Distressed PE vs Distressed HF?
What exactly differentiates a PE firm specializing in distressed debt from a distressed debt HF?
Does the private equity firm intend to take control of them company, while the HF would just go along for the ride?
I have been reading http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/ pretty regularly, but not much mention is made of distressed/HY PE firms. What are some examples?
Distressed PE firms are just turnaround firms.
I'm curious as well...don't distressed debt HFs do loan-to-own as well (e.g. silver point)?
My guess (VERY speculative): distressed PE buys private debt, distressed HFs buy public debt. is that true in anyway?
Interested as well
Thanks for the great post. So, the distressed PE firms people talk about when referencing restructuring exit opps are just normal turnaround shops?
Are there any particularly well known mezz/debt PE firms beyond Oaktree, GSC, and Sankaty (some of which are more like HFs)?
great post smitty!
Regular (Buyout) PE: Sponsor buys company using debt. Company pays down debt, improves operations, is sold at a higher multiple than it was purchased at. Example: Bain/TPG/GSCP buys out Burger King, IPOs it in 2006.
Distressed PE Varies. The sponsor can a) buy the equity of a distressed company, b) buy the public debt of a distressed company and steer for reorg to gain control, c) buy assets of companies that are in bankruptcy. There are a million variations/blendings of these strategies as well.
Example of a): What BX and Icahn tried to do with Dynegy. Sometimes scenario A involves buying the equity AFTER a bankruptcy to infuse cash and pay down debt.
Examples of b): Carlyle bought Metaldyne bonds during the downturn, ended up holding the keys. Apollo et al bought the mezzanine debt of Gala Coral in the UK and seized control from various UK buyout groups.
Examples of c): KPS bought various forging assets out of bankruptcy to form HHI.
Wayzata Partners bought various forging and stamping assets out of bankruptcy to form Grede Holdings.
These transactions can happen in any part of the bankruptcy/reorg process (Before/during/after). If the sponsor buys debt before hand, will often try to get involved and negotiate their way into being the "fulcrum" security (the creditors that end up holding the controlling equity stake) whereas a HF may want equity or they may just want to get paid out at par (usually they'll make money either way).
One thing that seperates distressed PE from regular buyout PE is that distressed sponsors sometimes buy their initial stake on an unlevered basis and then do a dividend recap/backlever once the company has turned around. Usually a company in distress is in no place to be taking on debt and interest expense.
Depending on how it's executed, distressed PE can blur the lines between PE investing and hedge fund investing (like the Carlyle example.) Many distressed debt hedge funds take illiquid positions and end up holding equity, so like Smitty pointed out sometimes the only real difference ends up being whether they're gunning for control or not.
The lines blur even further because most of the big sponsors have various debt/special situations arms as well (Bain/Sankaty, KKR/KKR Mezz, BX/GSO, TPG, Apollo and Ares have credit management arms as well, places like Oaktree and Carlyle have multiple funds and flexible mandates to allow them to buy distressed securities as well as taking controlling equity stakes.)
what is back leverage? and can you give an example of how it works? heaven't heard of this term before. thanks
There are a number of reasons this isn't ideal, and I can't say it happens that often with equity sponsors-the few examples I've seen have been evergreen/family office/conglomerate sponsors who don't necessarily have the same outlook as a pure buyout sponsor.
It's more common in the mezzanine/MM debt world, because those portfolios produce steady cash flows to support the debt, and in real estate, for both cash flow reasons and the fairly reliable asset valuation.
An example of this is Garrison's CLO of its MM/distressed/mezz loans: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-29/deutsche-bank-said-to-market-3…
Lynn Tilton, who's been in the news a lot lately, actually patented a distressed CLO structure which her firm uses to take controlling equity stakes (not really related to backlevering but interesting and relevant to the topic). http://blogs.forbes.com/investor/2011/04/06/lynn-tilton-diva-in-distres…
Kenny gets a SB :)
job decision: distressed PE or equity HF? (Originally Posted: 12/13/2007)
Hey guys,
I am a senior in college and currently deciding between two job offers for analyst positions, both of which are quite interesting and I can't make up my mind. I was wondering what you guys thought, hopefully that will help me a bit with my decision.
here's how I see the pros and cons
Job 1) distressed pe shop, brand name.
Job 2) small but fine long/short equity HF, ~$2b AUM
I am assuming compensation is comparable or differences are small enough for me not to base my decision on it.
Also, what do you guys think about switching between these two industries? Is it easier to go from PE to an equity HF or the other way round?
Looking forward to what you have to say!
How could you possibly not know what the comp is for each offer?
exactly where bonuses will be i am guessing.
kinda depends whats more interesting to you man, P/E or trading.
Compensation is generally based on multipes of base and they should guide you to a range, esp at the HF. I agree with iambateman - you have to figure out if you want P/E or trading but here are some additional thoughts:
1) There are going to be a lot of distressed ops in the next year so as long as this PE shop is a decent size and aggressive, you will close deals. You can always ask the shop how busy they are which is a pretty good indicator. Also, monitoring companies isnt that bad as you deal with management (C-level) and can learn about operating companies etc. I also dont know what you mean about "boring" industries. A lot of big PE deals over the past few years have dealt with "unsexy" industries like Auto but the deals themselves are still interesting. You should read this article: http://lbo.djnewsletters.com/exclusives.asp?s=DEALBOOK&sid=LHNQHJKKQPI
2) You will make contacts in a HF, they will just be different from those at a PE shop. You'll meet individuals at other HFs, industry analysts, etc. Also, the deals at a HF are vastly different from deals in a PE shop so i dont think the two are comparable.
In the end, just go to wherever your most comfortable. Both are good opportunities. As for your last question, its generally easier to go from PE to HF but each situation is different.
Velit blanditiis dolor cum quam ipsa tempora qui molestiae. Voluptate doloribus iste autem provident ipsa dolorum harum. Unde corporis sint saepe aliquid. Non in laudantium magni iste porro aut. Quisquam iure et ex quam occaecati velit.
Ut laboriosam repellat labore earum. Quam quia aut sit consequatur id et delectus. Ex ipsam voluptatibus aliquid inventore. Nemo dolore consequuntur est aliquam. A eum explicabo sapiente rerum harum. Placeat autem in eum temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...