Being an Asian in finance in the United States

I'm Asian-American. I see tons of Asians going into finance at the analyst level, and many who are Asian at the lower levels of PE firms (associate, analyst), but it seems to me that it's rarer to see Asians at the higher levels of PE or IBD. In my opinion, I think this is because it's simply harder for Asians in general to develop relationships with all you white folk who run the companies of this country (than for other Caucasians), and thus Asians tend to bring in less revenue.

Why this is so is possibly because people in general tend to get along better with similar people - others with similar backgrounds, cultures, and appearances. Another plausible reason is because of immigration patterns that led to second generation Asian-Americans being much larger now than maybe 10 years ago. Nevertheless, I can't seem to think of a single important Asian-American financier in the United States among the hundreds of important American financiers out there today.

One of my friends who worked at Goldman Sachs this past summer but decided not to accept his return offer told me one of the main reasons is because he thinks his chances of making it to the top are really slim since he is Asian. He decided to pursue a PhD instead.

What do you guys think about Asian-Americans in finance? Do you think I'm overthinking things? Is there potential for someone like me to be the Jeremy Lin of finance?

 

Interesting. Asian-Indians, in comparison, tend to have little problem with the 'bamboo ceiling'. In fact, considering their share of the US population (0.9%), they've done exceptionally well. CEO of Pepsi, Citigroup, McKinsey, Deans of Harvard Business School and UChicago Booth, several of the top (not the very top, obviously) executives at Goldman, Blackstone, Bain Capital, Governors of two States, etc.

I personally think it has to do with the personality types of the East Asians who do end up going into finance. At my school at least, all are incredibly intense, focused, and of course smart. The Indians, in comparison, are all of that and also, crucially, laid back. Meh, just a theory.

 
seedy underbelly:
Interesting. Asian-Indians, in comparison, tend to have little problem with the 'bamboo ceiling'. In fact, considering their share of the US population (0.9%), they've done exceptionally well. CEO of Pepsi, Citigroup, McKinsey, Deans of Harvard Business School and UChicago Booth, several of the top (not the very top, obviously) executives at Goldman, Blackstone, Bain Capital, Governors of two States, etc.

I personally think it has to do with the personality types of the East Asians who do end up going into finance. At my school at least, all are incredibly intense, focused, and of course smart. The Indians, in comparison, are all of that and also, crucially, laid back. Meh, just a theory.

spoken like a true college kid.

wait til you work a couple of years boy and let me know how this theory of yours works in your life.

 
melvvvar:
seedy underbelly:
Interesting. Asian-Indians, in comparison, tend to have little problem with the 'bamboo ceiling'. In fact, considering their share of the US population (0.9%), they've done exceptionally well. CEO of Pepsi, Citigroup, McKinsey, Deans of Harvard Business School and UChicago Booth, several of the top (not the very top, obviously) executives at Goldman, Blackstone, Bain Capital, Governors of two States, etc.

I personally think it has to do with the personality types of the East Asians who do end up going into finance. At my school at least, all are incredibly intense, focused, and of course smart. The Indians, in comparison, are all of that and also, crucially, laid back. Meh, just a theory.

spoken like a true college kid.

wait til you work a couple of years boy and let me know how this theory of yours works in your life.

Agreed..internship doesnt mean youve worked

I eat success for breakfast...with skim milk
 
seedy underbelly:
In fact, considering their share of the US population (0.9%), they've done exceptionally well. CEO of Pepsi, Citigroup, McKinsey, Deans of Harvard Business School and UChicago Booth, several of the top (not the very top, obviously) executives at Goldman, Blackstone, Bain Capital, Governors of two States, etc.

You forgot the Co-CEO of Deutsche Bank.

Although, I don't agree with your theory.

 
Macro <span class=keyword_link><a href=/resources/skills/trading-investing/arbitrage target=_blank>Arbitrage</a></span>:
seedy underbelly:
In fact, considering their share of the US population (0.9%), they've done exceptionally well. CEO of Pepsi, Citigroup, McKinsey, Deans of Harvard Business School and UChicago Booth, several of the top (not the very top, obviously) executives at Goldman, Blackstone, Bain Capital, Governors of two States, etc.

You forgot the Co-CEO of Deutsche Bank.

Although, I don't agree with your theory.

Potassium.

 

What an interesting question, though I was gonna say the same thing as seedy underbelly - tons of Indians who make it OK. Anshu Jain even made it big in a German, highly White setting...so I don't think there's firstly racism or latent racism as such. We all know brown people face a lot more racism than Asians...!

On the other hand, I think it has something to do with cultural/stereotypical strengths. Indians tend to talk more, be better at presenting than Asians, while Asians are more detail-oriented and excellent at analytics. Typically you find a lot of Asian CFOs for instance - those not doing a lot of customer facing work but still handling hugely important duties.

I think you should definitely keep going at your dream if finance is your passion. If you have strong interpersonal skills and are good at the analytical portions of your job, of which there'll be plenty, you'll be OK.

 

This:

goldman in da house:
One of my friends who worked at Goldman Sachs this past summer but decided not to accept his return offer told me one of the main reasons is because he thinks his chances of making it to the top are really slim since he is Asian. He decided to pursue a PhD instead.
Leads to this:
protectedclass:
Tell your friend the PhD, that he needs to understand "sampling bias" before he writes anymore papers.
Get busy living
 

I remember reading this in an article somewhere but they attributed this to the simple fact that not that many minorities entered finance until the 90's. Even during the middle to late 90's many people who entered finance were still of the old boys club variety. Nowadays its quite common ( maybe more than common) to see an Asian in finance. Maybe after a decade, the vast influx of minorities who enter finance right now will move onto the MD level of the firm. Just look at people at Qatalyst,they have three Asian MD who went into finance around the 2000s and lots and lots of East Asian analysts and associates.

I think the bamboo ceiling is vastly exaggerated. Its not that uncommon either to see an Asian person in the MD level especially in the West Coast and there isn't a inherent bias against Asians in finance. As long as you can perform and you are sociable, you should be totally fine.

 

I think you're overthinking things. There are a number of different Asian-Americans who are prominent in business that I could point to, but no amount would probably be enough (Stephen Chao and Jerry Yang are two that come to mind immediately; if you're looking for pure finance, how about Ping Jiang or if you're looking at dealmakers, the Greenhill MD who brought in the ATT/T-Mobile deal was Asian, and yes, I realize it fell apart). The point is that it's possible for an Asian-American to attain the highest level of business in the US. If the only reason your friend didn't return to GS was because of this, then I don't think he made a very good decision; there's no way the sample sizes we're using could be anywhere close to being statistically significant, and while I realize that's not how we make decisions in real life, I still think it's a very narrow minded view. After all, there's nothing that says that unless you make MD at GS by a certain age, then you fail at life.

Another point that's been raised is why Indian Americans tend to succeed more in finance than (East) Asian Americans, and I think this is a very valid question. It seems that you can extend this trend more generally to the entirety of the business world as well. My answer to this is that while both groups are traditionally associated with highly skilled positions (doctors, engineers, computer scientists), Indian culture is more embracing of business careers and aspirations. Part of this is because East Asian cultures place a huge emphasis on the group over the individual, meaning there is pressure to conform. While conformity has its advantages in some situations, in the corporate workplace, it's not very conducive to getting noticed and therefore promoted.

Additionally, this focus on the group's well-being also encourages risk-aversion in most East Asians; careers in medicine or engineering are viewed as 'safe' in that unless something really bad happens (i.e. losing your license to practice medicine), you're going to have a marketable skill that's in demand. On the other hand, business, and to an even greater extent, finance, is seen as much more risky; it's a foregone conclusion that recessions will occur, and that during these recessions, jobs will be cut. When my Asian roommate in college told his parents that he wanted to accept his IBD offer and not go to grad school, they didn't flip out per se but they sure tried to talk him into doing something more 'tangible'.

Anyway, the bottom line is that your race/ethnicity/gender/whatever doesn't define you. It's a part of your identity, but it's only as important as you let it be.

 

I think that what determines your long term ability to succeed in IB is your soft skills. My MD last summer wasn't a financier first and foremost, yes he was good at it, but he was a hard sciences PhD. His strength was his people skills. He had a great Rolodex, was a great networker and that's why he succeeded. A lot of Asian people I have known make incredible analysts, but lack in the soft skills that make you ultimately a good SVP/Director/MD.

 

YOU'RE OVERTHINKING IT. ASIAN AMERICANS ARE OBVIOUSLY VERY AMERICANIZED, AND THE NEXT GENERATION OF ASIANS WILL HAVE MANY MORE PEOPLE IN HIGHER MANAGEMENT. IN FACT, MY EX-GIRLFRIEND'S COUSIN'S BROTHER'S FRIEND'S DAD IS A PARTNER AT A TOP BB, AND I KNOW OF SEVERAL OTHERS THAT ARE GETTING THERE.

 
goldman in da house:
Nevertheless, I can't seem to think of a single important Asian-American financier in the United States among the hundreds of important American financiers out there today.

Here's another notable Asian-American financier: Chinh Chu. Look up his story -- very fascinating.

In summary, he fled to America from Vietnam at a very young age (Vietnam War), learned good engrish, funded his own education at a NON-TARGET (for all you monkeys out there) as a door-to-door salesman/telemarketer, and became one of Blackstone's youngest senior managing directors.

Some years back he closed the Celanese deal -- the largest public-to-private deal in European history. He's now co-chair of their private equity division / serves on the exec committee.

Oh, and he owns the top penthouse in the Trump Tower. What a boss.

Sometimes lies are more dependable than the truth.
 
Best Response

The funny thing is that I just had a counseling session with one of the WSO mentors last night and I actually brought up the same question. I am a South East Asian and so is the mentor. I have been working close to five years in Finance, from BO to MO and to FO. It is all the same. Based on my personal experience here are a few things that I would like to point out:

  1. Meritocracy. Finance is based on meritocracy. You are either making money for the bank or you are not. In the end of the day, bottom line matters.

  2. Don't play the victim card. You can keep blaming why you can't be a MD because you are Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, Woman, Old, Young, Veteran, went to target school with liberal art major, went to non-target school, and the list goes on. But what does it really accomplish? Nothing. Instead of complaining, you could have focused on getting something and going somewhere.

  3. Play with the cards you are dealt with. Fine, you are a minority then look out for programs that can give you an edge like this one: http://www.seo-usa.org/Home. Join community groups within the bank or within the region that provide you a support system. Find people whom you can relate to and make them your personal and professional advocates.

  4. Manage perception. Everyone is going to have bias and stereotypes against people whom they don't know. Instead of complaining about it, go out with them. Find topics that you can relate to them. After meeting so many people, I realize that we all wants the same thing: Happiness. Everyone of these people 1) love their families, 2) want to do something that they are good at, 3) want to be loved, get a gf/bf, get married 4) have a hobby/cause that they are passionate about.

  5. You have to prove it all the time. In Finance, you can have a track record, but it doesn't mean anything. As you progress in your career you change role, company, location, you start from ground zero again. The main focus is trying to learn the business, work harder than everyone else, maintain a great professional relationship in the industry, always take a stand for your opinions, and make money for your group. That is the only way that you can move up. And everyone (White, Black, Asian, Woman...) have to do the same thing. Company promotes competent people, and not necessarily because you talk or look a certain way.

  6. Your perception determines your reality. Finally, I am a firm believer in self-determination. I believe how we think affect how we are as a person. If you think of yourself as likable, intelligent and attractive, you are going to act this way. And when you act this way, people are going to view the same. That's why I believe that we can actively manage our perception by focusing on our inner self. As William Ernest Henley said in his poem, Invictus, "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul." And that is how I view and want to live my life.

Hope this helps.

"I am the hero of the story. I don't need to be saved."
 
Human:
The funny thing is that I just had a counseling session with one of the WSO mentors last night and I actually brought up the same question. I am a South East Asian and so is the mentor. I have been working close to five years in Finance, from BO to MO and to FO. It is all the same. Based on my personal experience here are a few things that I would like to point out:
  1. Meritocracy. Finance is based on meritocracy. You are either making money for the bank or you are not. In the end of the day, bottom line matters.

  2. Don't play the victim card. You can keep blaming why you can't be a MD because you are Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, Woman, Old, Young, Veteran, went to target school with liberal art major, went to non-target school, and the list goes on. But what does it really accomplish? Nothing. Instead of complaining, you could have focused on getting something and going somewhere.

  3. Play with the cards you are dealt with. Fine, you are a minority then look out for programs that can give you an edge like this one: http://www.seo-usa.org/Home. Join community groups within the bank or within the region that provide you a support system. Find people whom you can relate to and make them your personal and professional advocates.

  4. Manage perception. Everyone is going to have bias and stereotypes against people whom they don't know. Instead of complaining about it, go out with them. Find topics that you can relate to them. After meeting so many people, I realize that we all wants the same thing: Happiness. Everyone of these people 1) love their families, 2) want to do something that they are good at, 3) want to be loved, get a gf/bf, get married 4) have a hobby/cause that they are passionate about.

  5. You have to prove it all the time. In Finance, you can have a track record, but it doesn't mean anything. As you progress in your career you change role, company, location, you start from ground zero again. The main focus is trying to learn the business, work harder than everyone else, maintain a great professional relationship in the industry, always take a stand for your opinions, and make money for your group. That is the only way that you can move up. And everyone (White, Black, Asian, Woman...) have to do the same thing. Company promotes competent people, and not necessarily because you talk or look a certain way.

  6. Your perception determines your reality. Finally, I am a firm believer in self-determination. I believe how we think affect how we are as a person. If you think of yourself as likable, intelligent and attractive, you are going to act this way. And when you act this way, people are going to view the same. That's why I believe that we can actively manage our perception by focusing on our inner self. As William Ernest Henley said in his poem, Invictus, "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul." And that is how I view and want to live my life.

Hope this helps.

Agreed

 
Human:
The funny thing is that I just had a counseling session with one of the WSO mentors last night and I actually brought up the same question. I am a South East Asian and so is the mentor. I have been working close to five years in Finance, from BO to MO and to FO. It is all the same. Based on my personal experience here are a few things that I would like to point out:
  1. Meritocracy. Finance is based on meritocracy. You are either making money for the bank or you are not. In the end of the day, bottom line matters.

  2. Don't play the victim card. You can keep blaming why you can't be a MD because you are Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, Woman, Old, Young, Veteran, went to target school with liberal art major, went to non-target school, and the list goes on. But what does it really accomplish? Nothing. Instead of complaining, you could have focused on getting something and going somewhere.

  3. Play with the cards you are dealt with. Fine, you are a minority then look out for programs that can give you an edge like this one: http://www.seo-usa.org/Home. Join community groups within the bank or within the region that provide you a support system. Find people whom you can relate to and make them your personal and professional advocates.

  4. Manage perception. Everyone is going to have bias and stereotypes against people whom they don't know. Instead of complaining about it, go out with them. Find topics that you can relate to them. After meeting so many people, I realize that we all wants the same thing: Happiness. Everyone of these people 1) love their families, 2) want to do something that they are good at, 3) want to be loved, get a gf/bf, get married 4) have a hobby/cause that they are passionate about.

  5. You have to prove it all the time. In Finance, you can have a track record, but it doesn't mean anything. As you progress in your career you change role, company, location, you start from ground zero again. The main focus is trying to learn the business, work harder than everyone else, maintain a great professional relationship in the industry, always take a stand for your opinions, and make money for your group. That is the only way that you can move up. And everyone (White, Black, Asian, Woman...) have to do the same thing. Company promotes competent people, and not necessarily because you talk or look a certain way.

  6. Your perception determines your reality. Finally, I am a firm believer in self-determination. I believe how we think affect how we are as a person. If you think of yourself as likable, intelligent and attractive, you are going to act this way. And when you act this way, people are going to view the same. That's why I believe that we can actively manage our perception by focusing on our inner self. As William Ernest Henley said in his poem, Invictus, "I am the master of my fate: I am the captain of my soul." And that is how I view and want to live my life.

Hope this helps.

Best post I've seen in a while. SB

 

Your core issue is that you're focusing on the wrong market. Come back to Asia. Don't think you'll find many successful PE firms run by us white folk.

In other words, stop bitching about what you don't have and take advantage of your opportunities.

By the way, I'm based in Tokyo where the total number of immigrants is less than 1.5% of the total population. Of that there are a handful of us in finance, especially after the earthquake last year.

 
TheMasao:
Your core issue is that you're focusing on the wrong market. Come back to Asia. Don't think you'll find many successful PE firms run by us white folk.

In other words, stop bitching about what you don't have and take advantage of your opportunities.

He's Asian-AMERICAN, what do you mean "come back to Asia"?

My formula for success is rise early, work late and strike oil - JP Getty
 
Quarterlife:
TheMasao:
Your core issue is that you're focusing on the wrong market. Come back to Asia. Don't think you'll find many successful PE firms run by us white folk.

In other words, stop bitching about what you don't have and take advantage of your opportunities.

He's Asian-AMERICAN, what do you mean "come back to Asia"?

I always get a kick out of monikers like "Asian-American" or the like. Its the equivalent of "I'm different, just like everyone else".

As well, I didn't know there was a country named Asia, and last I checked, most cultures around the region are not the same. Either you were born the the U.S., became a citizen or you are from somewhere else.

 
Quarterlife:
TheMasao:
Your core issue is that you're focusing on the wrong market. Come back to Asia. Don't think you'll find many successful PE firms run by us white folk.

In other words, stop bitching about what you don't have and take advantage of your opportunities.

He's Asian-AMERICAN, what do you mean "come back to Asia"?

For real, and some idiot gave that racist shit a SB hahah.

 
Funniest
TheMasao:
Your core issue is that you're focusing on the wrong market. Come back to Asia. Don't think you'll find many successful PE firms run by us white folk.

In other words, stop bitching about what you don't have and take advantage of your opportunities.

By the way, I'm based in Tokyo where the total number of immigrants is less than 1.5% of the total population. Of that there are a handful of us in finance, especially after the earthquake last year.

Come back to Asia? When was I ever in Asia? Are you fucking stupid?

 

in ib, as long as u close, u can be a dog and still get to the top. in s&t, if u can be in the black all the time, u can be a pussy and still make it. either u make money or u don't.

stop trying to find excuses to why u didn't make it. god i hate asians who play the victim card.

 

Listen, you're just perpetuating the stereotype of asians being pussies. Shut the fuck up and make money for the firm, and you'll make MD.

Continue being a pussy and you'll end up as some back-office PHD quant.

 

I would say the primary reason why you don't see many East-Asians in the upper echelons of finance is as follows. Up until recently most Asian's on Wall Street were still first generation Americans (meaning sons / daughters of immigrants generally still born in Asia) who were raised under specific cultural norms to be good analytical employees that followed the rules, didn't speak up, showed respect for management, and knew their place - qualities that, for lack of a better word, don't show leadership. Hence because of this perceived lack of leadership many hit the "bamboo ceiling." It is mainly a culturally driven phenomenon...I think you'll start to see this change with time as this new generation of Asian-Americans begin to move into the workforce. They will have grown up with more American values and social skills that will allow them to move up the ranks in finance. I think if we fast forward 10 years you'll come to see Asians representing a more meaningful portion of management.

 
harvardgrad08:
I would say the primary reason why you don't see many East-Asians in the upper echelons of finance is as follows. Up until recently most Asian's on Wall Street were still first generation Americans (meaning sons / daughters of immigrants generally still born in Asia) who were raised under specific cultural norms to be good analytical employees that followed the rules, didn't speak up, showed respect for management, and knew their place - qualities that, for lack of a better word, don't show leadership. Hence because of this perceived lack of leadership many hit the "bamboo ceiling." It is mainly a culturally driven phenomenon...I think you'll start to see this change with time as this new generation of Asian-Americans begin to move into the workforce. They will have grown up with more American values and social skills that will allow them to move up the ranks in finance. I think if we fast forward 10 years you'll come to see Asians representing a more meaningful portion of management.

Well put. Asian-Americans just need to work hard, face the adversity and break this stereotype. I think a good example would be Jeremy Lin. He surprised the public when he changed the suppressed image of Asian-Americans in athletics and became a household name within months. This too can be done in regards to leadership in corporate America.

New money becomes old at some point.

 

Honestly, I think that asians are too concentrated on becoming the smartest and most knowledgeable, believing that those skill-sets will bring the greatest success.

Obviously, if you bring in the huge money consistently for your firm, you'll move up. But, how many people can actually do that? Now, look at the people in management roles, I don't necessarily believe that they were all rockstars younger. They knew how to network, how to be friendly with the right people, and how to play some politics.

In the end, finance is a relationship business. Having the skills help, but at the top levels, all the people are smart and have the skills. The tiebreaker is how you get along with people.

 

It's just cultural. Many Asians are introverted and frankly don't like to associate with those outside of their ethnic group. Perfect example: at my college, the Korean club kids literally only hang out with other Koreans, they make no attempt to branch out whatsoever with anyone else at the university. They don't integrate. Many Asians just put a premium on family and on academia but this clashes with the "jock" atmosphere of some fields like trading. It's tough for these people to reach high levels because they're not as good with developing relationships with strangers. They'd rather be working alone than working in a group atmoshpere (which I would too in most cases) and as a result flourish in that type of career situation than in one that requires more social skills than knowledge at high levels (i.e. Managing Directors, etc).

 
AlsatianCousin:
I hate to say it, but bulge_bracket raises a good point that I'm sure many of you notice: a lot of Asians stick together, especially my Korean friends.

I'm 2nd generation as well, but those who make excuses (especially regarding their ethnicity) really need to re-evaluate what they're doing wrong.

I didn't want to say it (and I knew someone else would) but this is true. I had asian roommates in college for a year and they didn't even acknowledge my presence, or my guests, or anyone else on the floor for that matter. The few asians that do network tend to do just fine, and on the rare occaison I meet an asian at a networking thing, they tend to be a fucking boss.
Get busy living
 

If you look around on LinkedIn I see many Indians get through to Associate, VP etc level. I also know many Caucasian people who get through. Its true to say however I don't see many other Asians get through.

BUT

I think if you work hard enough, and are pleasant to be around, no one will 'stop' you from progressing other then yourself. You are your own challenge IMO.

 

I agree with most of the points brought up - East asian culture vs Indian culture, etc.

One of the biggest reasons I believe is that Indians speak english as a 2nd language (despite the slight accent). Older East Asian-Americans have to overcome a language barrier (broken english) first.

Hopefully the trend is changing as the younger Asian-American demographic breaks away from the older conformist culture and adopt a more "american" attitude.

Nonetheless, you should become a baller and prove others wrong.

 

Anecdotal, but Asians were placed in very high levels at both banks I've worked at. The #2 person in my dept at both banks were Asians.

Also lots of Indians esp in the younger ranks.

Assuming you can speak fluent English and wear a proper suit, I don't see anything holding anyone back.

You don't want to throw a 'straight-off-the-boat' vibe - I have seen a few younger guys wearing obviously cheap, pastel-hued shirts and tons of man-jewelry mood-rings into the office...I do believe stuff like this might make people think you are not sophisticated. Wearing traditional dress is fine, but it must be done within the context of working in an American investment bank, not a sweatshop in Mumbai.

My guess is the younger-levels of these bank employees merely reflect the relatively new trend of Indians and Asians pursuing Investment Banking careers in the US.

 

Let's face it. Asians are still minority. 99% of white folks don't make it to the top anyway. Say, Asians were 3% of the whole finance population, the Asians who actually make to the top would be 3% x 1% =0.03% That's why you don't see a lot of high-level Asian Americans in the field. But there are a lot of extraordinary Asians in the business world: Jerry Yang, Andrea Jung, Li Lu, to name a few.

That being said, I do think there have been a couple of cutural factors playing into this. I have a friend who's 4th generation Asian American. Her parents, who were also born and raised in the US, are extremely successful. And she's essentially nothing different from a white girl. However, most 2nd generations I have seen grew up with very strict parents who place more emphasis on "going to Harvard" than letting their kids explore what they really want to do in life.

 

It has nothing to do with race, or the white man looking out for his own kind. It has everything to do with the culture that many of these Asians grow up in as foreign born or 1st / 2nd generation.

This will come off as a bit mean and stereotypical (stereotypes are around for a reason though), but Asians tend to be great with the hard skills but they really lack the soft skills. This can be seen all across Asia right now, and is no different for those here in the states. China specifically is having a hard time finding 'entrepreneurial' minded folks who are WILLING and ABLE to take a leadership role.

Just because your friend at GS can ace any problem in algebraic geometry, doesnt mean he is well polished and able to handle himself with a big time client. And the skill of being able to smooze is much more important then being able to do algebraic geometry. So, your buddy not accepting his offer at GS was fucking stupid... its skills he has to work on, not GS.

 
Nobama88:
It has nothing to do with race, or the white man looking out for his own kind. It has everything to do with the culture that many of these Asians grow up in as foreign born or 1st / 2nd generation.

This will come off as a bit mean and stereotypical (stereotypes are around for a reason though), but Asians tend to be great with the hard skills but they really lack the soft skills. This can be seen all across Asia right now, and is no different for those here in the states. China specifically is having a hard time finding 'entrepreneurial' minded folks who are WILLING and ABLE to take a leadership role.

Just because your friend at GS can ace any problem in algebraic geometry, doesnt mean he is well polished and able to handle himself with a big time client. And the skill of being able to smooze is much more important then being able to do algebraic geometry. So, your buddy not accepting his offer at GS was fucking stupid... its skills he has to work on, not GS.

if that's his friend's mentality, he is better off escaping into grad school.

 

As more first generation Asian-Americans enter into finance, we should see a big change in this.

Also from my experience, Indians tend to be a lot more social and laid back than other Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) They seem to be a mix of the jock and nerd.

Top executive positions are less about analytics (what asians are good at) and more relationship based (what asians are not really good at)

 

Dunno about others but Indians have had a very businessy culture since time immemorial. Some of the largest Indian companies were also started by individuals (Reliance, Tatas, Birlas, Mahindra, Infy, Wipro and so on). Indians are also an entrepreneurial lot, evidenced by the thriving small businesses that dot the country. Plus Hindus have a goddess of wealth. And where is more wealth, on average, than in high finance? No wonder Indians tend to flock there.

 
IRSPB:
Dunno about others but Indians have had a very businessy culture since time immemorial. Some of the largest Indian companies were also started by individuals (Reliance, Tatas, Birlas, Mahindra, Infy, Wipro and so on). Indians are also an entrepreneurial lot, evidenced by the thriving small businesses that dot the country. Plus Hindus have a goddess of wealth. And where is more wealth, on average, than in high finance? No wonder Indians tend to flock there.

That is why they were colonized by an Island nation for several centuries and 90% of the population lives in poverty.

 
Gate_Crasher:
IRSPB:
Dunno about others but Indians have had a very businessy culture since time immemorial. Some of the largest Indian companies were also started by individuals (Reliance, Tatas, Birlas, Mahindra, Infy, Wipro and so on). Indians are also an entrepreneurial lot, evidenced by the thriving small businesses that dot the country. Plus Hindus have a goddess of wealth. And where is more wealth, on average, than in high finance? No wonder Indians tend to flock there.

That is why they were colonized by an Island nation for several centuries and 90% of the population lives in poverty.

Why do you think the Brits came to India in the first place? They came to trade. After centuries of looting, no wonder the population was in poverty. 40 years of bad decision making leaders inspired by Soviet style socialism after independence didn't help either. The liberalization in 1991 let out out trading instincts that had been lying constrained under a control-freak commie govt. Things are changing, and hopefully the pace of change will quicken.

And no 90% is not in poverty. More like 30% or so. And rapidly falling.

Btw, a country like India holds lessons for America in what not to do. Too many rules and regulations screwed up the country. Sadly looks like America, slowly but steadily, is heading down the same path.

 
Gate_Crasher:
IRSPB:
Dunno about others but Indians have had a very businessy culture since time immemorial. Some of the largest Indian companies were also started by individuals (Reliance, Tatas, Birlas, Mahindra, Infy, Wipro and so on). Indians are also an entrepreneurial lot, evidenced by the thriving small businesses that dot the country. Plus Hindus have a goddess of wealth. And where is more wealth, on average, than in high finance? No wonder Indians tend to flock there.

That is why they were colonized by an Island nation for several centuries and 90% of the population lives in poverty.

Way to pull numbers out of your arse.

 
Macro Arbitrage:
^ Please don't bring fairy tales into this debate.

Understanding why people from certain culture might lean towards certain professions, and succeed in greater numbers than people from other ethnic minorities in the said profession, is fascinating. Trying to understand other cultures is not a bad idea. Globalization...remember?

 
Macro Arbitrage:
^ Please don't bring fairy tales into this debate.

^^^ I agree. Hope this doesn't turn into pro-Indian propaganda on WSO. And let's focus on working on our career rather than 1) complaining about the generation gaps 2) blaming the Asian education system and 3) highlighting differences among various Asian groups. You know what they all have in common? They are all in the past and there is not much we can do about it. Let us focus on what brings all of us together, which is we are all just "Monkeys" trying to make it big in the Finance/Consulting industry.

"I am the hero of the story. I don't need to be saved."
 

White girls become either shriveled or a fat squat squash after 30. Especially italian girls. Both white girls and guys have the most medical problems and genetic issues..

 

Gordon Pan will take over as head of Baird Capital Partners Do Kim was a big shot at Merrill Anthony Choe is a partner at Brentwood

Look harder. There are some Asian Americans who've made it high up.

 
whateverittakes:
Gordon Pan will take over as head of Baird Capital Partners Do Kim was a big shot at Merrill Anthony Choe is a partner at Brentwood

Look harder. There are some Asian Americans who've made it high up.

.... and everyone else wasn't Asian who's made it high up? Not really, but the fact that you're listing individuals proves the point that it's relatively rare. You wouldn't make a list of white people who have made it high up. It's like when people say "Did you know that a black man invented peanut butter?" Yeah, but then you're saying people who weren't black invented everything in the world besides peanut butter? I know that's not the case, I'm just saying it's an inherently bad/funny argument to make.

I think we've all agreed it has nothing to do with race, it's just cultural. If you jibe with the culture of wall street, you'll have no problem. Being Asian in itself has nothing to do with it, it's the culture that's evinced by so many first and second-generation Asian Americans.

 

1.East Asians don't lack social skills, they lack Western-style social skills. If East Asians tend to hang out with each other, it means they have strong social skills.

  1. Indians almost all want to work in Western countries. No wonder since there is so much poverty in India and no real opportunities.

  2. Many East Asians return to their home-countries after studies. Ivy league schools are very highly regarded in Asia, Bulge Bracket banks and Fortune 500 companies are not.

I'd say it is a mix of cultural differences and stereotypes. Westerners tend to feel threatened by East Asians (Understandably). East Asians don't really care about Westerners because they can return home at any time and be successful.

 
helpmepleasethx:
Is someone with white South African parents born in America an African-American? They're white, but they're parents are both from Africa. I report, you decide

There was a White African who applied for an African American scholarship at his high school. He should have won the scholarship, yet his application was denied.

 

to be honest, you shouldn't see working in Asia as "going home" or a sign of weakness, if you are a true paper chaser, just follow the money - everyone knows where the future lies, don't be too stuck with the "cultural upbringing" type of issue, or I am too white washed to go back to Asia. Tons of non-native people are working in Asia now simply because of better lifestyle, cash and opportunity.

If you are not a true paper chaser, oh wait, I thought I'm on wso

 
leonardneversleeps:
to be honest, you shouldn't see working in Asia as "going home" or a sign of weakness, if you are a true paper chaser, just follow the money - everyone knows where the future lies, don't be too stuck with the "cultural upbringing" type of issue, or I am too white washed to go back to Asia. Tons of non-native people are working in Asia now simply because of better lifestyle, cash and opportunity.

If you are not a true paper chaser, oh wait, I thought I'm on wso

Agreed. That is the true hustler's mentality. Thumbs up.

 

Just skimmed the thread but agree with what someone mentioned earlier that if you only hangout with your own race (Asian in this case) you will probably have a greater chance of being stereotyped with X,Y Z etc. Although, it is understandable, to hang out with those you're comfortable with, which is often your own race.

With that said, I think the personal limits you place on your self are far more powerful (limiting) in this case. Reminds how you will see a ton of Asian chicks with non-Asian dudes (usually white) but not so much the other way around. Why's that? It would be idealistic (I can't think of a better word at the moment) to say race doesn't matter, it does but it certainly (to a degree) can be overcome or you be a bitch and go get a PhD.

 
TOB2020:
Just skimmed the thread but agree with what someone mentioned earlier that if you only hangout with your own race (Asian in this case) you will probably have a greater chance of being stereotyped with X,Y Z etc.

True.

Also, Indians who are part of an Indian dance group = Most annoying yet true stereotype ever.

 
goldman in da house:
I'm Asian-American. I see tons of Asians going into finance at the analyst level, and many who are Asian at the lower levels of PE firms (associate, analyst), but it seems to me that it's rarer to see Asians at the higher levels of PE or IBD. In my opinion, I think this is because it's simply harder for Asians in general to develop relationships with all you white folk who run the companies of this country (than for other Caucasians), and thus Asians tend to bring in less revenue.

Why this is so is possibly because people in general tend to get along better with similar people - others with similar backgrounds, cultures, and appearances. Another plausible reason is because of immigration patterns that led to second generation Asian-Americans being much larger now than maybe 10 years ago. Nevertheless, I can't seem to think of a single important Asian-American financier in the United States among the hundreds of important American financiers out there today. One of my friends who worked at Goldman Sachs this past summer but decided not to accept his return offer told me one of the main reasons is because he thinks his chances of making it to the top are really slim since he is Asian. He decided to pursue a PhD instead.

What do you guys think about Asian-Americans in finance? Do you think I'm overthinking things? Is there potential for someone like me to be the Jeremy Lin of finance?

AgainstAllOdds
 

Vikram Pundit (Citi), Anshu Jain (Duetsche Bank), Ajit Jain (Berkshire)

Two CEOs, and 3rd one is in the making, I can't believe race goes against Asians (atleast Indians) in finance.

In trading Asian representation is very less, but in IB it's not correct to say that you have the wind against you if you are Asian, there are many many very well off Asians in IB and PE.

 
D0PA:
Vikram Pundit (Citi), Anshu Jain (Duetsche Bank), Ajit Jain (Berkshire)

Two CEOs, and 3rd one is in the making, I can't believe race goes against Asians (atleast Indians) in finance.

Add Ajay Banga (CEO of MasterCard to the list). Also Deven Sharma (CEO of S&P before getting the boot for downgrading US' credit rating). Not sure if D&B is a proper 'finance' company, if it is, the CEO Sara Mathew is also Indian.

Here's an interesting article the success of Indians:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2084441-1,00.html

 

I was thinking about this subject last night and I realized two things that I have learned since being out of college and working with Asian co workers and clients.

First, the Asian co workers we have in our office seem to only talk with themselves. They dont try to really get to know anyone else in the office or break out of their own click. Second, Asian clients almost ALWAYS ask to work with another Asian - Chinese only want to work with another Chinese, Korean with Koreans, etc.

I have specifically had my Asian clients tell me they want to only communicate / work with another Asian. And I know this is common throughout the industry and working with Asian clients.

Now, I understand that this is a cultural issue. But it is an issue that I have personally seen within the Asian communities. Just some food for thought.

 

I can speak first hand about the generational thing.

From my hazy memory of my time as an analyst in the 1990s, I remember out of an analyst class of around 80, there were around 10 Asian or Asian-Americans. The rest were white (American, European, etc.). And that was the late 90s when it was already changing - and I remember some of the Indian/Asian VPs back then who said that when they were analysts in the late 80s/early 90s, they were often the only non-white analyst in their entire year. And at the junior levels at the top tier PE shops and LBO funds -- almost exclusively white. In the last 5-10 years or so, that has been changing, and changing quite rapidly.

It will change as the influx of Asians at the junior levels in the 2000's eventually become MDs and partners in then next 10-15 years, and in fact there's already a LOT more than there used to be (even if it still seems like there's still relatively few).

I don't think it's a cultural issue at all - it's simply a generational one.

The Asian/Asian-Americans born in the 1970s who grew up or emigrated to the US at a young age were far fewer in number compared to the huge influx starting in the mid-1980s and beyond. If you think the numbers of Asians are relatively small even in a big city like Chicago, you can imagine what it was like in the 1980s when even in the large cities, you might as well be an alien from outer space because you may be the only Asian other kids have ever met.

As such, you'll see in the next 5-15 years more Asians in all facets of American life/culture/industry: in finance, media/entertainment, sports, and so forth.

It's more about numbers than culture. Especially when you're talking about Asian-Americans, and as those who were born in the 1970s have 2nd or 3rd generation Asian-American kids, you will see more numbers of Asians in all kinds of professions without any huge cultural barriers. Not saying there's no cultural/racial issues that come up (and there are, but that's another discussion entirely), but when it comes to workplace issues, it's really about numbers and generational differences.

Alex Chu www.mbaapply.com
 
swordfish24:
Im pretty sure it's a numbers/time thing given that indians on average have been in this country much longer than east asians. you are jumping to conclusions way too quickly man.

Umm what? Did the gold rush not happen?

 

I am Chinese American and the bank I worked for had quite a few Asian Americans, including at senior levels--mostly east Asians (Chinese or Korean), with a few Indians. I have experienced the sort of racism that the OP refers to in many situations, but never in banking. Maybe I was just lucky, but it was a refreshing experience.

The worst thing you can do is worry about it too much. Being so self-conscious will only reinforce the negative stereotypes. Relax, do good work, and be nice to people.

 
melvvvar:
it impresses me that asians aren't as trigger-happy to scream "racism" as much as other minorities. this is true on this board as much as it is in daily life.

i agree with this 1000%...this probably wont be PC, but maybe they just dont care as much as other races? IE they're perfectly content being with each other. You very rarely hear an asian person say thats racist, race crime, what have you as much as other races.

I eat success for breakfast...with skim milk
 

Seriously guys. Just because India is "on the subcontinent of Euroasia does not mean Indians are Asians.

Why do Indians get lumped in with Asians when their entire history, language and religion stems from the Aryan tribes who invaded that region in 2500 BC?

Indians are caucasian not asian, I really wish this perception would be changed.

Skin color has nothing to do with race.

You could make an argument that the north Indians who are descendants of the Aryan tribes from the "caucasus" mountains eventually intermingled with some of the original inhabitants of southern India the Dravidians but thats just about it.

I am sorry but you cannot account for some Indians having light hair or green eyes if they were asians (the ones not mixed with British).

This is the same reason Persians are not called Arabs. Arabs are a semitic people similar to Jews and Ethiopians who all speak Semitic Languages.

Persians are Aryans in fact the current name of "persia" today "Iran" is a derivative of Arian. The same tribes who settled in Persia also settled in,,,,,,,,,,,,,, wait for it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Afghanistan then into Pakistan through the Khyber pass and into northern India. If you really want to see what the original caucasian people looked like you go into the mountains of Afghanistan because they have had very little admixture with any other ethnic group in the last 4500 years.

Persians speak Farsi and Indo-European language. The roots of modern Hindi comes from Sanskrit another Indo-European Language and Urdu for that matter as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration

"The terms North Indian and South Indian are ethno-linguistic categories, with North Indian corresponding to Indo-Aryan-speaking, more Caucasoid peoples and South Indian corresponding to Dravidian-speaking, more Australoid peoples; however, because of admixture, these two groups often overlap.1213 The majority of North Indians tend to have more in common with West Eurasians, whereas the majority of South Indians tend to have more in common with East Asians"

Everything you think about Indian culture today comes from Aryans who settled in northern India. The language, the religion (both Hindu and Buddhism), the religious texts (Veda's etc) and even the Caste System were all created by Aryans.

Ever wonder why light skinned Indians are the Brahmins at the top of the caste system? Well because they are the direct descendants of the Aryan war tribes that conquered the region and put the darker skinned Dravidians at the bottom of the caste system as the "untouchables"

Here is a neat little map to show the migration of the Aryan people who also conquered most of western Russia, Poland, all the baltics, Germany, eastern europe, France, and even into England/Ireland etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Indo-European_isoglosses.png

Oh you ever wonder why this was the symbol for the Germans during WWII? http://history1900s.about.com/cs/swastika/a/swastikahistory.htm

"The Original Meaning

The word "swastika" comes from the Sanskrit svastika - "su" meaning "good," "asti" meaning "to be," and "ka" as a suffix.

Until the Nazis used this symbol, the swastika was used by many cultures throughout the past 3,000 years to represent life, sun, power, strength, and good luck. "

Key words there Sanskrit language. It originated with the Aryan tribes then was spread out all over the world as a symbol of good.

Now how do you figure it was used from England to the Levant to East Asia? It couldnt be that the Aryan tribes migrated all over and took their symbol with them could it? In 2500 BC.

The one who does not fall, does not stand up
 
ProdigyOfZen:
Seriously guys. Just because India is "on the subcontinent of Euroasia does not mean Indians are Asians.

Why do Indians get lumped in with Asians when their entire history, language and religion stems from the Aryan tribes who invaded that region in 2500 BC?

Indians are caucasian not asian, I really wish this perception would be changed.

Skin color has nothing to do with race.

You could make an argument that the north Indians who are descendants of the Aryan tribes from the "caucasus" mountains eventually intermingled with some of the original inhabitants of southern India the Dravidians but thats just about it.

I am sorry but you cannot account for some Indians having light hair or green eyes if they were asians (the ones not mixed with British).

This is the same reason Persians are not called Arabs. Arabs are a semitic people similar to Jews and Ethiopians who all speak Semitic Languages.

Persians are Aryans in fact the current name of "persia" today "Iran" is a derivative of Arian. The same tribes who settled in Persia also settled in,,,,,,,,,,,,,, wait for it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Afghanistan then into Pakistan through the Khyber pass and into northern India. If you really want to see what the original caucasian people looked like you go into the mountains of Afghanistan because they have had very little admixture with any other ethnic group in the last 4500 years.

Persians speak Farsi and Indo-European language. The roots of modern Hindi comes from Sanskrit another Indo-European Language and Urdu for that matter as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migration

"The terms North Indian and South Indian are ethno-linguistic categories, with North Indian corresponding to Indo-Aryan-speaking, more Caucasoid peoples and South Indian corresponding to Dravidian-speaking, more Australoid peoples; however, because of admixture, these two groups often overlap.1213 The majority of North Indians tend to have more in common with West Eurasians, whereas the majority of South Indians tend to have more in common with East Asians"

Everything you think about Indian culture today comes from Aryans who settled in northern India. The language, the religion (both Hindu and Buddhism), the religious texts (Veda's etc) and even the Caste System were all created by Aryans.

Ever wonder why light skinned Indians are the Brahmins at the top of the caste system? Well because they are the direct descendants of the Aryan war tribes that conquered the region and put the darker skinned Dravidians at the bottom of the caste system as the "untouchables"

Here is a neat little map to show the migration of the Aryan people who also conquered most of western Russia, Poland, all the baltics, Germany, eastern europe, France, and even into England/Ireland etc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Indo-European_isoglosses.png

Oh you ever wonder why this was the symbol for the Germans during WWII? http://history1900s.about.com/cs/swastika/a/swastikahistory.htm

"The Original Meaning

The word "swastika" comes from the Sanskrit svastika - "su" meaning "good," "asti" meaning "to be," and "ka" as a suffix.

Until the Nazis used this symbol, the swastika was used by many cultures throughout the past 3,000 years to represent life, sun, power, strength, and good luck. "

Key words there Sanskrit language. It originated with the Aryan tribes then was spread out all over the world as a symbol of good.

Now how do you figure it was used from England to the Levant to East Asia? It couldnt be that the Aryan tribes migrated all over and took their symbol with them could it? In 2500 BC.

What a load of bullshit. Aryan invasion is a myth spread by the Brits.

I still don't see big deal in calling Indians as Asians. In North America Asian refers to East Asians. In the UK Asians refers to South Asians and East Asians are refereed to as "Orientals". It just depends on where you live bro. Just chill.

 

IRSPB, I expected that type of response.

You can continue to live in a made up world or you can join reality. It is no more a myth than the building I am sitting in.

What you wish to do is continue to divide people and put them into boxes.

Indians share almost NO similarity to east asians or southeast asians.

Your lack of vision into reality is at the heart of the human races problem at identfying what is real and what isnt.

This is the main reason that Americans think that Choice is freedom, didnt friedman write a book called "Freedom to choose?"

That is a load of bullshit not what I wrote.

Americans actually think there is a difference between Obama and Romney or even a difference between Republicans and Democrats in office when in reality there is virtually none.

They all worship at the alter of the economic interests or rentier class who wish to continue the status quo of a paper exchange system dominated by one international reserve currency.

The IMS (International Monetary System) is set up in such a way that debt is created in perpetuity.

But IRSPB go on believing what your truths are, it shapes your reality and keeps you in intellectual slavery.

The one who does not fall, does not stand up
 
ProdigyOfZen:
Americans actually think there is a difference between Obama and Romney or even a difference between Republicans and Democrats in office when in reality there is virtually none.

I like this part. Smart people see what they actually do rather than which party they belong to or what they say "they stand for". I think people get lost in the rhetoric and can't see through the smoke and mirror.

"I am the hero of the story. I don't need to be saved."
 

Asians are overrepresented in finance and probably overrepresented in the upper levels too. The majority of management will be white as a functions of numbers; this is America and most people are white while few are Asian in comparison, The thread-maker makes a bunch of assumptions that aren't warranted.

With respects to the Indian Aryan nonsense: Wikipedia is a great source for non-controversial stuff but if you're looking for unbiased information on politically controversial topics, you're looking in the wrong place. The site is full selective evidence and lessons in political engineering.

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_new-research-debunks-aryan-invasio… New research debunks Aryan invasion theory Published: Saturday, Dec 10, 2011, 10:30 IST "“We have conclusively proved that there never existed any Aryans or Dravidians in the Indian sub continent. The Aryan-Dravidian classification was nothing but a misinformation campaign carried out by people with vested interests,” Prof Lalji Singh, vice-chancellor, Banaras Hindu University, told DNA."


And melvvvar: Asians cry racism when they suspect, as the thread-maker does. That others do not think it's racism just means the thread-maker made a strawman to attack. Other groups get more racism than Asians in general though.

 

Im from Nepal, and I don't really have a "bamboo ceiling." I came to US 7 years ago in high school, and have been pretty successful socially. I was even president of my 'American' frat in college, and was a leader in NUMEROUS other orgs on campus. I haven't made it into IB...yet; but I'm sure when I do, I will have no problem rising in rank.

 

This thread is ridiculous. It is all about how you carry yourself.

Some East Asians - esp. FOBs - are socially awkward and intense. Others are completely laid back and chill and someone you can get along with. Come on dude.

Personally though, as a super-white washed Asian, I tend to avoid other asians. UNLESS they were super ridiculously westernized.

 
anybankeratall:

This thread is ridiculous. It is all about how you carry yourself.

Some East Asians - esp. FOBs - are socially awkward and intense. Others are completely laid back and chill and someone you can get along with. Come on dude.

Personally though, as a super-white washed Asian, I tend to avoid other asians. UNLESS they were super ridiculously westernized.

So you're the asian guy in the middle who will never actually fit in with any crowd. Understood :)

speed boost blaze
 

almost all the new generation of asians in the US are going for jobs in finance, engin, med, and even law or some professional field. I'm guessing its a bunch of things.. money, prestige, opportunity, challenge, etc..

 

it's globalization. the same is happening in the UK. i totally agree that it's money prestige and opportunity. although i don't believe what barack or hilary are saying about ending NAFTA, if their protectionist attitudes are true, and one of them wins, you will see a lot less asians in america because people movement would be much more limited. but that is true for any non-americans. i mean there is already a tight cap on visas and it could get worse.

 
x:

it's globalization. the same is happening in the UK. i totally agree that it's money prestige and opportunity.
although i don't believe what barack or hilary are saying about ending NAFTA, if their protectionist attitudes are true, and one of them wins, you will see a lot less asians in america because people movement would be much more limited. but that is true for any non-americans. i mean there is already a tight cap on visas and it could get worse.

This is Hilarious... Especially after trump

 

I'm Asian-American. I'm not really sure if there's a shift from science and engineering over to finance really. The reason why I want to do finance/IB is because I don't find science all that interesting, don't want to go to med school like the hordes of Asians, and my quant skills are not cut out for engineering, but are good enough for finance among other reasons. IDK, it's just always seemed like Asians pick jobs that provide money, opportunity, etc. We do it for the same reasons everyone else has.

 
 

It's not just Asians, look around and you'll notice Africans are overrepresented in finance. I'm talking Africans who came to the US themselves or whose parents are immigrants, as opposed to African-Americans.

Anyone who has done SEO can attest to the fact that the vast majority of black people in that program are African

 
fp175:
It's not just Asians, look around and you'll notice Africans are overrepresented in finance. I'm talking Africans who came to the US themselves or whose parents are immigrants, as opposed to African-Americans.

Anyone who has done SEO can attest to the fact that the vast majority of black people in that program are African

You've got to be kidding. Blacks are OVERREPRESENTED in finance? Where do they "belong" then?

 
PleaseHireMe:
I just attended a Diversity dinner hosted by various student organizations from Rutgers University.

Diversity...is the greatest equity.

Please PM me with that offer letter :P

Awww man, I wish they had SEO for white males, we're so under-represented!

 

Law school for me. yay. I suck at science, I'm not all that great at math....and plus law school's the in thing to do.

Before you bite my head off, I'm kidding. I find the law intellectually stimulating.

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-
 

i m in china, i think it's not only in US, in 2007, all MBA gradudates in China or some executives in corporate all want to move to work in VC,PE or IB, I think money is a reason, also it seems work as a investor or banker sounds fashional.. ^^

 

As an asian-american(Indian) we have the same desires as anyone else. Most of us came from working class families. We know how our parents went through hard work and struggle. We tend to value education. Its not an accident that so many Doctors or Bankers are Indian or Pakistani or even Oriental.

 
smoke a blunt:
Its not an accident that so many Doctors or Bankers are Indian or Pakistani or even Oriental.

Blaaaaaah, hate to bust your balls 'smoke a blunt' but whenever someone uses "Oriental" to identify a person it makes me cringe. I thought "Oriental" was a label that belonged to my grandparents generation. Mind you, these are the same people that used to think racial mixing produced half-breed children.

Hahah, am I the only one that feels this way?

 

Recusandae cum aperiam et officia consequatur. In quo asperiores possimus sed voluptatem. Ea error harum odio est eius fuga.

Ut blanditiis voluptate voluptas. Autem quis et ut doloremque id voluptatem. Ipsum assumenda fugit eum odit. Omnis quis odio delectus in aliquam. Quisquam magnam quaerat rerum laborum amet libero tempora non. Non maiores sit fugiat dolor. Laudantium porro mollitia voluptatem.

Consequatur tenetur culpa incidunt officia laborum quasi fuga. Consequatur sed aliquid dolorem quibusdam enim.

Inventore reprehenderit in qui consequatur quos labore illum. Perferendis omnis quo ipsum voluptatem non in nemo. Molestiae provident ipsa vel ipsum doloremque officia qui. Eum suscipit et vel. Repellat non ab quae earum est nihil voluptas.

 

Aperiam consectetur necessitatibus voluptas. Aut possimus maxime unde repellendus velit. Excepturi in ut voluptatibus aspernatur aut voluptas necessitatibus. Consectetur iure vel sit perferendis beatae. Laboriosam et est minus qui quidem nesciunt iste.

Qui voluptates temporibus nostrum possimus corrupti quia quo non. Quasi consectetur velit totam. Magnam hic qui illum aut cumque aut deleniti. Cupiditate enim possimus voluptas exercitationem aliquid. Qui exercitationem doloremque error quisquam veniam consectetur.

In iure non velit et quibusdam. Qui libero quod voluptas sunt. Omnis adipisci quod rem eius voluptatem voluptas fugit. Commodi iure perferendis voluptatum voluptatem assumenda tenetur sunt.

Magni ea facilis mollitia. Ullam et sit aspernatur. Sint et eum non quas ullam voluptatem beatae.

 

Ut porro veritatis labore explicabo dolorem ut nostrum. Amet et et delectus illum.

Vel nemo ab sed est voluptatem quisquam. Porro voluptatem voluptatem dolor maiores occaecati dolorem. Nihil facere rerum explicabo nulla numquam et cupiditate. Ducimus saepe animi aliquam omnis.

Repellat vel est illum rerum vero. Amet molestiae mollitia magni voluptatem eius voluptatem ea. Quia hic natus laborum sed corrupti sit delectus.

Enim quasi adipisci laudantium eligendi. Quaerat autem quos est consequatur voluptas nemo tempore. Odio recusandae debitis rerum illum dolorem ratione autem.

 

Quia omnis placeat laborum. Rerum distinctio aspernatur maiores eaque et aliquid consectetur. Totam ut voluptatem aspernatur cumque quia.

Distinctio esse reiciendis voluptates eum culpa. Explicabo magni dolor nihil error distinctio. Et omnis veritatis quia sunt eum. Aut aliquam omnis modi molestiae rerum ipsum. Quia doloremque autem doloribus deleniti rem accusamus sit.

Libero dolorum dolores dolore odio enim molestiae autem. Debitis laborum eaque velit occaecati quaerat incidunt ex. Ducimus est et sapiente ut quos similique et.

Quaerat autem beatae eligendi totam quis sint repellendus. Sint similique necessitatibus sed. Ut atque quis voluptatem exercitationem rerum ut quia eos. Et quod itaque voluptatem soluta nobis sed enim. Voluptatem rerum dolor facere incidunt eum minus. Consequuntur exercitationem ipsam et nihil ut ut exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”