College Workload / Stress ?

I graduated from Carnegie Mellon. The workload was tough. I have heard that Chicago, CalTech, Cornell, and Cooper Union is tough as well.

That leads me to wonder - do the top D-1 colleges (HYPS, Duke, etc) have high workloads?

On one side of the argument, I was annoyed throughout college because I had I was spending weekend after weekend in the lab, while I knew people from "better schools" just dicking around, partying and pulling 3.8+ GPA's with seemingly no effort. Also there is the saying that "It's hard to get in, but once you're in, it's a cakewalk". In addition, many of these schools are D-1 schools, so you can't pile the workload too high or athletic performance will suffer.

On the other side of the argument, you could make the case that the workload is harder than "lesser colleges", including mine, but these guys are all-stars anyway, so they could handle it. Also, there are books, such as "Running of the Bulls" which indicate that these colleges actually do have high workloads.

 

It depends on the major and the classes you take. I go to one of the D-1 colleges you mentioned above, and the workload is very difficult in my major. If you major in math or econ, it's not a cakewalk. If you major in sociology or psychology, it's not as difficult. On the other hand, getting a B isn't that difficult, but getting an A is VERY difficult.

 
breakinginnew:
I agree it depends on the major etc, but I have also read that the top schools generally have very high average GPAs...like princeton at around 3.4 I dont know exactly what the distribution looks like, but i 3.4 is pretty high

This doesn't necessarily speak on the workload at these universities... just hints at the possibility of grade inflation.

 

it depends on the major. majors that require lab work obviously take up more time. it's not a cake walk for anyone at HYPS if they had to be an engineer.

Need stock/investing tips? Drop us a comment. http://chinameninvesting.wordpress.com
 

I did less work in college with a higher GPA than HS.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 
QueensFinest:
Well that also depends on your HS...my HS was a joke and had massive grade inflation. We graded on a scale of 100 points - if 90/100 is a 4.0 then I'd say over 50%-60% of my HS class would have graduated with a 4.0

Fair point, mine was pretty tough. Top of the class could be top of the class at any college. Also 94-A, 90-B+... no A-'s, was annoying. I guess it prepared me pretty well for college though.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Carnegie Mellon is predominately a science/engineering school. Schools in the same vein include Caltech, MIT, University of Illinois, Georgia Tech. If you were a science/engineering major at those schools, you probably had to bust your ass to get the grades you did.

On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit.

It may feel unfair to you since most target students essentially get a double boost. They get the brand name of their target which comes with massive recruiting resources AND they get an easier grading curve. It is what it is. Just work extra hard.

 
Best Response
NeverSurrender:
On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit. .

Not true that other schools haven't followed suit. I go to one of the aforementioned targets and while the policy is not school wide, almost every major including my own has a policy for grade targets in core classes. Most of my classes were curved to between a 2.9 and a 3.3 (depending on level, 100, 200, etc.)

To answer the original question, I think that getting in being the hardest part is very true. I have about a 3.5-3.6 and manage to go out almost whenever I want to. There will be stretches of hard work but you can also go M-F without opening a book some weeks. Class is generally optional as well I have found, unless it is a smaller class or one that takes attendance.

 
cheese86:
NeverSurrender:
On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit. .

Not true that other schools haven't followed suit. I go to one of the aforementioned targets and while the policy is not school wide, almost every major including my own has a policy for grade targets in core classes. Most of my classes were curved to between a 2.9 and a 3.3 (depending on level, 100, 200, etc.)

That's a pretty lenient curve.

I went to a top 5 science/engineering school and classes in my major were curved to between 2.3 and 2.6.

 

Grade inflation huh?

I personally go to a complete non-target school where all of the classes taught through the business school are affected by grade deflation. Essentially the average of the class has to be between a 2.6-3.2 (that is LOW), so even if the majority of the class gets a B+ or above, they will most likely get dropped down at least a half letter grade.

 

Grade inflation huh?

I personally go to a complete non-target school where all of the classes taught through the business school are affected by grade deflation. Essentially the average of the class has to be between a 2.6-3.2 (that is LOW), so even if the majority of the class gets a B+ or above, they will most likely get dropped down at least a half letter grade.

 

Dolore vitae ducimus aut nostrum. Nihil sed aut nihil non voluptatum quis dignissimos reprehenderit. Id nihil omnis enim maiores esse cumque labore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”