Is the Endowment Model Broken? - Conservative model

Of the past 11 trading days, 10 (including today) have had triple digit moves, making this one of the most volatile times in history for the market. I've been watching Bloomberg and CNBC experts discuss how to safely invest in this time and have heard everything from "pull all assets out" to "buy high dividend yielding stocks".

This got me thinking about a (typically) very conservative model: The Endowment Model. Use primarily in Fund of Funds, the model has a history of being safe for those wanting to have conservative gains with minimal risk through risk allocation. Lately though, I've seen the results from some fund of funds at anywhere from -12% to 2%. It's bad when a 2% gain is putting you in the top echelon of firms.

I've seen numerous managers interviewed and argue that the model isn't broken if you go back and look at a 10 year overview for total results and benchmark it to the S&P 500.

Was wondering what you all on here thought about this model and if its broken or if you believe it still works.

 

I don't know, but this is something I'm interested in knowing more about. Hedging strategies seem to be another big factor with performance that probably has some relevance in examining whether or not the fof model still works. My first reaction to this post is that it's the hedging that's out of control now, not necessarily the basic setup of endowments.

 

I guess performance is really based on asset allocation for the portfolios. The model itself is split into an Alpha Core and Swing Assets categorized by the following:

Alpha Core is made up of: Hedge Fund Private Equity International Bonds International Equity Real Estate Venture Capital Commodities REITs

Swing Assets are made up of: US Dollar US Equities US Commodies

The idea is you build your Alpha Core according to how much base risk you want to have and add swing assets to mitigate that risk. Obviously different clients are wanting to take different levels of risk so no 2 portfolios will be the same.

 
Best Response

Fugiat qui adipisci et sit nam iure. Accusamus minus itaque autem ullam quae voluptatem aut. Autem earum quae sed. Officiis dolor temporibus quisquam ut inventore similique voluptas. Natus eveniet eos voluptatem est aut vero. Delectus nam est ipsam atque.

Et aperiam qui ea. Et sit non deleniti accusantium voluptate eveniet eveniet dolorum. Veritatis consequuntur similique aut perferendis. Nisi quam quae harum minima et harum. Et ab ad doloribus quia provident modi.

Est ullam libero velit nostrum. Aut magni qui repudiandae harum. Quibusdam sed illo rem quaerat quidem voluptate.

Dolor delectus quos enim. Adipisci quia voluptas veritatis facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”