Do Corp Dev teams use LBO valuation?

lbo models are ubiquitous in PE--the sponsor's trying to lever up and then exit in reasonable time frame. Question: is LBO valuation used in corporate development as valuation methodology? For instance if you're looking at a target and want to fund 60% of the transaction with debt. Are there justifications to use LBO approach?
My guess is not... because you're not a sponsor who's looking to exit (assume you're doing it for strategic reasons) but I don't work in corp dev so not sure. Any thoughts welcome.

 

I can't imagine why you would since, as you mentioned, there's no exit. With no exit, then there's no way to get to the liquidity event that pays down the debt.

That said, I know a guy at one of the BBb groups everyone here dreams about and he said they pretty much only do LBOs (not a sponsors group not even that involved with sponsors) so who knows.

 

What's a BBb group? My only other thought was if there's a way to use LBO approach to figure out how much debt you can take on / pay off. But that didn't seem to make a whole lot of sense either because as a strategic, it's not about how much debt the target can take on but about how much you as acquirer can take on. And that's closer to merger model when figuring out funding capacity right? You're looking at acquirer debt capacity and PF cash flows for debt paydown.

 

Yes, it's pretty common practice to do LBO analysis for acquisitions at corporations. We've done it for every acquisition we've ever made. Even without an exit, an exit multiple or cap rate can still be used as a proxy for future cash flows beyond the exit horizon, thus the analysis still has some value in determining the levered returns.

In general though, corporations mostly look at / reference unlevered returns in press releases and company presentations, but the LBO analysis is still used for internal purposes.

"Once bread becomes toast, it can never go back."
 
Best Response

Our team does the model. Ultimately, it's your internal expertise (operations, marketing & sales, etc.) that drive the expected cash flows, so it's a concentrated internal effort putting the cash flow model together. Any company with a corporate development individual or team is going to be doing the modeling internally. Most of the time you see bankers doing the actual modeling these days is for the purposes of fairness opinions, in which they'll look at street estimates, management's projections, etc. to come up with a valuation range.

"Once bread becomes toast, it can never go back."
 

Every shop is different. We usually run our acquisition/divestiture models in-house but if we were going to do an ability-to-pay model for a competing bid for a PE, we'd probably make the bankers do it. Plus, they'd have a better idea of what's realistic on the debt side of things (especially in this market).

 

We've used lbo models in the past to get an idea of what a PE buyer may be willing to bid or get a sense of what a PE seller needs in order to get a decent return. It's a very fast and light model and not something that's used regularly.

Typically, we move discussions that involve price away from the headline figure and focus on the pros of having a strategic buyer vs. the leveraged price and obligations from a PE buyer. I can't say it always works or is received well but it does have its advantages.

 

Ducimus maxime a qui aut nulla ut. Excepturi impedit itaque sit magnam voluptas sit.

At delectus debitis quisquam dolores ab adipisci vel occaecati. Ducimus iusto beatae omnis deserunt magnam sed et saepe. Et magnam enim voluptas perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”