I'm being asked to give comment to WSJ

Hi guys. I'm being asked to give a comment on an old startup I worked for with the WSJ. What is the general consensus on talking to the press about an old job (people always asked about [redacted company], but my severance was on the line).

I have no ties, and was technically fired due to performance (i.e. I had another job offer and they found out).

I don't want to be an asshole, but I'd definitely give them some of the juicy deets of how it went down over there. Just what's your opinion.

 

doesnt sound like you have much to worry about, though if you are concerned on where to draw the line, obviously consider what you have to gain from it, e.g. are they going to link to your website/twitter etc? (if you have your own thing)

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 
AndyLouis:

doesnt sound like you have much to worry about, though if you are concerned on where to draw the line, obviously consider what you have to gain from it, e.g. are they going to link to your website/twitter etc? (if you have your own thing)

That's exactly what I want to do. I want to plug my website and will be named as CEO of XXX, prior Account Executive at blah.

But I feel they're trying to get a bit of dirt maybe. So I plan to draw a line, but is telling the truth going to be a negative light?

"It is better to have a friendship based on business, than a business based on friendship." - Rockefeller. "Live fast, die hard. Leave a good looking body." - Navy SEAL
 

they'll definitely want dirt, they want the most interesting story possible, SSits nailed it pretty good below. go in with a plan and if they ask you a question youre not comfortable with just decline to answer, or steer the answer in a direction that works for you

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 
Best Response

Typically when there's an option of speaking to the media, the upside is very limited, if not non-existent. The potential downside is significant.

You've referred to plugging your existing business. Journalists are not your friend. You are a means to an end for them. They may promise to plug you, but chances are they won't do that in the final piece (what's in it for them?).

Even if the journalist sincerely intends to include a plug for you, he/she has to get that past the sub-editors. Sub-editors owe you nothing.

I've seen people talk to journalists, only then for the sub-editor to take the story and completely turn it around compared to what the journalist originally intended (if you assume the journalist was telling the truth to the interviewee in the first place). The resulting story has fucked over the interviewees.

In short, don't trust journalists at all. Do not believe their promises, don't think you can play the game for your own upside etc. Chances are, at the very best you'll come out with no upside, at worst you'll be completely fucked over by the whole thing.

EDIT: If you're planning to do this anonymously, then what's in it for you? No upside at all. And you still risk being identified, as the journalist may not name you, but leave enough clues that make it clear to the old employers who you are. So there's a good chance of downside risk.

Journalists will fuck you over. They'll fuck you like an octopus in a Japanese cartoon. They'll fuck you in directions you never saw them coming from and in every orifice.

EDIT EDIT: Some of my best friends are journalists.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 
SSits:

Typically when there's an option of speaking to the media, the upside is very limited, if not non-existent. The potential downside is significant.

You've referred to plugging your existing business. Journalists are not your friend. You are a means to an end for them. They may promise to plug you, but chances are they won't do that in the final piece (what's in it for them?).

Even if the journalist sincerely intends to include a plug for you, he/she has to get that past the sub-editors. Sub-editors owe you nothing.

I've seen people talk to journalists, only then for the sub-editor to take the story and completely turn it around compared to what the journalist originally intended (if you assume the journalist was telling the truth to the interviewee in the first place). The resulting story has fucked over the interviewees.

In short, don't trust journalists at all. Do not believe their promises, don't think you can play the game for your own upside etc. Chances are, at the very best you'll come out with no upside, at worst you'll be completely fucked over by the whole thing.

EDIT: If you're planning to do this anonymously, then what's in it for you? No upside at all. And you still risk being identified, as the journalist may not name you, but leave enough clues that make it clear to the old employers who you are. So there's a good chance of downside risk.

Journalists will fuck you over. They'll fuck you like an octopus in a Japanese cartoon. They'll fuck you in directions you never saw them coming from and in every orifice.

EDIT EDIT: Some of my best friends are journalists.

THIS
 
DickFuld:
SSits:

Typically when there's an option of speaking to the media, the upside is very limited, if not non-existent. The potential downside is significant.You've referred to plugging your existing business. Journalists are not your friend. You are a means to an end for them. They may promise to plug you, but chances are they won't do that in the final piece (what's in it for them?).Even if the journalist sincerely intends to include a plug for you, he/she has to get that past the sub-editors. Sub-editors owe you nothing.I've seen people talk to journalists, only then for the sub-editor to take the story and completely turn it around compared to what the journalist originally intended (if you assume the journalist was telling the truth to the interviewee in the first place). The resulting story has fucked over the interviewees.In short, don't trust journalists at all. Do not believe their promises, don't think you can play the game for your own upside etc. Chances are, at the very best you'll come out with no upside, at worst you'll be completely fucked over by the whole thing.EDIT: If you're planning to do this anonymously, then what's in it for you? No upside at all. And you still risk being identified, as the journalist may not name you, but leave enough clues that make it clear to the old employers who you are. So there's a good chance of downside risk.Journalists will fuck you over. They'll fuck you like an octopus in a Japanese cartoon. They'll fuck you in directions you never saw them coming from and in every orifice.EDIT EDIT: Some of my best friends are journalists.

THIS

this
WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

Think how it's going to make you look if they flip it around - you might end up looking like an assehole taking it out on a company he was fired from and that's not going to make your current company look good either.

 

Optio eveniet et eos voluptas sed similique. Numquam alias omnis pariatur qui aut atque nisi. Totam cumque repellendus enim hic. Iste placeat omnis est eius. Aut nesciunt sunt autem est.

In voluptatibus ut totam sit alias quo assumenda. At earum harum minima.

Non facere consequuntur id tempore consequatur. Dolorem dicta dolorem tenetur voluptas totam earum blanditiis. Rerum laborum et soluta rerum autem.

Fuga qui ducimus vitae laboriosam quis at ipsum. Magnam quo magnam neque consequatur debitis est. Aut numquam voluptatem ut quo debitis voluptate in exercitationem. Corrupti quisquam voluptas dolores blanditiis ipsam debitis excepturi. Quo nihil accusamus ratione velit expedita eaque qui.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”