I'll tell you what I've learned from those million other threads. If you are at a "non target", it's all about networking. You have to find alumni that have broken into the industry and any other people that you can get in contact with. It's obviously easier at a "target" because banks come for OCR, which doesn't happen at "non targets". If you work harder than a student at a "target" it's possible to break in.

 

^Exactly. You can glean much more detailed and discussed information by searching for this topic, there are a million threads on it. In general though, the consensus is that networking becomes much more important at a non-target, as you do not get the name recognition or the on-campus recruiting. CompBanker, I believe, broke into IBD and PE from a non-target, so you may find some of his forum posts/blogs/qa sessions enlightening.

To the starving man, beans are caviar
 

1) Too many threads on this matter.

2) Target schools have OCR which makes things exponentially easier. Target resumes are viewed in a school-specific pile by alumni, whereas non-target resumes usually get lost in a black hole.

3) The shittier your school, the more important networking is. But if your school is really shitty, you probably can't find any alumni on Wall St anyways.

4) Please learn to use the search box on top.

 

Wow.... this type of post again. But I will give you a great picture. I got to meet the whole entire group of summer interns for 3 coverage group on one floor and also their analysts and associates at a BB in NYC. The 4 interns I've spoked to personally one on one in those three groups 2 from Princeton, 1 from Yale, and 1 from Norte Dame. The two from Princeton didn't network, worked in wealth management at a BB in their sophomore year broke into the BB group which is one of the stronger groups in that firm. The intern from Yale, never interned before. Very smart. Got in. One from Norte Dame, told me worked his ass off networking in order to break in. So, I think this will give you a picture that people from Targets like Ivy League schools are heavily favored.

 
Xaipe:
GS(sometimes)/JPM/Citi/Jefferies recruit for FO at Brandeis but very few spots. Bentley is not much better but definitely has better alum. BU also has a very good alum resources. No matter what you didn't get into harvard/mit, so why not just pick the one you like and network your ass off.

I think you're in the wrong thread.

 
nontarget kid:
Xaipe:
GS(sometimes)/JPM/Citi/Jefferies recruit for FO at Brandeis but very few spots. Bentley is not much better but definitely has better alum. BU also has a very good alum resources. No matter what you didn't get into harvard/mit, so why not just pick the one you like and network your ass off.

I think you're in the wrong thread.

If you read the other threads the kid posted, they are all about the same topic. He is trying to make a decision and I just try to answer his real question :)

 
CaliforniaAnalyst:
who knows. but if the article makes you feel better then just believe it

You are quite fiesty, sir.

Play games and get a finance job or internship with ConnectCubed
 

Literally impossible to answer. How do we think a hypothetical shift in education could effect a completely unpredictable hiring environment at some unknown time in the future.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
happypantsmcgee:
Literally impossible to answer. How do we think a hypothetical shift in education could effect a completely unpredictable hiring environment at some unknown time in the future.

Ok, right, but the hiring environment right now is pretty predictable insofar as the likelihood of being hired as a student at a target vs. non-target school.

I guess my question is more about the importance of a prestigious degree, and how immutable that importance is for recruiters. If there are a bunch of Princeton grads at a firm, would there be a bias in favor of other Princeton applicants?

Even if these questions can't be answered, I think it's a really cool idea

Play games and get a finance job or internship with ConnectCubed
 

As long as groups of extremely smart and ambitious people congregate in one location there will always be an interest in recruiters to go to that location. Target schools give you the advantage of getting a first round interview or a closer look during the screening process, but there's nothing stopping non-targets right now from getting the same opportunities if they put in the necessary work.

The prestige doesn't come from the schools as much as from the people who attend them. Until you see the best students go elsewhere the reputation will not go away.

 
Eljay:
As long as groups of extremely smart and ambitious people congregate in one location there will always be an interest in recruiters to go to that location. Target schools give you the advantage of getting a first round interview or a closer look during the screening process, but there's nothing stopping non-targets right now from getting the same opportunities if they put in the necessary work.

The prestige doesn't come from the schools as much as from the people who attend them. Until you see the best students go elsewhere the reputation will not go away.

I understand the concept of concentration of smart people, but there are tons of smart people who (for whatever reason) can't attend prestigious schools, and there are also tons of knuckleheads who (for whatever reason) can & do.

Play games and get a finance job or internship with ConnectCubed
 
Eljay:
The prestige doesn't come from the schools as much as from the people who attend them. Until you see the best students go elsewhere the reputation will not go away.

This. The value of going to a target is also that it signals to employers that, for whatever reason, you were a competitive applicant who was able to beat the odds and get accepted. I also think that the alumni factor is huge. Whether or not non-traditional educational systems begin to take hold, alumni from school X will almost always have some preference in considering candidates who are also from school X.

 

Even if IBanks change their recruiting process, that doesn't mean PE firms will.

for university recruiting, you're actually protected by the school to prevent the firms from taking advantage of you (Harvard won't invite GS on campus if they always treat Harvard kids like shit)

but GS isn't going to back you up when you apply to KKR.

 

I can see Ivies being rivaled in prestige as there are other up and coming universities that provide stellar educations, but I don't know if I could ever see Online classes overtaking conventional classes. But, who knows?

"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
 

Why does the OP of these ridiculous threads always have to belittle the IVY league( and other top 25 schools) and prop up the non targets? We know there are dickheads EVERYWHERE and just because some sweatshop full of Jews and Asians don't recruit at your school, doesn't mean your school doesn't have talent in the student body.

Learn Programming, Lectures by Professor Mehran Sahami for the Stanford Computer Science Department http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkMDCCdjyW8
 

[quote=jillmac]If two equally intelligent and charming candidates apply to the same job, one from a target school and other from a non-target, would the firm hire the former? How important is a degree?

Kevin Carey at the New Republic wrote an article the other day essentially questioning how long Ivies and other target schools will have a monopoly over selling education credentials.

He thinks their monopoly over higher ed is 'crumbling' and the way of the future is offering online courses for free and then having students pay a small fee to take an exam that tests whether or not they know the information.

If this happens or even begins to happen, how do you think the recruiting process for ibanks and hedge funds might change? Or will it change at all?

Article: http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/101620/higher-education-accreditati…]

I think it's pretty obvious that the 4 year degree model is dying, albeit slower than it should because universities are sacred and protected institutions in the Western world.

It makes sense from the employers perspective as well: Why hire someone with 150k in loans and a strong sense of entitlement when you can hire someone with little to no educational debt and a demonstrated ability to do the work required of them? The former will demand an extremely high salary simply because they need one to service their debt, while the latter can be paid peanuts in comparison.

The missing link in this story is the socialization that a university education provides, but there are cheaper ways to drink, hang out with people your age, and get laid.

Anyone want to open a new testing center or develop new behavioral screening tests?

 

I attend a Top 25 school (according to the Times Higher Education report yesterday, it's actually a Top 5 school). I wish that higher education followed this type of model. I think the university system is the cause behind a lot of our problems, including, but not limited to:

1) Structural Unemployment:

College is too often seen as the end, not a means to an end, so you have a collection of smart kids studying useless crap, for which the demand simply isn't there. If courses were available for free, and people could pick and choose the skills they were learning, we'd have a more efficient economy, complete with employees who could actually add value. (Think Microsoft's MCITP certification.) Further, people could respond to technological changes in the economy instead of feeling handicapped by decisions they made at the age of 17.

Hell: We see it on this very website, with a bunch of people gunning for BB jobs that don't even exist anymore.

To illustrate my point, last year, roughly 50,000 people graduated with a JD, and 14,000 with a Computer Science degree.

What in the...? I don't -- I can't even...

2) Social Hierarchy:

If anyone would like to pretend that going to Harvard Westlake or New Trier doesn't boost your chances of getting into Harvard or Princeton, then I don't really care to debate the point; however, there's a subset of the population that has obviously found a way to put the education system to work for them. Public Education counteracts this to a certain extent, but if education were as open as the article wanted it become, I think it could only help social fluidity.

Of course, as someone already noted, college is popular for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is social. It's impossible to predict what's going to happen long-term, but for the short term, I think the best way we could hope for is that the traditional 4-year degree model and these next-generation education systems find a way to coexist -- i.e., college graduates use these courses to develop practical, value-add skills. Of course, employers would need to respect these certifications for that to actually be feasible.

Also: I'll go ahead and second what Buyside said and point out that it's stupid to frame a thread like this in terms of "Non-Targets v. Targets," especially when this is such a cool fucking issue in the first place. It doesn't need the lame backdrop.

 
atomic:
If anyone would like to pretend that going to Harvard Westlake or New Trier doesn't boost your chances of getting into Harvard or Princeton, then I don't really care to debate the point; however, there's a subset of the population that has obviously found a way to put the education system to work for them. Public Education counteracts this to a certain extent, but if education were as open as the article wanted it become, I think it could only help social fluidity.

I went to New Trier. I can say with relative confidence that getting into Harvard out of New Trier is virtually impossible, unless you are an athlete.

Almost every single kid I knew at New Trier who went to Harvard or Princeton were star athletes who were recruited to play for varsity sports teams. We had multiple soccer, track & field, football, golf, and baseball athletes who went to play for Harvard, Yale, and Princeton's varsity teams each year, and most of these guys were no where near what I would call 'brilliant' academically.

Besides, I thought that New Trier was really, really tough academically. I think getting through New Trier's honors/ AP classes was much more rigorous/ exhausting than getting through my Ivy undergrad. In college, you have much more free time and you don't have to go to class everyday, nor do you have homework everyday. At New Trier, we had 3-4 hours of homework every fucking day, which was ridiculous amount of work for 16 year old kids, now that I look back...

 

I have friends at HYP, the harvard and yale guys say the course work is 'a complete joke'. I don't really think that online degrees will ever replace brick and mortar schools, but I can see other schools overtaking the ivies in terms of reputation at some point.

My drinkin' problem left today, she packed up all her bags and walked away.
 

Why make life harder than it has to be? Go to a target, or go to a non-target for one-two years with the plan of transferring to a target.

A non-target school will affect your ability to get the top slots for IB out of UG; not saying it's impossible, but it will be significantly more challenging. The jobs you have out of UG (quality, firm, type of work) will affect your MBA application. It's all connected.

'Before you enter... be willing to pay the price'
 

I'm going to echo what Frank said but add a couple things.

Wharton is one of the most competitive b schools in the world, you'll need to get a super high GMAT and have a great story to get in. also, make sure you keep detailed records of all of the good stuff you do at your jobs as well as the results that came from it. this will help in crafting your story, which will need to be perfect given your undergrad brand + GPA.

 

I'm facing the same thing. I wasn't serious about school until I changed majors to finance, began taking meds for my ADHD (diagnosed at 17, didn't take meds until 27), and realized that finishing school was paramount to having any chance to succeed. I went to a community college and made bad grades (2.5 GPA), then transferred those years old credits to a non-target state school. My junior and senior classes in my major were around the 3.5 mark, including classes in derivatives (toughest class in that school's business curriculum), two semesters of a student managed investment fund, international finance, Security Analysis, and all the other "tougher" finance classes. It increased my GPA to a 3.0, and was done while working a full-time corporate job and raising two children. There were many nights where my "equity analyst" partner from that student fund and I would be working on a stock to pitch and financial models at 3 in the morning and one of my kids would wake up and need me. It was nuts, but I still managed to do well in my major. I didn't know what I wanted to do at 17,18, so I didn't enjoy school and didn't really care. It was only when I realized that I absolutely enjoyed finance and it was something I could be really good at. I'm going to have to use some of that explanation in my essays as I apply to schools, maybe not the medical part. Haven't taken the GMAT yet, but I do pretty well with standardized tests. I agree with the others here that the best way to address the limitations in your applications is to do just that, address them. Don't make excuses, just explain the negatives by pointing them out, stating what happened, what you learned from them, and explain how that will make you a better candidate than others with that school and as an alumni out in the world after you graduate.

"Decide what to be and go be it." - The Avett Brothers
 
BATTS:

there are probably 100's of posts about this on poets and quants...

I agree. There's some good info on WSO, but there are dozens of websites that are almost 100% dedicated to this.
"Decide what to be and go be it." - The Avett Brothers
 

I believe that undergrad pedigree and performance is more important than ever for two reasons.

First, our society is becoming more credential driven, especially entrance into elite jobs in finance, consulting, tech. In many ways, one can argue that access to these jobs is being outsourced to the admissions officers at our best colleges.

Second, for finance at least, the game starts SUPER EARLY. To get on the coveted path, you have to get the right job after college; this sets you up nicely for lucrative buyside gigs and if interested, admission to the elite b-schools. Now, it is true that a top MBA can be used for career transitions, but I think people overstate this. Can one get banking without relevant experience? Yes, but the most desirable and interesting finance jobs are reserved for those with relevant impressive pre-MBA background.

 

Sure.

My aunt went to Creighton and it's a good school, but nobody has heard of it out here. Go to University Nebraska and you get credit for a flagship land grant state school. Then get a 4.0 GPA in Engineering, and you'll even have a pretty good shot on Wall Street.

For those who don't know, Creighton is the Fordham of the Midwest. Everybody in Nebraska and perhaps a few folks in Chicago have heard of Creighton and think it is a decent school, but cross the Appalachians and suddenly nobody has heard of it.

Unless the Jesuits give you money, I think the state school is the clear choice.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
For those who don't know, Creighton is the Fordham of the Midwest. Everybody in Nebraska and perhaps a few folks in Chicago have heard of Creighton and think it is a decent school, but cross the Appalachians and suddenly nobody has heard of it.
Well i was hoping to land a job in chicago, been to NYC and its not for me. I'm also looking at UChicago/ Northwestern, but as of now with a like a 3.6 in High School, 30 ACT, Zero extra curriculars, top schools could be a bit of a long shot.
 
IlliniProgrammer:
^^^ Then you're in the wrong industry. If you want to work in Chicago, you want to do insurance or (maybe) high frequency trading. Either way, University of Nebraska will do you just fine, but then you want to aim for Actuarial Science if you plan on working in insurance.

well i've neevr actually been to chicago, i was just saying that i dont want to go to NYC, i could deal with Houston/Chicago/Seattle and always assumed Chicago was the best for finance. I hope to go into M&A or something, not really into Trading

 

If you want to do M&A, you almost certainly have to go through New York.

There are a small handful of MM firms in Chicago like William Blair and RW Baird. The bigger firms have Chicago offices, but the deal gets sent off to New York to get finished.

You are still young. You will change your mind about this several times. Try and figure out, though, if you are more dead set on avoiding New York or more dead-set on doing M&A/IPO work.

 
IlliniProgrammer:
If you want to do M&A, you almost certainly have to go through New York.

There are a small handful of MM firms in Chicago like William Blair and RW Baird. The bigger firms have Chicago offices, but the deal gets sent off to New York to get finished.

You are still young. You will change your mind about this several times. Try and figure out, though, if you are more dead set on avoiding New York or more dead-set on doing M&A/IPO work.

yeah im just not sure if i would like trading, i have a virtual stock account and its not doing great, but i'm just kind of looking at colleges now, want to have more of a plan, i figured on studying either finance/comp science/pre-med/pre-law at Nebraska and have already been invited into the honors program, might go with that and use college money to go for a top MBA/JD/PharmD.

 

Extracurriculars are awful. The only reason they're valued by schools and employers is that they know if you're willing to endure that garbage to get accepted/hired, you'll accept and not whine about whatever they pile on you on the job. Which I suppose is fairly sound logic.

 
obscenity:
Extracurriculars are awful. The only reason they're valued by schools and employers is that they know if you're willing to endure that garbage to get accepted/hired, you'll accept and not whine about whatever they pile on you on the job. Which I suppose is fairly sound logic.

so am i going to have a tough time getting into a good university without many ECs?

 

You can always lie/exaggerate about extras. I agree that they are crap that most people exaggerate anyway. ECs matter to employers only when you don't have work experience. Universities look at them as another datapoint that would allow them to ding you vs. someone else as they already have enough qualified applicants that look very similar.

 

It will be mostly based on your deal experience. If you have good experience and your MD has the right contacts, you'll be fine. It is certainly not unheard of - go look at the websites of MM PE firms and you'll see plenty of kids from MM IBs.

 

What about one of those mega PE funds (Silver Lake, Carlyle, Blackstone).

Do they still consider undergraduate institution, GPA, etc? I don't have a stellar GPA and I'm from a non-target. Would it be necessary to go get an MBA even after banking experience?

 
TeamLRAM:
What about one of those mega PE funds (Silver Lake, Carlyle, Blackstone).

Do they still consider undergraduate institution, GPA, etc?

Yes (A LOT), yes (a bit). But then again, if well-known MD goes to bat for Analyst, everything can happen.

It's nearly impossible to get into banks that lead to mega PE funds with non-stellar GPA and non-target background.

 
longshot:
Does where you went to school still matter to MM PE firms if you have great experience from a top MM IB and had excellent grades, but went to a completely unheard of non-target?

im from a no-target and will be starting ft at a top BB. talking to alumnus from my school who work at the firm, they all were top analysts who had trouble getting top PE/HFinterviews because of the school they went to. the 2nd tier analysts in their groups got better interviews than them and it was based solely on the network of their undergrad institutions...

guess networking will be more important for us

 

Since i went to a semi-target public undergrad, I can tell you from personal experience that its very tough to break into a target grad school. Unless you can pull a super high GMAT score and have awesome experience, very very hard to break into a target grad school. Also, look into CFA...will definitely increase ur odds with grad school but see if its worth it given your goals and current status.

but overall yes from personal experience, brand of undergad does matter. not overwhelming but a big factor I would say.

"I always knew I was going to be rich. I don't think I ever doubted it for a minute."
 

I don't know about MBA, but I got into a top MFE program and I went to a non-target public school.

My suggestion, worry about things you can control (recommendation letters, essays, work experience, GPA, GMAT score). You can't control the brand name of your undergrad institution because you already started it and the brand name is not great. The GMAT + application fees is just a minor investment... you never know what the people on the other side think... Plus, if you are a minority add a few more points for your application...

 

Very important. If you want to go to a target MBA program, you need to enroll, at a bare minimum, in a university people will recognize, such as a major state a school. If you look at top MBA programs, they filled largely with people that have strong academic pedigree.

 

There are people with 3.7 GPAs at Princeton who didn't even get interviews this cycle for SA at BBs. You are drastically underestimating how competitive this industry is. I definitely suggest transferring to most prestigious UG possible, so long as you graduate with

 

Yes, internships and extracurriculars would definitely help those kids get interviews. But a lot of it is just the level of competition.

Think about it: 9 BB IBD programs each take 5 kids from a target school for 45 total. But how many were minorities, women, varsity athletes, and the very well connected? Half? More than half? At the end of the day, white/asian males without sports/connections need to do everything right if they are going to break in.

 

I actually have one other question, and I have decided to transfer to one of the schools I originally got into as a freshman, just haven't decided which one yet (Indiana university, Illinois university, or northwestern, I like the big 10). But would interning at Raymond James help out. I know its not a huge firm but they do have an ivestment banking division, and my high school girlfriend's father is a higher up there and said he can help get me an internship helping out with their investment bankers.

 
I actually have one other question, and I have decided to transfer to one of the schools I originally got into as a freshman, just haven't decided which one yet (Indiana university, Illinois university, or northwestern, I like the big 10). But would interning at Raymond James help out. I know its not a huge firm but they do have an ivestment banking division, and my high school girlfriend's father is a higher up there and said he can help get me an internship helping out with their investment bankers.

... Wait a minute, you got into Northwestern too? That's a huge target for Chicago offices.

And yes, an internship will definitely help you out as it'll show that you're hungry and interested in breaking into the industry.

 

Dude, what were you thinking when you chose SIU over Indiana?

And why didn't you mention Northwestern the first time?

I'm starting to get the idea that you didn't do your homework on investment banking recruiting.

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." --Abraham Lincoln
 
OkComputer:
Dude, what were you thinking when you chose SIU over Indiana?

And why didn't you mention Northwestern the first time?

I'm starting to get the idea that you didn't do your homework on investment banking recruiting.

I got a full ride to siu and my parents aren't helping much with college, and talked me into going to siu against my wishes. I never wanted to apply there in the first place, I just did it to see what kind of scholarships I would get. Also I didn't really know what I wanted to do. I was between finance and engineering until the summer between my senior year and freshman year of school. I started reading financial articles and watching financial television programs and finance began to really appeal to me. But at that point it was too late

 

Yeah, and Chicago is where i want to work, since i love the city and I'm from Illinois so it's closer to my family but I don't want to be 100000 in debt and not being able to get a job, that's why I went siu. And northwestern only accepts about 8% of transfers, so I'm not sure if I'd get in since I dont have a 4.0, I missed a 4.0 by .54% in one class and the TA wouldn't give me a break. So IU and U of I are my top choices, and I'll apply to transfer to michigan while I'm at it.

 

I really appreciate the all of the advice, I just wish I would of know about this forum a year ago when I was choosing a school. I guess I really have to reevaluate my education. And I got some aid the last time but not nearly enough since my parents do ok, and I'm a white male so aid discriminates against me.

 
dfisch93:
I really appreciate the all of the advice, I just wish I would of know about this forum a year ago when I was choosing a school. I guess I really have to reevaluate my education. And I got some aid the last time but not nearly enough since my parents do ok, and I'm a white male so aid discriminates against me.

Don't you worry, don't you worry child. See heaven's got a plan for you...

You can overcome your background. Transfer to a better school and it won't matter. Just keep your grades up.

[quote=Dirk Dirkenson]Shut up already. Your mindless, reflexive responses to any critical thought on this are tedious. You're also probably a woman, given the name and "xoxo" signoff, so maybe the lack of judgment is to be expected.[/quote]
 

Current position = Business Analyst in an Investment Management Services company - we provide outsourced services for Asset Managers, which is correct that is it operational strategy.

Education = MBA from state university with a 3.7 GPA; BS in Business from a small private school (not well known for Business outside of PA) --- I understand that I do not have an MBA from a top-tier firm

 

the indiana kid will have to prove that he is not stupid, not a rube, and doesn't have a grating chip on his shoulder. this is in addition to all the basic stuff the harvard kid is going to have to prove. this is advantage #407 of going to a top target.

 

melvvvar, your reply is ridiculous - clearly neither of you has worked in IBD. If you're a non target student, noone will assume you are inferior to the others and you will be given a shot just like everyone else. There are plenty of target people who suck and don't get return offers. Work hard, show your competency (assuming you worked your way to a BB from a non target, I assume you're a reasonably good, hardworking candidate) and have a good attitude. You'll be fine.

 

Unfortunately Mel is more on point.

Certainly the assumptions made about your intelligence hold true, but I would say there is also the second disadvantage of having fewer alum at the bank.

I know Harvard, Wharton, etc. kids get invitations to mixers, dinners, and other networking events with alum at banks that don't happen for non-target school kids (just by the sheer fact of there being fewer numbers and those that are there seem to take the attitude on the most part that they had to work extra hard to get to where they are and expect others to do the same). I have known of a couple kids who find mentors or even are able to network their way into other positions at the bank if they think a return offer is unlikely at these sorts of events.

In general though, you shouldn't underestimate the power of good work. If you do an awesome job (more than slightly better than the target kids), I think you get more respect (since you've "beaten the expectation").

Don't be bitter. The situation is what it is. Ultimately, I still think it is easier to be a non-target guy at one of these places than a woman from any school, target or not.

 

It means that when some guy who studied English and played Tennis at Yale tells you that UT Austin or UIUC or UMich isn't a real school, you can tell them that English isn't a real major and tennis isn't a real sport- and put them in their fucking place.

If you went to a public Ivy and landed at a Big Four, you've done well for yourself. Making partner there and having Wharton Accy majors work for you should be enough to convince folks you're as good and prestigious as anybody, but some people out there have REALLY thick skulls. So the one last perk of an elite graduate degree is that the last few idiots finally shut up.

The downside is that if you go to a school like HBS, you can no longer be the UT Austin kid trolling the Columbia alumns. As the UT Austin kid, you were kinda funny- as the HBS MBA, you're a douchebag.

In terms of actual grad school advice, the substance of why you want to go has to be about what the program has to offer. Not sure if Big Four means CPA or consulting. But either way if you want to be a CFO, or if the consulting firm is paying for it and says you have to do this to advance, it makes a lot of sense. Some of the time you'll get a return offer, and if it's free tuition, it's kinda hard to say no to. A consulting background could set you up well for a BB or even in some cases a PE offer depending on your consulting roles, but I'm a quant from an MFE program, not a banker.

Oftentimes a top tier MBA is also a way to solidify/lock in your career success if you come from a state school. It is also a mild signal that there's a cap on how well your career is going- otherwise why would you spend two years in grad school? (I say this as a 2nd year grad student). But it also helps keep a lot of doors propped open to you that could otherwise one day close if your career doesn't work out exactly as planned.

As a state school kid, you will always carry a bit of a chip on your shoulder. Some folks who don't know better will disparage that chip, but it's really a good thing. It's a good thing to want to prove yourself- it's a good thing to want to write better code or build better excel models than the kid from Columbia. It's good to let yourself think that he thinks he's better than you. (Just please have some compassion for your future self and don't do this to state school undergrads who went back to grad school- they honestly think you're at their level.) It's good to spend a few extra hours getting that project done while everyone else relaxes because you've got to prove yourself to the people from the private schools. And as you run circles around them, the smart ones and the people that count will begin to respect you, the momentum will build, and your career will advance faster than someone from a top target. Then one day three or four years from now, you will think again about grad school and determine whether it's a good business decision or not.

Good luck to you. Hope you counter-troll the "preftige" trolls well. (Maybe an ivy league institution could teach them how to spell prestige? Just a thought.)

 

Based on my research (as an applicant and from a semi-target private undergrad), the bottom line is that a "M7 Target" as you called it, you WILL get a job offer from OCR, should you go that route. Am I exaggerating? Probably a bit, but seriously, if you go to Booth, for example, you're going to get a job. Maybe not the PE job that you pursued, and maybe not even MBB/BB, but you'll get Tier 2 consulting or MM Banking or Fortune 500 Corp. Development somewhere.

To me, that's huge, because it takes a lot of the risk factor out of the equation. Offer to application rate is so hard to determine, for a number of reasons. One, I would be much more concerned with interview to application rate, since I really think that things are relatively equal once you get an interview. More people will get interviews at Wharton tha will at Darden, and most likely, more of those interviews will turn into jobs. That is obviously for a reason, since a lot of the characteristics that MBB will look for are what Wharton looked for in the first place (thus, more people from the better school will get interviews, and then do well in them).

But really, if you're not a douche, and want to go back to school for things other than "prestige", like to change industries, re-enter recruiting pool at MBB/BB, build a network, maybe learn something (!!), target schools just offer you tons of chances to achieve your goal. Illini commented more on the prestige side of things, but seriously, if you work in Big 4 consulting now, and you want to go be an investment banker, target schools will help...

 

Thanks again for your advice, as always. You summed it up for me there. It makes sense that the hoops you jump through to get MBA business schools">M7 synergize with what MBB is looking for.

Definitely not looking solely for prestige, but a huge, effective career reset so I can do something where being an individual and innovating are more encouraged, like consulting.

 
reddog23:
So you're a phd candidate in philosophy who wants to work in finance? How did that happen?

The basic story is that I realized I don't want to be a professor and even if I did, there aren't really many professor jobs, plus that lifestyle gives you little geographic choice over where you work and little financial incentive.

I'm interested in finance through a part-time job I had as a poker player during school. I became fascinated with using my logic abilities and some self-taught risk management and equity evaluation techniques to make smarter, more profitable poker decisions. So I started researching finance and now I'm here.

NorthEastIdiot:

At least do law school where your years of reading impossibly dense texts might be useful. I'm assuming you are 25-27 years old. You'd definitely be on the older end of the MSF spectrum at most schools.

To answer the other part of your question: what else do you need? Target schools give you access to firms that actually want to hire you. OCR = gold. Target school students also command higher salaries.

For example, I know some F500 firms will pay a top 10 MBA grad a significant premium, plus a higher signing bonus, than they will for a 30s ranked MBA student (I've experienced this firsthand, in fact).

Thanks for the information. Law school is not really an option for me and I think law school is a bad idea in general. The law market is more or less abysmal right now even for graduates of top schools.

leveRAGE.:
lets flip this around:

what the fuck is better about going to a state school?

better parties..?

I know going to a target school is better. I'm asking because there are no target schools for finance in my area and my current school does not offer an MSF (they offer an MBA but I can't do that because of lack of work experience). I'm asking if the affiliation with the target school (albeit in an unrelated major) will help me get a finance job.

1000Talents:
Which area of philosophy are you doing your phd in?

I haven't started on the actual dissertation yet. I went to the school to do ethics, but if I think another area would be more helpful I might switch areas.

 

^^ That'd be my first, and probably last, question during an interview. My guess is you want money and realize that teaching bored state school undergrads the intricacies of the Cartesian Circle, and the accompanying $50k salary, just wasn't worth the 9 years of your life?

At least do law school where your years of reading impossibly dense texts might be useful. I'm assuming you are 25-27 years old. You'd definitely be on the older end of the MSF spectrum at most schools.

To answer the other part of your question: what else do you need? Target schools give you access to firms that actually want to hire you. OCR = gold. Target school students also command higher salaries.

For example, I know some F500 firms will pay a top 10 MBA grad a significant premium, plus a higher signing bonus, than they will for a 30s ranked MBA student (I've experienced this firsthand, in fact).

 

Optio commodi ad perspiciatis. Facere amet nulla sed sint. Repellat et qui rerum ut repellendus qui sed et. Et commodi autem reprehenderit laboriosam quo. Dignissimos tenetur ut ut. Distinctio officia iusto quasi. Numquam aliquam ducimus maxime et magnam.

Quam cum impedit eligendi eius. Aliquam rem voluptatem vel debitis error in. Qui accusantium et porro expedita temporibus provident ducimus voluptas. Ratione quo corrupti delectus ratione repudiandae qui pariatur. Et doloribus quae rerum illum. Vero doloribus distinctio pariatur et necessitatibus voluptas error. Aut ipsam ut est eaque in.

 

Vel est nostrum et recusandae natus hic. Dolorum laborum aut consequuntur. Velit labore accusamus quia. Tempore aut quae sed labore iure ut pariatur. Aliquam suscipit nihil cum minus quod. Omnis iusto ea ratione aut eligendi non saepe. Ipsam earum amet similique animi veniam quisquam itaque.

Quod cumque quisquam repellat dicta dolor. Provident minima doloribus soluta eum ab aut ut. Magnam et tempora nisi eum.

A facere quia fugit consequatur illo beatae vel. Laboriosam sit repellat inventore non odio est atque hic. Sunt qui dolorem porro vel est sit aut eius. Et saepe sint similique nihil soluta. Nihil accusantium quod amet itaque.

Ut consequatur possimus temporibus placeat ut corrupti. Sapiente corrupti expedita et libero. Repellendus ex provident aut voluptates corrupti quaerat eaque. Dolores est enim quibusdam delectus magni reprehenderit. Quasi enim repudiandae blanditiis consequatur.

Get busy living
 

Molestiae sed ratione ut fuga ullam et aut perferendis. Sapiente esse repellendus tenetur impedit commodi sed qui. Nostrum voluptatum perspiciatis asperiores nihil autem ex nostrum. Non ipsum aut cupiditate modi tenetur.

Consequuntur omnis labore sit qui qui. Quae impedit quaerat harum velit facilis facere praesentium eligendi. Laboriosam expedita repellendus magni nihil placeat et eum.

Itaque eius et cumque fugiat et nisi ducimus. Molestiae dolorem quidem eum provident odit totam aut. Ab in culpa dignissimos nam voluptatem magnam amet.

Aliquid vero voluptas consequatur temporibus natus. Fuga sint qui corporis dolorum officia aut ut.

 

Autem autem consequatur vitae maiores. Aut amet modi est corrupti eos. Alias ipsa dignissimos id architecto voluptatem error velit.

Nostrum non modi ducimus rerum consequuntur alias assumenda sed. Et est perferendis officiis repudiandae. Et aperiam repellat nostrum omnis. Eveniet odit sit ex explicabo dolorem totam nemo exercitationem.

 

Aliquam quaerat quasi repudiandae ad quis labore rerum. Dignissimos harum a qui eos incidunt modi et. Facere voluptate et voluptatibus ut in sit ullam consequatur. Tempora esse qui cupiditate cupiditate repudiandae. Deserunt repellendus possimus repellat ut. Distinctio ipsa qui ex incidunt deleniti magnam quo. In officiis non sequi repellendus architecto numquam tempore.

Sit quo sunt magni libero et enim quo. Eaque aliquid perspiciatis ea. Reprehenderit ut eius perferendis. Eos repellat reiciendis ea ad est. Et nam minima nemo quam ut. Culpa quam natus id et ipsum debitis. Aliquid ipsam aspernatur vel fugiat labore nisi vel.

 

Culpa cumque expedita cumque. Aut nisi rerum quae possimus consectetur at. Omnis non deserunt quo et officiis assumenda voluptas. Veritatis quisquam distinctio praesentium natus nobis omnis qui.

Est quibusdam earum nisi exercitationem excepturi. Unde et voluptatem eos facilis in debitis quae. Aut sunt expedita voluptatum similique et eveniet nihil. Sit et pariatur cupiditate non veritatis. Molestias magnam odit illum beatae fugiat aut.

Molestiae laboriosam nihil est labore aliquid occaecati veniam accusamus. Nam aliquam voluptatem quod voluptatem sed. Voluptatum qui porro quibusdam sequi voluptas omnis. Quae quos ut repudiandae quaerat.

 

Delectus et voluptas temporibus neque sunt. Aut blanditiis laudantium ea optio excepturi. Ad quam eos enim nemo et sint doloremque. Possimus unde quaerat dolor consequatur quos omnis aspernatur corrupti.

Quas optio id facilis delectus magni ad qui. Reiciendis aut exercitationem est. Accusamus asperiores deleniti consectetur est aut numquam. Iusto quae ut rem rem consequatur facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”