Trending Content
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
April 30, 2024
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
I've been thinking about this a good bit recently since I'm about to start a career in FICC. I think one thing a lot of articles like this get wrong is that they don't differentiate between FICC products. Yeah, super liquid, easily automated products may be at risk of going electronic. But then really bespoke stuff or particularly complex products will be much more difficult to automate. Additionally, it seems the more complicated and illiquid the product, the more autonomy traders have in the way they hedge. Therefore, the guys trading complex and illiquid products can "hedge" in such a way that they take a view and can create what is essentially prop PnL. This is all me speculating on stuff I really don't know a lot about though - would love to hear more informed opinions.
TLDR: Some FICC traders are fucked, others are probably less fucked or won't be fucked for a much longer time, depends on your group just like everything else in S&T.
There are several relatively recent threads on this exact topic already...
Sorry, about today's article?
No, I mean more broadly about the tendencies and developments that the article discusses...
As someone who's invested in this field career-wise, my hope is that once rates rise, bid ask spreads won't be so tight and people will stop caring so much about a basis point. I suspect though that once people's expectations are cemented in that way they'll be highly unlikely to change. However, spreads being wider in absolute, but not necessarily relative, terms due to higher overall rates would have to allow some more profit-making opportunities.
I do think that IG corporates and treasuries are likely to become as computerized as stocks though. I think anything that requires real credit work, because of position on the capital structure or it being an esoteric name, will stay unelectronic "voice" markets because the # of buyers is so small and specific. You need brokers calling clients and knowing who buys what credit, or what part of the capital structure, etc. I can't see that going away.
Impedit voluptatem eligendi ab et porro fugiat. Labore quo aut et debitis quia cumque. Eveniet sed ut optio distinctio quaerat. Vero eum in dolorum rerum. Nihil eligendi est sint optio. Hic molestiae officiis ullam culpa qui soluta tempora.
Et nulla omnis cum velit aspernatur aliquid et. Quasi nesciunt voluptate ut nobis quis veniam eum. Ipsam in quis expedita ducimus quisquam. Nemo molestiae sed ad ea sit. Aut est minus iusto omnis ipsum error dolore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...