intro to Statistics" was a prereq for the class, even after numerous in-class examples students were oh so often unable to calculate even a mean or a standard deviation as first step to solving the questions on the exams. Don't be like these kids.

 

1) I'd definitely supplement the finance major with a degree in accounting, IS, or both.

2) No. Despite everything you read here, operations is way more than just back office duties at a bank. Ops covers logistics, inventory turnover management, etc...basically the study of maximizing productivity and cost efficiency. It's actually pretty useful. In my grad program, all of the people that went on to management consulting at the Bains and McKinseys of the world concentrated on operations.

3) I know that the placement rate in IB isn't great, but it is doable. Your chances are as good there as any other non target. I know Terps that work/worked in IB and S&T. The thing is, you're not going to have the on campus recruiting events that the people at target schools have. You'll have to make it happen through your own networking efforts and by actually being aware of how to pursue those opportunities independent of school assistance.

4) If you get out of Math 220 or 140, great. Just make sure you actually remember your math. Math 140 is more for scientists and engineers, and is considered to be more difficult. If you decide to take the upper level stat courses, you may need more math than Math 140. Stat 400 had (or used to have) double integrals on the final. If you haven't taken calc 3, it'll be pretty difficult to answer correctly.

PM me if you have any other questions. Otherwise, good luck, don't forget to take advantage of the free basketball tickets, and have fun at Bentley's/Cornerstone.

 

Hopefully I can help you out here, as I have completed 3 years of my UG, and previously had a double concentration in Accounting & Finance, before changing it to Finance & Economics.

First off, I think you're uninformed, and need to do more research on different careers, because corporate finance is very different from the IB world, and they require different backgrounds. First, you should research these careers in depth and figure out which one appeals to you the most, and then tailor yourself to be a competitive candidate for entry-level positions and recruitment.

For careers in corporate finance, an accounting degree and CPA designation is by far the most popular and intuitive route, because they give you the knowledge you will need to do FP&A, and various ad hoc strategic projects. You don't need to know Macaulay's Duration, or Black-Scholes if you're going to be a financial analyst at some F500 company. Perhaps capital budgeting classes, or forecasting, and other finance classes of the non-capital markets nature could help you understand the importance of time value of money, but Finance and Economics aren't as prevalent for those who work in Corp Fin.

If you want to work in Capital Markets, or IB/PE, an accounting degree does not provide that much value since you don't require tax knowledge, or advanced financial accounting theory. If you lean towards this side of the career spectrum, I would suggest getting a double major in Finance and Economics, because the degrees will increase your understanding of global macroeconomics, and capital markets.

All included, completing two majors in the standard time frame will help you somewhat because it is proof you worked harder than otherwise. However, you have to realize that tax and financial accounting theory don't mean shit all to anyone in investment banking.

Early on, I was in both Accounting and Finance because I didn't want to pigeonhole myself, and I was unsure of which career I wanted to target. In reality, the two majors do not work that well with each other. If you don't want to get a CPA designation, drop your accounting major, and boost your GPA with economics classes. If you want a CPA designation, I wouldn't do a double major at all, just take accounting classes and boost your GPA with electives.

But then again, if you really enjoy them both, and are getting top grades, then there's no reason not to continue taking classes in all three streams.

 

I would say no.. my undergrad is nontarget and my masters will be a target but having much of my work overlapping topics with undergrad. part of why I'm doing it is for the networks, but also I think the nontargets don't have as much rigor in classes as the targets. That's why firms get high-quality from target recruits

with that said I could have been much better off with a Computer Science or Engineering degree to be honest. STEM is also fine. And then I could just do the same MS program and cover all the business I need to know. Sociology/Psychology also can line up with management/strategy focused business topics.

 

In Chicago, a Comp Sci major is going to be what is most interesting to firms, especially since you are at a non-target. Even though non-target isn't as big an issue in some firms in Chicago, be aware that if you get the interview there is already a strike against you. Ace your classes.

There is an old saying in Chicago- 'Teaching a programmer how to trade is a lot easier than teaching a trader how to program.' And you could probably hear the same thing in NY.

 
There is an old saying in Chicago- 'Teaching a programmer how to trade is a lot easier than teaching a trader how to program.' And you could probably hear the same thing in NY.
Ditto for NYC. Although we're less of an algo town. It's more "teaching a math major how to trade is easier than teaching a trader calculus."

CS is a smart major, especially if you're at a strong engineering school like Georgia Tech.

 

im not at GT. My schools CS program according to US news is in the bottom 10% of the top 100 FWIW. The thing is i would probably have to extend my undergrad to a total of 5-6 years (1-2 extra), since it is a complete non target state school is this worth the cost of tuition?

 

so pretty much a CS major is out of the question as i would have to extend my undergrad to at least 2 extra years. I am willing to do a minor though as it would only be 18 credits extra, just wondering if it is even worth it being a minor if i wanted to go along with trading? Also for trading would I be better off with a middle tier MSF at lets say UIUC (for location) or a MFE (baruch, etc...) ?

 
Best Response

The CS is totally worth it, even as a minor. Just ace your courses.

If you land in Chicago, U of Chicago Fin Math is the program that you will want. It is tops here. Northwestern has a very well-respected Master's program in Financial Engineering, it is in the engineering school and focuses a little more on corporate problems. U of Chicago's Fin Math program, which is through the Math department, and heavier on theory. But, I haven't been to either school, this is just what I hear about them. They can afford to be very, very picky and the acceptance rate is in the single digits in some years. Those are the 1st tier. Michigan is not exactly local, but it seems to get great press and is respected here too. I would take that over Urbana ( Sorry, if you are reading this IP)

UIUC is a good back- up, and DePaul has a new program that is gaining some respect, but they are definitely second tier.

But I wouldn't worry about it, right now. If you get into a firm and prove yourself, you will probably develop relationships with people from U of C, Northwestern, et al. A personal recommendation will go a long way, if you ace the GRE's...

 

A CS minor is worthless unless you have the data structures and algorithms courses to back it up.

For any sort of coding role- including quant development and algo trading, it is all about the interview. And then it's all about being able to produce. You need to be able to kick ass and take names against CS majors in a coding-heavy interview.

You need to know the rules of object oriented programming.

You need to know order of complexity like the back of your hand.

You need to know data structures like the back of your hand.

You need to understand some of the idiosyncracies of Java or C++.

You need to show insights that your interviewer hasn't even thought of.

You need to have a decent background in numerical methods.

So my recommendation to you is that if you do CS, don't do it halfway. A minor isn't bad, but you need to be able to demonstrate that you are a competent developer in your own right. That doesn't mean a major, but it means more than just doing the bare minimum.

Take Intro to Programming and OO, Data Structures, CS Theory I and II, and a numerical methods course. Then do a project.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
A CS minor is worthless unless you have the data structures and algorithms courses to back it up.

For any sort of coding role- including quant development and algo trading, it is all about the interview. And then it's all about being able to produce. You need to be able to kick ass and take names against CS majors in a coding-heavy interview.

You need to know the rules of object oriented programming.

You need to know order of complexity like the back of your hand.

You need to know data structures like the back of your hand.

You need to understand some of the idiosyncracies of Java or C++.

You need to show insights that your interviewer hasn't even thought of.

You need to have a decent background in numerical methods.

So my recommendation to you is that if you do CS, don't do it halfway. A minor isn't bad, but you need to be able to demonstrate that you are a competent developer in your own right. That doesn't mean a major, but it means more than just doing the bare minimum.

Take Intro to Programming and OO, Data Structures, CS Theory I and II, and a numerical methods course. Then do a project.

Wish I had thought of saying this.....

Final thought- Grad school is a long way away, stop thinking about it for the time being. Just get your degree(s) and get the job. The opportunity for grad school will be waiting for you, don't worry about it.

 

i appreciate it a ton you guys are helping me out... I am one to definitely not do the bare minimum with a minor if i need to take more classes, im in it to learn and to better help me in interviews. I will probably be meeting with an advisor to talk to him about what specific classes i need to take for the minor along with the ones you can hopefully help me out with in the following question.

What are the necessary programs i need to learn that will best help me for what I want to do (C++ etc...) and that I will bring up in my meeting with an advisor so he can tell me what specific classes entertain these Thanks again

 

to be blunt, when people say "i'm not terrible with math" they are usually not good enough at math to excel in an undergraduate math program. there are many rewards to majoring in math, but the tradeoffs are huge. it will take you a whole lot of studying to beat the curve in math, much more so than finance. unless you're going to be some sort of a quant, i don't think it's much of an advantage (though it is more impressive), and may have a very negative impact on your GPA and free-time available to study for finance interviews.

most math majors i knew at my undergrad school (a top 50 non-target) graduated sub 3.0 and ended up pursuing careers as math teachers because they didn't have any other options. that being said, a math-finance double major is very impressive if you can keep your GPA up and will provide you with more opportunities than finance only, especially in fields that require more quant horsepower.

Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
 

Thanks for this post I am currently at a non target majoring in Applied Math as well as Finance. I go to a state school non target. I am good at math but not insane 33 on ACT section (A in calc 1 in high school not BC or anything). I want to major in math to try and compete better with target students. There are 10,000s of thousands of Finance/econ major few math majors(This stands out). If you can get good grades 3.7 + its probably worth it. I will be a sophomore next semester. Also a great option if you can is take a couple of math classes work your ass of and do well. After that if you are doing well and its working continue and if not get a minor. Its better then nothing and Math always looks good bc its considered hard at the college level typically. Thats my view but once again that is the opinion I have gotten from older people I know please correct me if im wrong?? very interested to see what WSO has to say? I also feel like it is a big difference with S&T and HF and much smaller deal with IB? correct me if im wrong?

 

dwgreene14: Understand this: a 33 on the math section of ACT means nothing when it comes to being a math major. Sure, math majors take classes calc, multi calc, diff eq. But then they go into incredibly theoretical stuff like complex analysis, knot theory, number theory, differential geometry, etc. That shit is not on the ACT. I think you'd be good to stick with Applied Math and Finance.

OP: Bottom line, don't sacrifice your GPA for the sake of a math major. Yeah, if you take financial stats classes that are heavy in math (covering Black Scholes, etc.) or maybe a couple math classes that may be relevant, that could be beneficial for S&T, especially prop shops. As far as banking, it will look impressive if you have good grades, no doubt. But bankers don't use anything above arithmetic, so it's not like you'd use it on the job. It just depends on how risky you are. No one is going to hire you with a crappy GPA, no matter what your major is.

 

If you have a passion for math and want to be a quant (HF, Prop shop, S&T) go for it. Otherwise you are wasting your time and will kill your grades if you aren't committed to it.

I AP'ed out of my math reqs in college, but once you get into calc 3, diff eq, linear algebra, and beyond, shit gets haaaard. I had a bunch of engineering, CS, and pre-med buddies who complained about the math classes as much as orgo.

dwgreene14: Nothing wrong with math/finance. I would make sure you do well in your finance classes relative to your math classes though. The math skills aren't very useful by themselves if you can't apply them. A math major certainly won't hurt you for IB, but IB math is + - / * ^. It's much more beneficial for more quant-related roles.

 

Thanks for the responses. By the look of things, it doesn't seem like the benefits of a math major is worth all the effort. However, I'm looking towards a financial math major rather than pure math, which would be considerably lighter in workload. Also, I have gotten perfect scores on math sections in ACT, SAT I and II, and a 5 on Calc BC. Would that have any correlation to success in a college math program? My gpa right now is 3.9+. I'm not sure if that should encourage me to try harder courses or the other way around. I'm thinking about pursuing math to potentially try for a HF or top trading position out of undergrad, and maybe it'll help for a getting into a consulting firm?

 
Buy And Hold:
Thanks for the responses. By the look of things, it doesn't seem like the benefits of a math major is worth all the effort. However, I'm looking towards a financial math major rather than pure math, which would be considerably lighter in workload. Also, I have gotten perfect scores on math sections in ACT, SAT I and II, and a 5 on Calc BC. Would that have any correlation to success in a college math program? My gpa right now is 3.9+. I'm not sure if that should encourage me to try harder courses or the other way around. I'm thinking about pursuing math to potentially try for a HF or top trading position out of undergrad, and maybe it'll help for a getting into a consulting firm?

math major for consulting? not so much.

you should have been more clear when you said you were "not terrible with math". with a 3.9 and perfect standardized test scores, i think it's safe to say that you wont be failing any of your math classes. plus, your high GPA gives you a lot of leeway... if you start doing poorly in upper-division classes your GPA will still be acceptable for ibanking.

with this new information, i say give it a shot. if classes start getting too hard, you can always drop the major with only a slight hit to your very high GPA. personally, i had high (not perfect) standardized test and AP scores. i got all A's in multivariate and vector calculus, but started feeling the hurt in differential equations and a mathematical proofs class. the more theoretical things got, the more difficult and frustrating they became for me.

so anyhow, go for it but remember your first priorities for finance careers (high GPA and top notch interview skills).

Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?
 

thanks for the advice. i think i might give it a try and hope for the best. the classes that really worry me would be the theoretical higher maths, but i would take them right before i graduate which i believe wouldn't matter that much for recruiting anymore.

 

I won't tell you whether or not you should enrol in the math major. I will say, however, that the hard work required to succeed in a math major is very front loaded. You need to bust your ass to build as strong a foundation as possible, and once you do, learning the more advanced courses becomes easier. In fact, getting very high grades in math is not that difficult once you have a strong foundation (which you can build by excelling in 2 introductory level courses). Whether or not it's useful for your career, I strongly advocate studying math (at least enough for a minor).

-MBP
 

RexAlpha: a msc in fin mathematics would take an extra year, which i can't really afford.

I know that a math major would be a lot of work, but I also want to learn something a bit more challenging in school than just some basic finance and accounting coursework. The only thing that worries me is that if i do screw up with this, then my chances for ib or consulting would go down the drain.

 
Buy And Hold:
RexAlpha: a msc in fin mathematics would take an extra year, which i can't really afford.

I know that a math major would be a lot of work, but I also want to learn something a bit more challenging in school than just some basic finance and accounting coursework. The only thing that worries me is that if i do screw up with this, then my chances for ib or consulting would go down the drain.

I knew that, now it´s too late...

But for consulting you don´t need that math skills, you expect. I have a friend which is partner at BCG, he studied literature and history.

http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/ http://www.tradersmagazine.com/
 

Zekai: If you think Black Scholes is the basics of basics. Tell me how you derive Black Scholes? Are you familiar with stochastic process? Brownian motion? equivalent martingale measure? stochastic integral representations? Girsanov Theorem? Ito's formula? Feynman Kac? forward and backward SDE? Probably not... Black Scholes is deeper than you think.

OP: If you are going to do IB, then Math is a waste of time. If you are going to do S&T, then it probably will help if your GPA is 3.5+. The thing about Math majors: there are ppl who don't study at all and get 'A's, there are people who study all the time and get 'B's. Sometimes you just get the stuff... like you speak the language. If you are gonna do it, I recommend you to take easy part of math undergrad course such as combinatorics, number theory, probabilities, stats for the sake of your GPA. Btw, calculus, linear algebra, or ODE are not really math, since they are not really proof based classes.

 
GekkotheGreat:
Zekai: If you think Black Scholes is the basics of basics. Tell me how you derive Black Scholes? Are you familiar with stochastic process? Brownian motion? equivalent martingale measure? stochastic integral representations? Girsanov Theorem? Ito's formula? Feynman Kac? forward and backward SDE? Probably not... Black Scholes is deeper than you think.

OP: If you are going to do IB, then Math is a waste of time. If you are going to do S&T, then it probably will help if your GPA is 3.5+. The thing about Math majors: there are ppl who don't study at all and get 'A's, there are people who study all the time and get 'B's. Sometimes you just get the stuff... like you speak the language. If you are gonna do it, I recommend you to take easy part of math undergrad course such as combinatorics, number theory, probabilities, stats for the sake of your GPA. Btw, calculus, linear algebra, or ODE are not really math, since they are not really proof based classes.

Right, the people who get As don't study..........are you an idiot? Math is just like any other subject you have to study and realize there are more than one way to solve a problem.

Real math can't be tested in 10 minutes on a quiz. Real math requires you to sit down for 2 hours and work out a solution to a problem that solves what ever value of what ever you can think of (formulas).

Furthermore real mathematics isn't a thing where grades matter. If you are in your math classes just because you want an A to boost your GPA and it will look good on your transcript good luck! You'll be competing with people who actually like math for the beauty of it and don't waste there time with the amateurishness cook book questions and more about analyzing how the proof was derived and what steps are missing in it.

Also, these people you are "competing" with don't give a shit they are probably studying some other topics on there own that interest them, but they will still "beat" you.

For example I doubt any of the math elites in this thread even remember what the hyperbolic functions represent and how to draw or the function of a logarithmic spiral.

Why? Because even the best of the best have to go back and look in there calculus books for properties of random shit they forgot in order to prove a theorem proved 200+ years ago.

ALSOOOOOOO

Let's be honest, we all know how grades in mathematics work. In early math classes Cal 1 - linear algebra, Diff Q, you only have X amount of time to solve a problem set. How does this show your math skills, and ability to do upper level maths? YEA SO YOU GET A -1 HERE AND THERE A -2 THERE FOR PUTTING + SIGNS WHEN IT SHOULD BE - ...lol. This tests math ability? Give me a break.

Again, I'm confident many of us know the chain rule, but I'm also very sure many of you don't UNDERSTAND why we we need to do it.

The kid with a C in Cal 1, 2, 3 , Diff Q, Linear Algebra etc who UNDERSTANDS it will get higher grades in upper level classes than the kid with an A in all 5 classes, but only knows HOW to do it.

My 2c

 

OP, if you want to do mathematics major than do it! There is this handy thing in life called dropping classes.....if it gets to hard you can either give up and learn how to deal with defeat or say fuck that shit and steam roll that bitch over with a mathematics degree handed to you when you graduate.

Also, remember some the greatest mathematicians didn't study maths till there mid twenties(Euler and Fermat come to mind).

But, again great mathematicians do not to math for popularity/Wall Street, but for knowledge.

I'm very confident mathematicians that are on Wall Street are still studying maths on there own time.

So, I think you should do the math major and ignore these idiots that are saying you will fail.

 

Yeah exagerations are great. Obviously when I say "there are ppl who don't study at all and get 'A's, there are people who study all the time and get 'B's. ", I mean there are people can quickly grasp mathematical concepts than others, and ace the undergrad math classes with much less effort than others.

 

Major in what interests you. If you love math, major in math. I started out in engineering and was miserable because there wasn't enough math. Switching to applied math was a great choice. I love having multiple math classes every semester. I really enjoy going to math classes every day. I almost always leave class knowing something I didn't know before. You can't say that for most majors. But the best thing is having a proof to write and sitting for an hour thinking it through until I figure it out. That's extremely satisfying. After taking elementary analysis, you'll laugh at ever thinking Calc I and II were challenging.

 
Thurnis Haley:
Major in what interests you. If you love math, major in math. I started out in engineering and was miserable because there wasn't enough math. Switching to applied math was a great choice. I love having multiple math classes every semester. I really enjoy going to math classes every day. I almost always leave class knowing something I didn't know before. You can't say that for most majors. But the best thing is having a proof to write and sitting for an hour thinking it through until I figure it out. That's extremely satisfying. After taking elementary analysis, you'll laugh at ever thinking Calc I and II were challenging.

This.

Baby Rudin was fun. I wouldn't say the same about measure theory for grad lvl real analysis.

 

I have a degree in both. What I was left with was the ability to learn different approaches to problem solving. On the other hand, I hated things that didn't have any practical usage in my everyday (linear algebra, knot theory etc.). Which means you need to have a passion for this, the drive to sit up late at the library going over problems untill you get it. Do you have the drive at 10pm? 1am? 7am?. Math is a bitch, unless you're Asian.

Contrary to most believes, college is a place of learning. Not just drinking, banging hot/ugly chicks and waking up late. Make the most of it (learning experience), you wont go back. I would beat the living daylight out of my future kids if I found out they were wasting my money in college and majoring in art (I'm sure your parents would too).

CNBC sucks "This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
 
Working9-5:
I have a degree in both. What I was left with was the ability to learn different approaches to problem solving. On the other hand, I hated things that didn't have any practical usage in my everyday (linear algebra, knot theory etc.). Which means you need to have a passion for this, the drive to sit up late at the library going over problems untill you get it. Do you have the drive at 10pm? 1am? 7am?. Math is a bitch, unless you're Asian.

Contrary to most believes, college is a place of learning. Not just drinking, banging hot/ugly chicks and waking up late. Make the most of it (learning experience), you wont go back. I would beat the living daylight out of my future kids if I found out they were wasting my money in college and majoring in art (I'm sure your parents would too).

LOL... I think everyone has that stage of "heavy partying, clubbing, bar hopping, drinking, banging hot/ugly chicks and waking up late.", no? At least for me, I was over that after like a year. (Btw I also have both degree.) That being said, I do agree math requires some passion, otherwise your life is gonna be pretty misable, unless you are fucking smart. Contrary to Working9-5 believes, linear algebra is extremely useful in real life, along with statistics, and probability theory. You use linear algebra in econometrics, computer programming, numerical methods, and optimization problems etc. which are frequently used in almost every analytic and quantitative field... just my 2 cents

 
Working9-5:
I hated things that didn't have any practical usage in my everyday (linear algebra, knot theory etc.).
How can you put knot theory and linear algebra in the same sentence? Knot theory (along with most of algebraic topology) probably doesn't show up in practical problems very often, but linear algebra? I use linear algebra all the time...
Working9-5:
Math is a bitch, unless you're Asian.
I've found that eastern europeans have been the strongest mathematicians during my studies. If by asian, you mean chinese, then I strongly disagree. I find that the chinese are excellent test/exam writers but lack the depth and creativity to do high quality mathematics. There are obviously exceptions (the great terry tao of course).
-MBP
 
Working9-5:
Contrary to most believes, college is a place of learning. Not just drinking, banging hot/ugly chicks and waking up late. Make the most of it (learning experience), you wont go back. I would beat the living daylight out of my future kids if I found out they were wasting my money in college and majoring in art (I'm sure your parents would too).
You can learn, have a serious major, AND do all the aforementioned things of course. People just have to stop wasting their lives playing CoD and they'll soon realize they have plenty of time during the day to get their work done and then drink themselves silly.
 

Haha, I see the Asian joke didn't go down with you.

Fair enough, regarding linear algebra, but I can't say I use matrices (decompositions), vectors or affine/projected space in my everyday calculations in S&T. Of course there are exceptions like least squares, but then again... who cares? The math skills you need is addition, subtraction, division and multiplication and mix them up for good measure.

CNBC sucks "This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
 

If you're at the University of Chicago or NYU, do Finance/Econ.

If not, CS is a tough degree and it gives you a bit of a put against another bank recession.

But yes, you have to do the engineering math sequence. And you have to do Systems programming (C and threading) and you have to do data structures (C++ and pointer hell) and you have to do algorithms/theory (I thought it was fun brain teasers but most people found it impossible.)

The good news is that C++ has gotten easier. Back when I was your age (2004), we had to code everything up in PICO on a black and white screen. Then we had to compile. And the compiler would tell us we had made five spelling mistakes. And you'd spend about 1/2 the time it took for you to write the code inserting semicolons, fixing typos, and looking up documentation and man. pages on which functions took which parameters.

Oh well, it beat coding by punchcard and assembly.

Now with eclipse, visual studio, and completion lines, you don't have to put up with that BS. You also get to run stuff in debug mode. They've taken out a lot of the drudgery, but you need to think like an engineer or a mathematician more than ever.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
If you're at the University of Chicago or NYU, do Finance/Econ.

Agree.

UChicago is one of some very traditional (read: backward, inflexible) colleges that don't offer the option of majoring in Finance. (These include my school) => Major in Economics at UChicago and Finance at NYU Stern.

Also, computer Science in Investment Banking is pretty useless. You're actually better off majoring in English, despite the sarcastic post above, as it would allow you to maintain a higher GPA.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
If you're at the University of Chicago or NYU, do Finance/Econ.

If not, CS is a tough degree and it gives you a bit of a put against another bank recession.

But yes, you have to do the engineering math sequence. And you have to do Systems programming (C and threading) and you have to do data structures (C++ and pointer hell) and you have to do algorithms/theory (I thought it was fun brain teasers but most people found it impossible.)

The good news is that C++ has gotten easier. Back when I was your age (2004), we had to code everything up in PICO on a black and white screen. Then we had to compile. And the compiler would tell us we had made five spelling mistakes. And you'd spend about 1/2 the time it took for you to write the code inserting semicolons, fixing typos, and looking up documentation and man. pages on which functions took which parameters.

Oh well, it beat coding by punchcard and assembly.

Now with eclipse, visual studio, and completion lines, you don't have to put up with that BS. You also get to run stuff in debug mode. They've taken out a lot of the drudgery, but you need to think like an engineer or a mathematician more than ever.

pico...ahhh, wow. i've heard stories like this, blows my mind. so old school compiling on the remote server..."javac program.java && java program"

My drinkin' problem left today, she packed up all her bags and walked away.
 

There is no way you are doing quantitative/computational finance without some sort of mathematics or computer science degree. I am doing a financial economics and mathematics double major at a non target. I chose this combination because I want to do derivative structuring in the future. Also, coming from a non target, the mathematics really sets me apart from all the economics ba's from targets.

 

Do not use CS in high school to compare to university if you want to major in computer science. I think you would be better off in software engineering if you want to code. CS in university is more math than programming in my opinion.

Also, you will impress just with a nice GPA as a CS major. You don't need the double major, this isn't liberal arts.

 

Im definitely interested in value investing over quant. investing. Under that knowledge, do you think a major such as accounting would be more important than a major in say computer science or physics?

 

Anything quantitative should work fairly well. Assuming you're at A&M because of the geology aspect, I'd focus on networking in Houston. Many BB's have Energy and Natural Gas offices there. And if you're lucky enough to have gone to Memorial or Highland Park, just have your dad make a couple calls for you. There's a lot of Asset Management in Texas as well, so just try to land an internship one Summer before your senior year.

 

I'm actually at Baylor, but, yeah, Houston is where I assume I will be getting a job. Unfortunately, I'm from out of state so my parents don't have those kinds of connections, but it's all good. Thanks for the info though. Asset Management will definitely be more on my radar since it's so prevalent.

 

Computing Science/Physics will make your resume stand out - no matter what you're interested in. Accounting - not so much. Besides, what you learn in school isn't necessarily going to help you at work so I'd go with something quantitative to stand out.

 

Don't do some something quantitative if it is going to wreck your GPA. It sounds like you are pretty uncertain as to your post college career aspirations - keep your options open by getting solid grades.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

If you think that double majoring in statistics will lower your GPA then don't do it. GPA>Double Major

With that being said, statistics are boring. If possible, get an internship during the school year. Taking classes and working part-time is more impressive than having 2 majors. I also think it would be more beneficial to spend your extra time taking online Wall Street Prep classes. They teach real job skills and you can put it on your resume.

 

It doesn't sound like you are actually interested in statistics. Are you even interested in finance?

You are still young, and I think a stats major will give you a lot more flexibility down the road if you ever decide to leave the industry.

 

Double majors, and majors in general, are overrated. After your first job, most people don't care what your major was. After your second job, most people don't care about what school you attended. (Sure, might be an overstatement, but you get the point.)

A second major is a pain for scheduling, course load, and really won't add much. An internship, extracurriculars, and a higher GPA are all far better uses of your time. Finance is plenty 'flexible' of a major and would be welcome in almost any industry.

 

What value will a double major bring to you? If you pair history with finance that's one thing....but too many business classes will take away from the college experience imo. As a side note: I'm a junior and I wish I majored in 'math', knew about the Khan Academy, bought MetLab for my laptop, got more trials to Capital IQ and just got out more. One thing I am proud of is my single major. Just my $.02.

 

If you do choose to double major you should do Finance+Accounting.

Better yet, major in Finance and something else that also interests you.

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 
Hamilton:
If you do choose to double major you should do Finance+Accounting.

Better yet, major in Finance and something else that also interests you.

+1

you'll never get a chance to spend time studying something you enjoy full time until you retire.

 

I'm a junior at Stern with a finance and economics major so my opinion will be biased. However, I dealt with the same issue as you when I was a freshman (for me it was between econ, marketing, and accounting).

Personally, I agree with others that you should pick a major that interests you and for that reason only. I find that if you want it for getting internships, than an accounting major won't be terribly beneficial anyway. Much of the accounting knowledge you'll need can be picked up easily through guides (but so can relevant finance info). So just pick something that you'll enjoy.

I'm taking economics because of the available classes at both Stern and CAS. You'll have the opportunity to take classes like Economics of Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'n' Roll, Sports Economics, Game Theory, Gender Choices, Urban Economics, Behavioral Finance, etc. (you get the idea). Those classes had awesome names and the ones I've taken have been extremely enjoyable so far.

Also, I took Financial Statement Analysis (FSA) hoping I'd get some advantage during recruiting, but it wasn't particularly mindblowing. Main lesson: read 10-Ks because they're awesome. There you go, 3 credits worth of knowledge right there. Talking about this makes me regret taking the class...my teacher was good and it wasn't her fault, but I definitely could have used my elective credits on something I found more interesting.

Anyway, I'd personally recommend being a double major because its so easy to get a second business major at Stern with a minor as you'll still have the opportunity to travel abroad easily / take a few random classes along the way.

There's my $0.02 too.

 

If you want to do IB, pick accounting over finance. Almost everything you do (for building models) entails looking through company financials. The more you know about accounting they better you will be. I majored in econ and finance and if I had to do it again I would do accounting and econ. Econ is fun and strengthens your thinking and problem solving ability and accounting got you ready for the job.

 

Major in something outside of your business program if you can get your adviser to help you arrange the credits. It can be harder to declare a second because of the credit requirements in your own program, but if you have something that you're interested in, that's better for you in the end than pairing a second major that's redundant to finance.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Thanks for the advice guys! I'll look into what kind of majors/minors I can get at CAS and the other nyu schools and see if any really interests me!

How are accounting classes at Stern? Gotta keep that GPA up.

 

Not that hard if you put in the work early. Beat the curve on the early exams and the final won't be a problem. Easy to finish before time.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

honestly, drop the double major and play the field of new women you'll be meeting.

but really, obviously that's probably a good/ambitious idea, however:

1)consider the work load(I was a double major in busniess econ and CS but found the workload insane and am doing a CS minor instead) 2)consider what this will do to your GPA (you're not an engineering major so a lowish 3.2 or so GPA won't look good) 3)consider going into college and doing a major or minor you find enjoyable. buddy of mine dropped his double major (finance and math) and did a finance major and history minor instead. he actually enjoyed 8:30 class and got a great offer. so stay open minded

 
dt18:
honestly, drop the double major and play the field of new women you'll be meeting.

but really, obviously that's probably a good/ambitious idea, however:

1)consider the work load(I was a double major in busniess econ and CS but found the workload insane and am doing a CS minor instead) 2)consider what this will do to your GPA (you're not an engineering major so a lowish 3.2 or so GPA won't look good) 3)consider going into college and doing a major or minor you find enjoyable. buddy of mine dropped his double major (finance and math) and did a finance major and history minor instead. he actually enjoyed 8:30 class and got a great offer. so stay open minded

Hm, okay, thank you for the response. Would I still be able to break into BB S&T with a minor in CS?

 

in entry level S&T, the majority of your programming will be done in VBA - something you don't need to major/minor in CS for. If you want the more quantitative desks, you will be needing more MATH/STATISTICS than CS.

Again, this is referring to S&T at an investment bank; if you are looking for a prop desk (leaning on algorithmic trading), then it's a entirely different story - you will need to master C++ for that.

 
crucifix.:
in entry level S&T, the majority of your programming will be done in VBA - something you don't need to major/minor in CS for. If you want the more quantitative desks, you will be needing more MATH/STATISTICS than CS.

Again, this is referring to S&T at an investment bank; if you are looking for a prop desk (leaning on algorithmic trading), then it's a entirely different story - you will need to master C++ for that.

THIS
Get busy living
 

I have been wondering a similar thing. I am majoring in econ but I am considering a double major in chem or molecular biology/biochem. Would a science major help me in finance? If I want to get into vc, should a science major help or will i learn what I need to know on the job?

 

Nemo, a science major does give you a good quant background, but I'd say computer science is better. Programming is extremely useful for S&T. To the OP - Check out this thread I made: wallstreetoasis.com/forums/engineering-or-finance-degree-for-st It seems that engineering degrees are more useful for S&T than finance degrees. Engineering degrees are the most versatile degrees and pay off the most. There was a thread on WSO about quants taking over the world. I'm doing a computer science and finance double degree, and I wouldn't have it any other way. Then again, I work my ass off and the double degree doesn't lower my GPA.

"The code of competence is the only system of morality that's on a gold standard." - Francisco d'Anconia
 
tobywashere:
Nemo, a science major does give you a good quant background, but I'd say computer science is better. Programming is extremely useful for S&T. To the OP - Check out this thread I made: wallstreetoasis.com/forums/engineering-or-finance-degree-for-st It seems that engineering degrees are more useful for S&T than finance degrees. Engineering degrees are the most versatile degrees and pay off the most. There was a thread on WSO about quants taking over the world. I'm doing a computer science and finance double degree, and I wouldn't have it any other way. Then again, I work my ass off and the double degree doesn't lower my GPA.

Thanks for the link, it was very interesting. I definitely agree with the general sentiment that quant degrees are insanely useful (not just for S&T), and that it would be ideal to have more than just finance. I take it you would recommend doing Finance/CS double major, but how would a Finance major with CS minor compare for S&T? And, if I end up majoring in both, how does the workload stack up? Thanks!

 

A finance major with a CS minor works too. However, employers don't really take minors seriously. A high GPA is of the utmost importance, so don't do a double major if you think it is going to lower your GPA. Depending on your desk, trading can range from plain vanilla to super quant. A CS minor will give you adequate skills for most types of trading. However, you don't want to be in a situation where you're limited to plain vanilla because your programming skills aren't up to par, and you have to jealously watch the more mathematical people handle the more exotic stuff. Me personally, I just double major, work my ass off, take it in and don't complain. The workload is pretty heavy (6 courses a semester). But that's just me. I manage my time pretty well, so I have time for extracurriculars, going out, and exercising. It's obviously better to double major, but if you're worried about the workload, I would do a minor. It's up to you to consider how much you're willing to work, and your work-life balance. Keep in mind that recruiters like to see kids who "did a double major, worked a campus job, and didn't seem to need any sleep." (Words of a bank recruiter)

"The code of competence is the only system of morality that's on a gold standard." - Francisco d'Anconia
 
tobywashere:
A finance major with a CS minor works too. However, employers don't really take minors seriously. A high GPA is of the utmost importance, so don't do a double major if you think it is going to lower your GPA. Depending on your desk, trading can range from plain vanilla to super quant. A CS minor will give you adequate skills for most types of trading. However, you don't want to be in a situation where you're limited to plain vanilla because your programming skills aren't up to par, and you have to jealously watch the more mathematical people handle the more exotic stuff. Me personally, I just double major, work my ass off, take it in and don't complain. The workload is pretty heavy (6 courses a semester). But that's just me. I manage my time pretty well, so I have time for extracurriculars, going out, and exercising. It's obviously better to double major, but if you're worried about the workload, I would do a minor. It's up to you to consider how much you're willing to work, and your work-life balance. Keep in mind that recruiters like to see kids who "did a double major, worked a campus job, and didn't seem to need any sleep." (Words of a bank recruiter)

toby, aren't you still in high school?

 

Most schools it is not really a double major, just a double concentration within business. My school you only have to take 4 extra classes to get the dual-concentration listed.

Either way, you should definitely do it. Sitting through SA training the other week and now spreading comps all day I would say the accounting concentration is just as if not more relevant than the finance concentration. You will understand how to work around financial statements a lot better. Definitely recommend picking up accounting.

 

It's not worth getting a significantly lower GPA by taking on a harder major if you know you want to work in finance (generally much better to have a 3.9 in finance than a 3.2 in comp sci, for example). A double major in finance and comp sci could be helpful if you want to go into a trading-type role post graduation, if you can keep your GPA up, but for ibanking it's unnecessary.

 

For investment banking, there are all kinds of majors that break into investment banking, but the most common majors are probably finance and economics. Although an imperfect indicator, being a finance or economics major is nevertheless an indicator that demonstrates the candidate has an interest in finance/economics/business/etc. and thus creates a logical entry point for investment banking.

With regards to technical majors (I'm assuming you mean quantitative or hard sciences), I think it doesn't hurt as long as you keep the GPA up. Plenty of engineering majors, math majors, etc. break into analyst programs at investment banks each year. It could also give you more flexibility if you decide to pursue an area other than investment banking.

There are some areas of finance that are very quantitative (some types of trading, hedge funds, etc.), so having a computer science or other type of quantitative background may potentially open up those areas. A finance major with solid but not world-class quant skills would have investment banking open to them, but the door might be closed on the more quantitative areas of finance.

 

Let me just put it this way: The CS degree implies you can code which in turn implies you should have the mental ability to do financial modeling. I went straight to a buy-side shop out of undergrad and I am pretty sure I got a GPA "allowance" for doing a difficult engineering major.

You also don't just stroll into VC - well you can - but I think some operating experience will be very beneficial. If you do the CS degree and you end up applying to a Facebook etc - You can point to the projects you did in college/projects you did for fun to address a need (they are really big on the "hacker" culture). You also get a feel for the industry by doing the major - why are people moving toward a Git workflow? Fucking Clouds, how do they work?

If you did finance undergrad with finance internships then TMT analyst and now you want to be a product manager? It usually doesn't sit very well.

Also, no one cares about GPA after your first job.

 
debater96:

I was thinking of either double majoring in finance and accounting or finance and math. The only issue with doing finance and math is that they are in separate colleges at my school so I will have to take an extra 30 credits.

So would the finance/accounting or finance/math be more beneficial in the long run?

You
 

Don't waste your time on a double major. Focus on one major and get your GPA as high as possible. You should spend your free time on internships and networking instead.

 

Doing finance and accounting uses the same amount of credits as just doing finance. I would just use my elective credits on the necessary accounting classes instead of on whatever else they have to offer. So only the finance/math would use extra credits and require more work than one major.

 

I completely disagree. Unless you're at a true target, having a double major is one of the few things you can do to differentiate yourself. Additionally, it's really no more difficult to do an extra major unless your second major is just much harder than your first. Math would certainly require more effort and time than Finance and might hurt your GPA a bit (it brought mine down ~0.15 pts in total) but, at least in trading, I would take a Math&Finance double major with a 3.6 over a pure Finance major with a 3.9 any day of the week. It's not even a contest.

@"debater96" As for Accounting, it's not much more difficult than Finance. Most undergraduate Finance programs are a fucking joke because they shy away from Math so much, and you really can't do large parts of Finance without some basic Calculus/Linear Algebra. Accounting is a lot of rules and arithmetic and definitely is more of a time commitment than Finance but if it's intuitive for you it should be easy to do well.

I would say do the Finance/Accounting and then try to pick up a more technical minor such as math/CS/statistics. Accounting is extremely important for understanding how businesses operate (much, much more so than Finance) and is something you can always fall back on because you're actually learning a hard skill set. It's boring as fuck though.

 

What are you looking to do specifically?

I'm going to assume that since you posted this in the trading section, you are interested in S&T or trading somewhere at some point in time.

If this is the case, a finance degree, unless it's a 4.0 from an Ivy League school, isn't very useful. Nor should it be, the things you learn in most university finance undergrad degrees are not very useful for trading. They are at best a basic foundation upon which you can lay everything else.

Everyone saying not to do a double major - very silly. Honestly if you're really that interested in trading, you could get away with doing math all by itself. The finance is of course helpful for understanding some things, but as I've said before, it's nothing you can't teach yourself in a few hours a week over the course of a month or two in the library. Or even just in your spare time, when you're bored.

Math is far more important than any other subject unless you really want to be in a sales position. Of course, if you're not interested in trading at all, then finance is ok, but the second major (especially math) would really help you stand out, and show intelligence. Networking doesn't help if you don't actually set yourself apart once you get to the interview. Networking only gets you that far.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Hi everyone here,

I also have the same problem. I will transfer to do econ at a target next semester. And I was wondering what should I complement with my econ major. Will something like history/polisci help standing out? I could switch to do a joint major in econ-math or econ-stat. There wouldn't be big changes to my gpa if I do econ-stat. Though my gpa would be 0.1-0.2 lower if I decided to do econ-math. As far as I know stat in undergrad is softer than math (analysis/algebra). Is a stat major much less attractive than a math major?

Also, if you can choose again, will you do a major/minor in CS? I guess a CS degree is really marketable for tech jobs at google/fb but it is a really tough and time consuming major.

Thank you so much for the advice!

 

It depends on what kind of math and stat program you're doing. My statistics minor is actually called Probability & Statistics and it's certainly more tangible than other fields of math but I don't think it's that much easier. We use a lot of stuff you learn in other branches of math in probability and it's incredibly theoretical (more so than I expected). If it's just statistics then yeah, it's probably significantly easier than pure mathematics. But if it includes probability where you're studying Markov Chains, Brownian Motion, Moment Generating Functions, etc. you incorporate a ton of different elements of pure math if your program is good. Lots of proofs.

On the other hand, I think something like a Philosophy major looks great if you have a good Philosophy program. It's more rigorous than people think and shows that you have interests/abilities outside of Finance/Math/Econ/etc. CS is great if you really like CS. I took a few CS classes and chose not to complete the minor. You can honestly teach yourself anything CS related that you would need to know in trading. Everyone mostly uses VBA anyway (at least on the sell-side).

 

A good internship will count for more than the second major: if you get a job offer you're going to feel a whole lot better than if you had just added a second line to the education section of your resume. If you don't get an internship THEN take classes.

Run this by other people, as the details of your situation make an exact answer hard to say, but for the most part experience > academic credentials for entry level jobs.

Get busy living
 

Ill have to go with internships. However, if you can pull off double majoring + internships.. which would be incredibly hard for almost everyone, it would look a lot better. Factor in that you would probably have no time to study and no sleep if you were to do that though..

 
Monkey Bizness:

Hi, I am a freshman at a semi-target. As of now, I am a finance major but I am thinking of adding a second major. I am interested in investment banking, so with that said which of the following majors would be most beneficial?
-accounting
-information systems
-marketing
-management
-business analytics (minor)

Thank you in advance!

I would say accounting might be most relevant to banking, but personally would choose information systems. If you ultimately decide to not pursue investment banking, there are a lot of good and in-demand jobs for someone with a technology background and understanding.

Also if you can tack on that analytics minor that would be fantastic. There is a serious demand for analytics positions these days.

 

Blanditiis sint ipsa reprehenderit tempora voluptatem architecto corporis. Pariatur cumque et molestias perferendis odio deleniti quia.

Et qui officiis non doloremque sequi. Voluptatem ut suscipit quas. Quae sed autem et illum. Sed ut minus non.

"Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money." - Mickey Bergman - Heist (2001)
 

Qui quaerat quos sunt blanditiis. Impedit nam sint porro quo. Et est et neque totam placeat maxime molestiae. Commodi vel alias nisi facere necessitatibus labore.

Quia iure dicta sed hic minima iusto id. Eos consequatur temporibus ea. Sunt ullam aliquid aut qui quae fuga eveniet. Animi laborum eos est itaque sint. Sint consectetur minima at.

 

Exercitationem dolorem expedita necessitatibus nam libero cupiditate nam. Aut quam nisi vel molestias accusamus voluptate. Inventore asperiores voluptate maxime vel aut sint qui. Repellat voluptatem dolor magni quia voluptatibus exercitationem qui delectus. Sequi saepe est nulla quidem nesciunt voluptatem. Eum doloribus et earum ut est.

Accusantium et dolor ipsam quia quasi. Iste non iure placeat molestiae a ut. Repellat impedit inventore vitae nulla tenetur. Officiis eius ipsa illo.

 

Consequatur repellat beatae at atque aut. Nisi quaerat qui aperiam vel minus. Adipisci quis alias occaecati qui quis.

Sapiente quae itaque non dolorum. Est qui rerum sint placeat repellendus magni.

Asperiores aut adipisci tempora est voluptas. Deleniti incidunt ut officia quia vitae molestias corrupti. Illo quia nemo aut ullam occaecati dolor rerum ducimus. Aspernatur ipsum ipsam magnam expedita eum tenetur. Consequuntur exercitationem eum expedita. Cupiditate repellendus consectetur odit. Et et quo aut aut maxime fuga.

 

Maiores et voluptatem dolores necessitatibus aut aspernatur velit. Cum mollitia quis cupiditate atque soluta. Ea dolores ut dolore eius molestiae sint ratione. Assumenda voluptate sint libero tempore voluptas ad. Doloremque architecto illo fugiat eligendi.

Et voluptatibus consequatur perspiciatis expedita facere quis deleniti libero. Vitae est deserunt est iste atque sequi provident. Sit velit nemo quia debitis aut. Placeat voluptatem voluptate dolore omnis necessitatibus nam expedita voluptatibus. Rerum voluptatem et consequuntur cum aut vel ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (85) $262
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (65) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (198) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (143) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”