Plus make sure to see my post <a href="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/how-i-got-a-770-on-the-gmat-with-minimal-effort-while-working-banking-hours%E2%80%A6">How I got a 770 on the GMAT with minimal effort while working banking... phantombanker's GMAT Study Guide |
A week or two ago there was an article written about how your weight might inversely effect you during the hiring process. During the conversation I dropped some personal information about me losing 130 (now 135 pounds). I was PM’d by somebody asking me to tell my story. Well I have some free... How finance saved and gave me a life |
Hey guys, it’s been some time since I posted regularly on this site. That’s what happens when you start working in finance; you don’t have any time. So why am I posting? It’s because I am seeing an injustice being done to a lot of military guys (and gals) who are discovering they want to... To all Military who want to work in IB/PE/Consulting |
<em>Mod (Andy) note: </em><a href="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/phantombankers-gmat-study-guide">Here is the link to his study guide</a>
Background: I recently took the GMAT and scored a 770 on my first and only try. Long story short, I studied and took... How I got a 770 on the GMAT with minimal effort while working banking hours… |
There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the close on Friday over the perceived lack of performance in the Facebook IPO. The stock priced at $38, opened at $42.50 (after a few hiccups at the NASDORK), and closed at exactly $38 after an effort by the syndicate members akin to the Spartans at... IPO Pricing 101 |
Hey Guys,
Been using this site for a while now and figured it would be beneficial for me to give back a bit. For starters, I thought I would detail my experiences using linkedin and cold emails to land a summer offer.
Coming from a semi-target undergrad b-school, I had my hands full.... How I used LinkedIn to get Interviews and Land Offers |
<a href="http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/what-does-the-labor-participation-rate-say-about-our-society">Back on the topic of what the composition of the labor force says about our society</a>, the New York Times recently put out this <a... Grandpa And Grandma Are Taking Our Jobs |
The Clear Admit Shop currently has <em>free b-school "snapshot" guides</em> <a href="http://clearadmit.shop.studylink.com/index.cfm?onsale=1">available for download here.</a>
The guides aren't terribly comprehensive, but can serve as a... Free B-School Guides! |
There she is again: Diane Sawyer, the primary ABC evening news anchor, with another installment in their interminable series of reports on imports and employment in America. I could just strangle her.
One week their (alleged) reporters go to people’s houses and look at everything the occupants... Sawyer’s Syndrome: The ABCs of Trade and Employment |
Fellow Primates,
We are looking for 1-2 students on each campus to help WSO in its sales efforts to student clubs/career centers, and overall promotion at your school both online and on the ground. Below is a description of the position and benefits...thanks in advance for your help! <a... WSO Campus Representative Program |
| User | Silver Bananas |
|---|---|
| TNA | 848 |
| Edmundo Braverman | 760 |
| CompBanker | 747 |
| happypantsmcgee | 654 |
| IlliniProgrammer | 552 |
| UFOinsider | 469 |
| Nouveau Richie | 377 |
| Midas Mulligan Magoo | 369 |
| TheKing | 342 |
| cphbravo96 | 339 |
| User | Banana Points |
|---|---|
| TNA | 11678 |
| Edmundo Braverman | 11075 |
| WallStreetOasis.com | 10284 |
| happypantsmcgee | 9352 |
| UFOinsider | 8209 |
| CompBanker | 7797 |
| IlliniProgrammer | 7695 |
| Midas Mulligan Magoo | 5250 |
| monty09 | 5152 |
| cphbravo96 | 4434 |
Hey man, I know what you
Hey man, I know what you mean. I come from a west coast target, applied to every bank in sight (20-25), and only got 3 interviews too. I have similar stats to you and most bankers I networked with told me that my resume looks great. I have no idea what happened with me. I keep wondering if 3 interviews is normal, if my resume actually just sucks, or if this is just a hard year.
But good luck on your interviews! We just gotta work with what we have.
Has Barclays already given
Has Barclays already given out interview invites? They just had an info session on Thursday and the deadline to submit your resume was the same day.
Have you networked?
Keep grinding away. Even
Keep grinding away.
Even while Wall Street / Finance is arguably going through a rough time, competition has never been more fierce. AND - analysts / associates / VPs/ MDs are busier than ever, which means they're going to cherry pick resumes from Ivys to save time. It's even difficult inter-Ivy league. We had so many applicants this year that we basically just eliminated non-targets and those with 3.6 or below. It's crude but efficient.
----------------------------
This is God's work.
demoz wrote: Hey man, I know
Hey man, I know what you mean. I come from a west coast target, applied to every bank in sight (20-25), and only got 3 interviews too. I have similar stats to you and most bankers I networked with told me that my resume looks great. I have no idea what happened with me. I keep wondering if 3 interviews is normal, if my resume actually just sucks, or if this is just a hard year.
But good luck on your interviews! We just gotta work with what we have.
Apparently a very bad year.. when I went through OCR for SA, I ended up interviewing with all BBs that came to campus and elite boutiques. I didn't even reach out to anybody and my work experience was completely irrelevant, plus my GPA was bad.
Hey Period, Did you network
Hey Period,
Did you network at all during the semester/summer?
Did you attend all the on campus events held by those firms?
I've found a major correlation between which event I attended and which OCR situation has worked out.
I'm sending you a PM with some useful info...
Keep your head up bro don't let anything get in your way and do work
GL bro gl.
GL bro gl.
I want a lady on the street, but a freak in the bed,
Go Bucks!!
I'm at a top target on the
I'm at a top target on the west coast, and from what I gather, most people only got 2-3 interviews (I personally got 2). It's definitely a really bad time to be recruiting.
My biggest concern is the whole idea of banks wanting candidates that other banks want. Is anyone else worried about this? If you only have 2-3 interviews, can you get dinged for this?
[deleted]
[deleted]
Recruiting this year is
Recruiting this year is terrible, especially for sophomores. I thought I was a shoo-in for first rounds, but apparently not. My sophomore friends and I have received ZERO BB/elite boutique first rounds through OCR this year, and we all have extraordinarily strong resumes, stronger than most juniors.
Exciting Prospects for
Exciting Prospects for Guggenheim
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. -Aristotle
I just transferred into C
I just transferred into C from a top pub school(semi-targets). I maintained a non-target attitude towards getting SA interviews and glad to say I got first rounds for most of the top BB's entirely from networking.
But quick question -- did Barclays really decide who gets 1st rounds already? The info session/resume drop deadline was on Thursday, and I haven't received an acceptance or rejection yet. PM me if you want some tips, I put together a pretty healthy compilation of VERY helpful alumni
Also, I don't think many of
Also, I don't think many of the banks you posted have posted who gets first rounds or not - and from the looks of it, it could be a resume format problem man. Honestly, most of the people I've met here at C with similar stats get interviews right off the bat. You might want to dig up that post here on WSO about the Associate who gave out info on what he does to 'ding' resumes for first rounds.
You're the exception. Most of
You're the exception. Most of my 3.6+ friends got first rounds almost everywhere they applied.
Also, very important thing to
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
Exactly, so it could be a
Exactly, so it could be a resume format problem given that you attended the info sessions, etc..
Also, did Barclays, Citi, SG, & BX really release decisions already? I know all of these besides SG required you to submit an app to their website as well. By chance, did you not do this? I'm sure that would be an insta-ding. Either way, let me know; I know the satellite offices are still in the process of conducting interviews and most of my BB interviews are for the SF/LA offices.
Oh, and I'm from GS, I was in
Oh, and I'm from GS, I was in the Marines and just transferred in from a top public school (UVA/Haas/UCLA)
Ohh wow, man its kind of
Ohh wow, man its kind of weird that people in my non-target are getting BB's with 3.7 GPAs last year even 2 of our students accepted offers from GS, this year I dont exactly the numbers but I will ask our IB recruitment head.
I want a lady on the street, but a freak in the bed,
Go Bucks!!
You probably need a
You probably need a non-target attitude since Columbia is in NYC. Lots of competition when you can intern year-round.
I'd probably remove most of the IDing info in your post too. Not too hard to figure out who you are if I wanted to.
Buddy, for your own sake,
Buddy, for your own sake, remove some of the identifying information from this. It would take all of about 30 seconds to piece together who you are if someone had a resume book.
A lot of people do certain things to add days to their life. I do things to add life to my days.
seedy underbelly
You're the exception. Most of my 3.6+ friends got first rounds almost everywhere they applied.
Are you sure? I don't go to Columbia, but at my Ivy I know plenty of people with 3.6+ who didn't get more than 2-3 first round interviews at OCR.
Even at Ivies with strong GPA's, I am convinced that it will be tough to land first rounds unless you network heavily.
I just spoke to my buddy at Northwestern. He had 3.6~ GPA in Econ. He got exactly 1 first-round interview for OCR.
Also - even if you get first round interview, you are still facing heavy odds stacked against you to land an offer. Even at superday, candidate to offer ratio is around 10:1.
econ_guru wrote: Keep
Keep grinding away.
Even while Wall Street / Finance is arguably going through a rough time, competition has never been more fierce. AND - analysts / associates / VPs/ MDs are busier than ever, which means they're going to cherry pick resumes from Ivys to save time. It's even difficult inter-Ivy league. We had so many applicants this year that we basically just eliminated non-targets and those with 3.6 or below. It's crude but efficient.
God damn... Do you work in IB? Are you an analyst?
Do you mean you auto-ding any resume with a GPA below 3.7, even from Ivies? This is bat-shit crazy.
I wonder what most of Ivy kids will be doing after graduation if they strike out on finance/ consulting. Job market is fucking terrible.
seedy underbelly wrote: Also,
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
I don't think that matters. In fact GS students tend to be more successful because they have more work experience, etc. I know that last year GS sent at least one each to GS, MS, BAML. I know it's not fair...
Do they really care who attended their info sessions?? If you hit it off with recruiters, then that makes a big difference, but otherwise......
I am having the same problem
I am having the same problem too. I have been told by many that I have a great resume. I have a 3.6 GPA, I am a sector manager for our student managed investment funds, work with a no-profit as a research specialist, I am a member of several honor societies. The only difference that I can see between me and you is that I do not go to a target school.
I found this article on here a while back and it cleared most of my questions. Keep your head up man.
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ug-recruiting-part-i-how-a-resume-...
When luck shuts the door you gotta come in through the window - Doyle Brunson
Bruce.Wayne wrote: Exactly,
Exactly, so it could be a resume format problem given that you attended the info sessions, etc..
Also, did Barclays, Citi, SG, & BX really release decisions already? I know all of these besides SG required you to submit an app to their website as well. By chance, did you not do this? I'm sure that would be an insta-ding. Either way, let me know; I know the satellite offices are still in the process of conducting interviews and most of my BB interviews are for the SF/LA offices.
Not applying online is not an auto ding. HR always sends out emails to remind us to do so.
thejoker wrote: seedy
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
I don't think that matters. In fact GS students tend to be more successful because they have more work experience, etc. I know that last year GS sent at least one each to GS, MS, BAML. I know it's not fair...
Do they really care who attended their info sessions?? If you hit it off with recruiters, then that makes a big difference, but otherwise......
Matters quite a bit, actually. Recruiters see CC as the target on campus, not SEAS/GS.
seedy underbelly
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
I don't think that matters. In fact GS students tend to be more successful because they have more work experience, etc. I know that last year GS sent at least one each to GS, MS, BAML. I know it's not fair...
Do they really care who attended their info sessions?? If you hit it off with recruiters, then that makes a big difference, but otherwise......
Matters quite a bit, actually. Recruiters see CC as the target on campus, not SEAS/GS.
Are you serious? From what I hear it's clearly SEAS>CC.
seedy underbelly
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
I don't think that matters. In fact GS students tend to be more successful because they have more work experience, etc. I know that last year GS sent at least one each to GS, MS, BAML. I know it's not fair...
Do they really care who attended their info sessions?? If you hit it off with recruiters, then that makes a big difference, but otherwise......
Matters quite a bit, actually. Recruiters see CC as the target on campus, not SEAS/GS.
Dude, finance employers love engineering students with high GPA. Why would I-banks not consider SEAS as a target? If anything, SEAS is more of a target than CC at Columbia, especially for trading analyst jobs.
I know a junior girl at
I know a junior girl at Columbia who sleeps with 30 year old financiers. She got GS in her sophomore year. So you might want to consider learning from her.
BrokenBanana wrote: I know a
I know a junior girl at Columbia who sleeps with 30 year old financiers. She got GS in her sophomore year. So you might want to consider learning from her.
I've been doing this for 2 years to no avail. Am i bad in bed?
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
^Maybe its because bankers
^Maybe its because bankers know you're easy to bang so they do so without reciprocating.
That is a terrible attitude.
That is a terrible attitude. You have so many resources that non-targets don't have: Alumni database, organizations, etc. Network, Network, Network...you can't assume that since you are at an Ivy its going to fall into your lap.
Good is the enemy of Great
Sexy_Like_Enrique
Also, very important thing to consider: Are you CC or GS?
I don't think that matters. In fact GS students tend to be more successful because they have more work experience, etc. I know that last year GS sent at least one each to GS, MS, BAML. I know it's not fair...
Do they really care who attended their info sessions?? If you hit it off with recruiters, then that makes a big difference, but otherwise......
Matters quite a bit, actually. Recruiters see CC as the target on campus, not SEAS/GS.
Dude, finance employers love engineering students with high GPA. Why would I-banks not consider SEAS as a target? If anything, SEAS is more of a target than CC at Columbia, especially for trading analyst jobs.
Nope. Most of the hiring/interviewing is done by current analysts, the majority of whom are CC. SEAS, for several reasons, is not looked at as prestigious as CC. In fact CC makes Princeton look like a safety school (6.4% at CC vs 8.2% at Princeton), whereas just a few cycles ago SEAS had an acceptance rate of over 20%.
Also, and this counts a bit less, but all the major alumni are CC. Alexander Navab (co-head of KKR PE), Barack Obama, Eric Holder, etc etc.
And your thinking that engineering is valued in finance recruiting - LOL. Don't even have words for that.
Columbia College is prestige
Columbia College is prestige defined.
SEAS is a mediocre technical school for socially awkward kids who realized early on they weren't accomplished enough to compete in the CC applicant pool.
GS is a good way for Columbia to make a quick buck. I hate how the admissions office makes so many GS students take out ridiculous loans.
seedy underbelly wrote: And
And your thinking that engineering is valued in finance recruiting - LOL. Don't even have words for that.
I can't speak to everything else in your post, but this single sentence is just embarrassing.
A lot of people do certain things to add days to their life. I do things to add life to my days.
seedy underbelly
Columbia College is prestige defined.
SEAS is a mediocre technical school for socially awkward kids who realized early on they weren't accomplished enough to compete in the CC applicant pool.
GS is a good way for Columbia to make a quick buck. I hate how the admissions office makes so many GS students take out ridiculous loans.
Wow, seems like you have the intellectual depth to identify nuance. Speaks volumes about CC!
^ Oh really? Let's see
^ Oh really? Let's see now:
Cornell: AEM kills Engineering.
Penn: Wharton/College kill SEAS
Harvard: WHEN have you ever met a Harvard engineer on wall street? (keep in mind over 15% concentrate in engineering)
Princeton: Very well-defined engineering program yet no representation whatsoever on wall street
And these engineers want IB jobs just as much as the business/liberal-arts kids.
If you still believe what you believed about engineering being valued in finance recruiting, then you're just a moron.
yl715 wrote: seedy
Columbia College is prestige defined.
SEAS is a mediocre technical school for socially awkward kids who realized early on they weren't accomplished enough to compete in the CC applicant pool.
GS is a good way for Columbia to make a quick buck. I hate how the admissions office makes so many GS students take out ridiculous loans.
Wow, seems like you have the intellectual depth to identify nuance. Speaks volumes about CC!
LOL. Sorry Sternie, but your opinion doesn't matter. Maybe after you finally make it to CC, then it might. ;)
Also, OP why would you not
Also, OP why would you not major in FEcon and Bus. Man. if you were going to participate in IB recruiting anyways?!
Hmm... I'm from GS, networked
Hmm... I'm from GS, networked with MD's at top BB's who came out of CC and had 0 problems whatsoever. Think of it this way, cc, seas, and gs are just admission portals. Once you're in, everyone is competent; a 3.0 at cc, is obviously not going to have a competitive advantage over 3.6+ at gs. Also, let me reiterate that even though you're at an Ivy, doesn't mean you can skip networking. Given the economic climate, I'd say that networking is a necessity; also, most alums from all 3 that I've interacted with really do not care what part of CU a candidate is in. It's entirely how well you connect with them.
seedy underbelly wrote: And
And these engineers want IB jobs just as much as the business/liberal-arts kids.
This is false, most engineers don't want to go into IB...it's self selective which is why you don't see as much engineering representation. Most would much rather have a silicon valley job
JustADude wrote: seedy
And these engineers want IB jobs just as much as the business/liberal-arts kids.
This is false, most engineers don't want to go into IB...it's self selective which is why you don't see as much engineering representation. Most would much rather have a silicon valley job
LOL. Really? And just how many end up on silicon valley? How about you go read some career reports before you post nonsense like that. Silicon valley jobs are more competitive than IB jobs. Most engineers from top schools even end up in second-rate leadership rotational programs or back office finance jobs. Exceptions: CMU SCS, Stanford, Caltech. That's it.
Engineering = over-hyped.
Bruce.Wayne wrote: Hmm... I'm
Hmm... I'm from GS, networked with MD's at top BB's who came out of CC and had 0 problems whatsoever. Think of it this way, cc, seas, and gs are just admission portals. Once you're in, everyone is competent; a 3.0 at cc, is obviously not going to have a competitive advantage over 3.6+ at gs. Also, let me reiterate that even though you're at an Ivy, doesn't mean you can skip networking. Given the economic climate, I'd say that networking is a necessity; also, most alums from all 3 that I've interacted with really do not care what part of CU a candidate is in. It's entirely how well you connect with them.
That's great for you. I'm speaking of a neutral field where neither candidate has networked. In that situation the analysts reviewing resumes will go for what's familiar -- CC. And there's more to GPA my friend. If GPA was the sole criteria for admission to CC, the acceptance rate wouldn't be the second lowest after Harvard. CC students, in general, are more typically accomplished, and that matters in recruiting. Not to mention, brand value. A lot of alums self-identify as CC not as CU, for instance.
Do you even read posts? All
Do you even read posts? All you've done is cite how there isn't as much of an engineering presence in IB because for some strange reason you are completely oblivious to the fact that the majority of engineers actually want to go into engineering.
JustADude wrote: Do you even
Do you even read posts? All you've done is cite how there isn't as much of an engineering presence in IB because for some strange reason you are completely oblivious to the fact that the majority of engineers actually want to go into engineering.
Clearly you've never stepped foot on an Ivy League campus.
someone is making an
someone is making an exhibition of himself tonight lol
With the position the
With the position the investment banking industry is in, I don't think you can judge the 3 schools on a premise where nobody networks. I'd say with a student from all 3 schools who are personable and network there are no differences.
thejoker wrote: someone is
someone is making an exhibition of himself tonight lol
lol yeah enough trolling ;) ;)
i'm out.
seedy underbelly
Do you even read posts? All you've done is cite how there isn't as much of an engineering presence in IB because for some strange reason you are completely oblivious to the fact that the majority of engineers actually want to go into engineering.
Clearly you've never stepped foot on an Ivy League campus.
I go to an Ivy. You, on the other hand, need to go back to College Confidential with your juvenile posts, they must miss people like you over there still swinging your epeen about brand name and acceptance rates to colleges in online forums.
JustADude wrote: seedy
Do you even read posts? All you've done is cite how there isn't as much of an engineering presence in IB because for some strange reason you are completely oblivious to the fact that the majority of engineers actually want to go into engineering.
Clearly you've never stepped foot on an Ivy League campus.
I go to an Ivy. You, on the other hand, need to go back to College Confidential with your juvenile posts, they must miss people like you over there still swinging your epeen about brand name and acceptance rates to colleges in online forums.
Douchey Whartonite is douchey. ;)
Wharton: until mid-2000s, the safety school of the ivy league, where applicants looking to avoid intellectually rigorous courses went. ;)
Lol jk, but seriously, chill.
seedy underbelly
Do you even read posts? All you've done is cite how there isn't as much of an engineering presence in IB because for some strange reason you are completely oblivious to the fact that the majority of engineers actually want to go into engineering.
Clearly you've never stepped foot on an Ivy League campus.
I go to an Ivy. You, on the other hand, need to go back to College Confidential with your juvenile posts, they must miss people like you over there still swinging your epeen about brand name and acceptance rates to colleges in online forums.
Douchey Whartonite is douchey.
Aimlessly denouncing an entire field, even parts of your own school, makes you sound like a tool. I hope not all Columbia kids are like you.