Greenhill vs HL RX vs MS vs BAML vs PWP

Finished SA recruiting at a top target school and came away with these offers in NY. MS and BAML are generalist offers so I wouldn't know what group I'll be placed into. Greenhill & PWP are generalist M&A / RX offers.

I like RX so I'm thinking between HL, Greenhill, & PWP at this point. Also, I think I would like to start off at an elite boutique like Greenhill, Houlihan Lokey, or PWP rather than a BB after graduation.

Really liked everyone I met at Greenhill and HL and think I could be a good fit at either one. Was also extremely impressed with HL RX people I interviewed with; they just seemed a bit more polished than some of the interviewers at other banks for whatever reason.

Having a tough time making a decision. Thoughts?

 

Your thinking sounds about right if you want to get restructuring exposure. Greenhill leaves you the option of M&A work as well as RX (I believe) vs. HL pure restructuring so probably comes down to how much restructuring you want to do. Obviously Greenhill overall brand is much stronger than HL, but HL is well known in RX so if you're sure about RX i wouldn't sweat that a ton (assuming you may want exit ops etc). I dont know much about the restructuring practices at either shop but one thing to consider is whether each bank typically represents debtors or creditors, how the experience would differ if they are different in this regard and which experience you would prefer

 

My friends in IB are saying Greenhill is on the decline and hasn't been doing that well in the past couple of years and that I should narrow my choices to HL RX or MS. I'm pretty adamant about going to an elite boutique like Greenhill or HL so I'm wrote off MS and BAML.

Are you sure about the Greenhill brand being stronger than HL? I was under the impression that Houlihan Lokey was a very prestigious shop because it seems like some really top kids from previous years at my school have went to HL and everyone that I've talked to at school speaks highly of the bank.

What are the exits out of both Greenhill and Houlihan Lokey? Also any ideas about culture, lifestyle, bonus?

 

While you're pretty set on RX, I wouldn't count out PWP if you want to be at an elite boutique. They've perennially had a great RX team, but the rainmakers were recently fired and currently being replaced both internally and externally. If you're at all interested in M&A and RX, it probably offers the best combination with GHL but more heavy on M&A of course. They've had great deal flow recently with multiple deals over $15B in just the last few quarters (Medtronic, Willis Tower merger, Altria stake in SAB Miller), which is pretty substantial as small as they are.

 

Wow do you really have all these offers? That's pretty impressive.

If you are really interested in RX, this shouldn't even be question. Houlihan Lokey is arguably the best investment bank in that space and especially so the past couple of years. HL has a prestigious brand name and consistently sends the RX analysts to all the top distressed HF / PE funds, credit funds and top PE funds. It's M&A practice however does strictly MM deals rather than the large headline deals other EBs do but it is by far the best bank in the middle market and consistently places analysts into good MM PE shops. Definitely think this is the next top bank to watch out for, they've been on the rise and have been bringing on a lot of talent recently.

Greenhill is a good option because it runs super lean at the analyst level compared to the other EBs so you would get a fantastic experience here. However, you're friends are right in that they've had pretty choppy deal flow in the past couple of years which is worrisome since M&A has been hot in 2013 and 2014. As a result they started doing smaller deals and their revenues have been declining year over year in the past 3-4 years. They do some RX but it won't really be any high profile RX deals. In spite of all this, I would say Greenhill is still probably one of the better places to do your analyst stint since the class is so lean which leads to better experience and exit opportunities which is mostly MM PE with an occasional upper tier PE fund.

A note about PWP: it's a very Elite M&A shop but it's RX practice has pretty much dissolved at this point. The top RX guys left and started their own shop called Ducera.

I switched from a BB M&A group to an well-known RX shop (Rothschild, Moelis, Evercore) so PM me if you have any questions about RX or bulge vs boutique. Definitely agree with your choice to do a boutique.

 

Agree with your friends on this one. Decision should be between HL RX and MS.

MS if you want typical Industry M&A type deals and Houlihan Lokey if you are set on RX. I've heard from friends that the RX skill set encompasses everything you would learn in M&A so you won't be missing anything from a learning standpoint.

Exit Opps: MS would open up opportunities to Top HF, MM PE, and if in a good group (M&A, FSG) you can get opportunities for MFs. HL RX would open up opportunities to Top Distressed Investment Funds (PE or HF), MF Distressed / Credit Arms, and MM PE.

 
Best Response
undefined:

Exit Opps: MS would open up opportunities to Top HF, MM PE, and if in a good group (M&A, FSG) you can get opportunities for MFs. HL RX would open up opportunities to Top Distressed Investment Funds (PE or HF), MF Distressed / Credit Arms, and MM PE.

I want to correct this. I very nearly went to MS when I was considering analyst offers. M&A is the best group, yes, but Sponsors isn't the next best in terms of exits. CRG and Media & Comms alum are littered across MFs and the elite MM firms (FFL, GTCR, etc.). GPUG and Nat Res get a lot of attention too.

The comment about HL RX is accurate.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
Funniest

Quia fuga ab quasi aut. Blanditiis voluptatum ea ad sunt doloribus. Sint unde fuga aliquid suscipit id magni laborum.

Expedita blanditiis qui eius beatae. Deserunt iusto similique quasi eligendi iusto. Quae iusto quia dolor voluptates reprehenderit et ab quis. Tempore ad maiores voluptatem ut voluptatibus quod explicabo quia. Aut autem quia nulla voluptatem minima et ut. Voluptas corporis omnis et fugit. Quo veritatis vel quia similique.

Dolorem maxime sed doloremque amet. Ut nisi omnis veritatis eum molestias qui a ut. Sint non laboriosam suscipit qui iste. Aut dicta earum maiores minima delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”