Deloitte S&O vs. Oliver Wyman

I am currently deciding between two entry level positions in the SF offices of Deloitte S&O and Oliver Wyman. I have no interest in the financial services industry and I am considering both entrepreneurship and B-school after I graduate. What would you recommend in terms of:

1) B-school placement
2) Exit Opportunities
3) Ability to have meaningful impact on interesting projects
4) Office culture

 
Best Response

Here's how I might compare them:

  1. Probably a wash, maybe a slight edge to OW
  2. OW
  3. OW clearly
  4. No insight here

From reading these forums you get the sense that Deloitte S&O might be moving up in the consulting rankings, but OW has always been a top-tier mid-sized firm that consistently competes against MBB. It is more selective, does significantly less implementation work (hence why OW is a clear winner for your third category, unless you're interested in implementation work I guess), and is more well-regarded.

That said, it's a great choice to have and both will set you up well for b-school or entrepreneurship, with the latter probably depending more on your network than which firm you choose. Good luck.

 
moosen:

Here's how I might compare them:

1. Probably a wash, maybe a slight edge to OW
2. OW
3. OW clearly
4. No insight here

From reading these forums you get the sense that Deloitte S&O might be moving up in the consulting rankings, but OW has always been a top-tier mid-sized firm that consistently competes against MBB. It is more selective, does significantly less implementation work (hence why OW is a clear winner for your third category, unless you're interested in implementation work I guess), and is more well-regarded.

That said, it's a great choice to have and both will set you up well for b-school or entrepreneurship, with the latter probably depending more on your network than which firm you choose. Good luck.

Hmm, that's interesting, because an alumn who works at OW told me to not come to OW unless you wanted to work on FS work, as they said the GMC practice wasn't all that great. This is probably moot, now that FS and GMC are being merged, but something to think about.

 
The Sour Patch Kid:
moosen:

Here's how I might compare them:

1. Probably a wash, maybe a slight edge to OW
2. OW
3. OW clearly
4. No insight here

From reading these forums you get the sense that Deloitte S&O might be moving up in the consulting rankings, but OW has always been a top-tier mid-sized firm that consistently competes against MBB. It is more selective, does significantly less implementation work (hence why OW is a clear winner for your third category, unless you're interested in implementation work I guess), and is more well-regarded.

That said, it's a great choice to have and both will set you up well for b-school or entrepreneurship, with the latter probably depending more on your network than which firm you choose. Good luck.

Hmm, that's interesting, because an alumn who works at OW told me to not come to OW unless you wanted to work on FS work, as they said the GMC practice wasn't all that great. This is probably moot, now that FS and GMC are being merged, but something to think about.

Both are true - they do compete with MBB sometimes, but only on FS work. They are basically a strong FS-focused shop. Also do a lot of such FS-specific stuff as risk management. I haven't heard much about their GMC practice. I think OW is more prestigious than Deloitte, probably has better pay too, and probably more interesting if you are interested in FS.
 

My impression is that GMC (i.e. non-FS consulting) is still pretty top-tier. OW, an almost exclusively FS firm, merged with Mercer Management Consulting 5 years ago, which was a top boutique/midsized consulting firm similar to places like Monitor/Booz/LEK, and that is what turned into OW's GMC group. Regardless, now that the FS and GMC practices are being merged for entry-levels it seems like the best of both worlds: access to OW's top brand, strategy-focused projects, and ability to work in a diverse set of industries. Granted, I've only ever spoken to non-FS consultants at OW, so maybe the FS guys tell a different story.

Put another way, it's not uncommon for someone interested in FS to take OW FS over MBB, and while that may not be true for GMC, in older threads here you see both Deloitte and OW people recommending GMC over Deloitte. With those groups merging together, I'd guess that 'prestige' now falls somewhere in between.

 

The problem with Deloitte S&O, and all other Big 4 consulting firms really, a lot of their projects are executions/implementations. This will entail a lot of PM work, and will not be sexy or engaging at all. I dont know what its like at OW or all other firms, but from what I hear, they do less of the project management work and more f the analysis, etc.

Also, I heard OW pays pretty well and has a nice bonus. Deloitte S&O doesn't give bonuses (beyond the signing) to their BAs. But thats just what I hear and I don't know for sure.

Hugo
 

I would take Deloitte S&O over OW in a heartbeat, especially if you don't want to do Financial Services. Deloitte does more real strategy work (though at smaller clients). It also places pretty well into business schools, though you will still need a nosebleed GMAT and support from your managers to get into a good one. Neither is great for entrepreneurship. Culture wise is more office / team dependent than firm dependent.

Source: M7-> MBB with a roommate at OW + friends at both OW and Deloitte S&O.

 

For b-school placement, both are not golden enough to get you into top 10. Especially US-based Deloitte because it is not as selective as its European counterpart. It also depends on your gender (female gets an advantage) and ethnicity (under-represented minorities get an advantage). All in all, if you only base your work on those 2, it's very hard to get in top 10.

 

Est dolorem voluptate beatae provident. Eligendi molestias autem amet et et laborum. Enim voluptas asperiores earum ratione ut.

Quis delectus totam aut ut. Voluptatem autem sit accusamus odit voluptas cupiditate ut. Voluptatem deleniti amet nemo corporis provident dolorem. Et aut ut at omnis autem perspiciatis est. Tempore accusantium dolorem tenetur nemo. Eveniet laudantium similique quidem in neque. Laboriosam consequuntur cum et molestiae eaque dolor veritatis omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (100) $226
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • Senior Consultant (331) $130
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Consultant (587) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (538) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (146) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (344) $103
  • Associate Consultant (166) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1048) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (188) $84
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (551) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”