GPA for economic consulting internship?
Does anyone know what the GPA cutoff for economic consulting junior internship is? I'm talking about analysis group, nera, and cornerstone, etc.
thanks!
Trending Content
| +29 | Nervous about MBB - incoming BA | 18 | 1d | |
| +11 | Premed to MBB Recruiting | 2 | 12h | |
| +10 | Chances at MBB - Reality Check | 1 | 1d | |
| +9 | Lateral to MBB from Investing Seat | 1 | 8h | |
| +6 | How much do your MDs make? | 1 | 4d | |
| +5 | Restructuring market | 4 | 1d | |
| +1 | Portfolio Operations Group--DFW area | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
I could be wrong, but I thought it has to be like 3.7 (or higher).
3.5-3.7
Everyone we used to interview typically had 3.7-4.0. I can't remember anyone under a 3.5.
I work at one of the firms mentioned above, and this is true in my experience.
ahh, i guess 3.67 would be a border line case then?
3.3-3.5+ depending on experience. It's much easier to get economic consulting interviews than management consulting ones, and they value your internships/schoolwork much more than the latter.
Good luck getting an internship at any reputable econ consulting firm with a GPA of less than 3.5. I used to work at Cornerstone/NERA/AG/CRA and we'd throw out most resumes with GPA less than 3.8. Only when we were in need would we look at individuals with GPAs 3.5-3.8.
I work at one of the firms you mentioned in your post. We don't have an official minimum, but for full-time recruiting this season I've never seen a candidate with less than a 3.5 get an interview and all of the ones who got offers had 3.7+. Internships are more competitive than full-time because we hire fewer interns, but the GPA cut-off is probably around the same. tl;dr 3.5 is around the minimum for an interview, but I've never seen someone get an offer with less than a 3.7
but if I do get a first-round interview, what will be the most important deciding factor?
if i do well in the interviews, will the company look at my grades in the last round, and then decide "meh, don't want her, she only has a 3.67"?
No. You'll be fine. If you've already made the first round the GPA becomes basically irrelevant and it comes down to how well you interview. A 3.67 should be a 3.7 on your resume by the way. That's exactly what I had!
Good luck with your interviews. Any idea which group you're interviewing with?
i had a 3.5 to 3.6 while interviewing with one of the firms you mentioned, and got a FT offer.
Mind sharing more on your background/ experience and how you made the sell?
I don't know if Im getting an interview yet haha! my application is due Jan 17 and I'm having my fingers crossed that I can get an interview!! thanks for the luck jankynoname!
I agree with jankynoname. You can call your 3.67 a 3.7 on your resume for sure. If you do well in the interviews they won't ding you for your grades.
Consequatur dolores laudantium animi ipsum eligendi nobis iusto. Ut assumenda nemo adipisci suscipit possimus non fuga. Earum quis adipisci velit. Sit labore animi tenetur dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...