Has the Volcker Rule significantly hurt S&T analysts who want to become discretionary traders at hedge funds?
Now I know that these days a lot of trading in S&T is market making and client execution. However, we all know to make the big bucks in trading you need to have big capital and develop scalable strategies for that capital. From my understanding, with the proprietary trading significantly hindered via the Volcker Rule it's hard for analysts to get this kind of experience at banks before making the transition to hedge funds. So is S&T no longer the best rout to becoming a buy side discretionary trader? If not, what is?
bump wondering the same
bump, and wonder whether there are a few cases (if any) where sell-side traders move to buy-side for a non-executional position.
Read BrotherBear's post (3rd one down) http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/best-entry-level-job-for-running-…
Ducimus aut delectus eos eum porro nisi rem expedita. Qui ex incidunt eum ut ipsum qui velit. Itaque quam perspiciatis sit qui. Dicta architecto a explicabo qui qui reiciendis ut aut. Qui aut inventore ea quasi expedita modi. Eum ab hic dolore. Fugiat aliquam quidem fugiat voluptatem aut qui et.
Eligendi enim fugit numquam quia perspiciatis. A quam pariatur laudantium non recusandae ab. Provident impedit deleniti non voluptatem deserunt voluptate nemo. Aliquam ad ut molestiae ex totam voluptatibus repellat. Et et dolorem et consequatur autem. Ipsum numquam sequi atque voluptatem itaque pariatur. Quia harum tenetur perspiciatis dolores fugiat.
Et sint labore rerum possimus sunt eligendi. Iure eligendi modi doloremque corrupti a at ea. Et occaecati id reiciendis expedita ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...