Just How Bad Is This Job Market ?

I'm a recent graduate of a top 10 undergrad business school (student-athlete, 3.5 GPA) who was hoping to get a job in banking or s&t out of college. Instead, I'm working at what I consider to be a mediocre job at a mid-sized Asset Management firm making about half as much as I would be making at a Wall St. job. Since I've started this job 6 months ago, I've been applying to all sorts of firms, BBs, MMs and even prop shops. I can't even get a whiff of an interview. Those close to me tell me to stop complaining because I'm lucky to even have a job. I think that's BS.

This got me thinking...just how bad is this job market? The reason I pose this question is because as a recent college grad, I don't actually know what a good job market looks like.

I'll present the following numbers...please criticize or correct them because they are extremely rough estimates. I'm aware I'm making assumptions and generalizations and not accounting for many variables.

Let's assume that 3 million kids graduated college in 2010. That's 1/100th of the American population or 1,000 kids at each of America's 3,000 colleges and universities.

Let's rank all 3 million of those grads according to how " good or qualified" they are. Coming from a top 25 US News school, I'd put myself somewhere in the top 200,000 college grads of the Class of 2010. Roughly the top 7%. So now you have 200,000 to work with.

Let's say 75% of those top 200,000 want to go to law school, med school, grad school or another profession such as engineering or computer science. That's leaves 50,000 competing for the finance/consulting jobs.

My question is...how many "1st year analyst" positions were available in the US at attractive places for the graduates of 2010? Again, let's assume BBs, MMs, top consulting firms, prop shops, etc. My guess would obviously be that supply is not meeting demand, even for those in the top 7% of grads. What did this same number look like in 2006? How much harder is it to get a banking job now vs. 2006 for someone right out of college?

And lastly, are there ever going to be a flurry of banking jobs again, or is the field changed forever due to the crisis, meaning the graduates in 2009 and beyond are just unlucky?

I don't mean to sound bitter that I didn't get what I want, I'm just looking for a comparison between now and a "good job market."

Thanks.

 

It is impossible to try to even guess the statistics. I'll say this: I secured a banking job in Fall 2006. I'd never have secured a banking job in 2008, 2009, or 2010. Timing matters a lot. For those who were unfortunate enough to graduate in recent years, the opportunity was still there, the bar was simply set much, much higher.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

I'm interested in this as well. 2010 is supposed to be much better than 2008 or 2009 for example.

I know most of the complaints about a job-less recovery seems from the working class non-skilled or low-skilled jobs but how is it impacting IBD?

I'm graduating in 2012, it can only get better from now right? Even if its a double-dip recession.

 

well, while the stats are impossible to guess and I graduated in 2008 so I haven't ever seen a super-bright job market, I'm going to say that the answer is probably both. Perhaps in the frothy days of 2004-2006 you might have gotten the job in IBD, but that's not to say that you shouldn't have gotten one now. Even though the market is bad all the top banks are still hiring analysts and I'm sure if you had a 3.8 at an Ivy w/ 1500+ on SATs you'd have found yourself a BB IBD position in M&A or whatever other sexy group you were looking for. The reality is that, while we hear stories of non-targets getting good jobs on the street and its certainly possible, once you show up at a top firm it's hugely populated with people from top schools and great stats.

Now that I'm in China it's a different mix, but when I was in London at a different REPE firm before this I was stunned at how literally 95% of the analysts/associates were from Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, H/Y/P and Stanford. I went to an Ivy, but not one of the tops, and I still felt out-gunned by these kids skills and resumes. Even solid undergrad b-schools like ross and stern had 0% representation. And that was essentially true at the NYC office as well...

I'm not saying that you should be satisfied / complacent with your current position, but with a 3.5 from a seemingly non-target school, the fact that you got a job working in finance isn't bad considering market conditions. You may not get into IBD right away (or even in the next few years), but if you keep on fighting and improving yourself --- get promoted, lateral to a better AM firm, etc, you'll likely be able to go to a solid MBA. Maybe you'll be able to get an Associate position at a solid bank after that... It's probably hard and annoying to look so far down the road, but its a lot better than giving up.

 
International Pymp:
well, while the stats are impossible to guess and I graduated in 2008 so I haven't ever seen a super-bright job market, I'm going to say that the answer is probably both. Perhaps in the frothy days of 2004-2006 you might have gotten the job in IBD, but that's not to say that you shouldn't have gotten one now. Even though the market is bad all the top banks are still hiring analysts and I'm sure if you had a 3.8 at an Ivy w/ 1500+ on SATs you'd have found yourself a BB IBD position in M&A or whatever other sexy group you were looking for. The reality is that, while we hear stories of non-targets getting good jobs on the street and its certainly possible, once you show up at a top firm it's hugely populated with people from top schools and great stats.

Now that I'm in China it's a different mix, but when I was in London at a different REPE firm before this I was stunned at how literally 95% of the analysts/associates were from Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, H/Y/P and Stanford. I went to an Ivy, but not one of the tops, and I still felt out-gunned by these kids skills and resumes. Even solid undergrad b-schools like ross and stern had 0% representation. And that was essentially true at the NYC office as well...

I'm not saying that you should be satisfied / complacent with your current position, but with a 3.5 from a seemingly non-target school, the fact that you got a job working in finance isn't bad considering market conditions. You may not get into IBD right away (or even in the next few years), but if you keep on fighting and improving yourself --- get promoted, lateral to a better AM firm, etc, you'll likely be able to go to a solid MBA. Maybe you'll be able to get an Associate position at a solid bank after that... It's probably hard and annoying to look so far down the road, but its a lot better than giving up.

Thanks a lot for the response. I appreciate the advice.

Don't want to get off topic, but a quick question. Do we consider Stern a target? Because my diploma is from a place comparable to Stern.

 
International Pymp:
well, while the stats are impossible to guess and I graduated in 2008 so I haven't ever seen a super-bright job market, I'm going to say that the answer is probably both. Perhaps in the frothy days of 2004-2006 you might have gotten the job in IBD, but that's not to say that you shouldn't have gotten one now.
Considering hiring happens a good 8 or so months in advance, I think 2008 grads had it pretty easy. The banks really didn't start feeling the effects of the recession until after the 2008 incoming analyst class was hired. It was the 2009 and 2010 graduates who got really smoked (recruiting in the fall of the prior year). I will say that the 2008 grads and 2007 grads (my year) had to fight off the seemingly endless layoffs and then recruit for PE positions right in the midst of the shit hitting the fan. I secured my PE job in the winter of 2008 and I was scared to death that it wouldn't be there anymore come the following summer.
CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 
CompBanker:
International Pymp:
well, while the stats are impossible to guess and I graduated in 2008 so I haven't ever seen a super-bright job market, I'm going to say that the answer is probably both. Perhaps in the frothy days of 2004-2006 you might have gotten the job in IBD, but that's not to say that you shouldn't have gotten one now.
Considering hiring happens a good 8 or so months in advance, I think 2008 grads had it pretty easy. The banks really didn't start feeling the effects of the recession until after the 2008 incoming analyst class was hired. It was the 2009 and 2010 graduates who got really smoked (recruiting in the fall of the prior year). I will say that the 2008 grads and 2007 grads (my year) had to fight off the seemingly endless layoffs and then recruit for PE positions right in the midst of the shit hitting the fan. I secured my PE job in the winter of 2008 and I was scared to death that it wouldn't be there anymore come the following summer.

This is almost true from my experience. I secured my job Nov 2007 and started Sept 2008 and it definitely wasn't easy. There were 3 of us meant to start. One offer got dropped and the other analyst I started with was fired in Jan 2009. My friends experienced similar situations at other banks. Banks were already starting to figure that something was up and were slowing hiring already.

 

You should try and put everything into perspective.

The job market right now is terrible, TERRIBLE, for the financial sector. Is the job market terrible for sectors like engineering, general sales, and various tech and IT jobs? Maybe pockets throughout the US, but those job markets are generally a bit stronger than finance right now.

As comp banker said it is all about timing. In 2006 banks would have been a lot more lenient and willing to discuss jobs/interview/opportunities with recent grads. Now they just want the best of the best.

One of my buddies dads is a partner at a larger consulting firm in the south east and he can't even get his son a job.

You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
 
absinthe:
"even prop shops"

...do you know anything about trading?

A lot of those prop shops are better than the bank jobs, especially at the top tier firms like GETCO/Jane Street/SIG ect.

I'm well aware of the strength of those firms, I know a couple SIG employees. I just phrased it that way because it's the IB forum and I'm mostly referring to IB (my first choice for a career). And I don't think I'm competitive at those firms, I meant more along the lines of the 2nd and 3rd tier prop shops.

 
NestoGrande:
absinthe:
"even prop shops"

...do you know anything about trading?

A lot of those prop shops are better than the bank jobs, especially at the top tier firms like GETCO/Jane Street/SIG ect.

I'm well aware of the strength of those firms, I know a couple SIG employees. I just phrased it that way because it's the IB forum and I'm mostly referring to IB (my first choice for a career). And I don't think I'm competitive at those firms, I meant more along the lines of the 2nd and 3rd tier prop shops.

Fair enough.

Good luck with your job search, it is pretty difficult out there. I know prospective traders at HYPSM undergrad who seemed really competent but got screwed, so it's definitely competitive.

If you want more help, posting your resume (omitting identifying info) might probably help.

 

I know how you feel. I graduated this May, ex-football player, 3.4 gpa with double finance/accounting major. I thought I had a job lined up interning at Raymond James down in Tampa for 2 winters. 2009 comes around, and firms continues to layoff employees and impose hiring freeze. What I thought was close to a sure thing pretty much went down the drain. The trader that I interned under also was let go but was good enough to get hired somewhere else. Fortunately, I was able to procure a full time offer from a BB providing service to hedge funds.

For people like us, I think we have to be persistent, be knowledgeable in the industry you want to get into, and most of all, network like crazy to get what we want. The rest lies in a little bit of luck, and the good fortune of having professionals in your industry that's willing to take their time and help you out. WSO is a start. I've met a lot of people on here that's done a lot for me, people like monty09, CLGCTrader, shorttheworld, etc. Good luck

 

I'd say stern is pretty much a target or if not it's definitely a "semi-target". Similar to Ross and UT McCombs... Stern has the advantage of being in NY so a lot of kids graduating from Stern have nice internships. USC and other UG business schools are less targetish, but you'll still see a few kids scattered around at good firms. This is obviously aside from "higher level" (whatever that means) UG business schools like Wharton (clearly the leader), Cornell AEM and MIT Sloan, where you see a ton of kids at good firms.

 

Timing is everything, so is the demand for the positions.

My desk was starving for people when I graduated in 2009, and I was lucky enough (seriously) to know a friend's father who had a client that lived next door to the human resources representative that had casually mentioned the position. I hate saying that because it sucks and is impossible to replicate, but that's how I got in.

After you do break in though, which you will if you keep at it enough, you meet enough people and establish working relationships where these types of random connections are more available. I started off in ops because it was available (and mostly I hadn't started reading this site yet, where taking an ops job is akin to shoveling shit) and showed people that mattered that I could get shit done without having to be asked to do it.

Those skills are what will take you up.

 

I graduated December 2008 and this job market doesnt even begin to compare to off cycle 2008 grads. When I graduated it was the end of the world literally. After I finished my summer analyst position I had 3 "sure things" and when it was all said and done I didnt get any of those. The Market was going to zero. Things have dramatically improved in many other sectors but I think finance is dead last to recover. Places to tend to over hire in good times then over fire in bad times. The worst of everything is clearly behind us.

"Oh the ladies ever tell you that you look like a fucking optical illusion" - Frank Slaughtery 25th Hour.
 
trade4size:
I graduated December 2008 and this job market doesnt even begin to compare to off cycle 2008 grads. When I graduated it was the end of the world literally. After I finished my summer analyst position I had 3 "sure things" and when it was all said and done I didnt get any of those. The Market was going to zero. Things have dramatically improved in many other sectors but I think finance is dead last to recover. Places to tend to over hire in good times then over fire in bad times. The worst of everything is clearly behind us.

Why, exactly, is finance the last to recover? Specifically I'm wondering about banking...I thought it was a "high beta" sector, so it was the first to fire, but also one of the first to start hiring once things picked up.

 

I hope you realize that applying to all those types of jobs probably makes you seem as-if you have literally 0 direction or specific interests. There are few to no similarities between any of those jobs. If your interviewer heard or realized that, it would be an auto-ding at many places. I know where I work (prop shop) frequently autodings very bright kids who, when asked about where else they are looking for employment, mention consulting or IB.

 
Jerome Marrow:
I hope you realize that applying to all those types of jobs probably makes you seem as-if you have literally 0 direction or specific interests. There are few to no similarities between any of those jobs. If your interviewer heard or realized that, it would be an auto-ding at many places. I know where I work (prop shop) frequently autodings very bright kids who, when asked about where else they are looking for employment, mention consulting or IB.

You make an excellent point that I don't have my heart set on a specific field. This is possibly a big downfall, but as you mentioned, I'm not dumb enough to say that in an interview. I have several different resumes depending on where I'm applying, but the point I was trying to make is I can't even get my foot in the door...anywhere, and I doubt that has anything to do with a lack of direction. Like everyone else on these boards, I want a job that will provide me with good earning potential, something that matches the quality of the education I received. I don't believe I'm getting that now and I don't like my future prospects at my current employer.

I don't understand how I'm supposed to have my heart set on a very specific career without having actually done work in that industry. Sure, I've done my research, I've sat on a commodities market-making desk during an interview for 30 minutes, but even that doesn't give you a true feel for the job. I don't know exactly what I want, but I know I don't want what I'm doing now. I consider myself a fairly talented individual looking for a little luck and a chance to pursue a good career in finance. It's tough to put things in perspective and think that the other 90% of America is working at very middle of the road jobs and I'm bitching about my 50k starting salary at my AM job. Sometimes you just get greedy, but I feel I've put in a lot of work during my first 22 years.

 
NestoGrande:
but I feel I've put in a lot of work during my first 22 years.

You know dude, a lot of people on this board might be able to sympathize with that statement and when I was 22 I felt like I was owed the world too. The fact of the matter is no, at 22, you aren't owed anything in life and no one cares about you.

I could get into this a lot further, but I feel like the quote in my signature explains it all.

You're born, you take shit. You get out in the world, you take more shit. You climb a little higher, you take less shit. Till one day you're up in the rarefied atmosphere and you've forgotten what shit even looks like. Welcome to the layer cake, son.
 

"If you let finace be twice as large (just because of the variety of roles), that's still only 15,000 spots for those 50,000 kids."

Finance is only twice as large as consulting? Also, twice as large would mean 10k spots, learn some math.

Also, 50k kids looking for finance jobs makes absolutely no sense.

 

Nesto I feel your pain. I was a non-Ivy 2009 grad, basically my final fall semester sucked. I even considered law school.... Fortunately I was talked out of that. I remember my last recruiting season banks had signed up and a few even came to campus but by late september our campus career calendar was like a ghost town.

As Clemenza from the Godfather said, "These things gotta happen every five years or so, ten years. Helps to get rid of the bad blood. Been ten years since the last one."

You were me last year bro - had a job but not the one I wanted because Wall St. had to hit restart. I had to go back to school to hop back on a more traditional recruitment path, which worked out. I used getting an MSF as a means to an end, you should consider it. Dont get discouraged it sucks at times, but you have to Jerry Rice everyone and out work them - show the banks you really want it.

Plus classes of 09/10 get to start careers after a recession, were buying the dip, so when the economy starts booming again we will be the "higher ups" and you know what that means $$$.

 

1) 1.5 million earn bachelors, 700,000 earn associates. AD doesn't count, so we'll say 1.5m.

2) You are at a top 10 b-school with a 3.5 gpa. Let's let that assume you are in the top 30% of your class.

3) To start, being in the top 30% of your class means you are in a better position than 1,050,000 students, leaving 450,000 to compete against.

4) Let's assume your top 10 b-schools is also a top 25 school. We can rule out the schools coming in outside of the top 50 (since non-targets make up a smaller fraction of WS jobs), effectively eliminating approx. (this is a low-ball guess) 80% of the remaining competition. This leaves you with 90,000 students to compete against.

5) Out of these 90,000, how many go to law school/med school/non-profits/other jobs. Probably a good number, kind of ridiculous to figure that out.

I obviously gave the numbers some room to pit you against the most possible applicants. I'd assume probably somewhere around 40-50k apply for finance jobs (including all BB's MMs boutiques). I don't know, is someone needing some case study practice that wants to take a crack at this?

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 
Ben Shalom Bernanke:
monkeysama:
It's bad. I've been unemployed since June.

This is my resume: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B6lf…

That asset management company you mentioned; is it hiring?

I feel like Nesto needs to quit bitching. It could be worse. You aren't really owed anything.

Bullshit. No one is ever owed anything and yet some people are born with a silver stick up their ass aren't they? What does that supposed to even mean "You aren't owed anything"? Go fuck yourself in the face.

 
monkeysama:
It's bad. I've been unemployed since June.

This is my resume: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B6lf…

That asset management company you mentioned; is it hiring?

No wonder you didn't get a job yet, you listed your gpa as 3.51/4.0 tart. If you feel it is so important to recruiters that they see that additional 1/100th of a decimal gpa, it should look like this: 3.51/4.00.

Piss poor attention-to-detail.

 
Getgo:
monkeysama:
It's bad. I've been unemployed since June.

This is my resume: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B6lf…

That asset management company you mentioned; is it hiring?

No wonder you didn't get a job yet, you listed your gpa as 3.51/4.0 tart. If you feel it is so important to recruiters that they see that additional 1/100th of a decimal gpa, it should look like this: 3.51/4.00.

Piss poor attention-to-detail.

I like how you typo'd "tard" as "tart". Piss poor attention to detail! Your wiener will now be dipped in acid! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA.

Grow up.

 

It is a good market for candidates who have done their homework. Keep your head down and don't stop trying.. Re-examine your strategy and perhaps commit to one area (eg S&T or IBD)

ambition is a state of permanent dissatisfaction with the present.
 

The job market in certain areas is a lot worse than last year, not quite as bad as 2008 though. Many banks overhired their 2010 SA class in expectation of an upturn.. now grads have to suffer (e.g. zero FT hiring in IBD ans S&T at JPM). Unfortunately these cycles are part of the business and always has been like that. Only thing you can do is to adjust your timing, by postponing graduation, doing another internship etc.

 

All bitching aside, it is a terrible job market especially for recent grads.

I remember reading in WSJ or NYT that the reason for this persistently high unemployment rate is not that there are still massive layoffs, but that there is a huge drop in the hiring people. If you're currently employed, then you probably won't see sizable layoffs, but if you're unemployed, there is a real barrier to getting a job. This is especially true for college grads with no real experience.

Furthermore, the numbers for unemployment among recent grads are totally skewed because many recent grads didn't work in college or didn't pull enough hours to be considered part of the labor force. There was a joke of an article that said unemployment among college grads was calculated be less than 5% (by the gov't).

However, last winter some poll was taken for 2009 grads and found that more than half were unemployed or working part time in dead end jobs that used to be reserved for high school kids. Somehow, I doubt the situation is much improved for class of 2010.

Good luck on your job search monkeysama.

 
Best Response

I think there was a recent article in CNN saying that the majority of 25/26 year olds have been laid off at least once since they've graduated. It is definitely bad out there for new grads. Meanwhile, in certain instances, headhunters have been calling up the wazoo. I'd say there's a big need in finance for the junior/mid-level roles (and by junior, i don't mean 1st year analysts). Intuitively, it makes sense: VPs and associates were generally the first ones who were laid off when the market was really bad.

Like Compbanker, I was lucky to have gotten a job in Fall '06. By the time I joined (and at the time, I wanted to do mortgage/asset-backed securities! yay!), the market had turned and melted down almost instantly.

At the end, a lot of getting into this space (and staying in) has to do with timing and luck. You can do everything right and still not end up where you want to be.

The cash payouts of the '05 / '06 / '07 timeframe are long gone and not likely to come back any time soon. One of my favorite posts on here thusfar has been Uncle Eddie's "Why You're So Easy to Replace". Definitely give that a read.

 

swagon - Im saying that because truthfully it seems like finance got to big. At one point it was like 13% S&P. Basically the industry is seeing a permanent contraction in its overall size. I guess thats a good thing because hopefully it gives the smart kids incentive to want to do other things. If all the smart people go to finance we arent going to have any doctors, engineers, or technology. Cant rely on an economy based around financial services have to produce something real. Unfortunately im not willing to give so hopefully able to squeeze another person into the already overcrowded elevator.

"Oh the ladies ever tell you that you look like a fucking optical illusion" - Frank Slaughtery 25th Hour.
 
trade4size:
swagon - Im saying that because truthfully it seems like finance got to big. At one point it was like 13% S&P. Basically the industry is seeing a permanent contraction in its overall size. I guess thats a good thing because hopefully it gives the smart kids incentive to want to do other things. If all the smart people go to finance we arent going to have any doctors, engineers, or technology. Cant rely on an economy based around financial services have to produce something real. Unfortunately im not willing to give so hopefully able to squeeze another person into the already overcrowded elevator.

So true. I did a hard science/engineering (comp) with double in international relations but went into consulting. My family friend at MIT who did Biochem went to BB, and another friend at top IVY in Bio/Chem (i thought be doctor) went into consulting as well. This is the trend, and it kind of sucks. The cost/benefits of technology, engineering, etc. just doesn't add up for decently smart and hard working folks who want the stable/steady career path in US. Of course entrepreneurship is a whole different story.

2009 was probably the worst. I help my firm recruit at my Alma Mater. We interviewed a ton of very qualified, many of them more impressive than my resume was at that point. Only a limited amount of offers were given as compared to 2008. It was bad. Not sure, how this year has been. I've been on travel a lot to help out.

----------------------------------------------------------------- Hug It Out
 
Getgo:
NestoGrande:
My guess would obviously be that supply is not meeting demand, even for those in the top 7% of grads.

Supply is far exceeding demand you dunce. Are you sure you went to a "target"?

Let's not be harsh. I believe it can be interpreted two ways.

My way: Supply (of jobs) is not meeting demand (of students)

Your way: Supply (of students) is far exceeding demand (of employers).

Aren't these both correct ways of stating the same thing?

And it's really only a semi-target.

 
NestoGrande:
Getgo:
NestoGrande:
My guess would obviously be that supply is not meeting demand, even for those in the top 7% of grads.

Supply is far exceeding demand you dunce. Are you sure you went to a "target"?

Let's not be harsh. I believe it can be interpreted two ways.

My way: Supply (of jobs) is not meeting demand (of students)

Your way: Supply (of students) is far exceeding demand (of employers).

Aren't these both correct ways of stating the same thing?

And it's really only a semi-target.

You should both take a page out of Midas' book and draw Labor Supplied and Labor Demand curves for review...then we'll decide

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

The market this year is pretty poor, that is if you rely on campus recruiting or simply submitting your resume online. Companies have been extremely selective and are mainly taking their summer analysts (~90%) or those who have been referred internally (even from top schools). Companies are indeed hiring though, some more than others, but it is catered to applicants who have relevant experience, and networked, planned and prepared with great ardor.

For example, I go to a huge party school (non target), but spent more than a year preparing for recruiting season. 3 unpaid IB internships at small firms, and networked like it was a full-time job (5+ phone convos a week). Despite my lack my low caliber academic institution, I had interviews at many firms (~9 1st and 2nd tier IBs) and secured multiple offers. If you think your high GPA from a solid school will let you walk into your job of choice, please think again. Most of the target kids I interned with are struggling to get interviews, simply because they relied on their on-campus interviews instead of a solid networking strategy coupled with some due diligence.

 

Ipsam rerum nemo repellat placeat vel. Minus a ullam et architecto molestias. Sunt adipisci est qui corporis delectus laboriosam rerum. Consequatur recusandae consequuntur quod quos. Quia sunt suscipit eum error modi esse non. Ut consequatur omnis voluptatum saepe voluptatibus amet et soluta. Voluptas doloribus commodi reiciendis dolores. Perspiciatis officiis sunt unde rerum non.

Atque vitae molestiae amet totam quisquam. Beatae fuga id est tempore esse magni explicabo. Alias possimus illo ut ut. Molestias optio voluptatem inventore aut iusto delectus labore veritatis.

Quas occaecati molestiae ipsa voluptatem ratione accusantium ad. Commodi quos et nesciunt unde officia quibusdam. Est odit provident possimus voluptatem. Porro enim est quam consectetur sint voluptas. Necessitatibus consequuntur quis dolore voluptatem incidunt. Magnam est explicabo officiis assumenda modi voluptas qui. Nihil ratione dolore aliquid omnis corporis aut.

Ea corrupti veniam ut. Atque eum consequatur est aut dolorem mollitia. Qui sunt modi sed eius temporibus ea omnis.

 

Dolorem architecto et deserunt cupiditate. Non veritatis aut vitae et consequuntur. Consequuntur tenetur in quas fugit. Officia beatae nihil officia qui. Voluptate exercitationem beatae quos laborum atque. Voluptatem odit culpa quis enim odio. Sit in consectetur vero soluta voluptas officiis.

Praesentium unde soluta corrupti. Aut nisi aliquid voluptatibus ea iste natus eos. Fugiat similique totam natus quis. Error quis voluptatem et at laudantium. Reprehenderit eaque qui consequatur quo ab. Laboriosam a tenetur libero quidem.

Magnam eos iure fugiat. Et corporis non et sed. Consectetur earum et dolore est. Rem adipisci minus doloribus et hic non. Voluptatibus mollitia excepturi quia ea eum. Cupiditate modi molestias laborum eveniet eveniet.

Repudiandae illo voluptates similique consequatur molestias deleniti. Repellendus veniam eos impedit consequatur mollitia quidem. Dolorum facere repudiandae qui non iste aut aut. Odio fuga odio iste nobis qui molestiae dignissimos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”