Bad First Practice GMAT Score

Hey All,

So I took my first practice gmat test (official test) and scored a 530 (31Q, 31V). I took it as a baseline test to see where I stand before starting my studies with manhattan GMAT. In all honesty, I guessed on around half of the quantitative questions. Verbal naturally comes easier to me, so I'm sure I will have no trouble raising that score. Have any of you scored low your first time around? What's the typical increase for a second practice test after studying for a month or two?

Thanks,
MKballer

 

I scored 580 the first time, because I used that garbage Kaplan study guide shit (its useless unless you want a mid 500 level score)

Then I invested in Manhattan gmat prep books (SC, and like 4 of the quant books) and the Critical Reasoning Bible and I scored 660. I know my score is not super high, and I blame that on my quant score (I didnt buy all of the quant study guides, I only went through a few). If you study all of the MGMAT quant books and verbal books, in addition to practicing 40-50 questions a day (from the GMAT official guide), you should be able to bring your score up to 700 in a few months.

By the way, this was while working full-time and having a somewhat regular social life...

Be warned though, after the 3 month mark, you may start burning out. I know I did, shit starts getting old really quick and you dont want to study at all.

I plan on retaking it to break 700 for the 80/80 quant/verbal split, but not for a while.

Super Nintendo, Sega Genesis - when I was dead broke man I couldn't picture this
 

It's pretty common to have a low score, which a 530 is about average. Find your weakness and leverage what you are naturally good at. Check out Manhattans Guides and you'll be good

 

I'm actually in the midst of studying right now and want to just caution you that you're first test post-Manhattan GMAT may be low too.

I scored well on the first baseline test, but actually did worse on the second test because I'm trying to employ the Manhattan GMAT methods, as opposed to my less efficient methods. My subsequent practice tests have shown continual improvement and I'm now well above my initial baseline score.

Also, I've anecdotally heard the Manhattan GMAT quantitative questions tend to be a little harder than the real test (i.e. include an extra step in the algebra, etc.).

Test is in 3 weeks...

 

I did it before the changes but I scored around 580 and jumped to 730 on TPR.

My experience was the practice tests were way harder than the real test. TPR hedging I guess - omg look how much you improved, right? Never scored above 700 on a practice test.

Then, could just be luck. All will depend how hard you work. What was your SAT/ACT like?

if you like it then you shoulda put a banana on it
 

I had an odd GMAT. My quant was a 44 (high 60s) or so my verbal was 99 percentile though. The total score was a 720. I have a liberal arts background, however I was an econ. major before then and that score isn't indicative of my abilities. I have classes varying from calc. to finance to statistics that are all B+-As. Should I consider trying it once more?

 
NotPossibleCannotBeYouAreNot:
I had an odd GMAT. My quant was a 44 (high 60s) or so my verbal was 99 percentile though. The total score was a 720. I have a liberal arts background, however I was an econ. major before then and that score isn't indicative of my abilities. I have classes varying from calc. to finance to statistics that are all B+-As. Should I consider trying it once more?
If I were you I would give it another shot. That v/q split doesn't look great even with the quantitative strength of your undergrad transcript. You should be able to pull up your quant score close to 80 and at that point you'll be pushing 750, which is a great number.
 
NotPossibleCannotBeYouAreNot:
It's risky. You never know how everything else may go (drop in verbal) but I'll consider it. Thank you for the advice.

I think you should retake the test. I mean, how much do you honestly think your verbal might drop in a likely scenario? I would think it wouldn't be much, if any.

I don't know for sure because I'm not an admissions person or anything so take my advice with a grain of salt. Your overall score would qualify you for good schools, but my gut says having a huge split one way or the other is going to give people pause when they see it. Furthermore, I tend to think that most schools are going to find the quant score to be more important, so that can be a mark against you, however slight. Again, I don't know that for sure, but that would be my guess.

Business schools are looking for well rounded candidates and that large split can potentially shed a poor light on you, even if you know it's not accurate. Even if your actual score doesn't change, I think having splits that are a bit closer might be helpful.

Maybe someone else has an opinion.

Regards

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
 

Not a bad start! My baseline was 600 and i did a little bit less than a month of studying and got a 730. Get the Manhattan GMAT books and read through the verbal stuff about 4 times. Also, in my opinion the biggest problem with the verbal sections was testing endurance. Just keep doing practice problems and you may find your score increase without too much of an increase in studying.

 

Oh, and a follow up. You should aim to get around the 750 level. That's a killer quant score first time around. If you can be putting up consistently 720+ practice scores in about 2 months you could easily get there.

 

Looking at this , I think the GMAT quant ought to be much tougher. You can miss 8 questions and still get a 51! You miss 8 on the verbal , you'll be at 40.

I want quant questions that will really make people feel the pain.

 

Right around 600 on first practice (Princeton review), took Princeton Review course and studied hard and scored 730. If you do serious work and prep it's not unusual to bump about 100 points. From what I hear Manhattan GMAT is the best prep materials. Courses tend to depend on what teacher you get - see if you can meet them before you commit to a program.

For reference, you are showing percentiles in your scores right? Just saying 44Q tends to refer to the score, not percentile (above 40 in each is good and usually gets you to the magic 700).

It would be more helpful if you shared what you think your problem areas were. Looks like quant was rough. There are lots of tricks for improving there. Was time a factor?

PS you might get major selection bias on this question so don't get discouraged...

if you like it then you shoulda put a banana on it
 
frgna:
Right around 600 on first practice (Princeton review), took Princeton Review course and studied hard and scored 730. If you do serious work and prep it's not unusual to bump about 100 points. From what I hear Manhattan GMAT is the best prep materials. Courses tend to depend on what teacher you get - see if you can meet them before you commit to a program.

For reference, you are showing percentiles in your scores right? Just saying 44Q tends to refer to the score, not percentile (above 40 in each is good and usually gets you to the magic 700).

It would be more helpful if you shared what you think your problem areas were. Looks like quant was rough. There are lots of tricks for improving there. Was time a factor?

PS you might get major selection bias on this question so don't get discouraged...

By 44Q I meant percentile. I did not prepare at all and there were some sections that I did not finish due to the time limit. I didn't do 5 questions in Quant and 6 in IR. I know that not completing questions can really screw up your score big time. I got some old ebooks for Manhattan GMAT online so I think I'll study those for a few weeks and try my luck again. I am planning to sit for the real thing sometime in November....I really need to bust my ass cause I won't have time to retake, I'm sitting for CFA level 2 in June and want to start studying in December for sure.

 

My first practice test was around a 600 I think. I used a really crappy study book (Peterson's is garbage in case anybody sees it) and scored a 700 on the real thing. I had a poor Q/V split though so I registered for the Kaplan Advanced Anywhere online class. The class met twice a week for 2 months then I retook the GMAT, got a 750. The test is definitely beatable once you understand the concepts and how to approach each particular question type. Take enough practice problems and you start to recognize how to solve the problem before you've finished reading it.

 

I have very similar stats as you except I am about a week behind you in studying. For some people, namely me, it takes a shit ton of studying to remember everything. Good luck! I'm not taking mine until late april or June.

 

Going to be difficult with 1 month left to study if you were only able to jump from a 490 to a 600 after 2 months. The biggest gains are in the beginning and the points get incrementally harder to obtain. With nothing more than the data available, I'd say you should expect to score in the mid 600s unless you change your study technique / habits.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Your scores seem almost unbelievable if the 490 was the very first time you saw the test. Learning how to do DS properly (no-one does it right the 1st time) in of itself should bring you up by 40-50 points, and familiarizing yourself with the rest of the test, and getting your math up to date a little, should be another 40-70 points, depending on where you started. These improvements should take 10-15 hours of studying.That means your studying has been completely worthless beyond those first 15 hours. How are you studying? If you continue doing what you are doing, you will end up right where you are.

Admittedly, above opinion assumes the 490 and 600 are truly representative. It is possible you got lucky on the 490 (had an expectation of 460, 20% chance this could be true) and unlucky on the 600 (had an expectation of 630, maybe 10-15% chance this could be true). Then this makes sense. Does that sound like what happened?

Curious - how are you studying? What materials are you using? What did you do for a math review? I can't believe your verbal has not improved - CR and RC are tough, but SC has a reasonable learning curve that you can take advantage of. I should add that after an initial improvement, these reverse - SC is easy to improve at in the beginning, but difficult after. CR and RC have the reserve pattern.

 

I did 2 months of self-study with Kaplan and MGMAT books. My practice tests were stuck in high 500s and low 600s. I took like two weeks off and jumped back in and my last practice test was a 680. Find your weakness and make a weekly plan to cover each topic. I really liked the Powerscore SC book for extra help on the Verbal section.

What program are you using for your studying? I wasn't impressed with Kaplan at all, but found Manhattan GMAT to be great.

If you aren't confident and relaxed 2 weeks before your test date then you should probably just re-schedule it. It only costs $50 to move it but $250 to take it all over again. I moved my test to mid April and have just been doing some focused practice problems now that I am confident with most of the underlying theories.

 

Using 8 Manhattan Strat Guides, and all the OG's (12th, Verbal and Quant).

EDIT:

As far as studying, I'm basically constantly going through the MGMAT guides and then doing the problems for that specific guide. For example, I'll read through FDP MGMAT Strat Guide then complete the corresponding questions in OG12.

-- "Those who say don't know, and those who know don't say."
 
wdz0001:
I scored in the 620-660 range... any idea what 2-3 solid months of study should yield?

I know this is highly speculative, just wanted to see what you guys thought.

Going off your range provided.... 500-780. Hope that helps.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 
yeahright:
wdz0001:
I scored in the 620-660 range... any idea what 2-3 solid months of study should yield?

I know this is highly speculative, just wanted to see what you guys thought.

Going off your range provided.... 500-780. Hope that helps.

Hahah. Good stuff

"Come at me, bro"- José de Palafox y Melci
 

I don't get how people are able to spend 2-3 months on GMAT. I took the evaluation quiz and scored 650, spent two weeks prepping, by reading a chapter a day from the GMAT prep book and broke 710 on game day. I realize that a high GMAT can be important, except that a) it's one data point of five or six for MBA applications, b) it's high enough to earn a spot in every MBA program (keep in mind the top ten have an accepted GMAT average either = or > than 710, but that means people below 710 get in). I'll continue to argue that spending more time on the essays will get you further than bumping a GMAT from 710 to 750.

 
overpaid_overworked:
I don't get how people are able to spend 2-3 months on GMAT. I took the evaluation quiz and scored 650, spent two weeks prepping, by reading a chapter a day from the GMAT prep book and broke 710 on game day. I realize that a high GMAT can be important, except that a) it's one data point of five or six for MBA applications, b) it's high enough to earn a spot in every MBA program (keep in mind the top ten have an accepted GMAT average either = or > than 710, but that means people below 710 get in). I'll continue to argue that spending more time on the essays will get you further than bumping a GMAT from 710 to 750.

Completely agree.. However, I am still in undergrad and I won't be applying for another 3-4 years. Simply getting the thing out of the way before I start as an analyst.

 

What practice test was this? The one from MBA.com or one of the kaplan/princeton review/manhattan exams?

The mba.com test is fairly accurate while the others are a mess. I studied for about 2 weeks when I took the GMAT. Started off in a similar situation as you, I scored 610 on my first practice. I just spend a lot of time every night practicing GMAT questions and understand what type of questions the test asks. When I took the test I scored over 700, so it is possible, depends what you are struggling with and what practice test you have taken.

 

pay the $80 and reschedule! its only $80, easy decision. Dont bother sitting down in your testing center chair if you aren't confident and ready. I made the mistake of this once on a gmat

 

If it was the kaplan test then my guess is that you will score higher on the actual test.

I do agree with "I want to invest" that you should probably reschedule it. You are in no rush (even first round apps aren't due until at least Oct if I remember correctly). Make sure you score well on the GMAT, it is a very important part of your application.

And yes, the exams on mba.com are free. There are two practice tests, and you have to download them on your computer. Everyone that I have talked to has told me that the Kaplan test gives you conservative results (happened on my test too).

 

Your probably fine honestly. Kaplan scores way lower than the real test. If I were you, I'd take the practice test on mba.com and see how you do. From there, just study the official guides and do Manhattan GMAT practice tests. Two days before the test take the other mba.com practice test and you will know basically how your going to score on the real deal.

 

All scores are reported; even if schools technically take your highest into consideration, they see all of them (even if you choose to cancel your scores after the test, they see a note that you cancelled). You're crazy to not reschedule for $80. Use this as a wake up call to actually start studying.

 
Best Response

The fact that you don't even know that there are official practice tests seems to reflect your overall preparation. Don't take the test next week. Figure out if you want to take the test, and if you at least think you want to go to b-school.

If you do, study. Some people study more than others, but everyone can improve their score and their strategies enough to make the case for solid preparation. There's a bunch of people on WSO that claim they studied a week and pulled a 750, but the fact is, that's not the norm. Most of the stuff on the math portion will be things you haven't done since middle school. Data sufficiency itself is strange, and something you definitely want to practice some, even if you're a quant beast. Verbal isn't that hard, but definitely helps to study sentence correction and know some of the common things they look at.

But seriously, just figure out what you want to do, and don't expect to get a 700 without loooking at the material until one week before. You might be smart enough, but that entitled mentality will probably screw you later when it comes to putting off apps til the last minute, etc..

 

Et ullam natus accusantium odit. Reiciendis est ut voluptate molestiae libero aut. Officiis hic dolorem facilis porro sapiente. Deserunt consequuntur numquam quas perspiciatis atque at. Numquam optio totam distinctio. Iusto delectus et exercitationem possimus quis tempora error.

Ab vel tenetur quisquam a. Ea minima quas doloremque aut natus doloribus tenetur. Ullam voluptatem non autem magnam. Aut aut at in vero itaque dolore tempora nostrum.

Cupiditate necessitatibus atque neque ipsum culpa dolore laudantium. Mollitia ratione quasi tenetur vel aut magnam. Esse qui aperiam illo accusamus. Facilis quod quaerat reprehenderit necessitatibus voluptates expedita.

Quam in vel asperiores tempora quibusdam provident animi. Excepturi dolores dolor error sunt adipisci voluptas. Aperiam doloremque cum ea.

 

Consequatur et molestias laboriosam repellat ex beatae nesciunt temporibus. Voluptatem ab qui ut nisi occaecati tempore quae omnis. Sunt unde aut aut quasi et ut facilis. Quaerat commodi ea praesentium alias autem sapiente veritatis. Magni et nemo enim est ea quaerat error.

Illo dolore sed nostrum natus quia omnis aperiam. Soluta id quia possimus corporis. Rerum voluptate omnis voluptate nihil blanditiis omnis optio. Numquam accusamus nulla esse ea. Minima officiis voluptate voluptatibus cupiditate assumenda quia corrupti. Praesentium aliquam aut laborum ea non.

Deleniti iure suscipit sed quia mollitia et quisquam. Voluptatem fuga nihil voluptatibus est asperiores quia. Beatae excepturi vero cumque suscipit maiores. Eveniet voluptatum in sunt et in repellat porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”