VP's still take a lot of time committment. The same if not more than analysts. The difference being, they're doing business, not necessarily work. If you're gone for 3 days on a road trip pitching clients, that is 72 hours of "work". Plus the time you'll spend in the office. Whereas analysts will spend 80-100 hours in the office doing modeling and what have you.

 

The place I worked as a summer VPs stayed till about 6pm - 7pm unless something crazy was going down. Where I work now VPs stay 9-11pm. So in conclusion I would say the later one is probably more likely, but its highly variable.

 

ah yes, being in my early thirties / starting to start a family and being in the office until 11 PM every night. yummy...

a 2 year analyst experience is one thing, but i gotta say i just don't understand career bankers.

 

with VPs is they can't switch to PE/HF b/c those hires normally come at analyst level where labor costs are cheaper. If they move into corporate, they will take huge pay cut with better hours. It's hard to change your lifestyle and live on 150k when you've been making 500k. Therefore, VPs are kind of in a no-man's land and stick around. My VP is always bitching about hours and how he's never home with his 2 year old child. He's been in the job for 6 years and looks like he's aged 15 years according to him. Although he likes his job, the only reason he deals with hours is b/c he gets paid well and doesn't have many other options with similar compnesation.

 
scotttwibell:
with VPs is they can't switch to PE/HF b/c those hires normally come at analyst level where labor costs are cheaper. If they move into corporate, they will take huge pay cut with better hours. It's hard to change your lifestyle and live on 150k when you've been making 500k. Therefore, VPs are kind of in a no-man's land and stick around. My VP is always bitching about hours and how he's never home with his 2 year old child. He's been in the job for 6 years and looks like he's aged 15 years according to him. Although he likes his job, the only reason he deals with hours is b/c he gets paid well and doesn't have many other options with similar compnesation.

Tell him he needs to quit his bitching and sack up. You can tell him I said it, too.

 

Tell him he needs to stop buying crack with that 500k+ salary, save it for a couple years and then find a corporate 150k job where he'll still live like royalty and won't have to commute 2 hours every day (assuming he's already in the burbs).

The career bankers have no excuse to complain about being away from the family; they have options, and your VP is simply choosing his Porche and $3 million home over his kid...

 
StreetLuck:
spectzix:
i dont think the question is how many hours how many VPs actually make it to MD? and lets say you are VP for like 8 years and cant make it to MD, what are some opportunities that do not require that big of a pay cut while having okay lifestyle
MD at lower tier bank.

There will be no 8th year as a VP. It's usually around 3-4. Up or out.

Banking.
 

The guys with families typically leave earlier say 8-10PM (and even earlier than that sometimes).

Some of the guys without families are just insane, workaholics. You don't want to get staffed with them if possible.

I think the major plus (in addition to more traveling and less modelling work) is they work a lot fewer weekends where I am. They might call in from home, but they are only in the office when shit is hitting the fan.

 

There is info on this already posted, just look at anything about work life balance.

At VP, you work about the same as an associate to slightly less. You will not have anyone drive by staff you at the VP level or above and you can always choose to do things from home late if they aren't important.

SVP/Director tends to be a hybrid between VP and MD. Basically, if you are good then you are just running deals and making it rain, if you aren't then you are more in the weeds.

At the MD level the hours are whatever you want, however you will have to travel a ton to meet with clients. Your time away from home is usually the same as if you were in the office, you just get to be in nice hotels and (if you have status) in first class on a plane.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

One of the most important considerations if you want to survive your analyst/associate tenure is to 'interview' your senior bankers to ensure that they are emotionally stable and, if possible, have families (and balance).

A single senior banker with a work-aholic mentality will make your life miserable...particularly if they suffer from underlying emotional problems (ie: the reason they are single in the first place).

I've worked with single, emotionally unstable, unhappy senior bankers in the past...it sucks.

 

I'm a B-school applicant looking to get into banking, so take this with a grain of salt, but what I've heard is that the for the first 6-18 months (depending somewhat on group/bank) of being an associate you will work analyst hours (i.e. 90+ per week). During that time, it might taper down a little bit, mostly due to simply being better at getting your own work done and better at delegating to analysts (efficiency gains). As you get to your 2nd and 3rd year of Associateship, I've heard you can expect AM once or twice a week instead of staying until 3-5 AM four nights a week. Of course, you still don't know which days you will be stuck at the office until 1 AM. As you move up further into VP and MD ranks, your work becomes increasingly client facing, which means that the bulk of your work literally cannot be done in the middle of the night (clients are asleep), so you tend to pare down to ~10-12 hour days during the week, although oftentimes that work is in another city, so expect lots of travel. If you have other things to work on at night or over the weekend you can typically do it from home; no one is watching MDs for "face-time" in the office. I'm told that you never really get below about 60 hours a week, but the higher up you are the more control you will have over your own schedule.

 
Best Response

1st year/stub associate - +5 to +10 analyst hours. Assuming you weren't an analyst before you went to b-school you will be in the office more than the analysts your are working with. You will have no idea what you are doing and will slow down the entire process. Everyone will think you are worthless for the first 6 months. You have absolutely no control over your schedule.

2nd / 3rd year associate - -0 to -10 analyst hours. You probably have some idea of what you are doing at this point, efficiency gains will kick in and you can get shit done. That being said you will be on more projects then your analysts, so you will have more hot items at once. You have a little control over your schedule.

Last year as an associate/1st year VP - -10 to -20 analyst hours. True efficiency gains, projects under your control, other associates doing work under you. At this point you set timetables and manage both above and below you. At this point unless something is really under crunch time you will no longer be ordering seamless at the office. An efficient person will have a lot of control.

VP-SVP-MD - Its all up to you, you are managing client relationships, meetings etc. If you like to be in the office you can, likewise you can make everything a call you can take from your couch in your absurdly sized house in NJ or CT.

To what AltESV said, cut and dried hours are not the way to think about it at any level. If you read the posts around here, you will see that is the case. One group you might be in everynight to 1am as an ass or an analyst. Another group you will be out every night at 10pm. Think in terms of how much those around/below you will be working and the control you have over your life.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

PowerMonkey - That's very helpful detail and mostly confirms what I had heard. I like the notion of thinking +/- analyst hours, since, as you mentioned, it's all relative.

RNR1811 - That depends how you define normal. From what I've heard you never really get below 60 hours a week (at least not if you are doing your job right), and as you get higher up you will tend to travel more. I'd say that as you get higher up work/life balance exists, but it still isn't ever normal.

 

A line you should only ever use with higher-ups you've got a fantastic relationship with: "So, I hear you've got some kids. Do they know what you look like yet?" But then again, that's kinda the corporate world nowadays at anything higher than grunt level.

 

You will work A LOT. That's probably the only guarantee anyone can make.

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-
 

People live all over the place, generally people move outside the city when they have families. So, you may have 60 year old MDs without kids living in Chelsea, you may also have sub-30 associates with a wife and kids living in NJ. With kids people live in NJ, CT, LI, and other places, generally the city sucks with kids. I know very few people at any level who live outside the city if they don't have a family (I knew one chick who lived in Greenwich with some friends, but that was the only one).

With regards to a normal life, you will never have a normal life in banking. It trends more towards normal the higher up you get. At junior levels, you work way too much with little control over your life. At senior levels, you travel a bunch and have conference calls all the time. It's never normal, it just gets better and pays you a boat load as you move up.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

I worked with a VP over the summer who was married and had a kid (pretty young). However, this did not seem to affect him at all, as this guy was absolutely insane - he would actually be excited about the prospect of working an all-nighter.

I hated being staffed with him because he was such a workhaholic dick, but I have to say, this guy knew his shit and I probably learned the most during the times I was with him.

 

Deleniti ut ea at ut nihil quod culpa. Quam incidunt ut quis temporibus nobis sapiente vitae. Est id similique sunt deleniti exercitationem soluta.

Nulla beatae veritatis dolores. Et provident dolores maiores iure. Optio recusandae qui suscipit quia nemo architecto. Aperiam quibusdam eum voluptas autem soluta voluptas. Architecto exercitationem dolor maiores mollitia assumenda omnis nisi. Ab numquam laborum et aut. Eaque omnis amet repellendus quaerat ad vel.

Corporis minima porro rerum nisi. Accusantium omnis non qui pariatur nostrum. Qui nam ad ullam. Similique magni et recusandae nisi quasi. In sed inventore veritatis voluptatum aspernatur. At eum quos reiciendis tempora corrupti quo.

 

Ut similique sint nesciunt omnis esse magni dicta. Vel nulla ab ex officia quidem odit. Adipisci velit laudantium iusto nihil tenetur. Odit saepe quasi voluptatem voluptatum nesciunt quo. Expedita recusandae sunt earum doloribus alias est porro. Molestias facilis quo qui quos fugit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”