EBITDA Multiple method

Hi guys,

Just got one interrogation this morning :

Imagine 2 companies with an EBITDA of $100,000

But one company bought the walls on its office, of a value of 1 million $

The other is just paying a rent every months

Let's imagine that in their specific industry (they are in the same industry) we apply a multiple of 10 on the EBITDA for estimate the value of a company

Then, the value of both companies is 1 million $ right ? (100,000 x 10)

But in one case the buyer will have the value of the walls (1 million) whereas in the other case the company is just paying the rent

So my question is that the method of the EBITDA multiple doesn't take in account the fact that if yes or not, the company own its own building

In the two cases we pay the same price but in one case we got the 1 million dollars building in the package !

Where is my mistake ??

Thanks a lot

 

assuming you're not making interest/lease payments on the first company that owns its property, the two should be valued approximately the same.

If the two were identical businesses, the second must be generating slightly more revenue to cover the rent expense (in order to get to the same EBITDA), so you can think of the second company as having slightly larger operations to make it equal in value to the first company that owns the $1mm building.

 
So my question is that the method of the EBITDA multiple doesn't take in account the fact that if yes or not, the company own its own building

In the two cases we pay the same price but in one case we got the 1 million dollars building in the package !

Where is my mistake ??

The rent payment is going to be expensed on the income statement. This means that if you had two companies with same revenue/costs aside from this, the company that's renting is going to have an EBITDA that is lower by the amount of the rent.

The company that owns the building isn't going to have a related expense on the P&L and will thus have a higher EBITDA, but the disadvantage is that you have that much cash locked up in your real estate.

 
Best Response

And this, my friends, is just another one of the many reasons why EBITDA is a terrible metric in 99% of all situations.

Envision that both companies actually do have a rent payment. The owner of the building (assuming the value of the building is $1M and that the value of the land under it is not a consideration in any of this) is paying his "rent" as depreciation while the lessor is paying his rent as an actual rent payment to whoever owns the building. In this case, the lessor's earnings power from its actual business is understated relative to the one who owns the building because in EBITDA the owner's "rent" gets added back while the lessor's does not. That's why people use EBITDAR to cut out the lease vs. own aspect in judging peers across the board in certain industries.

I hate victims who respect their executioners
 

Excepturi laborum sed quia. Quas labore impedit magni sit aut omnis corporis. Eos deleniti perferendis rem ex voluptas enim.

Et impedit labore aut pariatur minus omnis. Sunt blanditiis tempora quod dignissimos et quod hic. Maiores deleniti sapiente qui impedit velit. Et deleniti quia ipsa consequatur eos aspernatur. Sed dolore sed eligendi ducimus consequatur est. Iure saepe molestiae repellendus qui tempore. Dolores rerum corporis et eos dolores sunt voluptatum ratione.

I am wise because I know that I know nothing -Socrates

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”