Exit Opps from Accenture, Deloitte, and The Monitor Group
I can't seem to find any old threads that address the exit opps that come after working at Accenture and Deloitte. The only information that I've gotten from reading about these two firms is: Deloitte isn't good, and Accenture is the "kiss of death". I know these two firms don't compare to MBB but you can't put your eggs in one basket (or even 3). I also would like to know about the exit opps for The Monitor Group; I think they may be better than Accenture and Deloitte.
careers after consulting: Accenture career path
Our users shared that exit opps from firms like Deloitte and Accenture will likely be similar to exits from Bain and McKinsey with the exception of private equity exit opportunities.
They have the same exit opps as any other consulting firm. If you're in tech consulting at Deloitte you likely won't get any corporate strategy exit opps, but if you're doing actual MC at any of these places, you'll have the same options as someone from MBB. Granted, you probably won't be as high in demand as if you were at MBB. In the end, people don't care about the name of your firm, they care about the quality of your experience. Generally, you will get better quality experience at MBB, but if you have good quality experience someplace else, it's not like the hiring company will reject you just because you don't have McK on your resume.
I think the only difference in exit opps between MBB and Accenture/Deloitte is in PE. MBB place well in PE, whereas it is tougher for Accenture/Deloitte. Granted, this could be an issue of self-selection, as my friends at Accenture/Deloitte are not interested and/or did not try to move to PE.From a corporate perspective, exit ops are pretty similar. Nice mix of corporate strategy, corp dev, and even a few people going into real operating roles. Also, a surprising number go into non-profit (TFA, Peace Corps, other non-profit).
One other difference I've observed is re: grad school. I think (I do not have a large sample size for this assertion) that most Accenture/Deloitte alums who choose to attend grad school (either right after consulting, or after their job they did after consulting) get an MBA.
At MBB, a material % of the analyst class will pursue a graduate degree other than an MBA. MBA is definitely the most common, but many kids do JDs, MDs, MA/MS, PhD, etc. For example, in my MBB class, two went to law school, two went to med school, two went to culinary school (seriously), and several others went to get an MBA. Several are doing a joint degree (most common is MBA + MPA-ID at HBS/Kennedy and the Lauder program at Penn).
Anyway, the take-away is that exit opps from Accenture/Deloitte are great compared to most first jobs out of undergrad, especially if you're interested in corporate.
Venture Capital Exits from Deloitte and Accenture Consulting
Coming out of any management consulting program, it will be difficult to break into PE as you don't have modeling experience, likely don't have vast connections in the industry, and don't have detailed industry experience in HC or tech.
It is very difficult to break into VC from any firm straight out of undergrad. Unlike PE firms, VC shops do not (typically) have a large number of associates (the name of the position ex-consultants and bankers take). VC shops may have 1-2 associates, but they are mostly partners.To be valuable to a VC shop, you must either:
- Have incredible subject matter expertise (e.g., PhD in a life-sciences or computer science field)
- Have an incredible network (e.g., know all the entrepreneurs and VCs in Silicon Valley)
- Be a proven entrepreneur
None of those three things are likely true for any person who has only done two years of consulting after undergrad.
If you really want to do VC, than start a successful business (or two).
An associate's role at PE firm is to:
- Evaluate markets to identify potential investment opportunities ("market scans") (this is done by attending conferences, meeting with bankers, and simply doing research online)
- Help execute the deal process, including modeling, doing diligence, and managing consultants, lawyers, etc.
- Help oversee the portfolio companies (run analysis on performance, assist the management team)
None of those skills are valuable for VCs. Hence, very small need for associates at most VC shops.
If you are interested in pursuing a career in VC, check out a video from the Columbia Business School about how to break into VC.
Read More About Venture Capital on WSO
- Venture Capital Q&A
- Private Equity Vs Venture Capital - Differences And Similarities
- Venture Capital Associate Fielding Questions
Need Help Preparing for Consulting Case Interviews?
Land at an elite consulting firm with the most comprehensive case interview prep in the world. The WSO Consulting Interview Prep Course has everything you’ll ever need to land the most coveted jobs.
They have the same exit opps as any other consulting firm. If you're in tech consulting at Deloitte you likely won't get any corporate strategy exit opps, but if you're doing actual MC at any of these places, you'll have the same options as someone from MBB. Granted, you probably won't be as high in demand as if you were at MBB. In the end, people don't care about the name of your firm, they care about the quality of your experience. Generally, you will get better quality experience at MBB, but if you have good quality experience some place else, it's not like the hiring company will reject you just because you don't have McK on your resume.
Are tech consulting and MC under the same umbrella at Deloitte? If so, is the career progression similar?
No they're not. MC at Deloitte is under S&O. Tech is separate. They even have different analyst programs (BA vs BTA).
I think the only difference in exit opps between MBB and Accenture/Deloitte is in PE. MBB place well in PE, whereas it is tougher for Accenture/Deloitte. Granted, this could be an issue of self-selection, as my friends at Accenture/Deloitte are not interested and/or did not try to move to PE.
From a corporate perspective, exit ops are pretty similar. Nice mix of corporate strategy, corp dev, and even a few people going into real operating roles. Also, a surprising number go into non-profit (TFA, Peace Corps, other non-profit).
One other difference I've observed is re: grad school. I think (I do not have a large sample size for this assertion) that most Accenture/Deloitte alums who choose to attend grad school (either right after consulting, or after their job they did after consulting) get an MBA. At MBB, a material % of the analyst class will pursue a graduate degree other than an MBA. MBA is definitely the most common, but many kids do JDs, MDs, MA/MS, PhD, etc. For example, in my MBB class, two went to law school, two went to med school, two went to culinary school (seriously), and several others went to get an MBA. Several are doing a joint degree (most common is MBA + MPA-ID at HBS/Kennedy and the Lauder program at Penn).
Anyway, the take-away is that exit opps from Accenture/Deloitte are great compared to most first jobs out of undergrad, especially if you're interested in corporate.
Agree with this. In my earlier post, I was only thinking of corporate exits. I'm sure McK and Bain are in a league of their own when it comes to PE placement.
The McBainGroup places extremely well into PE, friends of mine have easily been able to get into pretty good shops based on 2 years of post-undergrad experience or getting some pretty interesting positions in the corporate world. I have heard of very few Deloitte/Accenture/Monitor alums placing well with only 2 years of experience.
Is it difficult to break into venture capital from Accenture and Deloitte?
It is very difficult to break into VC from any firm straight out of undergrad. Unlike PE firms, VC shops do not (typically) have a large number of associates (the name of the position ex-consultants and bankers take). VC shops may have 1-2 associates, but they are mostly partners.
To be valuable to a VC shop, you must either: - Have incredible subject matter expertise (e.g., PhD in a life-sciences or computer science field) - Have an incredible network (e.g., know all the entrepreneurs and VCs in Silicon Valley) - Be a proven entrepreneur
None of those three things are true for essentially any person who has only done two years of consulting after undergrad.
If you really want to do VC, then either start a successful business (or two). Haha, easier said than done.
An associate's role at PE firm is to: - Evaluate markets to identify potential investment opportunities ("market scans") (this is done by attending conferences, meeting with bankers, and simply doing research online) - Help execute the deal process, including modeling, doing diligence, and managing consultants, lawyers, etc. - Help oversee the portfolio companies (run analysis on performance, assist the management team)
None of those skills are valuable for VCs. Hence, very small need for associates at most VC shops.
It is very difficult to break into VC from any firm straight out of undergrad. Unlike PE firms, VC shops do not (typically) have a large number of associates (the name of the position ex-consultants and bankers take). VC shops may have 1-2 associates, but they are mostly partners.
To be valuable to a VC shop, you must either: - Have incredible subject matter expertise (e.g., PhD in a life-sciences or computer science field) - Have an incredible network (e.g., know all the entrepreneurs and VCs in Silicon Valley) - Be a proven entrepreneur
None of those three things are true for essentially any person who has only done two years of consulting after undergrad.
If you really want to do VC, then start a successful business (or two). Haha, easier said than done.
An associate's role at PE firm is to: - Evaluate markets to identify potential investment opportunities ("market scans") (this is done by attending conferences, meeting with bankers, and simply doing research online) - Help execute the deal process, including modeling, doing diligence, and managing consultants, lawyers, etc. - Help oversee the portfolio companies (run analysis on performance, assist the management team)
None of those skills are valuable for VCs. Hence, very small need for associates at most VC shops.
i like wikit's name for MBB... lol "the McBainGroup"
you have to say it with the deep movie trailer guy voice... hahahaha
L.E.K. vs Monitor (London) exit opps (Originally Posted: 12/08/2011)
Hi Guys,
Would appreciate some advice on this. Sadly I didn't get offers from MBB but I'm choosing between L.E.K. and Monitor - both for the London office.
My ideal plan is to work in consulting for a couple of years, do an MBA at H/S/W (is that even possible with these firms?) and then go into a strategic/management role at a tech company (my background is in EE/CS).. somewhere like Google or Apple (or some interesting startup) would be the dream. A lot of the cool tech companies I feel are in the US, so I would also be looking to potentially move to the US in the future (specifically maybe silicon valley)
Which of these two companies would set me up best for this? And if I decide that I want to go into PE or something, which would set me up better?
Aside from the exit opps are there any general comments that people have about the companies in terms of 'prestige'/career development/pay/hours/culture/work?
Thanks!
What you need to do is take that Monitor offer and be excellent. As you may know Monitor was founded by Porter. Be outstanding at Monitor, then do your MBA at Harvard. They have strong links with the school, due to obvious Porter reasons and you have a chance of getting in. Monitor + HBS Porter = Strategy god. Then move on to a management role wherever you want basically.
Monitor -> Harvard. It's a given if you perform well.
Just curious, did you do your undergrad in the US or in Europe (or elsewhere)?
What're you feeling sad about man? Many would be chuffed with offers from both LEK and Monitor. Be positive and do great at Monitor (agreed with suggestions above). Life does not, despite what this forum may say, begin and end at M/B/B.
^So true, you should be glad for breaking into somewhere like Monitor/LEK
This forum just disillusions people into obsessing over MBB with some association of "winning at life" as a vindication of sorts. It's sad, but that's how myopic type-A personalities act; everything is a dick measuring contest and as a result people don't really measure what actually matters.
I have a friend at LEK and he loves it though. He's only been on strategy projects thusfar. With that said, you got some sound advice at Monitor. Can't really go wrong here.
How would you guys actually compare LEK, OW, Monitor, ATK, Booz?
has monitor bounced back from the recession? they closed a lot of offices and I heard they pretty deeply hurt
OK fine maybe 'sadly' was not the best choice of words there - perhaps this forum has been getting to me too much...
But there seem to be a couple of votes for Monitor over LEK. Is this considering my long term plan of consulting->MBA->strategy in tech company? Or just generally? I'd be keen to hear more views, and maybe also some explanations.
runitback - yeah I am studying in the UK (Cambridge)
Congrats good sir
Monitor OW LEK AT K are all excellent, excellent consulting companies. Very good exit opps, very good pay, good projects, smart people. I keep thinking when I read these forums how obsessed people are with MBB. I bet 90% on this board are still in college, because a lot of comments are very immature. Consulting is an exceedingly difficult industry to break into, so if you have got offers from Monitor and LEK you are already in the 95th percentile of college grads. Pat yourself on the back and move on to bigger and better things.
In terms of ranking, OW FS is generally considered a top tier player. LEK's strategy work can at times be on par with MBB. Booz is in the ear of high ranking government employees, like AT Kearney's operations work is top quality. As I said - all superb firms, guys.
give me a gig at anyone of those firms and i'll be happier than a pig in mud... especially OW...
doesn't booz do mostly commercial work? not sure they even have a significant presence in government at the moment, at least compared to BAH
I'm not sure it's a slam dunk with Monitor - LEK is pretty damn good, too. I'd just go with the one you like more; for what you want to do, both places will put you in a good position.
They were both taking a hit in Europe lately. However, Monitor was hit much worse. If I was you and going to HBS (which you won't need to if you want to stay in the UK) is not your main goal, I'd take LEK
Randomperson, what did you eventually decide? I'm curious to see how you made your decision because I also have an offer with Monitor Group London.
My cousin worked at Monitor as an analyst for three years. Now, he attends Harvard MBA.
So I went for LEK in the end (even though everyone here was recommending Monitor). I spoke to a bunch of people and it really seems that LEK has a better reputation in London/Europe than Monitor (it is headquartered in London after all). LEK London also does a lot of stuff in alternative energy, biotech and PE apparently, while Monitor Europe focuses on healthcare and consumer goods - considering my long term goals, I'm more interested in the sectors that LEK works in.
However, I do realise that Monitor probably has a better global name, which would maybe have served me better for getting into a HSW MBA. Does anyone know how well LEK places into HSW? One other disadvantage with LEK is that there is little travelling at the Associate level, but people seem to say this is a good thing (no 5am Monday flights). Also the LEK office is sooo much nicer than Monitor.
Anyway, those are some of the reasons for the decision. I know that LEK has a reputation for working a lot, but on the flipside, they seem to have a much more structured 3 year long program for new intakes (Monitor London doesn't appear to have the same).
I hope I haven't made a mistake! I'd be interested to hear any further thoughts on this..
Congrats Buddy! either way you would have been sitting pretty
randomperson - nicely done. Great that you have done your hwk and research and are at peace with the decision. As you should be - both are terrific offers. You're right - LEK is not as global a name but in London it is very very good.
As for HWS placement, I think the difference between an applicant from LEK/Monitor will be miniscule. Don't worry too much about it. Yes Monitor has perhaps greater 'history' with the top b-schools, but now everyone has heard of LEK and all the good work it does.
I know this is a bit late, but you made a good choice! LEK is run very conservatively with no debt and lots of cash in the bank, unlike Monitor.
I would do LEK.
EXIT OPPS come after working at Accenture ? (Originally Posted: 01/26/2012)
Dear all,
What's the exit opportunity from Accenture as an IT consultant ? I have gotten from reading that Accenture is like "Kiss of Death", not sure if it is true as so far the jobs seem pretty good (Beside the fact that long working hours) but of course the paid is incomparable to ibankers.
So ya, any comment/idea on the exit opportunity for Accenture ? Furthermore, I m taking a master degree in finance at HKU, not sure if it is "target school"or not but is a famous local university, what value will it add to my career path and any chance get into ibank or switch field ?
Any comments are welcome, thanks in advance !!
What would you like to exit into? If it's a bigger CO firm then it's difficult unless you do an MBA.
What are your plans for when you decide to leave?
First of all, thanks for the reply
I may continue MBA at target school after 4 years of work experience. I am looking for getting into finance sector after my postgrad degree in Finance, so it will be like 2 years from now
I work at Accenture and know a couple of people who quit and moved to PwC, mcK, Deloitte. I think you can easily move to 5-10 ranked consulting firms, especially if you aligned to MC rather than IT. But otherwise, for top 5, you def need MBA.
Also doesn't hurt that Accenture recently moved up to #11 consulting firm on vault.com
No one gives a shit about vault
Thanks for the comments,
How about ibank ? any chance for ibank position after I finish my postgraduate degree in finance ?
Also, if I want to switch to MC role, how should I approach it ? (since I am in IT role atm)
if you're set on going into banking after mba, you should obviously try to attend a top 10 mba program, and network your balls off... also, you need to get lucky with economy
my older bro was an engineer and went to HBS for MBA. He wanted to get IBD job, but couldn't get it. He got some very solid offers outside banking, but if economy sucks and there is very high competition for banking jobs, it may be difficult to land a banking job even after top MBA. a lot of people at top mba programs come from banking analyst work experience, and many of them want to go back to banking. you are competing against these people to land banking jobs...
that said, consulting firms don't care as much about your pre-mba work experience as finance employers. as long as you have high GMAT and attend top b-school, that's all you need to land interviews for top management consulting firms... and you need to do well with case interviews to land offer
also, you seem to be thinking about exit ops even before starting your work... try to focus on doing well at your work and try to enjoy it. lastly, Accenture is not kiss of death. I know 2 people, who were friends with my older bro, who made it to HBS after working at Accenture for several years, so anything is possible
Sexy_Like_Enrique,
Much appreciated for your input, it really help me out a lot (Especially the doing well on your job part)
I will take your input and work hard on my MBA and work first.
i agree with sexy like enrique, focus on getting your shit done at Accenture and kill it there.
i started off in IT and through networking/hard work/a little luck, i ended up on some prety kick ass projects that i doubt even MBB likes cant get you straight out of college. i was sitting in on client board meetings, writing/selling proposals, advising C-suite execs as an analyst. Then through networking Accenture internally, i am moving to MC hopefully soon. like i said i ended up pretty lucky since I managed to make good contacts with SMs in MC who are helping me transition. only way to do it i think, going thru HR will take u ur whole career to transition.
my plan is to get into top MBA soon and then decide on banking vs consulting.
Dude - big props for doing that at Accenture, I know how rare it is and you must have really pushed hard. You are, however, kidding yourself if you think sitting on board meetings and advising the C-suite is out of the ordinary for fresh faced MBB BAs.
Pre-MBA? from what i hear it is but i know 0 pre-MBA MBB people personally.
It's not
Thanks for all the inputs !!
hopefully I can end up with some luck as you !
Just curiosity, I moved to HK after I finished my BCs degree in US 1 year ago.
How useful is master of finance from HKU, CU or UST ? Am I able to switch field with it (either one) and are they worth to take it ?
Thanks ahead for any input !!
I know someone who went from Accenture to a prestigious consulting firm in Chicago, no MBA. Seems to be a good launching pad for some folks.
Accenture SI vs. Grant Thornton Auditing vs. Shell Finance to IB, exit opportunities (Originally Posted: 05/01/2012)
Hi Guys,
I am seeking for your advice.
Which of the following FT positions do you think would offer me better exit opportunities? 1. Accenture Systems Integration 2. Grant Thornton Auditing 3. Shell Finance
I am a finance major seeking for a break into IB or other finance jobs. But Australian job markets really sucks lately (10 years' low in M&A and all sorts of job cuts in banks) and these are my only options at the moment. I know that I probably need to get an MBA after a few years if I really want to work in IB. And that's my plan.
So which one do you think would be the best choice ?
Thanks guys.
A bit of more info, the partner told me about the pay in final interview.
I know, very tempting. But how about auditing and Shell finance, any insights?
The above is the Accenture pay btw.
If you don't mind Oil & Gas IBD/ER, I'd take Shell. I'm not really sure that Accenture (with an IT focus) would be a good transition to IBD. However, Accenture places better than Audit into a business school - so it depends on how you want to transition (before or after b-school).
What are the chances for a direct transition from Oil&Gas to IBD ? How about a b-school, given that I won't have any pre-MBA IB experience ?
bump
bump bump bump Helpppppppppp brothers
It depends on what else you do while at Shell - but pursuing the CFA, and networking will greatly improve your chances. I've seen many transitions from Financial Analyst at an oil company to equity research, because you bring a deeper understanding of costs, industry and potentially technical knowledge to the table.
Deloitte Consulting Exit Opps (Originally Posted: 02/27/2013)
Hello all,
I've been with Deloitte Consulting's Tech branch for about 2 years now. Though I'm aligned to an SAP/Oracle service line, I've had the opportunity to do some process improvement work and project management along the way, on top of the normal ERP endeavors.
I graduated with a 3.9+ in Finance from a target school (top 30 undergrad business program) and turned down some corp fin and wealth management offers before joining DC.
I'm trying to get away from the implementation/ERP work and get back to my Finance roots. I was curious as to what others went into post-consulting who had a similar background? I've looked into GE Capital Analyst positions or even their FMP program... Going to B school has never really been in my plans - though I would consider my alma mater's online exec MBA program. Due to other financial obligations, I would rather pursue a new opportunity. Any suggestions or comments would be much appreciated!
I believe Deloitte Consulting has a program where they fund your MBA (GSAP?). You mentioned getting an MBA is not something you want to do, but it really is one of the best ways to switch industries (and the DC brand would probably help in getting into a top school). Consider schools like Kellogg that have a one year program too.
Other than that - try to network and get into S&O (which, I believe, has a financial consulting division). I know of people networking their way into S&O from Tech/HC/Advisory. While it is an uphill battle, it is definitely possible. Getting staffed on projects that are cross-service-line/area definitely helps here.
Not too sure if this will help - but look into certifications like the CFA as well. CFA + solid GPA in finance from a good school + work experience at DC might help you lateral (without being pushed down to an entry-level job).
FMP is an entry level program only.. if you have any type of Masters Degree, you don't qualify. They do have some other MBA-type programs, although I'm not sure what the recruiting is like for those.
Thanks for the replies so far! Part of me wants to just get out of consulting. Living out of a suitcase has been trying at times. Maybe moving out of consulting into a more advisory type position in FAS would be beneficial?
As far FMP goes, I don't have a Master's, but I have been out of school working for 2+ years. Not sure if that disqualifies me.
you could look at the other 3 big 4 firms as they are aggressively getting into the financial consulting space and they pine over Deloitte people
Thanks for the reply!
Thanks for the comments so far. Any other suggestions?
Deloitte Tech Consulting (Info Management) vs S&O for exit ops (Originally Posted: 12/07/2013)
There may already be a thread relating to this, but I can't locate it. My question is, is there a significant difference in prestige/exit ops between undergrad Strategy & Operations analysts vs Tech Analysts with Deloitte? I work specifically in information management, which involves a lot of data mining/modeling, and is not too heavy on actual tech knowledge (relative to Oracle Programming or Web design). Deloitte likes to bill the position as primarily business-driven, and most people here are either Business or Math majors, very few from comp sci
From the people that I know at Deloitte, S&O seems to be far superior to Tech as far as exit ops and prestige are concerned. Prestige was a given, but it seems that S&O people that focus on tech projects tend to have better exits than the tech people themselves.
EY M&A/Valuation vs Deloitte S&O exit opps, etc.. (Originally Posted: 01/03/2014)
Hi Everyone!!!
I am new of the forum and although I got quite a bit of information from here I never posted. I want to specify that I European and the positions offered refer to the EU market but I believe the job itself doesn't change much as well as the exit opportunities.
I would like to have some thoughts regarding the daily routine and especially exit opps from two offers I recently received, EY M&A/Valuation (they are both together where I applied, though I believe more valuation/business modelling than M&A - kind of 70-30) and Deloitte S&O.
I just want to mention that I don't mind the hours or work life balance, I just want to have a couple of years (also interesting to know from you after how many years) before exiting possibly to VC or PE houses without an MBA.
Thank you in advance and Happy new year!!
You're probably going into VC or PE from either.
I think he meant not going to VC or PE from either...at least not right away. It's hard even for MBB kids to make this jump, you'll need to build your skillset and CV a bit more than this. I would say that Deloitte S&O is generally a better launching pad.
Go with Deloitte.
Would go with Deloitte, although I think PE would be a tough next step from either. VC sounds highly unlikely.
Thanks for the comments! Hankyfootball what do you mean with further building my skill-set and cv? Any suggestions on possible exit from and the other? Any experience is much appreciated
What would be necessary to jump from S&O to PE? The reason I ask is because I have talked to S&O consultants that have engagements with PE owned companies, but never asked them if it was possible to jump to the PE firm. Does anyone know if this is possible?
bump
@"Myron Gainz" @"JonnyPi" -- I didn't see that OP is located in Europe, and, unfortunately, cannot speak intelligently to the comparative exit ops for these groups over there.
However, as it seems you are both generally interested in how a consultant might break into PE, I have a few general thoughts that might be helpful to you.
The most logical progression from management consulting to PE, in my mind, is to join an "in-house operating" team within the PE firm. The current PE landscape has moved significantly away from relying on financial leverage and multiple arbitrage for outsized returns; operational expertise and active management of portfolio companies by the PE firm have become critical drivers of IRR. If you are interested in learning more about these operating teams, take a look at this white paper done at INSEAD (may have to copy and paste link into your browser):
http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/centres/global_private_equity_ini…
For young professionals, there are two hurdles on the way to making this jump:
1) While scores of PE shops have teams like this, they are not as essential as the deal teams themselves (obvious, I know) and, as such, not every firm has one. 2) There is no need for junior level consultants on teams like this; as an analyst/associate, you're not going to have any meaningful input regarding the operation of portfolio companies. The kind of work a PE firm needs a junior to do can, and will be, given to former IBD kids, etc.
So, if you want to join a team like this, you have to stay in consulting for a significant amount of time to build the experience you'll need to be competitive. This is what I meant by bolstering skillset/CV. Not to mention that you'll likely want an MBA at some point along the way. It may seem a bit daunting, but hell, it's the path I'm gunning for, and if I can make it happen I'll be pretty damn satisfied with what I've been able to make out of my career.
Deloitte S&O Exit Ops (Originally Posted: 01/21/2016)
Have accepted an offer to Deloitte S&O out of undergrad. I am interested in going into Corp. Dev. or Internal Strategy down the road, and am wondering how limited my options will be from Deloitte rather than an MBB. From what I've heard, the most prestigious companies (Google, etc.) will be off limits, but in all honesty how will my odds be for most jobs?
My dream job would be working in Corp. Dev. for Patagonia. Would this be possible from Deloitte?
Odit eveniet ut aut rerum fugiat. Est perferendis assumenda incidunt mollitia. Earum provident et harum sapiente voluptatem. Omnis in impedit dolor velit delectus placeat saepe. Nihil vel inventore voluptatem magnam.
Quidem voluptatem dolor explicabo cum repellendus aut quibusdam. Neque est temporibus molestiae praesentium saepe quae deleniti sunt. Voluptas id quis rerum et ut. Eaque ipsam aut sapiente.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Debitis dolore consequatur consequatur et nisi assumenda. Ullam sit nam autem nihil adipisci incidunt mollitia. Asperiores et dolores et fugiat harum omnis. Dolor cupiditate rerum fugit nobis velit.
Sequi id cum amet veniam quis magnam velit. Velit similique ducimus nobis inventore. Qui dolor sunt id repellat. Cupiditate et enim fuga illo. Eum earum ad repudiandae tempore voluptatem est numquam.
Quam omnis minus ipsum sint inventore ratione expedita. Porro voluptatem culpa quibusdam quisquam quia qui laboriosam.
Nesciunt molestias earum consequatur quaerat et. Blanditiis sequi sunt earum hic aut ab. Porro facilis libero doloribus aut. Laboriosam eum quia soluta saepe magni rerum. Reprehenderit autem voluptatibus soluta hic non ut accusantium.
Minima dolore maxime officiis qui. Illo sunt id consequatur sit.
Asperiores voluptas aut ipsa ut modi nulla. Voluptatem sed voluptatem tempora et. Nisi tempore tenetur amet perspiciatis explicabo nam ad.
Ea et occaecati tempora corporis soluta et nesciunt. Eum quidem iure quo inventore.
Similique perferendis nulla nemo libero quia voluptatibus. Iure ut est suscipit culpa excepturi voluptatibus. Iusto qui quia enim quia. Adipisci expedita qui quo voluptas recusandae facilis. Harum hic dolorum suscipit odio. Qui mollitia eius inventore similique. Odio dicta expedita non deleniti quos magnam officiis fuga.
Ipsam sint sed rerum expedita. Aut quia perspiciatis corporis. Voluptatem iusto vitae voluptas voluptatem recusandae minima et sit. Incidunt ratione consectetur optio dicta rerum et voluptatem. Natus libero distinctio quos ratione nihil ut. Hic minus et ducimus accusantium.
Iure quaerat commodi libero consequatur. Alias dolorem molestias saepe nulla minima. Doloribus nulla itaque doloremque.
Consequatur consectetur expedita non doloremque. Omnis ipsam nisi labore deleniti ex omnis. Provident eveniet eaque asperiores corporis doloribus illum placeat officia. Expedita voluptate odio aliquam. Ut eum ut impedit aut asperiores deserunt minus velit.
Earum consectetur rerum unde iste. Quod non mollitia laboriosam vero velit voluptas.
Corrupti nihil dolores illum velit nesciunt quam. Repellendus dolorem veritatis quibusdam voluptatem id. Fugiat et sed reiciendis assumenda.