I'm a successful private trader. What's the best career path for me?

I did the military for 5 years after highschool and I'm now going to Columbia GS, financial economics.

I started studying and trading the currency markets when I was 18(7 years ago) and I've become successful, using just price action and trend lines to trade trends that last a few days to a few weeks.
Been doing 5% to 7% a month for the last 2 years.

I used to think I wanted to join the finance world and make a name for myself, however I've realized that anywhere I go, I'll have to ignore most of what I've learned about trading and investing(because my methodology is fairly radical) and adopt the investment methodologies of my employer, and the investment philosophies of the mainstream finance world(you know, the worship of FA)**.

These would be the same investment methodologies and philosophies that have not only led to the repeated stock market crashes in the 12 years,but also, for the most part, failed to predict them.

I know I could just graduate with a degree and then just sit on a beach somewhere, but that's a boring wasted life. I want to make a name for myself, learn the ins and outs of the financial world, and develop networks of peers so that I could someday start my own financial business.

Is there a certain sector I could go into so that I could continue my trading on the side? Or are there hedge funds or banks where I could used my own skills? Or something else?

Thanks for the advice.

**Read the intelligent investor, total respect for Warren Buffet's patience, but I think as money can always be made quicker and more predictably through price action analysis.

 

Yes they scale. I wouldn't waste my time building a strategy that exploits a temporary inefficiency.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 
aicccia:
Yes they scale. I wouldn't waste my time building a strategy that exploits a temporary inefficiency.

you'd be surprised how we see this and you see this would vary. My seat at my firm costs the company $25,000 a month. I am salaried as well, (not included in this amount) and bonus on performance. For the company to get value out of you, they need at least double that per month, including costs.

 
trazer985:
aicccia:
Yes they scale. I wouldn't waste my time building a strategy that exploits a temporary inefficiency.

you'd be surprised how we see this and you see this would vary. My seat at my firm costs the company $25,000 a month. I am salaried as well, (not included in this amount) and bonus on performance. For the company to get value out of you, they need at least double that per month, including costs.

Gotcha. Thanks.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 

If you are truly annualizing at between 80-125% per year, you should have little trouble getting seeded. The problem is, nobody is going to believe those returns. If you can get that track record audited by a reputable firm and the numbers are what you claim, some multi-strat fund would probably give you some money. I think that it is highly doubtful that the results are anywhere near as good as you think they are.

 
SirTradesaLot:
If you are truly annualizing at between 80-125% per year, you should have little trouble getting seeded. The problem is, nobody is going to believe those returns. If you can get that track record audited by a reputable firm and the numbers are what you claim, some multi-strat fund would probably give you some money. I think that it is highly doubtful that the results are anywhere near as good as you think they are.

Where did you get 80-125%? You are a HF partner and I'm not even in a FO role and I even know if you annualized 5-7% its like 40%-60% annual returns.

Frank Sinatra - "Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy."
 
Best Response
yeahright:
SirTradesaLot:
If you are truly annualizing at between 80-125% per year, you should have little trouble getting seeded. The problem is, nobody is going to believe those returns. If you can get that track record audited by a reputable firm and the numbers are what you claim, some multi-strat fund would probably give you some money. I think that it is highly doubtful that the results are anywhere near as good as you think they are.

Where did you get 80-125%? You are a HF partner and I'm not even in a FO role and I even know if you annualized 5-7% its like 40%-60% annual returns.

(1.05^12)-1 = 79.59% (1.07^12)-1 = 125.22%
 
SirTradesaLot:
If you are truly annualizing at between 80-125% per year, you should have little trouble getting seeded. The problem is, nobody is going to believe those returns. If you can get that track record audited by a reputable firm and the numbers are what you claim, some multi-strat fund would probably give you some money. I think that it is highly doubtful that the results are anywhere near as good as you think they are.

This is good advice, and if you're seriously annualizing 80%-125%, and have been for some time (and you've gotten it audited), you could simply start your own fund. Those numbers are insane, why give someone else part of your returens when you can do it yourself?

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 
mikesswimn:
Those numbers are insane, why give someone else part of your returens when you can do it yourself?

I would almost discourage you from joining a Wall Street firm and having their "investing methodologies and philosophies" shoved down your throat. The only name you'll make from this route is when you get sued for overly aggressive trades using shareholders' money.

Create an S-Corp and seek an Angel Investor. Or find someone with a similar trading strategy and form a partnership. Working for someone else you'll have to give up nearly half your income up front in taxes. If you have your own business you can duck and dodge some of those taxes (or at least buy some fly shit with pre-tax $).

Make opportunities. Not excuses.
 

You sound like a good guy, so i will give my unbiased $0.02 Seeing that i currently work at a hedge fund, specifically a fund of funds, first you might be overstating your returns 5% monthly will make you one of the best managers right now.

Your strategy might be working but it might not be scalable - i cant count how many times we see good small managers AUM $5-10M give them another $5M and they can't sacle the strategy. You might think it is scalabe but you will never know with a sub $100k trading book.

Finally if you are really into your strategy you should look the prop direction because no solid bank might be that welcoming for an under dog, keep your cool and know you are in a very critical industry.

 
monkeyDD:
You might think it is scalabe but you will never know with a sub $100k trading book.

Well currencies are supposedly the largest financial market, but point taken. I wonder how dry it gets in between markets for a minor pair.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 

First, that is an amazing return. I understand what you are saying. Even being profitable, it is kind of boring to trade from your apartment. I think with returns like that, if you can show your monthly statements to prove your returns to a potential employer, you should have no issue getting into a prop. trading firm.

By the way, how do you find time to trade that much while attending graduate school?

 
andres17:

By the way, how do you find time to trade that much while attending graduate school?

I'm not trading a lot. It averages out to about 1-2 trades a day. I risk 0.5% of my capital per trade, maybe I risking more than the norm? What is the normal risk per trade is in the professional world? 0.1%?

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 
aicccia:

I'm not trading a lot. It averages out to about 1-2 trades a day. I risk 0.5% of my capital per trade, maybe I risking more than the norm? What is the normal risk per trade is in the professional world? 0.1%?

Risking only 0.5% for a private account seems very little, especially if you are only doing 1-2 trades per day. I'm now trading my PA for a couple of weeks and I'm risking about 4% per trade. How many of your trades are winners?

 

Used to trade Forex a few years back, but never traded consistently enough to fine tune my trading strategy. When you say 5%-7%, are you saying you don't have a losing month? I would assume that all technical trading strategies dry up for periods of time, but that they win out in the long term. Is it just candle sticks and trend lines? I've read up on numerous traders claiming they double their accounts monthly, but I could never take it seriously. Just curious to hear your general strategy.

 
SlikRick:
Used to trade Forex a few years back, but never traded consistently enough to fine tune my trading strategy. When you say 5%-7%, are you saying you don't have a losing month? I would assume that all technical trading strategies dry up for periods of time, but that they win out in the long term. Is it just candle sticks and trend lines? I've read up on numerous traders claiming they double their accounts monthly, but I could never take it seriously. Just curious to hear your general strategy.
Interested as well...
 
ST Monkey:
what specific pairs, market session, and leverage you are trading on?

With my school schedule, I've given myself about 15 min 3x a day to check the markets: 7 am before class, 3 pm after class, and 11 pm before I hit the rack. So I trade on the 8 hour tf, and I'll trade any pair where I see a trend clearly ending/beginning. The account has 1:50 leverage but even with 10 positions, I'm just using about 1/3 of it. Like I said earlier, with stops, I'm risking 0.5% of the account per trade. I pay close attention to how the currencies correlate and avoid opening essentially duplicate orders such as on EUR/JPY and AUD/JPY, but its hard to truly diversity in currencies when there's only 8 or so major base currencies.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 
Benjammin822:
Whenever there are these threads, the one question that always goes unanswered is the capital base... So... Can you break that trend and at least provide a range?

About $5,000. I am a married student, with no part-time job, attending Columbia, with no parental financial support, so I am essentially already breaking the first rule of not trading money you can't afford to lose. However I know its critical to build a track record if I want to continue trading my own way in the professional world.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 
monkeyDD:
I second Benjammin - the range will provide more pespective. Also if you are consistentily averaging 5% each month, what is your worst monthly loss?

There's been a few months where I'm essentially break even balance-wise. But equity-wise I'm up. I the inter-weekly trends of 10-15 currencies. Currencies usually have 1-2 inter-weekly trends. Some times these trends last for 3 days, sometimes they last for 30 days. So for me to just break even in a month, that means I've completely missed over half of all the trends that happened that whole month on each currency.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 

How do you define "risk" when you say you only "risk" .5% of your capital per trade? DO you mean you intend to use a .5% stop loss? I say this because if your "risk" as I would define it - the amount of capital committed in the trade - is only .5% per trade, and you do 1-2 trades per day, that means max risked capital per month is 2.5%25 trading days per month = 25 basis points of your capital, but you generate 5% returns, so... your return per individual trade is 20x??? unless you are trading deep OTM options with some crazy gamma profile and are timing them perfectly, I think you must be risking a lot more capital...

 
DkrCap:
How do you define "risk" when you say you only "risk" .5% of your capital per trade? DO you mean you intend to use a .5% stop loss? I say this because if your "risk" as I would define it - the amount of capital committed in the trade - is only .5% per trade, and you do 1-2 trades per day, that means max risked capital per month is 2.5%25 trading days per month = 25 basis points of your capital, but you generate 5% returns, so... your return per individual trade is 20x??? unless you are trading deep OTM options with some crazy gamma profile and are timing them perfectly, I think you must be risking a lot more capital...

Yes 0.5% stop loss.

"It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer." - Albert Einstein
 

OP, I understand where your coming from as I initially wanted to make a name for myself also and I think many people do. I went to a successful boutique ER firm and it didnt work out unfortunately. Nonetheless, I realise that I made it to the top (arguably) and to be honest, the only way to make money is working for yourself. I think its better starting your own thing if you earn those returns and build a company. You would get plenty of st cred. I realise that you can be a slave and work up in the industry but if you have a gift, in your case market intutition, go with it. I feel like I have a gift at picking small cap equities. So my plan now is to get into any field that I can make good money and build up a capital base so that I can begin my trading strategy. Thats my plan for 2013. I have been investing for 7 years in the market and have made plenty of losses. Point is, if you have the ability, it's far more satisfying buuilding an empire on your own as you will earn far more credibility and often try and be poached that way. Dont discount this opinion.

 

Sit sequi vel rem esse. Deserunt et sunt sit nobis. Non non voluptatem quos mollitia. Beatae consequuntur blanditiis eum doloremque dolorem qui suscipit. Magnam voluptas voluptas aut velit consequuntur optio sint.

Nisi nobis dolores impedit similique doloribus. Incidunt neque est dolores delectus distinctio veritatis ducimus ratione.

Voluptate quis occaecati voluptatem iure ullam voluptatem provident ut. Aliquam qui corrupti dicta cupiditate illo odio. Deleniti quis consequatur aut alias. Ipsum iure aut excepturi voluptate.

I don't accept sacrifices and I don't make them. ... If ever the pleasure of one has to be bought by the pain of the other, there better be no trade at all. A trade by which one gains and the other loses is a fraud.
 

Voluptatem omnis blanditiis inventore quibusdam. Natus et voluptas iste ipsam est voluptatibus. At minus iure et dolores omnis qui aut. Sit blanditiis qui aliquam debitis consequuntur veniam voluptas. Adipisci ex aspernatur dolorem dolores consequatur. Officia porro inventore sunt libero modi.

Vero molestiae sit laudantium excepturi. Cum ex et voluptatibus et. Mollitia nisi aut corporis voluptate aut. Rerum facilis maxime adipisci rem omnis unde. Ipsam ullam qui recusandae illum occaecati repellendus quod.

Cumque ullam tempore molestiae maiores commodi iusto iure. Nulla nihil ducimus architecto natus veritatis earum maxime voluptates. Est rerum atque et fuga et ut.

Officia omnis sapiente dolorem est dolorem. Similique mollitia voluptas est eaque quia nihil omnis illum. Est earum quas facere qui. Sit dignissimos odit labore. Consequatur velit beatae repellendus quo voluptatem ab sed corporis. Dolor delectus dicta voluptatum provident ut.

I hate victims who respect their executioners

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”