Consulting vs. TAS vs. Audit in Big 4

I've been doing research on the different departments of the Big 4 firms, but I was hoping someone could clear up the differences between these 3 career paths. I'm going to be a junior at a top 30 national university and I'm currently majoring in finance, though my school offers a masters in accountancy 5 year program so I am considering majoring in finance and getting my masters in accounting to broaden my career options. Basically, from what I've read I feel like ideally I would like to do TAS, though I understand it is very competitive. I'm wondering if I should go for 4 years finance or 5 years finance/MSAcc based on each possible career option? Obviously the audit would require the 5 year program, but what about the other two? And also, how would you rank the competitiveness of getting a summer internship in these 3 departments during the summer after junior year?

 

TAS is basically glorifed audit. I did audit for 2 years and moved to banking. A friend of mine moved to TAS, he hates it. Based on his description of the work they do it sounds boring.

Here's what I recommend you do: look at job descriptions for whatever you want to do in 2-5 years and see what skill sets they require then get those skills.

 

thanks, but also do you have any idea the difference in competition for getting an internship in each of these fields? I assume it went consulting>TAS>audit. But I'm not sure.

 

My experience with the big 4 is somewhat limited and I can only comment on full time not internships. I don't think it is very difficult to get a standard consulting gig w the big 4. When I was doing my superday for audit, they had people going for consulting and I wasn't really impressed by their backrounds. They seemed to all come from schools I had never heard of or schools ranked at in the 50 to 150 range. GPA's were nothing special either. Frankly, I wasn't impressed with the audit candidates either. Maybe I am being overly critical, but I can usually tell how qualified someone is within 5 minutes of meeting them. As far as Transaction Services, I believe it is definately harder to get than the other two and still offers possible exit Ops to Private Equity or Corporate Development. Since I took a position in Audit, my plan is to quickly pass the CPA, start the CFA,and look to transfer to TAS within 2 years. With a backround in Audit and TAS, there are few finance/accounting type jobs which you wouldn't be qualified for. If you can push hard from TAS and make it to a smaller or middle market PE Fund (as an investment professional and not an accountant)you would be well positioned for a Top MBA.

 

This is a huge open-ended question.

Generally, it goes Consulting > TAS > Audit, but it depends on what you are ranking them on. Prestige? Competitiveness? Interesting work? All three would correspond to the above ranking. However for many individuals, these service lines present different career paths and are therefore not really comparing apples and oranges.

For the sake of discussion, let's assume you are asking about the management consulting businesses, i.e. strategy vs the other areas (Tech), since you posted this in the consulting forum. There are huge differences even among the Big 4 Consulting arms, let alone the different service lines each as. Let's start at the highest level, ranking their competitiveness for new recruits and their competency/prestige/practice maturity:

Deloitte > PwC > KPMG > EY

Of the Big 4, Deloitte has the most mature consulting practice as they were the only ones to not divest several years back. Therefore, they had a head-start when the Big 4 began competing in consulting once again. Deloitte also gained significant strategy capabilities with their acquisition of Monitor. PwC made major strides in catching up with their Booz & Co. acquisition, while KPMG/EY have only been acquiring smaller shops (SECOR for KPMG, Parthenon for EY) and are farther behind

Each firms' consulting practices will be more "competitive" than their TAS/FAS and Audit service lines, but to reiterate, that's not really a fair comparison. A Big 4 consultant may exit to MBB, while a TAS may exit to BB IB.

One caveat is that many firms will not hire undergrads directly into their TAS/FAS groups. An example of scale: an audit practice may hire 30-40 new accountants, but the same firm's consulting practice may only hire 2 new strategy analysts/associates.

Makes sense?

 
pr4mence:

This is a huge open-ended question.

Generally, it goes Consulting > TAS > Audit, but it depends on what you are ranking them on. Prestige? Competitiveness? Interesting work? All three would correspond to the above ranking. However for many individuals, these service lines present different career paths and are therefore not really comparing apples and oranges.

For the sake of discussion, let's assume you are asking about the management consulting businesses, i.e. strategy vs the other areas (Tech), since you posted this in the consulting forum. There are huge differences even among the Big 4 Consulting arms, let alone the different service lines each as. Let's start at the highest level, ranking their competitiveness for new recruits and their competency/prestige/practice maturity:

Deloitte > PwC > KPMG > EY

Of the Big 4, Deloitte has the most mature consulting practice as they were the only ones to not divest several years back. Therefore, they had a head-start when the Big 4 began competing in consulting once again. Deloitte also gained significant strategy capabilities with their acquisition of Monitor. PwC made major strides in catching up with their Booz & Co. acquisition, while KPMG/EY have only been acquiring smaller shops (SECOR for KPMG, Parthenon for EY) and are farther behind

Each firms' consulting practices will be more "competitive" than their TAS/FAS and Audit service lines, but to reiterate, that's not really a fair comparison. A Big 4 consultant may exit to MBB, while a TAS may exit to BB IB.

One caveat is that many firms will not hire undergrads directly into their TAS/FAS groups. An example of scale: an audit practice may hire 30-40 new accountants, but the same firm's consulting practice may only hire 2 new strategy analysts/associates.

Makes sense?

This is pretty on point, though I would place EY higher than KPMG, by a fair bit in fact, as they have a decent (not on par with Deloitte or PwC, but still decent) consulting practice in the UK and the Middle East. In the US from my experience both EY and KPMG are pretty crap consulting-wise.

 
GlobeTF:

This is pretty on point, though I would place EY higher than KPMG, by a fair bit in fact, as they have a decent (not on par with Deloitte or PwC, but still decent) consulting practice in the UK and the Middle East. In the US from my experience both EY and KPMG are pretty crap consulting-wise.

Is there really that big of a gulf between the firms? Not doubting you at all, but you've mentioned this a few times and I was wondering if you could share some insider info.

From what I've seen, the Big4 is pretty incestuous, and people seem to rotate between the firms. Seems like once you're in, nobody really cares which firm you're at?

 

Just curious..what kind of consulting/advisory work does EY offer? Advisory is one of their service lines and they have risk, performance improvement, etc..I believe performance improvement is the closest thing to real consulting for them?

What type of clients/projects would they be doing in performance improvement?

 
asljkfasldkjf:

Just curious..what kind of consulting/advisory work does EY offer? Advisory is one of their service lines and they have risk, performance improvement, etc..I believe performance improvement is the closest thing to real consulting for them?

What type of clients/projects would they be doing in performance improvement?

Thats correct. Their legacy 'strategy' group falls under performance improvement. Risk/Assurance = internal audit and GRC type work.

EY is split into two groups - Financial Services Office (FSO), and everything else. FWIW, FSO gets paid a little more than the other group. Clients will depend on what practice you fall under, but expect a lot of process improvement/project management/implementation/supply chain type work. The strategy work is few and far between.

 
the_stig:
asljkfasldkjf:

Just curious..what kind of consulting/advisory work does EY offer? Advisory is one of their service lines and they have risk, performance improvement, etc..I believe performance improvement is the closest thing to real consulting for them?

What type of clients/projects would they be doing in performance improvement?

Thats correct. Their legacy 'strategy' group falls under performance improvement. Risk/Assurance = internal audit and GRC type work.

EY is split into two groups - Financial Services Office (FSO), and everything else. FWIW, FSO gets paid a little more than the other group. Clients will depend on what practice you fall under, but expect a lot of process improvement/project management/implementation/supply chain type work. The strategy work is few and far between.

I was really curious about the pay with these groups and reached out to a few friends at EY and apparently the performance improvement group gets paid more (first year) than even FSO. The other advisory fields like risk don't, but they said the guys in PI were around 70 range base (NY office). Which I was SHOCKED, I know BTAs for Deloitte are around 72, so I think maybe EY is trying to be competitive now

 
Best Response

Voluptatem non quia facere aspernatur repudiandae necessitatibus. Ea suscipit rerum deleniti qui blanditiis quia nihil ea. Maxime qui ut alias qui sint. Nesciunt ab ut sit dignissimos esse. Minima animi eligendi est aut a quia. Ad est tempora repellat sapiente exercitationem soluta aspernatur.

Nesciunt eaque omnis occaecati hic molestiae minima et. Dolor asperiores et aliquid at. Qui qui tempora ut. Enim possimus voluptas aut nihil distinctio debitis eligendi quod. Architecto doloribus voluptas saepe delectus dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (99) $225
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Senior Consultant (329) $130
  • Consultant (584) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (538) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (145) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (341) $102
  • Associate Consultant (165) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1046) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (187) $84
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (546) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
pudding's picture
pudding
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”