LBO Model: Entry Multiple Method - IRR goes UP with time?

Hey guys,

I have a modelling question, which is probably pretty basic but please excuse me.

I've built LBOs where we've looked at taking a public company private: start with share price, imply a share price with offer premium * NOSH = equity value + debt - cash + minority interest = enterprise value.

Uses = equity value + refinancing existing net debt (debt - cash) + fees
Sources: debt (in whatever structure) + equity as a plug (with or without management)

then flow through the model and get your return calculations.

My question is when it comes to valuing a private company and using a multiple for entry - I recently did this for my MBA program. We are looking at a secondary buyout of Agent Provocateur, and I believe the company should be valued at 11.8x FY2016E EBITDA (which I've estimated to be GBP11.6mm). So I do:

11.8x * 11.6mm = 136.9mm - debt (15.4mm) + cash (4.2mm) = 125.7mm.

Uses are: Purchase of equity (125.7) + refi net debt (11.2mm) + fees (2% of EV is 2.7mm)
Sources: debt (calculated as a multiple of FY2016E EBITDA) with equity as a plug.

The issue I have is when I calculate my returns. We assume transaction end of 2015A (March) so I do:

EBITDA for 2016, 2017 etc * 11.8 = implied enterprise value - debt + cash = implied equity value * sponsor equity (giving some to mgmt) = equity to sponsor.

My problem is that my IRR goes UP with time, which doesn't make sense. When I use an LTM EBITDA multiple everything works fine, when I make up a share price and # of shares as I would with a public company and imply an 11.8x FY2016E EBITDA multiple everything works fine, but its when I try to link it through to the 11.8 entry multiple the whole thing breaks down.

I've got some PE interviews coming up and the fact that this doesn't work is making me very comfortable. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated -- model is attached, nothing confidential here it was a school assignment.

Thank you all in advance for your time!

Attachment Size
model_vwso.xls 266 KB 266 KB
 
Best Response

Voluptatum non voluptatem sint. Odio laboriosam facere necessitatibus eius sit quia fuga. Soluta aut debitis porro aperiam vel. Sit dolorem rerum dolor architecto quam sit. Magni qui vitae aspernatur recusandae qui et. Ut esse dolorem amet modi. Dicta in ex consequatur excepturi iste.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”