FCF - Term Loan A vs Term Loan B
I was recently in an interview and asked to calculate the PF free cash flow in the following scenario. The acquisition given was a company that had $40mm of EBIT, $10mm of D&A, $10mm of Capex, Change in Working Capital was assumed to be $0 and the tax rate was 40.0%. The debt to finance the transaction would be 100% bank debt given the size and would be split between Term Loan A and Term Loan B.
Assuming the transaction multiple of 5.0x EBITDA (assuming no cash or debt transaction) with a 40.0% equity check, the company would have $150mm of debt--$75mm Term Loan A and $75mm Term Loan B. Assume that Term Loan A has an 8.0% cost of debt and amortizes over 10 years while Term Loan B has a 10.0% cost of debt. Assuming 2.5% financing fees amortized over ten years, I calculated FCF below. Please let me know of any comments.
Pro Forma Free Cash Flow
EBIT - $40.0mm
(+) D&A - $10.0mm
(+) Term Loan A Amortization - $7.5mm
(+) Amortization from Financing Fees - $0.4mm
EBITDA - $57.9mm
(-) Capex - $10.0mm
(-) Change in WC - $0.0mm
(-) Interest Expense from Term Loan A - $6.0mm
(-) Interest Expense from Term Loan B - $7.5mm
(-) 40.0% Tax (Tax based on EBIT - Interest Expense from Term Loan A and B) - $10.6mm
FCF - 23.8
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this Forum topic




You got the idea but its much easier to start with net income
I caught one thing: the financing fee would be $6.25mm (2.5% x $250mm purchase price), or $0.625mm per year amortizataion. (PP calc = $50mm EBITDA * 5x multiple = $250mm)
Cash Flow From Operations (Operating Cash)
- Capital Expenditures
---------------------------
= Free Cash Flow
broken down more is
Net Income
+ D& A
+/- Change in WC
- Capital Expenditures
---------------------------
= Free Cash Flow
EBIT - $40.0mm
- Interest Expense from Term Loan A - $6.0mm
- Interest Expense from Term Loan B - $7.5mm
EBT - $26.5mm
- Taxes $10.6
Net Income $15.9
+ D&A - $10.0mm
+ Amortization from Financing Fees - $0.625mm
- Amortization of Term Loan A - $7.5mm
- Capex - $10.0mm
- Change in WC - $0.0mm
-----------------------------
FCF = $7.775mm
How can EBITDA rise
by $7.9m given that (we assume) the operations of the company, and thus revenue and operating expenses, remain the same?
I think you're confusing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amortization_(business)
with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amortization_(business)#Accounting
why are you guys adding back
why are you guys adding back the Term A Loan Amortization - it doesn't hit the IS - it should be deducted
Hmmm
Actually, you don't add the TLA amortization to EBIT to get EBITDA. Amortization in the non-cash sense is quite different form Debt amortization, which is mandatory and must be paid in cash.
EBITDA: 50 mm
-D&A: 10 mm
-Financing Fees Amort: .375 mm
EBIT: 39.625 mm
-IntExp A: 6 mm
-IntExp B: 7.5 mm
EBT: 26.125 mm
-Taxes: 10.45 mm
Net Income: 15.675 mm
FCF Calc
Net Income: 15.675 mm
+D&A: 10 mm
+FinFeeAmort: 0.375 mm
+NWC: 0 mm
-Capex: 10 mm
-TLA Amort: 7.5 mm
-TLB Amort: 0 mm
=
8.55 = FCF
That looks more like it but
why is TLA amortization not just added to TLA Interest (ie making it $13.5m)? I'm sure you're right I'm just curious about this.
because
Interest is tax-deductible, mandatory amortization is not.
Thanks curiousmonkey
Also for ibanker26 and welldawg08 how can you guys (apparently) work in IBD and Private Equity and get this stuff so wrong?
agree with above poster -
agree with above poster - this is some pretty basic stuff
because i wrote my answer in
because i wrote my answer in 10 seconds without much thought. I have real work to do then troll ws oasis forums all day commenting on peep's mistakes
small point
small point... i woulld start with EBIT to calculate FCF in an LBO as you sometimes have PIK interest which NI includes as well
PIK interest is added back
PIK interest is added back on the CF statement as a non-cash expense