Einhorn Crushes HLF
AM
Tags:
(Senior Orangutan, 377
Points)
on 5/1/12 at 5:12pm
How funny would it be if he was asking questions to validate a long thesis? He's getting the stock 20% cheaper.





I own HLF. Bleeding badly
I own HLF. Bleeding badly today. I am holding on to it though. Good idea?
Will the company disclose those distributor percentages tomorrow?
I would LOVE to work for
I would LOVE to work for einhorn!
Me, you, and just about every
Me, you, and just about every single other equity analyst. These guys are more powerful than Buffett.
My initial observation was
My initial observation was that the move today was irrational. I'm familiar with how successful Greenlight has been with their shorts (Allied, Lehman, Green Mountain, etc), read his book, and would not want to be on the other side of a trade. That being said his questions were relatively innocuous - the distributor mix at the low end is important to the growth of the business but is not a GAAP line item that would be skewed and indicative of accounting fraud. Most of the big ones he has nailed have been actual accounting frauds. There is a very legitimate chance that the CFO digs up the relevant figures, they have deteriorated slightly but there is nothing illicit going on, and the stock slowly recovers.
All of that being said, I doubt Einhorn himself would be on the call unless something big was in the works. I see this playing out one of two ways.
-Greenlight is short. HLF gets back to him and other investors with the distributor mix and is very transparent about things. The stock suffers a bit but many of the shorts cover. Einhorn made a nice little profit and the world goes on its way.
-Greenlight is short. HLF isn't forthright with disclosure on the distributor mix or there are more accounting issues. There are 15 days until the Ira Sohn conference. This could very well be a grace period for HLF to make things right. If not, Einhorn goes into full out assault mode and HLF gets ripped to shreds at the conference. If a few questions on a call are enough to send the stock down 20%, I can't imagine how ugly it would be off of a full short thesis.
The idea of him being long and manipulating the price for an entry point seems like a very low probability event to me. He seems like too much of a stand up guy. I doubt it would be legally awry, but after the whole mess with Punch I don't think they want another headache.
Gray Fox: My initial
My initial observation was that the move today was irrational. I'm familiar with how successful Greenlight has been with their shorts (Allied, Lehman, Green Mountain, etc), read his book, and would not want to be on the other side of a trade. That being said his questions were relatively innocuous - the distributor mix at the low end is important to the growth of the business but is not a GAAP line item that would be skewed and indicative of accounting fraud. Most of the big ones he has nailed have been actual accounting frauds. There is a very legitimate chance that the CFO digs up the relevant figures, they have deteriorated slightly but there is nothing illicit going on, and the stock slowly recovers.
All of that being said, I doubt Einhorn himself would be on the call unless something big was in the works. I see this playing out one of two ways.
-Greenlight is short. HLF gets back to him and other investors with the distributor mix and is very transparent about things. The stock suffers a bit but many of the shorts cover. Einhorn made a nice little profit and the world goes on its way.
-Greenlight is short. HLF isn't forthright with disclosure on the distributor mix or there are more accounting issues. There are 15 days until the Ira Sohn conference. This could very well be a grace period for HLF to make things right. If not, Einhorn goes into full out assault mode and HLF gets ripped to shreds at the conference. If a few questions on a call are enough to send the stock down 20%, I can't imagine how ugly it would be off of a full short thesis.
The idea of him being long and manipulating the price for an entry point seems like a very low probability event to me. He seems like too much of a stand up guy. I doubt it would be legally awry, but after the whole mess with Punch I don't think they want another headache.
Nice. Very curious to see how this ends up.
I listened to it and read the
I listened to it and read the scripts too. I do not understand why the stock dropped 20%
GF, I did not mean to imply
GF,
I did not mean to imply that Einhorn is trying to manipulate. I meant that its possible he was trying to develop a long thesis. His questions were pretty simple and that response from management did not sound like they're trying to avoid the issue.
Anyone on here submit an idea to Ira Sohn? I'm thinking about doing it.
Multi-level marketing stocks
Multi-level marketing stocks have defied gravity until now. On a purely numerical basis, they look very attractive, but it isn't difficult for someone to realize that fundamentally these businesses shouldn't be allowed to exist. 99.9% of distributors don't make money, and a majority of products are bought by those distributors, not end customers. These stocks have been putting up consistently good numbers, beating quarter after quarter, and in a market that is hungry for growth (especially in EMs) people will turn a blind eye and buy it. The irrationality has been going on for a while. It doesn't take much of a jolt to wake people up. It's not about the specific question that was asked. This is a situation where everyone knows the game will be up at some point, so when people see the first hint of smoke, they rush for the door because they don't want to be the last one out.
Gray Fox: My initial
My initial observation was that the move today was irrational. I'm familiar with how successful Greenlight has been with their shorts (Allied, Lehman, Green Mountain, etc), read his book, and would not want to be on the other side of a trade. That being said his questions were relatively innocuous - the distributor mix at the low end is important to the growth of the business but is not a GAAP line item that would be skewed and indicative of accounting fraud. Most of the big ones he has nailed have been actual accounting frauds. There is a very legitimate chance that the CFO digs up the relevant figures, they have deteriorated slightly but there is nothing illicit going on, and the stock slowly recovers.
All of that being said, I doubt Einhorn himself would be on the call unless something big was in the works. I see this playing out one of two ways.
-Greenlight is short. HLF gets back to him and other investors with the distributor mix and is very transparent about things. The stock suffers a bit but many of the shorts cover. Einhorn made a nice little profit and the world goes on its way.
-Greenlight is short. HLF isn't forthright with disclosure on the distributor mix or there are more accounting issues. There are 15 days until the Ira Sohn conference. This could very well be a grace period for HLF to make things right. If not, Einhorn goes into full out assault mode and HLF gets ripped to shreds at the conference. If a few questions on a call are enough to send the stock down 20%, I can't imagine how ugly it would be off of a full short thesis.
The idea of him being long and manipulating the price for an entry point seems like a very low probability event to me. He seems like too much of a stand up guy. I doubt it would be legally awry, but after the whole mess with Punch I don't think they want another headache.
Great analysis. The 20% drop is the market discounting the very real possibility that Einhorn is going to present a damaging thesis against HLF at the upcoming conference.
I find it amusing that HLF just so happens to report its quarterly earnings so shortly before the Ira Sohn conference. I think Einhorn is onto HLF and is going for an expose. The timing of the earning call allows him to give everybody a heads up on what he is up to.
I can tell you how I made each of my millions - but not where I got the very first
EDIT: Just saw the link.
EDIT: Just saw the link.
Edit: Can someone please explain to me what does it all mean in a simple manner. I think I am missing on what the significance of the questions and answers are.
Thank you
Gate_Crasher: EDIT: Just saw
EDIT: Just saw the link.
Edit: Can someone please explain to me what does it all mean in a simple manner. I think I am missing on what the significance of the questions and answers are.
Thank you
His question has to do with two things primarily:
1) Distributor mix. It's important to know how a company gets its products to end-users, because this can have implications for sales timing, revenue recognition, working capital, and margin. Any time you have a non-typical relationship with your suppliers or distributors, there's potential for earnings manipulation because you can do things like use your leverage to force product into a distribution channel, creating additional sales for you in the short-term but "stuffing the channel" with excess supply in the longer-term.
To use a hypothetical example here, if HLF has 10,000 ladies who host herbalife parties and are selling it to their friends and family, HLF can "stuff the channel" by forcing or incentivizing them to buy, say, a 18-month supply upfront instead of a 12-month supply. This creates additional sales for HLF now (which they likely recognize immediately because they've moved the product and gotten paid for it) but means that those sales won't reoccur for over a year. (I don't know enough about HLF's business model to know if this is what's happening, just an example.)
For another example of why this sort of thing is important, read up on Greenlight's thesis on GMCR. A big part is growth potential (or lack thereof) but also important is the atypical relationship with their key vendor.
2) Quality of reporting. HLF used to disclose the distributor break-down; now they don't. The cynical interpretation is that the distributor mix has changed for the worse and the company is trying to disguise/hide this.
There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
Dealbreaker has a solid
Dealbreaker has a solid run-down as well:
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/05/david-einhorn-is-do...
There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
blueslord2910: I listened to
I listened to it and read the scripts too. I do not understand why the stock dropped 20%
Because Einhorn was the on the call and not one of his analysts. It was meant to make a point - the questions were somewhat inconsequential/innocuous but the tone was obvious.
"Social cohesion and puritanical morality place roughly on my list of concerns between whether I'll pick up jock itch at the gym this week (not likely, since I don't go the gym) and whether it'll rain in Christchurch, New Zealand next Tuesday."
-Eddie
Kenny_Powers_CFA: Gate_Cras
EDIT: Just saw the link.
Edit: Can someone please explain to me what does it all mean in a simple manner. I think I am missing on what the significance of the questions and answers are.
Thank you
His question has to do with two things primarily:
1) Distributor mix. It's important to know how a company gets its products to end-users, because this can have implications for sales timing, revenue recognition, working capital, and margin. Any time you have a non-typical relationship with your suppliers or distributors, there's potential for earnings manipulation because you can do things like use your leverage to force product into a distribution channel, creating additional sales for you in the short-term but "stuffing the channel" with excess supply in the longer-term.
To use a hypothetical example here, if HLF has 10,000 ladies who host herbalife parties and are selling it to their friends and family, HLF can "stuff the channel" by forcing or incentivizing them to buy, say, a 18-month supply upfront instead of a 12-month supply. This creates additional sales for HLF now (which they likely recognize immediately because they've moved the product and gotten paid for it) but means that those sales won't reoccur for over a year. (I don't know enough about HLF's business model to know if this is what's happening, just an example.)
For another example of why this sort of thing is important, read up on Greenlight's thesis on GMCR. A big part is growth potential (or lack thereof) but also important is the atypical relationship with their key vendor.
2) Quality of reporting. HLF used to disclose the distributor break-down; now they don't. The cynical interpretation is that the distributor mix has changed for the worse and the company is trying to disguise/hide this.
Thank you for taking the time to explain that to me. I do appreciate your effort.
anybody buying may the 19th
anybody buying may the 19th puts on HLF ?
Yeah and when Einhorn saw
Gray Fox: My initial
I can tell you how I made each of my millions - but not where I got the very first
BAGL up for strategic review
Very bearish price action in
Incredible. How can you not
Thanks for post. It’s really
critical illness cover
critical illness quotes
By the way, do you guys have
Think of it this way - if
I hate victims who respect their executioners
Follow BH & Co. on Twitter: @DumbLuckCapital
twitter.com/DumbLuckCapital
16rl: By the way, do you guys
when you put it this way, my
16rl: when you put it this
HLF saw a big move up
The story is not over. At the
do u have access to the
Blackhat, i also sent you a
Gray Fox: The story is not
Check out my Blog