Biggest Killer of Your App? A Low GMAT Score..
No matter what admission officials or consultants say, this is unfortunately one of the unshakeable truths of the B-school admissions game. In an ideal world, a gmat score would just be another data point, perhaps equal to any other in your application, from recommendation letters to how you craft your essays. But last year’s survey by Kaplan Test Prep of B-school admissions officers showed that a low GMAT or GRE score is the single biggest reason why business schools ding MBA applicants.
The survey found that 58% of some 265 responding admissions officers said that a weak score on the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) or the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) is the biggest application killer (see survey results in table above). That was up ten percentage points over Kaplan’s 2010 survey which showed that 48% identified the exams’ score as the biggest killer.
A low undergraduate GPA placed second at 24%, below last year’s 33% citation, while the lack of relevant work experience followed at just 12%.
More info: http://poetsandquants.com/2012/03/27/gpas-gmats-wh...







That's what they may say, but
That's what they may say, but from personal experience, talking with former students who were on the Admission committees, and reading forums like GMAT club, it seems like plenty of 700+ GMAT, 3.5+ from top schools aren't getting into the top tier schools. Essays and the fluffy stuff are used to distinguish one Goldman I-Banker from another...they're not all getting in everywhere.
Note they surveyed 265 admissions officers...how many of them are at schools WSO users would consider?
Life, liberty and the pursuit of Starwood Points
I think it's pretty
I think it's pretty understandable. Someone that really cares about getting into a top school and is reasonably intelligent can obtain a good GMAT score with some effort over a relatively short period of time compared to how long it takes to get and obtain a good GPA (~4 years). What does it say about someone who can't muster up a good score?
yes but its saying one of the
yes but its saying one of the biggest net reasons o the whole applicant pool are based on thos factors.. it says that they surveyed 22 of the top 30...
I need a crib, a big estate, I need a boat and that need a lake, I need some salmon that need a plate, that need a chef so I feed my safe
From trading equities to slanging wine in Latin America
A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what a ship i
This is basic logic. GMAT,
This is basic logic.
GMAT, and to a lesser extent GPA (except at HBS where it's the other way around), are NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS.
Hence, they are application-killers, rather than "what gets you in".
This makes sense to me and is
This makes sense to me and is pretty consistent with the notion you hear that "Your GMAT/GPA can't get you into a school but it can get you dinged." Ad comms receive thousands of applications and they have to have a quick, relatively cheap, way to cut the pool down to a managable size. The GMAT/GPA, while not a perfect indicator, are probably the best way to judge that quickly and easily. Obviously, like any thing that is a proxy for intelligence/ability, some people on either side will be incorrectly judged (real life dolts who kill the GMAT and really smart people who don't do well) but such is life.
Definitely makes sense from a
Definitely makes sense from a macro, total application pool perspective, I just thought of "You" as the WSO crowd, which is obviously way smarter and higher achieving than the rest of the rabble applying.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of Starwood Points
haha . that could be argued
haha . that could be argued ;)
I need a crib, a big estate, I need a boat and that need a lake, I need some salmon that need a plate, that need a chef so I feed my safe
From trading equities to slanging wine in Latin America
A ship is safe in harbor, but that is not what a ship i
THANKS, this is very useful
THANKS, this is very useful info
lack of relevant work experience followed at just 12%.
However, ^ this makes me laugh
I'm not here to change the system, I just want to know how to use it to my advantage.
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
petergibbons wrote: That's
That's what they may say, but from personal experience, talking with former students who were on the Admission committees, and reading forums like GMAT club, it seems like plenty of 700+ GMAT, 3.5+ from top schools aren't getting into the top tier schools. Essays and the fluffy stuff are used to distinguish one Goldman I-Banker from another...they're not all getting in everywhere.
Note they surveyed 265 admissions officers...how many of them are at schools WSO users would consider?
Say your overall application can be split into: 1. GPA + GMAT combo 2. Work exp 3. Story (ie essays) 4. Extras 5. Recs
At the top schools the most you get a break on is one of these categories. That's it. And the reason is simply what you said: the oversupply of good applicants.
jtbbdxbnycmad wrote: This is
This is basic logic.
GMAT, and to a lesser extent GPA (except at HBS where it's the other way around), are NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS.
Hence, they are application-killers, rather than "what gets you in".
This is exactly right. Past a certain level (around the averages for the schools, obviously), you are helped if you have uber stats, and hurt if you have weak stats, but they don't get you in or keep you out in isolation unless your stats are really bad. If you're in a competitive demographic like white males in finance, you need to be solid all around with no weaknesses, because your competition won't have any weaknesses. If you're a non-traditional like the guy / girl who worked at a social media start up or built huts in Africa for 10 minutes, you're competing against the other non-traditionals from a range of pre-carved out spots for people like you. The number of spots isn't going to be rigid per se, but they'll take a 600 GMAT 3.0 GPA at HBS if that's the best applicant they get for social media (they have a specific sub-program for that apparently). It's ALL about what bucket you are in and how you stack up against the other people in that bucket relative to the rough allocation of spots at the school.
Ravenous is spot on. How
Ravenous is spot on. How competitive you are within your specific bucket is what matters.
My WSO Blog
cinnamontoastcrunch
Ravenous is spot on. How competitive you are within your specific bucket is what matters.
Is it possible to straddle buckets? Or shoot for the "other" category? While my finance work history is good and improving, I have a bunch of random but interesting experiences that I can weave into a story. I'm wondering if the schools may just be of the mind "well shit, I don't know what to do with this guy but he's interesting so let's bring him in and see what happens".
I'm asking a relatively focused demographic here, I get that, but I'm just curious what the parameters here are...
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
re: bucketing of
re: bucketing of applications
does this more or less mean those in MO positions basically can't compete with FO within finance?
well damn...
I think it's possible but you
I think it's possible but you have to have a pretty convincing pitch. If you volunteered at a soup kitchen for a month and suddenly got religion about helping people, that's not going to fool anyone. If you've been pursuing something with a respectable amount of diligence and have tangible accomplishments over a 3-5 year period (or whatever looks substantial), then you might have a shot if your pitch is convincing -- "Yeah, I built huts in Africa for a year and realized that you can't really get anything done without financing, so I got interested in a career in finance and I've done both over the last 5 years, so now you should take me as a non-traditional candidate because I want to use my MBA to built even more huts in Africa after I graduate." So now you're "hut guy who has a finance background" instead of "finance guy." Or whatever, you get the point.
Ravenous wrote: I think it's
I think it's possible but you have to have a pretty convincing pitch. If you volunteered at a soup kitchen for a month and suddenly got religion about helping people, that's not going to fool anyone. If you've been pursuing something with a respectable amount of diligence and have tangible accomplishments over a 3-5 year period (or whatever looks substantial), then you might have a shot if your pitch is convincing -- "Yeah, I built huts in Africa for a year and realized that you can't really get anything done without financing, so I got interested in a career in finance and I've done both over the last 5 years, so now you should take me as a non-traditional candidate because I want to use my MBA to built even more huts in Africa after I graduate." So now you're "hut guy who has a finance background" instead of "finance guy." Or whatever, you get the point.
Fascinating. Thanks
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
I think you can probably
*looks up programs with hut
inspireddude wrote: re:
Sounds good, thanks Booth.
How much do they care about
Booth or Bust, love the
See my WSO blogs here.
Keep in mind that it's Kaplan
markhobbus wrote: Keep in
charlie 09 wrote: How much do
Boothorbust
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
How good/bad does it look if
My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
How much does a good GMAT
YOU JUST GOT TROLLED
http://www.troll.me/images/red-foreman322/dont-you...
EngBanker wrote: They
Life, liberty and the pursuit of Starwood Points
Is this GRE Score good for B
petergibbons
nori90 wrote: Is this GRE
Ravenous wrote: I'm not
Thanks a lot for your
Also, you can read more about
nori90 wrote: Btw a lot of
I see. However, studying
nori90 wrote: I see. However,
Great! Thanks a lot! Good
EngBanker, that quant thing
N.R.G. wrote: EngBanker, that
80/80 rule for top schools.
ke18sb wrote: 80/80 rule for
My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
aempirei wrote: Is 80th+
shorttheworld wrote: last
If you were to get 80th in
UFOinsider wrote: Ravenous
aempirei wrote: ke18sb
Hi, Eric Stratton, rush chairman, damn glad to meet you.
So how bad does one look for
- Ostende Mihi Pecuniam -
PanAfricanBanker wrote: So
700 is the magic number,