Based of my diagnostic GMAT what can I expect on the real deal after studying?

Hey guys,

I just took a gmat practice exam to see where I'm at before I start studying and I got a 650, it was a Manhattan GMAT exam(don't know how well their exams translate to the real thing).

What is a realistic score that I could achieve putting in 2-3 months of decent study time(2-3hr/day), anyone else get a similar score on their first try and improve significantly? I am hoping for a 750 because I come from a state school so I feel as if I need to make up my undergraduate institution in the GMAT. Let me know! Thanks.

EDIT:
GMAT breakdown was;
Quant: 43 - 61%ile
Verbal: 36 - 79%ile

-I am more of a math person than english traditionally so I should be able to improve my math score significantly I believe, just forgot alot of the concepts I haven't used in a long time.Hoping 750 is feasible.

 
Best Response

MGMAT tends to be a little tougher than actual GMAT on quant, and a little easier on verbal. So I would say your score is pretty accurate.

If you put 2-3 months of work, you can EASILY hit the 750 mark. But it has to be 2-3 of mind-breaking studying. Without knowing your quant/verbal split I can't give you a sure-fire way to improve, but your score suggests you have a decent grasp of the fundamentals (provided your split isn't heavily leaning toward one side).

Below is a list of the materials you should check out if you want to hit the 750 mark:

Ultimate GMAT Ass-Kicking Arsenal

Quant: Manhattan Guides (each book comes with access to 6 CATs) Jeff Sackmann's Total GMAT Math Manhattan Advanced GMAT Quant Sackmann's 1000q advanced challenge set GMAT Club Math Book OG Quant

Verbal: Manhattan Guides OG Verbal GMAT Pill (A+++ source for Verbal)

Both: GMAT Club Tests GMAT Prep CATs MGMAT CATs

I have subscriptions to GMAT Pill, Magoosh, GMAT Club, and Veritas Prep and would be more than willing to offer a slashed price for 2-3 months use.

Good luck on your studies mate!

"Come at me, bro"- José de Palafox y Melci
 
lasampdoria:
MGMAT tends to be a little tougher than actual GMAT on quant, and a little easier on verbal. So I would say your score is pretty accurate.

If you put 2-3 months of work, you can EASILY hit the 750 mark. But it has to be 2-3 of mind-breaking studying. Without knowing your quant/verbal split I can't give you a sure-fire way to improve, but your score suggests you have a decent grasp of the fundamentals (provided your split isn't heavily leaning toward one side).

Below is a list of the materials you should check out if you want to hit the 750 mark:

Ultimate GMAT Ass-Kicking Arsenal

Quant: Manhattan Guides (each book comes with access to 6 CATs) Jeff Sackmann's Total GMAT Math Manhattan Advanced GMAT Quant Sackmann's 1000q advanced challenge set GMAT Club Math Book OG Quant

Verbal: Manhattan Guides OG Verbal GMAT Pill (A+++ source for Verbal)

Both: GMAT Club Tests GMAT Prep CATs MGMAT CATs

I have subscriptions to GMAT Pill, Magoosh, GMAT Club, and Veritas Prep and would be more than willing to offer a slashed price for 2-3 months use.

Good luck on your studies mate!

">

I am broke as hell, just finished undergrad so no money for any of that. Going to try using free resources/library etc.

 

GMATPrep is the most accurate indicator of what you'll likely score if you took the test the next day. I used MGMAT guides only for a few months of review and upped my score by 50 from my diagnostic. I've taken many practice tests and would say that MGMAT, like the poster above said, is tougher on quant but easier on verbal as compared to the actual test.

 

I started with a 540 diagnostic (didn't even remember if #1 was prime) and ended up getting a 760 on the real deal with about 3 months of studying. So yes, it can be done. Figure out your learning style and pick a program that works for you. I didn't want sit down classes, but I like tutorials online and lots of practice problems. So I went with Knewton, did the entire course, and then went through the last two versions of the official GMAT guides (including supplements). My last Knewton diagnostic and official GMAT prep software practice test were both 760s, and they mirrored my actual GMAT score's breakdown almost exactly.

 

I scored an average of about 710 or 720 on Manhattan and scored 750 or 760 on the second GMAT Prep after studying. I wound up getting just 700 on the real deal. I got some crazy math questions on the real exam that really threw off my entire test, which was kind of disappointing, but at least I broke 700.

I believe I got around a 650 on my first practice exam, too (I also used Manhattan). I think you can easily break 700 with a couple months of review and by using Manhattan shortcuts.

 

A lot depends on how good you are under pressure. My first time with the GMAT I used some crappy library book (Peterson's GMAT Prep) to study from, was getting around a 650 on the practice tests and scored a 700 on the real deal. I didn't like my score so I took the Kaplan Advanced class, was scoring around 690 on the practice tests and scored a 750 on the actual test. However if you are a bad test taker it could go the opposite way on test day, only you really know that about yourself.

I think people either exaggerate how much they studied or go a little overboard here. You really don't need to buy every single GMAT book available to prepare for the test. It isn't that hard once you understand the basics. It just comes down to actually taking the time to work on practice tests and problem sets. The more problems you see the more they start to look alike and you can often eliminate 2 answers just by reading the problem.

 
mappleby:
A lot depends on how good you are under pressure. My first time with the GMAT I used some crappy library book (Peterson's GMAT Prep) to study from, was getting around a 650 on the practice tests and scored a 700 on the real deal. I didn't like my score so I took the Kaplan Advanced class, was scoring around 690 on the practice tests and scored a 750 on the actual test. However if you are a bad test taker it could go the opposite way on test day, only you really know that about yourself.

I think people either exaggerate how much they studied or go a little overboard here. You really don't need to buy every single GMAT book available to prepare for the test. It isn't that hard once you understand the basics. It just comes down to actually taking the time to work on practice tests and problem sets. The more problems you see the more they start to look alike and you can often eliminate 2 answers just by reading the problem.

Testing under pressure has always been a forte of mine, think a GMAT exam should adapt well to my test taking abilities. Hoping to follow in your footsteps!

 

The breakdown in my GMAT was: Quant: 43 - 61%ile Verbal: 36 - 79%ile

I am a much better math than english person, just didn't remember alot of the math principles/concepts. Think I should improve my math significantly if I just go over the principles. Hoping 750 is feasible.

 

score breakdown was 44 math (73 percentile) and 42 verbal (95 percentile)- did worse on the quant than I expected but did better on the verbal than expected. im surprised with that breakdown i got a 710. i'd think they'd simply average those percentiles.

regardless, im happy with a 710

 

I've never heard of a score changing - and people don't give a shit about your essay scores, so congrats.

Just an FYI, the reason they don't average your percentiles is due to the fact someone who scores at the 95th percentile in both math and verbal will come out at a higher overall percentile, since there are a number of people that will score at the 95th percentile in only the math or verbal portion (their relative area of strength). The same logic applies to why your 710 should equate to a higher overall percentile.

 

Yes, it's possible. Just wait a long time before taking the practice tests again and focus on building up the skills and learning the tricks.

The truth is you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd.
 

I think it depends on when you took the test and which practice test you took. You said it's your first test, so I'll assume that means you haven't done much studying and you mentioned MGMAT, so I'll assume you took their first practice test. If those assumptions are correct, a great score is definitely doable, as MGMAT's practice tests are notoriously difficult. Just as an example, I scored a 610 or 620 on my first MGMAT practice test. I then studied pretty hardcore for a month and got a 650 on the final MGMAT practice test I took three days before the real thing. On the real thing, I scored a 760.

The official GMAT site's practice tests are extremely accurate though (based on my personal experience and the experience of others I've read on message boards) and I would advise that you take both of those a week or two before test time. I think both of my scores on those tests were within 10 points of what I got on the real thing.

Hope this helps! Good luck with studying!

 

You are probably missing out on some points just due to your unfamiliarity with the test. Once you learn the nuances of Data Sufficiency and the tricks they play with number properties you'll do better. When you develop a timing strategy and plan of attack for each type of problem, you will already be upping your score by 50 pts. I suggest you go through the entire MGMAT book series. That should take you about 5-6 weeks and give you the knowledge to attack each problem.

 

well, I scored a 750 or 770 or something on my first practice test, than practiced for a month, and scored a 730 on the real thing... so I'd say anything is possible, including actually getting WORSE at the test as you practice, which is what I did.... haha

 

@is 620 a good score: that's a a very relative question, because that's an above average score, but this is a site focused on investment people.... I'd say it's not great (many people on this site hit over 700 on the first try), but I've also heard of a lot worse and people coming up as much as 80-100 points through practice...

People may disagree with me on this, but I've noticed people tend to end up (on test day) getting very close to half of their SAT score... I thought i was going to do better than that on the GMAT, but didn't... how you handle the pressure on test day is part of the game as well, and that's something that if you used to be good at, you probably still are, etc.

 
International Pymp:
@is 620 a good score: that's a a very relative question, because that's an above average score, but this is a site focused on investment people.... I'd say it's not great (many people on this site hit over 700 on the first try), but I've also heard of a lot worse and people coming up as much as 80-100 points through practice...

People may disagree with me on this, but I've noticed people tend to end up (on test day) getting very close to half of their SAT score... I thought i was going to do better than that on the GMAT, but didn't... how you handle the pressure on test day is part of the game as well, and that's something that if you used to be good at, you probably still are, etc.

From my own experience, I have to disagree with half of the SAT thing. From what I remember, my SATs were something like a 1340 (half of which would be around a 670) and my GMAT was a 760 - almost 100 points difference. In addition, my first practice test score was a 540. However, I have to say that it had been over 13 years between when I took the SATs and the GMAT, so that may have made a difference.

 

^both comments above relate to the official practice tests, which are easier... the non-official ones are harder and if you guy a 620 on that i'd say that's like a 650-660 on the official practice test first try... I never scored as high on the non-official ones

 

Qui iusto accusamus eveniet corporis voluptatem. Et pariatur quia sed iusto. Occaecati laborum aut ad unde deleniti nobis quam similique. Odit iste sequi dolor deleniti eligendi et id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”