Is VC possible right out of undergrad?
I was wondering if VC was possible right out of undergrad? I know a few companies do take undergrads for PE and HF, but do not know about VC.
My ultimate goal is either PE or VC.
Working in Venture Capital out of Undergrad
Some venture capital firms take undergraduates. These spots usually go to a student with a VC Firms That Hire Undergrads
This list is not all inclusive but it shows that even some of the largest names in venture capital hire undergraduates.
from certified user @VCmonkey"
Breaking into VC/PE from undergrad is very challenging. I did it coming out of university (I cannot reveal which university since that will give me away...I'm on my firm's website). I also cannot reveal which VC fund for similar reasons, but I will tell you that it is an independent (not bank arm) and top-tier VC based in Silicon Valley.
Are you ready to step up your networking game?
The finance networking guide has detailed guidance on how to network with Wall Street professionals. Learn the most important skill for a successful career in finance.
It all comes down to networking.
My buddy's dad runs a VC firm and he got in right out of undergrad of course haha.
There are few firms that take undergrads straight out of school, and in most instances, it's from networking or a prior relationship. Insight Venture Partners comes to mind as one of the rare opportunities to join a VC firm through OCR (Harvard, Penn, Princeton, NYU only), but they have a very different role for junior personnel than most.
Yea its possible. Know your shit though as it'll be tough to get
BVP ... not easy. USV also was hiring a while back.
It's definitely possible. I'm currently doing an internship at a VC firm, and I have seen several firms based in Asia that take in undergrads. Usually they have top stats or strong connections with someone in the firm, typically at the partner level.
VC and PE are two very distinct fields. VC focuses more on the business model since most start-ups have projections that are overly-optimistic and so aren't as heavily regarded as compared to the growth potential. On the other hand, there is a significantly greater emphasis on financial engineering and making equity sweat, so you'll be actively engaged in modeling to find ways to load debt on the company instead of taking an active role in managing the company.
Please choose wisely. Don't dive into either field simply because of the $ and the notion that buy-side > sell-side in terms of compensation. In fact, compensation at ibanks at the entry-level pay SIGNIFICANTLY higher than at VC firms UNLESS you work at a mega-fund i.e. Blackstone/TPG/Carlyle. Remember, the grass is always greener on the other side.
Thanks a lot for the info.
Yes! Some of the firms like alsop louie partners have campus associate programs, so check those out.
I know Terra Firma does
Yup, a guy from Haas went straight to work for a VC somewhere in Boston.
Sure it is possible. That said, VC is a bubble right now with too many bad firms. You really want to be at a top shop, and in order to get there it might be best to not go directly.
Why no undergrads straight to VC? (Originally Posted: 08/10/2013)
Especially at early stage firms. Why are grads so much more valuable after 2-3 years at an investment bank than they are coming out of undergrad? From what I understand there isn't excessive in depth modeling going on at early stage firms anyway. Coming out of undergrad the VC firm could pay them less and I find it hard to believe their sourcing abilities would be THAT much better after an analyst stint in IB.
Help me understand why moving from undergrad to vc is so rare but 2-3 years of IB to VC isn't.
I'm pretty sure nobody actually cares about financial modeling experience in venture capital. Some DCFs are nice but they're never ever going to need somebody who knows M&A or LBO modeling. It's literally no use to them.
VCs are successful if and only if their deals are successful. That means they need good deal flow. Which means they need credibility. In a world where there is tons of excess capital and not enough good entrepreneurs, the best deals end up becoming a contest between just a few investors - Sequoia, Accel, Greylock, KPCB, and the like. The reason these firms are successful is not only because their founding partners are typically illustrious billionaires, but also because the people sourcing their deal flow are very accomplished in themselves.
Take, for instance, the Sequoia scout program: http://pandodaily.com/2012/05/04/sequoia-confirms-existence-of-stealth-…
This program focuses on the use of angel investors to source deal flow. The reason is that the number one source of deals for any accomplished VC firm is through other entrepreneurs, whether they're acquaintances or current portfolio executives. Using angels adds credibility and allows entrepreneurs to place trust into a person who they know can add value to their company as they scale.
Now imagine you're an entrepreneur, and instead of an angel or a current entrepreneur, some kid who just graduated from college approaches you attempting to get in on the next investment round. Would you take him seriously? No.
Here's a good tweet to reflect on: https://twitter.com/jordancooper/status/352498731100291073
Few people can argue with that. VC firms hired experienced people because they need to find people who can represent their brand. KKR doesn't necessarily need to care that much about who their associates are because they'll add more value through modeling than actually sourcing deal flow (especially at the scale with which they operate). But with entrepreneurs it's not only hard to source deal flow, but new associates are heavily relied upon to source and research incoming deals, screening for potentially lucrative investments. This means they need to be respected by their target entrepreneurs, which is more likely if they're ex-bankers, consultants, or engineers as opposed to some frat bro that just graduated college.
I'm sorry if this answer is long winded. I'm kinda drunk right now and it's 4AM.
Tl;dr - VCs want people that entrepreneurs will trust. Entrepreneurs will not trust fresh college grads. They will be more likely to trust the experienced banker, entrepreneur, or product manager/engineer.
Totally agree with the post above. Experience is crucial for the top firms. Reputable VCs and corporate venture arms (ie. Google Ventures) are more about your vast knowledge and experience. In addition, they want people with actual experience in building and potentially selling their own tech start ups. Two to three years at a top BB won't always do the trick. Also, remember that VC is a lot about forming relationships in the tech community and helping the company you invest in grow through operational and strategic support. Unless you sold a start up to Marissa Mayer at age 20, a kid coming out of college with no tech or finance experience will not be very valuable to a VC.
That being said, some firms (very small minority) offer junior positions to TOP graduates out of college. Insight Venture Partners, Summit Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners and a few others come to mind. Most of these graduates have at least some rock star tech/finance experience and come from Ivy League school. Moreover, these analyst positions typically fall under the sourcing model (a lot of cold calling) job description. These jobs are still top-notch / great experiences though. If you can get one, grab it!
You actually won't do much modeling in VC and all due diligence/company&industry research/business analysis require you to have vast knowledge and experience in that industry, which are not commonly seen from undergrads. It's normally a small team, so if somehow you need to see a client, why that tech start-up will believe that you, a young recent graduate without any credentials, can give advice and make right judgement?
But certainly there are some top kids who break into vc out of undergrad, but i wouldn't really recommend to do so.
Another route is going from BCG or McKinsey into VC
VC right out of UG (Originally Posted: 02/26/2008)
What do people think of the opportunity to work as an analyst at a vc fund like Bessemer Venture Partners right out of undergrad as opposed to working at a BB?
any thoughts???
What do you expect people to say? Bessemer is one of the best VC shops out there- if you want to do VC as a career, take the job. If you don't, don't.
You should be more specific...
Possible VC Opportunity Out of Undergrad? (Originally Posted: 09/16/2014)
Hey Guys, I've been interning with a small VC (currently raising a 20mm first round) and helping with early diligence and organizing their pipeline. What are your thoughts on a possible hire after graduation? Are they too small to even consider an analyst? Right now there are 2 Managing Partners and a few venture partners. Thank you all for your help.
It depends on a lot of variables. For example... Do you have a better offer elsewhere? What type of responsibilities will you have as an analyst (sourcing or actual transactional/operational)? Is the firm located in a city where you can easily network to other firms later on? There are many other things to consider.
Fund size is merely an indicator of prestige (IMO). If its not very well known, I would concentrate on the responsibilities and experience that you might get out of the analyst gig.
2% of $20 MM and they won't get more income until they raise more (likely a bit away) or exit a company (likely very far away). If I do the math I wouldn't say it's looking promising.
Entering VC from Wharton UG (Originally Posted: 06/23/2010)
Hey guys,
Well, I am an incoming freshman at Wharton and am curious about VC. Firstly, how easy (is it possible?) is it for a Wharton UG to land a nice VC position pre-MBA? Additionally, assuming it is at least possible, what classes are needed to enter into VC?
Thanks, Robbie
Check out the book "Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation" by Andrew Metrick. He teaches a class of the same name at Wharton.
At my school (not Wharton) a couple of VC funds, even a mega, recruited UG analysts. From my understanding you need to be more creative and have unique qualifications/experiences to catch their eye than say your normal IB recruiting resume.
Dude, it's way too early to think about that...you're gonna take core and gen ed classes for the first two years anyway
agree w. noonies- but after an internship and exposure to a couple of firms there's not "set path," except for the big boys, and even then it's def not "set." I.E there are other ways in besides Goldman TMT
Plenty of VC firms in Philly full of Wharton alumni. Do a search and start sending out emails. Eureka Growth Partners comes to mind.
anthony check PM's
Undergrad Straight to VC? (Originally Posted: 08/08/2012)
Would like to get a VC internship next summer and hopefully convert that into a full-time offer.
http://www.razume.com/documents/26846
Pretty tough to convert a summer internship at a VC firm into full-time, even with your great CV. Usually you need to provide some serious value-add (very in-depth knowledge of an industry and the investment process)
Again, possible but extremely tough
1- The title you've given yourself at your company/project is a little on the toolish side and I'd probably change it to "Founder and President" but that's just me.
2- I'd seriously consider getting rid of EDM from your interests section, assuming that's electronic dance music.
hahaha EDM
[quote=Darkmouth]Would like to get a VC internship next summer and hopefully convert that into a full-time offer.
http://www.razume.com/documents/26846[/quote] Hey Darkmouth, I'm assuming your target school is.....Columbia?
OP - very nice resume ... Can you confirm what font, font size, and margins you are using?
VC out of undergrad (Originally Posted: 05/10/2013)
Sorry this is a stupid question but I've been looking on the web for a couple quick answers and couldn't find them.
It sounds like most people go into VC out of grad school with experience as an investment banker or another prestigious job. Is it possible or common to go into VC out of undergrad? If so are there many firms that will help pay for grad school or are you stuck (one website said it's pretty impossible to move up the corporate ladder without a graduate degree)
Also, are the hours for the first few years similar to a banking analyst (found one website that said that but that was it)?
Thanks
Would be very hard. Possible if you are at a top target(especially harvard). Had interviewed with a small VC firm at silicon valley. The interviewer told me that a lot of their applicants are actual entrepreneurs who really have started and managed their companies. So if you have similar experience, it'd be easier.
Going to a top VC out of undergrad is not feasible. I have watched kids with realistic shots at the Rhodes and offers from Goldman SSG fail. They need people with experience.
Contrary to the above two, a good buddy of mine went to VC out of undergrad. (he went to virginia tech). Got hired by a retail bank's VC arm after interning there for two years, worked for a couple years, then got hired by Draper.
i know a cuny kid that just got into the vc arm of a huge insurance company...it can be done.
rare
Internships are rare but full time analyst roles are even more rare. Good luck though
If I wanted to go into VC is management consulting out of undergrad a bad route to start on?
Magni a labore praesentium tenetur velit deserunt. Et dicta quis et in sed. Dicta modi ratione libero est aperiam et cupiditate. Qui alias distinctio magnam autem totam ea fuga. Et reprehenderit placeat nihil est ut.
Voluptatem aut et nemo. Ab autem sit reprehenderit voluptas. Est accusamus incidunt odio ea in. Neque aut omnis qui et dolor amet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Enim cumque aperiam quidem qui optio. Consequatur et quo fugit. Non eligendi omnis delectus. Magni optio nemo qui.
Velit omnis hic dignissimos et non delectus voluptate. Asperiores laudantium repellat necessitatibus aliquam. Eum quam iste debitis molestias qui quae sint. Et dolores eius et dolores esse. Nihil quas perferendis sunt deserunt asperiores temporibus. Deleniti est ut repellendus ullam quasi ut.
Dignissimos dolores ratione rerum quasi. Omnis porro eligendi et sed rerum minus. Unde pariatur sint odit voluptatem. Sint quo deserunt quo autem quibusdam ipsa consectetur.
Voluptatum et laborum molestias sed eum quia et. Cum maiores excepturi quis enim aperiam. Et et eos a delectus vel ut ipsam. Molestiae doloremque ea doloribus aliquid est dolor facere.
Repellendus expedita sint laudantium reprehenderit. Doloribus sapiente eveniet vitae cum ad vitae. Reiciendis dolores quaerat dicta saepe.
Laborum qui dolorem corrupti eum et. Non animi assumenda fugit quod. Laudantium quaerat maiores quis id exercitationem.
Sed sit minima id mollitia et quo rerum non. Nemo ipsum error nam eos labore. Tenetur accusantium sed id. Ut facere qui pariatur at qui aliquam est. Sit voluptatem deserunt praesentium enim architecto quae reiciendis. Voluptatem repellendus repellat occaecati iure.