Masters in Finance Programs That Are Less Quantitative/Don't Require a Math/Engineering Degree?

Hi,

So basically, I've been reading a bit more about masters in finance programs and I'm starting to get a little more attracted to them. Here's the thing though: I'm already a junior and I basically have to major in finance/accounting (or else graduate late). Therefore, I'm guessing programs like WUSTL, Princeton, MIT are all out because all of those programs seem very quant-heavy and thus I'd get dinged if I applied. Therefore, I was wondering if there are any other MFin programs that are less quant-heavy that I can apply to that still place well in finance jobs (and that doesn't just mean BB Ibanking/Consulting but even corp finance)? Otherwise, I have a few options:

  1. Continue on business path but major in finance (my school has less finance electives) and load up on math whenever I can. Any suggestions on what math classes I should take by the way, assuming I've only taken the bare minimum thus far?

  2. Major in accounting, apply only to non-technical programs, hope that I get in and get placed somewhere good.

  3. Jump off the finance/accounting wagon completely, graduate late, but get a major in math.

I'm wondering what you guys think is best? Ideally, I'd really, really like to avoid number 3 because I don't want to stay in school for so long, but I'll do whatever is best for my career.

thanks

 
mezzmonkey:
look in france
hahaha true, majority of European/UK Master's don't require quant degrees at all. Do a search or check Anthony's blog.
People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis, you can't trust people Jeremy
 
mezzmonkey:
look in france

This is wrong.

European masters are generally more quantitative than American ones, not less. And France tends to be the most math-obsessed of all.

 
nauru:
mezzmonkey:
look in france

This is wrong.

European masters are generally more quantitative than American ones, not less. And France tends to be the most math-obsessed of all.

Agree. Many of my friends are from Sweden (not France) and always speak about how math and finance classes in the US are so rudimentary and this is still undergrad.

But I believe (as I've also taken some interest in a Masters and have limited quant background as well), that Columbia offers a MS in Econ. which may be less mathematically geared.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

If you want something that ins't as quantitative then focus your search on MSF degrees. Even with a MSF be prepared for graduate level statistics, probability, calc, etc. I wouldn't really worry about it unless your trying for a MFin degree.

Do a search, the MSF degree has been talked about a lot .

 

Claremont McKenna actually is pretty quant.

If you want something quant light I would look at Vandy, Villanova, BC, Florida, Purdue, Rochester and maybe Brandeis.

All MSF programs will have an element of stats and math so you have to know some math, but the ones listed above are not overly mathematically focused.

 
Anthony .:
Claremont McKenna actually is pretty quant.

If you want something quant light I would look at Vandy, Villanova, BC, Florida, Purdue, Rochester and maybe Brandeis.

All MSF programs will have an element of stats and math so you have to know some math, but the ones listed above are not overly mathematically focused.

i don't agree. claremont mckenna seems reasonable. a large portion of the students are from non-technical backgrounds, though there are some with math/engineering backgrounds.

i am in the program, and haven't had to use very much math so far.

 

european MSc finance programs are just as quantitative, if not more quantitative, than their american counterparts....

they may not require a quant undergrad degree, but you better believe they are preferred and you wont be admitted if you are unable to show an adequate level of numerical proficiency

 

so what exactly is keeping you from applying directly to jobs in finance out of undergrad as opposed to getting a masters in finance? you can start earning sooner, dont hafta pay another year of tuition, and youll likely end up in the same position whether you go directly from undergrad or take another year for the MSF. and since youre on track for a degree in finance already, i feel like it would add very little to your skill-set (not to mention, employers train you for what you need to know/do anyway). so why exactly are you drawn to the degree over employment immediately after you graduate?

 
Best Response
dew2229:
so what exactly is keeping you from applying directly to jobs in finance out of undergrad as opposed to getting a masters in finance? you can start earning sooner, dont hafta pay another year of tuition, and youll likely end up in the same position whether you go directly from undergrad or take another year for the MSF. and since youre on track for a degree in finance already, i feel like it would add very little to your skill-set (not to mention, employers train you for what you need to know/do anyway). so why exactly are you drawn to the degree over employment immediately after you graduate?

I go to a non-target and have had very little success thus far in my networking efforts (still trying though!) which means that breaking into a banking/consulting job off the bat will be very difficult. Hence, I'd look to the MS in Finance to re-brand myself, add some more quant skills, and perhaps get another shot of recruiting in a (hopefully!) better economy. That's my logic, although I guess I can look into masters in accounting or other programs to re-brand.

Btw, although I have no clue why I deserved one for asking a question, thanks to whoever gave me a silver banana lol.

Pretty women make us BUY beer. Ugly women make us DRINK beer.
 

Let me say this, if you have had no luck networking or getting relevant experience please take a very hard look at your efforts so far and see if the problem is on your end. I know too many people who try and use the MSF for another shot at recruiting only to see them do no networking or put any effort in and end up in the same spot as before, but with another degree and more debt. Networking truly is a full time job and you need to work hard at it. Rebranding is a great idea and can work wonders, but you need to make sure you know how to network first.

 
Anthony .:
Let me say this, if you have had no luck networking or getting relevant experience please take a very hard look at your efforts so far and see if the problem is on your end. I know too many people who try and use the MSF for another shot at recruiting only to see them do no networking or put any effort in and end up in the same spot as before, but with another degree and more debt. Networking truly is a full time job and you need to work hard at it. Rebranding is a great idea and can work wonders, but you need to make sure you know how to network first.

you need to take that comment and slap it across the front page of this website.

--- man made the money, money never made the man
 
mr1234:
Anthony .:
Let me say this, if you have had no luck networking or getting relevant experience please take a very hard look at your efforts so far and see if the problem is on your end. I know too many people who try and use the MSF for another shot at recruiting only to see them do no networking or put any effort in and end up in the same spot as before, but with another degree and more debt. Networking truly is a full time job and you need to work hard at it. Rebranding is a great idea and can work wonders, but you need to make sure you know how to network first.

you need to take that comment and slap it across the front page of this website.

AGREE 100%.

 
 

Esse soluta aut commodi ab sunt nulla accusamus. Quas aut quo fuga a. Quis perferendis voluptates consequatur temporibus dolor et laborum. Exercitationem alias sunt esse beatae iusto odio enim. Placeat a nulla dicta quia ut.

 

Cum at accusamus quos est non sit alias. Eaque quae quis suscipit sit perspiciatis. Qui consequatur soluta aliquid debitis perferendis beatae. Beatae laborum magni excepturi dolores sequi. Dolorem facilis id est vero.

Libero dignissimos eum et et nemo vel. Omnis quis quisquam perspiciatis.

Consequuntur saepe ipsa quia dicta rerum harum nemo. Nobis fugit non omnis labore. Doloremque sit inventore est accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”