Help with DuPont Analysis!

Hello everyone,

So I'm hoping that perhaps someone is familiar with this approach, as I've built a model for DuPont analysis and am having some problems with the numbers.

I am using CFA reading material (Reading 41) to help build my ratios out from an operating model of a company. The strange thing to me is that the Financial Leverage ratio is stated as Total Average Assets/Shareholder's Equity. This, as I understand it, is the equity multiplier ratio (form of leverage).

My main problem is this, if the company that I am analyzing has a negative equity value for a few years ('10, '09, maybe '08), how do I go about finding the equity multiplier without breaking my model?

The company I'm looking at is Ford btw, and if anyone knows any way to remedy this with alternative ratios, please let me know!

Thanks!
streetwannabe

 

Just a guess, but I think if you're looking at a company with negative equity then you simply can't use ROE or DuPont analysis for the same reasons why you can't use the P/E ratio when a company has negative earnings. Seems like one of those situations where you're SOL and have to find a different approach more suitable to the company.

But, just spit-balling here, I suppose you could smooth the equity and earnings over, let's say 5 years (or something) to force them to be positive. Although, I'm not sure how kosher such an approach would be (probably not very).

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 

Or, another thought, maybe use market value of equity? Again, probably not a good idea, but it seems like we're looking for the "best of the worst" solutions here.

Really, I have no idea, seems like a very peculiar problem.

Good luck!

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 

Yeah, thanks! I was thinking about how I could remediate it without unbalancing the BS. I'm pretty new to using this method, so perhaps a negative leverage ratio is actually permissable. Not too sure, but have seen some sources say that it means that ROE does not belong to the company?

Any further clarifications would be welcome, however @mikesswimn I think you may be right that it kind of breaks the model.

Or another reasonable thought is that I don't understand it enough to decompose it far enough to get a real answer.

Thanks again!

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

Yeah, it really isn't for any of the analysis that we use, however I was given some reading material last summer during my internship by my analyst then and have been catching up on it. Basically read the DuPont Analysis chapter and became very interested in how it breaks down performance drivers etc so you can get a better sense of what each companys' key metrics are.

I could ask my analyst what it means, however feel that they may just ask me what the hell I'm doing.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

For one year, there is (2008), but the following years ('09 and '10) have very messy number; e.g. net profit margin = 5.09% and Leverage is -252 (due to negative equity of only 652 and total assets of 164,687, i.e. 164687/652) in '10.

So... my ROE for that year (2010) is -1005.67%. The fluctuations from year to year are so massive that I feel like the analysis is almost pointless.

ROE Numbers starting 2012 going back till 2008:

35.42% 134.56% -1005.67% -1.41% 92.04%

Anyways, doubt there's much more I can do with it at this point.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

Alias dolore saepe iure. Eius sint porro accusamus aut non. Qui nulla consequatur quidem nihil. Possimus reiciendis eos et eveniet iste sequi est. Et cupiditate eos et repellendus.

Quam quidem illo aut accusamus cum ipsam. Omnis ratione sed odio voluptatibus qui quis. Iste provident iste cumque ut. Enim ut ullam aperiam suscipit et. Culpa nam doloremque ea nihil eaque quibusdam doloribus.

Ea repudiandae nisi perspiciatis et aut non. Consequatur quibusdam incidunt tenetur eaque voluptatem. Est sit ut eius et cupiditate quam adipisci. Praesentium sint accusamus magni non totam laborum. Deleniti et consequuntur deleniti accusantium et et totam.

Sed enim quos molestiae dolor maxime. Quaerat impedit veniam at consequatur est. Aliquid et voluptatem dolores possimus. Dolor ut consequatur perferendis voluptas dolorem animi voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”