Ugh...Business Jargon

I came across a pretty hilarious article on Forbes when brainstorming ideas for my column this morning. It's about business jargon and how useless most of it is.

Now, I'm the first to be skeptical of buying into culture, jargon is a defining component of culture, so I have always been the last to use an organization's jargon when I've been a part of it, but even I find that some of the assertions the author makes are a little absurd. You can find the article here.

Now I'm going to reach out to all of you, exceed expectations in writing this article, and shoot the wind about how I feel about jargon. Was that good enough?

Original Post Continued At Bottom

what’s the Point Of Finance Business Jargon

Business jargon can be useful when used correctly as an effective means of getting your point across but unfortunately, it’s often used as fillers or ‘fluff’ making it meaningless.

Market Fundamentals shared this great image of common business jargon.

User @johndoe89 shares a list of amusing jargon:

  • Leverage (the most abused noun turned verb turned everything in finance)
  • Cross sell opportunities
  • Maximizing Shareholder Value
  • Synergies
  • Ducks in a row
  • Core Competency
  • Open the Kimono
  • Lots of Moving Parts
  • Meritocratic culture
  • Scalable
  • Robust
  • Think Outside The Box
  • It Is What It Is
  • Ecosystem
  • Full-Service
  • Entrenched
  • Tee-Up
  • "Let's talk offline"
  • Hard Stop
  • Price Point
  • Low Hanging Fruit

Check out this article from Forbes.


Looking for guidance in your career?

With a network of more than 200 mentors, WSO’s Mentor Service can help increase your chance of landing a job by over 12x. Our mentors are top employees at the most selective firms. Find your mentor today.

WSO Mentor Service

Original Post Continued

The funniest thing about jargon to me is the degree to which _no one_ likes it but everyone buys into it. For instance, I am not a huge fan of the phrase "reach out"...it just sounds bizarre to me. I, like the author of the Forbes article, would much rather say "get in contact with", "contact", "get in touch with", etc. Any sexual connotations aside, reach out is simply a strange way to say that you are talking, or planning on talking, to someone.

However, despite disliking the phrase "reach out", I find myself using it all the time -- during information interviews, when talking to normal people, when giving friends advice about networking, and even in other situations. Honestly, I don't think anyone really _likes_ phrases like reach out...they do make you sound like a bit of a tooligan. But that doesn't matter -- spend a little bit of time in the business world and you'll quickly understand that everyone both uses business jargon and expects the people around them to use it as well.
Jargon has a bit of a cult of personality, despite being an inanimate object. Maybe because I was interested in finance (and wasn't interested in software), I found it easier to stomach the fact that suddenly I was using phrases like "reach out", "execute", "give 110%", among others.

I remember one time I got into contact (note, I did not say "reached out" :) ) with someone at a local startup that I was interested in learning more about. Their PR person was about my age - 23 - and a recent college graduate. In her e-mail response to me, she thanked me two or three times for "reaching out", and upon meeting her, I was interested to learn that she did not have a business degree and didn't see herself in a business role whatsoever after graduation. She was clearly not your prototypical business person, but she had, in a short period of time, totally bought into the jargon associated with business professions.
What do you guys think about jargon? Absurd, a necessary evil...perhaps an unnecessary evil? And what do you make of some of the jargon the Forbes article brings to light...a lot of these words I didn't even realize were "business jargon" per se.

 

Agreed, I can't stand it. My firm uses the phrase 'tag-up' for meetings, and when I hear the phrase 'lets tag-up later' I immediately want to vomit.

"Who am I? I'm the guy that does his job. You must be the other guy."
 

Leverage (the most abused noun turned verb turned everything in finance) Cross sell opportunities Maximizing Shareholder Value Synergies ducks in a row Core Competency Open the Kimono Lots of Moving Parts Meritocratic culture Scalable Robust Think Outside the Box It Is What It Is Ecosystem full-service Entrenched Tee-Up "Let's talk offline" Hard Stop Price point Low Hanging Fruit

Check out this article from Forbes- a few of the above are on this list, hilarious: http://www.forbes.com/sites/groupthink/2012/01/26/the-most-annoying-pre…

 

At my previous job, one of the desks next to mine was open, and therefore would often be used by some "regional" guy that would come work out of our office 2-3 times a week. No idea what he was hired for, nor do I care to remember his extremely obscure title/job function. If I had a dollar for every time he sat on the phone using the most empty, meaningless, unproductive keywords with people, I would have had enough money to quit on the spot, stand up, ask him straight up something along the lines of "what do you even DO here??"...and then take a steaming dump on his desk - (as would be recommended by a strangely large proportion of the people here on WSO).

Moral of the story: Spend more time doing a productive job than you do on thesaurus.com memorizing words to confuse people into thinking you do.

 
Best Response

Your 3 examples are all short hand phrases which have a fairly well understood meeting (at least among those who use them). Maybe less so among people who use them when speaking bullshit.

For example: Me: What's the EBITDA we're financing off? Person: $120m Me: Is that reported? Person: No. $30m is synergies, $20m is pro formas. Me: Sounds like a hard sell. Got a QOE? Person: Yes, but only sell-side. Buy side is due Friday. Me: OK, get across it when it lands and circle back to me on Monday. Then we'll touch base with Sales and see if they can sell this shit.

That's all more time and concept efficient than trying to deploy long-hand language.

EDIT: I'm more annoyed by sales language bullshit. Particularly in TMT deals. Like every fucking company is a "leading" company selling "mission critical" products.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

I'm with you there. I feel like every deck I see says "we're the industry leader", then says their industry is something like "gluten free, non-GMO, all-veggie dog treats for Shih Tzus weighing under 10 lbs."

"There's nothing you can do if you're too scared to try." - Nickel Creek
 
N0DuckingWay:

I'm with you there. I feel like every deck I see says "we're the industry leader", then says their industry is something like "gluten free, non-GMO, all-veggie dog treats for Shih Tzus weighing under 10 lbs."

It's like credentials in beauty parade decks.

1 TMT ECM underwriter in 1Q 2016*

  • Excludes IPOs occurring on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursday and issuers with names beginning with M, P or L
Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

I think it's a matter of repetition. If you "touch base" every now and then, it's not a big deal. If you're "touching base" every time you email or meet with someone, that's when it becomes noticeable.

I checked some of the recent emails I sent out and I have successfully not used any bullshit phrases. I type "just" and "wanted to" far too often, however. Need to cut that shit out.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Phrases like synergy, circle back, and touch base don't bother me much. But words like innovate, disrupt, and leverage can be very annoying when they are overused or used improperly, which all too often they are. Around the office we sometimes use cliche business phrases to mock folks who blatantly overuse them.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2012/06/19/89-business-cliches-…

Not all of these are completely useless, but many are overused or not used in the right context.

 

The management presentations are what get me. Last week, this phrase was bundled up with a lot of perspiration, "Our core competency is not to boil the ocean, but rather shifting the ecosystem in our industry-- it's more of a paradigm shift". I saw the VP cringe.

I think management will try to use it as a buffer and help them appear smarter. It often has the reverse effect.

 
THEBLUECHEESE:

Senior Associate: "bandwidth. You got bandwidth?"

Yes I do; my Internet works great!

 

i was planning a trip to patagonia with my cousin 1.5 years ago and she kept using the word "beta", as in info. "i'll get you the beta asap", "keep me up to date on the beta". she was a tryhard to work in tech at the time, so maybe she was over-compensating. i was like, just f*cking say "info".

there were other words similar to these she was saying but i've blocked them from my memory

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

I'm a big believer in simplifying your writing to maximize clarity. This means using the word 'use' over 'utilize' for instance. Both mean the same thing - one just has more letters and sounds more pompous than the other.

Many great writers also advocate writing like you speak. This is more difficult than it seems though, as it runs counter to what we're taught throughout high school and university.

 

More than just the jargon, it bothers me when people misuse terms when they apply them to a finance context. E.g. ppl often say "sales trends are accelerating" when what they really mean is that they are "growing". Acceleration has a very precise definition and while sometimes it gets used correctly, more often people completely butcher the meaning. I guess that's just the physics major in me being nitpicky though...

 

i love jargon, i think it is the funniest/douchiest thing in the world. Even though I love it in a facetious way I find myself using it all the time. Some of my favorites include: Closing the loop, moving the needle, sit down on this and many others. Although I know saying all of this makes me sound like a tool I do it all the time because one its hilarious and two I just want to fit in. When everyone at a firm has bought into it, it becomes part of the culture. Everyone uses it and acknowledges its absurdity but it also gives a way to communicate because we all understand it perfectly. I don't think its useless at all, I disagreed with the Forbes article. It has become so ingrained in business that if you don't use it you almost seem like an outsider. I think it's usefulness comes more from the "common language", if you will, that it provides business oriented individual

just my 2 cents

 

I don't see it as a big deal at all. Some of the more absurd ones I don't use (lion's share, 30,000 ft view), but other pieces of jargon are so common place that they make it easier to communicate.

Reach Out vs Get in contact with Ping vs Instant Message etc...

Everyone in the business understands it and it's usually a shorter way of saying something.

And synergies is jargon?! how else would you describe synergies concisely?

EDIT: Some of the ones in article I've never heard - "Open the Kimono?" - don't think I could hold it in if I heard that

 
trailmix8:
I hate more than anything that when describing something you add "from group X perspective" or "from system Y perspective" etc... I just hate that. Sometimes you sit in a meeting and a person uses "perspective" more than once in a complete thought. It absolutely kills me.

Hahaha, I hate that one too! It's awful.

There's one guy I work with that says "at the end of the day" with such frequency, I am expecting his head to one day explode. Just saying "at the end of the day, at the end of the day, at the end of the day" faster and faster until his head blows up.

 
TheKing:
trailmix8:
I hate more than anything that when describing something you add "from group X perspective" or "from system Y perspective" etc... I just hate that. Sometimes you sit in a meeting and a person uses "perspective" more than once in a complete thought. It absolutely kills me.

Hahaha, I hate that one too! It's awful.

There's one guy I work with that says "at the end of the day" with such frequency, I am expecting his head to one day explode. Just saying "at the end of the day, at the end of the day, at the end of the day" faster and faster until his head blows up.

totally with you regarding "at the end of the day" haha did we work with the same people or something, because next to "perspective" that was also one of my top most hated, just because it was used with such frequency

 

A lot of the time when you try to explain things in normal English I feel like people think you don't know what youre talking about. I always try to avoid using jargon but it seems like you have to use it if you want to be seen as a professional

 

I will agree some of of them like "open the kimono" are kind of weird. But seriously, complaining about saying "reaching out" and saying it's BS? It is what it is (yes, this was on purpose). Now I can't think of a better way to say "reach out" than actually saying "reach out." I'd rather say "going forward" than "in the future" or whatever. These phrases come into practice for a reason. They have a specific meaning that everyone can understand without being fucking confused, and using them is usually the most efficient way of conveying your meaning. So no, I like using them, I do use them, and it doesn't make me look like a douche because everyone around me uses them without thinking about it. Embrace it and get used to it. Isn't there something better to complain about?

 

I like jargon and useless sentences.

"Our competitors forgot that they already tried to make us think about the opportunity we'd rather forget" is my favorite

Try to say that in a meeting and watch everyone "bug" as they try to figure it out.

Associate Editor at Mergers & Inquisitions @AusartThomas
 

Business jargon is revolting... the reason it sounds so empty is because business is anti-intellectual by it's very nature. In a way, it makes sense.

I'm not a fan of excessive abbreviations either. It reminds me of military / state bureaucracy; Not surprising as many of the ideas of modern management originated in the military.

Whenever i hear someone say "think outside the box" i get the urge to reply "i think about box all the time..."

 

Non nam aut esse qui nostrum sed. Labore ab qui quam dicta omnis autem. Et molestiae aperiam est. Deserunt eius reiciendis aperiam quis delectus voluptatibus. Quaerat non vero itaque tempore reiciendis.

 

Voluptas dolorum fugiat ut aut quas soluta repudiandae. Ducimus repudiandae dolores beatae qui inventore. Aspernatur iure sunt et iusto sed. Iure quo suscipit sunt voluptatem nobis laudantium velit.

Eos nihil asperiores assumenda et. Reprehenderit fugiat voluptates qui quo porro. Aut consequatur fuga sed quaerat aut. Itaque tenetur laudantium sapiente sit dolor natus quam. Magni ducimus vero fugiat incidunt similique quas amet.

Qui sit aut veritatis cupiditate ullam ut eaque iste. Quo pariatur quam sint exercitationem debitis earum sint ut. Aut est voluptates qui veritatis aut nihil.

Incidunt impedit vel voluptas. Recusandae aperiam maiores velit quas rerum voluptatem. Quis voluptates et sint nulla et praesentium delectus. Totam culpa quae odio iusto sunt. Ea necessitatibus eum reprehenderit autem assumenda a. Qui aut et est unde.

 

Voluptatem perspiciatis suscipit incidunt ratione. Doloremque ipsum aut laboriosam et illo. Libero vero perferendis numquam vel dolores.

Sapiente nesciunt sapiente sit dicta sunt. Nisi facere minus dolorum autem harum ea. Veritatis commodi veniam dolorem nihil. Accusamus dolores quibusdam in quis est deleniti. A tenetur reprehenderit optio optio accusamus veritatis. Autem ut quidem omnis odio.

Modi nostrum alias dolores vel qui. Dolorem illum quo debitis sit ut commodi consequuntur aut. Aliquam neque est nisi aut praesentium tempore vero. Cum nobis et ea in sunt. Sit est perspiciatis ipsam eos quam. Dolores adipisci expedita eum nihil voluptatem totam recusandae corporis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”