Financial Sponsors vs. Other sectors

In all sector teams you will do merger modelling, mergers execution except financial sponsors M&A.

Is it bad not getting exposure to mergers / mergers modelling in financial sponsors M&A for PE / better exit opportunities?

 
Best Response

I'm not sure what you're talking about.

Banking can be categorized into either: industry or product

Industries would/could be: consumer products, oil and gas, chemicals, financial institutions, etc... Products would be: M&A, financial sponsors etc...

The industry groups (aka coverage groups) focus only on that particular industry... if there's a deal getting done in their industry, their on the deal team to offer their industry specific expertise. Similarly, if there's an M&A deal getting done, M&A bankers are staffed on the team to offer their expertise into the M&A product. Now every bank is organized differently... but generally speaking... an industry banker's expertise will be premised around projections, product offerings, etc... the M&A banker's expertise will be based on deal structure. As a result, the M&A bankers will be driving the M&A model and the coverage group will be driving projections, spreading comps, analyzing industry metrics, etc...

So where will you get the best modeling experience? Depends what bank you're at. MS M&A has a very strong reputation... similarly GS doesn't even have an M&A group. Depending on how your firm is organized, you could be getting the lion's share of modeling experience in either or.

 

There's nothing special about "merger modeling." What you want exposure to is LBO modeling. And cretain PE firms do a lot of M&A... they acquire a platform portfolio company and bolt on additional companies to the existing platform to create value.

And your thinking is a bit confused... no one is hiring you because you know "merger modeling" or can build an LBO model. If you've got solid financial modeling skills, thats what their looking for. And modeling is for the most part just a very basic requirement. Its similar to thinking that since youre an economics major and not a finance major in undergrad investment banks won't be as interested because your Gordon's Constant Growth modeling isn't up to snuff.

 

There's no such thing as Energy M&A, TMT M&A... as I mentioned above you're either in an industry group or a product group. From what I hear MS M&A is very good for PE placement. And, in addition to what I've heard, I've also seen GS TMT places EXTREMELY well.

Ideally you'd want to get to a group which is consider tops across all of Wall Street. This would be GS TMT, MS M&A, etc...

If you want to go to a megafund (BX, Apollo, KKR) you essentially should have: ivy degree with very high grades and solid work experience in a top group at a top BB firm or elite boutique where you were at the top of your analyst class. A good way to figure this out for yourself is to go to any PE firm's web site and read the team bios. This should give you a good idea as to what you'll need to get in. I'm sure there are exceptions to the above, but this is what I've seen.

 

I think your picking over small details...

If the goal is to go into PE, Financial Sponsors make sense jsut because you're going to be exposed to PE clients (not uncommon for them to hire somebody they worked with and liked) and will do a lot of LBO modelling, which is what you need in PE.

In the end, it's all about deal experience though. I would pick the team that is most successful and has the most dealflow - if the FS team sucks or is a pure coverage role, you're going to end up with no deal flow at all. Its for you to do the due diligence by looking up at some of the previous deals and ask people who work there aobut which team is the busiest.

Another thing - I know quite a few generalist PE shops that do not like people with energy deals (and things like FIG, utilities, infra) because it is too specific.

 

There's too much variety to answer that... some Sponsor is combined with LevFin, some banks dont have sponsors (it is done out of industry teams, like GS), some do only coverage and no modelling, etc.

Personally I wouldnt do Sponsors with JP, GS, MS because its done either out of LevFin or out of industry teams. UBS is combined levfin/sponsors.

 

GS Sponsors? I is a very very very small team of senior guys doing coverage. Basically pitching ideas and making sure PE guys are happy. In GS, industry teams are king. Every deal is executed from industry teams, including PE deals. FS guys originate, and then pass on execution to the relevant industry guys together with LevFin guys. That is why Sponsor is not a good place to be. I'm not saying they suck, just that the structure is like that. MS and JP are a bit like that too, industry focused - so just go for Industry teams with those guys.

My point is - you wont get wrong by going for GS/MS/JP and will get a very good shoot at PE even if you are not in FS. It is a bit more tricky in other places such as CS, Citi and UBS because all the PE deals go into FS specifically. So if you want to do PE, you have to be very clear about the exact structure of the IB department so that you can get the best exposure

 

wow - you're mixing up things and generalising too much here.

Recap: You have 1. Financial Sponsors M&A (PE deals) 2. Industry Groups M&A (TMT, Industrials, etc.) 3. Generalist M&A pool (or execution team) 4. Leverage Finance (product team - not M&A)

Financial Sponsors means different things to different bank: either they lump it in with Leverage Finance as a standalone entity or they keep it separate. Also, either it is a coverage group, or it is a coverage + execution group.

Leverage Finance is a separate issue from the above and again means lot of different things to different banks. Either it is a sepate product team that only does structuring, or it is mixed with Financial Sponsors, or it is the team that handles the whole deal execution.

 

there's a pdf floating around that quantifies 1. which banks have high hit rates at pe/hf 2. which groups have best hit rates at pe/hf 3. which group at which bank have... blah blah blah

do some digging on wso. you should be able to find it.

yes. LevFin/restructuring would be a better route to distressed hf. some boutique's do distressed m&a so that'll be good too. at bb's, you have to make yourself stand out in the m&a group to be the go to guy for distressed m&a. if you're not, then you'll get random m&a assignments.

 

Voluptatem fugiat non inventore voluptate quo. Commodi veritatis saepe corrupti cupiditate animi sunt. Fugiat nihil soluta enim eos ipsa. Velit molestiae tempore fuga est sequi. Nobis quam dolor tempora velit aut. Ut iure iste deleniti esse delectus error numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”