Buy it as a keepsake if you're a fan.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

Football isn't good business, everybody knows that.

[quote]The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males.[/quote]
 
SonnyZH:
Football isn't good business, everybody knows that.

What exactly is your reasoning behind this statement? Soccer is the most popular sport globally... Sure, throwing big money at players is a risk, but if the team wins -- the upside is enourmous

 
gordo:
SonnyZH:
Football isn't good business, everybody knows that.

What exactly is your reasoning behind this statement? Soccer is the most popular sport globally... Sure, throwing big money at players is a risk, but if the team wins -- the upside is enourmous

Of course it's the most popular sport, but does that make it profitable for club owners? Roman Abramovich has put in WAY more cash into Chelsea than he's got out, as a matter of fact, Chelsea isn't even profitable. Malaga, Manchester City, Manchester United... None of these have green numbers at the end of the year.

[quote]The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males.[/quote]
 
Best Response
SonnyZH:
gordo:
SonnyZH:
Football isn't good business, everybody knows that.

What exactly is your reasoning behind this statement? Soccer is the most popular sport globally... Sure, throwing big money at players is a risk, but if the team wins -- the upside is enourmous

Of course it's the most popular sport, but does that make it profitable for club owners? Roman Abramovich has put in WAY more cash into Chelsea than he's got out, as a matter of fact, Chelsea isn't even profitable. Malaga, Manchester City, Manchester United... None of these have green numbers at the end of the year.

This. There are two big clubs that don't fall foul of UEFA's upcoming financial fair play rules right now and those are Arsenal and Bayern Munich. No one else is on track for long-term sustainability as of yet. And judging by Man U's Champions League run this past year, I'd say they are vastly overvalued.
 

Its not? Sometimes teams get carried away with spending money they don't have (City) but a team like Man U is one of the biggest if not the biggest sports team around the world. DHL are paying 10 mil quid just to get their logo on the practice warmups. Then again, players are paid high wages and transfers can cost like 30 mil/euro. I guess I don't know how good of a business it is, but there is a ton of money involved.

 

Thats my line of thinking- sure teams overspend, but in terms of most popular global sport (and the global market is huge) soccer is number one and then most popular soccer team is either Barcelona or Man United, so it seems to be a good investment if the price is right, but I'm not sure if it is.

 

The Premier League is a credit bubble waiting to burst....its a lot like the investment banks, salaries are too high and the employees are taking too much of the pie. Sky (UK satellite cable co.) recently forked out close to GBP2bn for the 2013-2015 TV rights. Those costs will be passed on to the already financially stressed pay-TV consumer. Stadiums are no longer selling out and petro-dollars from the Gulf and Russia and making it more difficult for teams to run within their means. ManU has an average squad that punched well above their weight last season, I don't see them being competitive for a while with City and Chelsea spending big again.

 
Ovechkin08:
ManU has an average squad that punched well above their weight last season, I don't see them being competitive for a while with City and Chelsea spending big again.

Honestly? With their captain and best defender out for the season, most of the rest of their defence and midfield out at points of the season, and a rookie goaltender, you feel they were an "average" squad. Even though they lost on differential on the last day of the season? Yes they lost in spectacular fashion in the Champions League, but to a very good Benificia team. I would argue they punched under their weight, as City tried desperately to give the title away after amassing a nearly insurmountable lead. Meanwhile Chelsea won the UEFA on the strength of Sanchez's three missed wide open nets.

Still a horrible investment though.

 
panchofabricio:
Ovechkin08:
ManU has an average squad that punched well above their weight last season, I don't see them being competitive for a while with City and Chelsea spending big again.

Honestly? With their captain and best defender out for the season, most of the rest of their defence and midfield out at points of the season, and a rookie goaltender, you feel they were an "average" squad. Even though they lost on differential on the last day of the season? Yes they lost in spectacular fashion in the Champions League, but to a very good Benificia team. I would argue they punched under their weight, as City tried desperately to give the title away after amassing a nearly insurmountable lead. Meanwhile Chelsea won the UEFA on the strength of Sanchez's three missed wide open nets.

I agree they were plagued by injury problems however I don't think anyone in their squad, not even Rooney, would make the Man City, Barca or Real Madrid squads. They had to bring back Scholes just to fill the void! Anyway I like ManU, they play decent football, but I think they will struggle this season.

Still a horrible investment though.

 

Alright thanks everyone! I'm assuming then from a financial standpoint it would be best to avoid the IPO then (while it may be cool to say you own .00000000000000000000000000000000001% of Man U, I'd rather have money) so what price do you think it would be best to buy the stock at?

 

From an investment point of view, this is among the worst IPOs including ZNGA, GRPN and FB. You'll not be getting any dividend or voting rights. This IPO is only ment to pay off the hugh amount of debt the Glazier family stuck ManU with (guess Miller-Modigliani didn't know that capital structure in sports is different than companies). A bad case of a LBO gone bad.

Since European football teams don't have sal.cap. all the biggest clubs are paying a ton of money for the best talent. The trading system isn't the same as in US sports either, meaning that a club can pay $30m for a player, and that is not including his salary, bonus, comp. for goals/matches played. In return the other team free's up a ton of cash that supporters demands to be put into a new player of equal or better caliber.

European football is a financial race to the bottom.

CNBC sucks "This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
 

Not only do sports franchise not last long on public exchanges (Boston celtics comes to mind) but the multiple is so aggressive and unsubstantiated. Furthermore the Glazers will have no obligation to the shareholders as they retain nearly all voting with the dual class equity structure. Also, Man U's revenue is based on expected success and in the ludicrous financial context soccer finds itself in these days its impossible to accurately predict success. While the Glazers might believe in crystal balls or mirrors telling them they're the fairest in the land, I don't. To buy in to this IPO would be irresponsible..the only way it doesn't tank is if enough Man U fanatics buy in which is doubtful as they've already had to scuttle two attempts at IPOs on other exchanges.

 

Don't buy in initially it's valued a bit too high in my opinion. Wait for it to go down a bit and then buy it. I made this mistake when I bought CHUY too early and it began to go down (I still profited but my profits could have been much greater.)

-RR
 

Thanks everyone. I was thinking of buying if it gets to like $12-13/share, definitely agree from a financial standpoint it's overvalued because of the fact that it's a sports team and the novelty factor is high.

 

Are you kidding me? They have 26mm in cash on the BS and the interest payment per year is like 40mm+; and they have to place well in the premier league and secure a decent place in the championship/euro cup. All while Ferguson can kick the bucket any day with the Glazer bunch still holding a tight grip on the committee. I see literally a crash-and-burn should there be any match-wise under-performance. Did I mention that the only two reasons they go IPO is to pay interest and for the Glazer family to unload?

This is at best a trading position, a bragging right, or a stance of support from a die-hard fan. Anything investment/financially oriented is literally suicide.

 

Personally I don't see how they can dig out of this hole. Odds are stacked against them and I consider it a lottery ticket. So in short I would not touch it until its leverage ratio goes down. No opinion on price target--I think it can go bankrupt.

 
patriotsfan1:
Alright thanks so at what price do you think its reasonable to buy financially? Never?

Never. All the cash flow is being reinvested into the club through interest on debt, salary, transfer fees and stadium upgrades (in that order). I'm not even considering what the UEFA financial fair play regulation will do to ManUs drop at both the top and bottom line (withholding prizemoney, fines, disqualification from continental play,etc.)

CNBC sucks "This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
 

Any company half a billion in the red is a bad investment, sports related or not. Also with the rise of Chelsea and Man City I don't see Man U keeping up with it current owners or as a public company.

Personal wealth is not how much you have in the bank or the worth of your portfolio. But, rather how you've used the wealth to make your life and those around you better.
 

No one buys a sports team to make money. Man U is set to trade at 50x P/E, is swamped with debt, has ridiculously overpaid players and no one likes ownership. I think this thing will tumble.

Having said that, if you're a United fan, or want to say you own part of a professional football team, pick up a share at IPO, ask your broker for a paper stock certificate and hang it on the wall. I bought 1 share of Packers stock when they did the offering a few months back knowing that it's completely worthless, won't pay me any dividend, ever, but it's a fun thing to have and hang on the wall. Man U is different in the sense it's publicly traded but I don't see this as a good investment at $16-$20 a share.

 

Hey,

I definitely agree with the general consensus that the share price is overvalued, and I am short selling the stock. By the way, Bayern and Arsenal are not the only clubs that comply with the Financial Fair Play rules, Real Madrid do as well by the way. In addition, Madrid are the 2nd biggest brand in World Football (ahead of Barcelona), and they have the largest revenue in World Football as well.

Sources: http://swissramble.blogspot.kr/2011/06/real-madrid-and-financial-fair-p… http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/industries/sportsbusinessgroup/sp…

Only die-hard United fans will purchase these stocks, and I think United overestimate the number of fans they have, especially true fans. United claim that 10% of the world's population are United fans, which is definitely overestimated. I think the share price will decrease and short selling could be profitable.

 

Unde quia omnis explicabo. Ex consequatur voluptate quis perferendis placeat aut et. Praesentium laboriosam maiores et et recusandae fugit.

Quas eos eaque reprehenderit omnis. Velit ducimus ipsam perspiciatis voluptatem quia rerum incidunt.

-RR
 

At at similique sed omnis aut unde totam aut. Eveniet fugiat corrupti aut error consequatur deserunt. Maxime quis voluptatem at nemo tenetur magnam. Corporis omnis tempore ut vitae numquam vel voluptates. Vel voluptatem fuga vel itaque dolores labore aut.

Error cum maxime est consectetur asperiores veniam possimus. Ipsam rerum culpa doloribus debitis voluptas. Doloremque at esse aliquam ipsam nostrum iusto maiores.

Architecto dolor ipsa voluptas enim vero. Expedita quia illum debitis non quis repellat illum dolorem. Sunt maxime reprehenderit sed praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”