GMAT score - Bachelor in math, physics, and engineering
Is it true that people who have a bachelor in maths,physics,engineering can achieve better score in GMAT than ohers with an accounting/finance degree or no?
Trending Content
| +44 | UC Berkeley (Haas) vs Cornell Dyson vs Columbia vs Dartmouth | 19 | 2d | |
| +33 | MSF Rankings 2024 | 25 | 11h | |
| +27 | Should I take on 100k in loans to go to Emory? | 31 | 1d | |
| +23 | Got admission to ESCP MiM - now what? | 14 | 2d | |
| +21 | Clash of the MSFs, Georgetown vs Nova | 9 | 1d | |
| +21 | UK business schools (below top 5) | 9 | 13h | |
| +18 | Oxbridge or Top 15 US School. | 6 | 3h | |
| +18 | SHOULD I DO THIS MINOR? | 15 | 14h | |
| +18 | HEC Mim vs Bocconi Mfin (URGENT) | 7 | 1d | |
| +17 | Full-Ride at Nontarget or Full Price at Target? | 9 | 1d |
Career Resources
I can it is a chicken and egg questions actually.
People studying science, most of the time, have better aptitude than people studying Finance and Accounting. Now, I m sure if the 4-year education in itself may make someone better in the gmat test.
My point of view though is that the population studying math and science is just smarter than the populaiton studying finance and accounting
The chicken was definitely here first.
This is a little nit-picky, but you mean self-selection.
Definitely plausible. It could also be true that studying those subjects helps you though. I studied math in undergrad, but I don't know if I'd say I'm innately more intelligent than a lot of you guys who studied finance. With that said though, I think I'd have a slightly easier time with the GMAT. Again, not because I'm innately more intelligent, but rather that forcing yourself to learn Real Analysis and Fixed Point Theorems is like lifting weights for your brain.
So, I agree that there is definitely elements of self-selection at play (although I'm not convinced it's with respect to innate intelligence), but I also think that studying math or physics will help anyone out (assuming they actually applied themselves during their math courses). In other words, I think there is potentially some causality there.
Absolutely....after all, it is only the highest levels of calculus tested on the GMAT - but seriously...no.
I think if the people taking the GMAT did not spend any time studying then the answer to your question is yes. But if a person from an art or finance background spends a lot of time studying, he/she has potential to do better than science nerd.
I think people are overlooking the correlation of Math/Physics major and non-native English speakers. My guess is that Math/Physics students will have no problem reaching 95%+ percentiles on the Quantitative section, but will likely struggle significantly on the Verbal section.
As an example, one can score 720+ with a 99% Verbal / 80% Math, but I don't think it's possible the other way around. Many adcoms today will admit that 80% on the Quant section is very good given the concentration of foreign students taking the test these days.
Also, as someone mentioned above, any inteligent liberal arts major can ramp pretty quickly to 70%+ on Quant with just a little studying, but the Verbal isn't as easy to improve (it's more of a "you either get it or you don't").
+1 on what BananaStand is saying. I have a 720 with a 99% verbal, 58% quant. You reach the 99% faster on the verbal part so anything beyond that can really boost your overall score.
I would say the philosophy major might have a slight advantage on the verbal - critical reasoning, lots of writing, etc. Also, I disagree that math/physics students will have no problem reaching 95%+ on quant - the math involved in the GMAT is very different from real math. It is almost more similar to critical reasoning, particularly in data sufficiency.
Dr Joe is probably right. 95%+ is probably challenging for anyone, especially under the GMAT time constraints. Having said that, I just made the assumption that a Math/Physics major is going to have much better conditioning for the mental gymnastics and algebraic manipulations that the GMAT requires.
I was a social sciences major in college, so needless to say, it has been awhile since I worried about prime numbers and factoring. My personal goal is to be able to finish 80%+ on the Quant section (starting from 70% a few weeks ago on a practice test).
If you get 95th percentile you can join Mensa:
http://www.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScore…
That seems like a pretty nice backdoor into Mensa considering the 95th percentile overall is right around a 720-730.
Given where the score profile of students at the top 5-10 MBA programs, Mensa is saying slightly under 50% of the student bodies at the top 5 MBA programs would be eligible to join.
Accusamus voluptatibus voluptates laudantium exercitationem blanditiis perspiciatis. Reiciendis aut et aut unde. Saepe ut sit rem inventore quibusdam autem. Laudantium quae sit aperiam autem. Qui et ut qui pariatur eligendi. Vel numquam sapiente commodi voluptatem non. Quia voluptate quis minus dignissimos voluptas.
Qui quaerat illum unde quos ullam id mollitia. Tempore sapiente ab temporibus sed ab incidunt pariatur. Dolor qui dolores quo consequatur aliquid suscipit.
Placeat et corporis quae illo ex doloremque consequatur. Vel eius autem voluptatum corporis temporibus quia. Qui ipsa qui libero odit sit possimus. Consequatur libero fugiat eius provident.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...