Basic Guide Ramping Up On A Company With Public Information Part Two

We published part one last week which can be seen here and we are using Facebook as an example as it is well known to almost everyone.

See Part 1 Here

Now that we know the story well, lets go ahead and build the financial model. To do this lets review the latest earnings print (8-k) to see what information we are working with on a quarterly basis. Before we begin, this is a technology stock so you see they give both GAAP and Non-GAAP numbers, generally speaking for technology you use Non-GAAP numbers because tech stocks have quite a bit of stock based compensation (SBC) expense. The 8-K currently does not breakdown revenue by segment within the IS but does give a slight breakout in the comments.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000119312513192397/d5303…

Q1 2013 Highlights: With the basics out of the way, notice how the items we want to track are also disclosed on the 8-K (see Part 1). Daily active users (DAUs) were 665 million, Monthly Active Users (MAUs) were 1.11 billion; Mobile MAUs were 751 million. In addition the Company does give some breakout of revenue in the Q1 highlights (although exact numbers are not disclosed to the decimal point on the IS. Revenue from advertising was $1.25 billion, representing 85% of total revenue; Mobile advertising revenue represented approximately 30% of advertising revenue; Payments and other fees revenue was $213 million for the first quarter of 2013

In addition, note the other highlights in the most recent quarter: 1) Launched Facebook Home; 2) Instagram reached 100 million 3) Launched new advertising products such as Lookalike Audiences, Managed Custom Audiences, and Partner Categories 4) Partnered with Datalogix, Epsilon, Acxiom, and BlueKai 5) Enhanced ability to measure advertiser ROI through acquisition of Atlas Advertising Suite; 6) Appointed Susan D. Desmond-Hellmann, M.D., M.P.H., (UCSF), to the company’s board of directors.

Revenue: With the basic first quarter out of the way go ahead and build out your three statement model (yes this will take some time), generally at least 5 years of data should be a good starting point. Now you can break out the revenue line item.

1) Notice Q4 has higher revenue followed by a dip in Q1 (seasonality, IE: Q4 generally has a higher net contribution to annual revenue than Q1, Q2 or Q3)
2) Continue to build out the geographic break out (not from the 8-K however disclosed in 10-q filings so you can track regional ARPU numbers and other metrics, page 19 and 24). http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326801/000132680113000011/fb-33…
3) While your financial model will simply have a revenue line, continue to track the 10-Q and 10-k filings and you will see that they disclose advertising and payment revenue (page 27).
4) Now break out the numbers we were told Mobile advertising was 30% of advertising revenue, we now know that Advertising revenue was $1.245 billion from the 10-Q so you can break out mobile versus desktop/notebook revenue by applying 30%*1.245B = $0.3735 billion in mobile advertising revenue $0.8715 billion in desktop/notebook

This is the basics, so now you have a general break out of revenue and have a top-line number to build out your financial model.

Expense: Read through the expense lines to understand how the items are being broken out starting with COGS which represents the operation of data centers, facility and server equipment, energy and bandwidth costs, support and maintenance costs, salaries, benefits, and SBC associated with such activities. This is followed by 1) R&D which is primarily salaries, benefits and SBC for employees in engineering; 2) Marketing and sales, sales support, marketing, business development, and customer service functions; 3) General and administrative salaries, benefits, and SBC for executives as well as legal, finance, human resources, corporate communications and others. Run the numbers as a percentage of sales for now and go through the 8-K to find guidance and long-term plans.

To wrap things up and make sure you have tied all the loose ends on the financial statements, go through the quarterly company slide deck (some companies do not have any) and build out the additional numbers as you see fit. Here’s the link to the deck.

http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/AMDA-NJ5DZ/2487389760x0x659143/b…

You now have an idea for the expense structure on a historical basis and it is now time to turn to building out the future quarterly earnings

Build Out The Model: Finally, now that you have a large set of historical numbers to review and also have information broken out by segment you can start to build out a forward model. The easiest way to get a proxy for forward estimates would be to review the analyst consensus numbers as of now. You can simply check yahoo finance for that.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=FB+Analyst+Estimates

To keep things simple set up a model that is in-line with consensus, then we can move on to part three where you come up with a differentiated approach. Attached is a more complicated financial model for Apple so you understand how to build a bottoms up model with a detailed breakout by revenue and even gross margins.

Updated Text

The Comparison example was a bit too complicated so we are leaving the finalized only. On June 30, 2013 we will load a basic guide to balancing and spot checking a three statement model. 1)Working Capital Checks, 2) change in non-cash charges and 3) adjustments to financing statement

Attachment Size
Apple Final.pdf 128.17 KB 128.17 KB
 

Great stuff here. I'll say from experience that this looks very clean. I'm assuming you def have some year of experience in either banking or research. This is very good educational material, some of the best i've seen on the internet. Hope this catches the eyes of others to make modeling more painless for the rest of us.

 
WallStreetPlayboys:
GED or Bust:

WSP - Thanks for putting this together. I realize that excluding SBC is the norm on the street. How do you feel about it being excluded?

It is street convention. Not sure what you mean by feel about it being excluded. Basically, if you want to be safe use GAAP numbers.

Or were you asking a different question?

I meant more along the lines of the Barron's article a few days ago on SBC (link below). I was interested in learning if SBC was a talking point with investors or just ignored in general.

Hope that clarifies my question. Thanks again for your time.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052748704509304578515082253…

 
monkeyd00d:

Model doesn't balance.

+1 to you sir

We are not sending the excel sheet to anyone else (for now) but you can PM with your email and it will be sent your way. A balanced one of course.

Edit: will also send to those who can figure out why it does not balance (hint always check the CF statement), if you have the solution post here or shoot a PM if you're correct and will also send the sheet your way.

 
Best Response

Opinion, but there is one issue the article does not seem to understand. Growth Rates See our post on valuation metrics by sector.

For technology most companies go public with zero earnings. This is because the value is on the long-term revenue growth.

You cannot compare a CRM or Linked-in to a Microsoft or an Apple perfectly because you are comparing growth companies to mature companies.

This is actually perfect for part 3, which drops next week where you have to understand what is a fair comparison.

As a laymans example.

Do you believe an Internet company (Facebook) should be compared apples to apples to (google)? How about to linked in?

Well the truth is it likely should be compared to something between linked in and google depending on your view of growth rates for each of those 3 companies.

If company A is growing revenue at 100% Company B is growing at 50% Company C is growing at 20%

Even if company C has higher net income than company A... If the companies have the same margin profile... You can argue pretty easily that company A deserves a much better multiple and valuation than company C.

Make sense?

 
WallStreetPlayboys:

Opinion, but there is one issue the article does not seem to understand. Growth Rates See our post on valuation metrics by sector.

For technology most companies go public with zero earnings. This is because the value is on the long-term revenue growth.

You cannot compare a CRM or Linked-in to a Microsoft or an Apple perfectly because you are comparing growth companies to mature companies.

This is actually perfect for part 3, which drops next week where you have to understand what is a fair comparison.

As a laymans example.

Do you believe an Internet company (Facebook) should be compared apples to apples to (google)? How about to linked in?

Well the truth is it likely should be compared to something between linked in and google depending on your view of growth rates for each of those 3 companies.

If company A is growing revenue at 100%
Company B is growing at 50%
Company C is growing at 20%

Even if company C has higher net income than company A... If the companies have the same margin profile... You can argue pretty easily that company A deserves a much better multiple and valuation than company C.

Make sense?

Yes. +1 SB for all of this.

 
  1. Other line in cash flow statement is not being balanced by the balance sheet
  2. Changes in short term investments should be a zero
  3. Other in financing is not being balanced as well

To be honest I just ripped the model off your blog but I think I deserve credit for being right!

Seriously though, how do you check it?

 
mtanner189:

1. Other line in cash flow statement is not being balanced by the balance sheet
2. Changes in short term investments should be a zero
3. Other in financing is not being balanced as well

To be honest I just ripped the model off your blog but I think I deserve credit for being right!

Seriously though, how do you check it?

Ha, smart. Will load the corrected version when a computer is in front of us tonight so you can see both versions. Also will send you the excel sheet (thanks for the email).

To your question, we will load a post (on Wall Street Oasis) on how to quickly check a model to make sure it balances.

 

Sunt accusantium voluptatibus quia eos dignissimos at. Laboriosam ut voluptatem quos possimus eaque. Deleniti fuga neque quo accusamus. Exercitationem vel ad minima minima pariatur fuga. Quo at explicabo dolor repudiandae. Est doloribus eligendi ullam ut dicta saepe.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”