While studying for ib interviews, I have found guides always state the 3 common valuation methods as DCF, Comparable Companies, and precedent transactions; however, while reading an M&A book, the author states the NAV method as one of the most common. Since the book was published in 2001, is NAV an antiquated method or is it still an acceptable and common method? Thanks for your help!
| +164 | The "Not So Obvious" things that get you a return offer? | 19 | 3h | |
| +94 | Is my life over after not getting GS? | 20 | 4h | |
| +64 | Best IB group on the Street | 27 | 25m | |
| +56 | BIG FOUR ARE PARADISE | 15 | 1h | |
| +46 | Thoughts and tips on how to speak like an investment banker. | 25 | 1h | |
| +45 | Tell me one good reason why Jefferies isn’t going to be a top bank in the next 5 years | 22 | 5h | |
| +36 | UBS Outlook | 28 | 1d | |
| +35 | Georgetown Placement for 2024 and 2025 | 21 | 6d | |
| +33 | How to deal with egotistical team? | 6 | 3d | |
| +32 | Highest Paid Bankers in Toronto? | 51 | 12m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Est rerum pariatur quos et. Ab ab ut eligendi id error debitis. Possimus sed voluptas esse. Sunt quas sit sed dolorem ea vel in sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...