New breed of Finance and Capital Markets Professionals

Before I start to express my piece of mind I would like to set some hygiene points. The category of professionals I intend to generalise here are all those non-IT professionals involved in various pre/post-trade functions. We exclude the front office guys (trader, deal crackers, sales, BDs) here for the plain reason that there is a negligible scope if any for them to do anything different but generate money...

So we are referencing here all other professionals which includes everyone concerned with Research, Risk mgt, Performance mgt, Operations, Due-diligence, Compliance, Reporting, etc.

Enough of introduction & warnings...you know by now if this piece relates to you or not...

Ever since I qualified as a finance professional about a decade ago, I realised we had a parallel breed of professionals who were itching to penetrate on almost any damn finance job out there. Yes I am talking about ‘Engineers’. The value proposition they brought was superior number-crunching ability to otherwise pure play commerce turned finance professional guys. They found drawing a valuation model more interesting than replicating the mechanics of a pulley. Sorry for the bad analogy but you get the point, it is the monetary benefits that drove the choices. Surely the engineers I am taking about did bring their fair share of finance with a MBA, CFA®, or other finance/capital markets driven certifications.


Back then the organic finance guys still enjoyed an edge over the non-organic peers i.e., engineer turned finance professionals. Perhaps the so called ‘domain’ was considered and looked up more holistically then which worked in favour of the former. This is what I coin as a ‘pre-coding era’ wherein jobs attracted more organic domain driven talent than others.

Since then the splurge and demand of engineers or rather I should say in-organic finance professionals have only increased multi-fold times and the market continues to appreciate the skill-set they promise to bring. This is true especially since last 3 to 5 years. I term this as the ‘Quant era’ or the ‘Coding era’.
The trend noticed in last few years is in-fact other way round to that witnessed a decade ago wherein now the math and coding driven candidates (with little domain background) are given priority over pure play domain guys. In my view every job these days has a quant element to it. What this means is it’s not enough for one to just have a fair understand of the domain but at the same time have strong analytics sense as well.

With the rise of data science and big data elements, every role out there has a flavour of Quant. This is again contributed with the rise in statistical driven packages like R, Python, etc which deliver cutting edge analytics and modelling which was earlier complex and taxing to perform. What’s more is most of these languages are free to use (opensource). Surely every organization out there wants to automate manual processes and take statistically backed decisions to the extent possible. This is true even for functions like accounting where there is a fair bit of spreadsheet based reporting to be performed and something like a VBA comes in very handy.

Some coming back to the point of which professionals are preferred in this day and age, the answer is clear. It’s definitely the guys who come in with the knowledge of these packages or some coding background like C++ alongside some domain skills. Fortunately my exposure with students and businesses at large as a trainer and entrepreneur allows to me witness these dynamics very closely.
Hence the trend has changed from the time when engineers had to catch up on their finance skills to now when finance professionals have to catch up with analytics and coding skills.

What I mentioned above is not just true for entry point professionals but also experienced ones. There is a constant need to make ourselves as much indispensible as possible even in our current roles let alone exploring fresh opportunities. While this is easier said than done fortunately there are loads of online learning channels to ease the process. I personally used Datacamp site to learn some of these skills myself as I found it more user friendly and practical but, there are many more to choose from based on your individual use case and preference (not to miss, some of these are free).

Finally I would like to clarify that the merit of this article is not to conclude or rank some set of professionals over other but instead it’s to help both the types of breed to balance out their skill proposition to have that edge when seeking their career opportunities. Having those thrust worthy domain driven academics is no longer a powerful shield as it use to be erstwhile. The ‘Quant era’ is here to stay!

Wish you a productive and fulfilling professional year ahead!

 
Best Response

This post is very much on point (despite the SB-MS ratio). I studied finance and economics and the fact my skills are fast becoming obsolete is something I'm becoming increasingly conscious of, especially since reading "Rise of the Robots" by Martin Ford. This sentence in particular struck a chord - "groundbreaking [artificial intelligence] technologies created by teams of specialists will rapidly become ubiquitous and accessible to even amateur coders.. More often than not, AI software will be hosted in the cloud. From that vantage point it will eventually be poised to invade virtually every workplace and swallow up nearly any white collar job that involves sitting in front of a computer manipulating information". Maybe this is alarmist, but I can definitely see it happening in my lifetime.

Here's an anecdote which goes to my point. At the moment I'm training a junior colleague to replicate my role in another office (credit risk management, corporate banking). He's got a few years coding experience doing business intelligence and implementing machine learning algorithms in another area of the bank. The scary thing is how quickly he's picking up the basics of my role. Within a year or two he will know everything I know, plus his background in coding (which he learned on the job) will allow him to easily surpass my efficiency and potentially automate part of my job. These skills are not only capable of causing massive disruption to the traditional way of doing business, but they are very much accessible to the layman. Creative and motivated people will always find ways to utilise the tools at their disposal to create value, it just so happens these tools are becoming incredibly powerful.

I honestly believe anyone in an analytical function needs to up-skill or risk falling completely behind. Unlike the industrial revolution, AI does not offer creative destruction meaning there is no net increase in jobs as a result of increasing mechanisation. Workforces will shrink and company managers will no longer control human workers so much as control algorithms. We have already seen companies in the digital space that have created huge amounts of value with virtually no staff (Twitter, IG, Snapchat). I don't see why this can't apply to the finance industry. In the book Ford also talks about an algorithm that is able to independently replicate Newton and Kepler's physical laws of motion in a single hour just by observing and manipulating a pendulum. This goes to show self learning technology is turbocharging not just data science but science in general, which in turn has huge implications for industry.

Sorry to hijack the thread with my diatribe on AI but I think the trend you are describing goes much further than just being a coder/non-coder issue. And yes I have already started teaching myself coding & machine learning techniques..

 

I honestly don't buy it. I think the finance/economics degree was always useless - but the skillset of good judgement and intuition plus relationships that finance requires will be one of the last things to be automated

 

No offense, but this article sounds like it was written fifteen years ago and just now someone got around to publishing it. Nothing new here. I wish I could write some trick lines of code that would draft my CIMs for me...where's the braniac quant delivering on that?

 

There are algorithms available-for-hire that can write news reports based on a set of data that are completely indistinguishable from those written by journalists. In fact if you read Bloomberg or any other financial news source from time to time there's a good chance you've read an article written by a machine and not even realised. So the evolutionary step for this technology to be able to draft a TPS or whatever bullshit report it is you're writing may be smaller than you think.

 

Quae perferendis harum consequatur at in officiis sed et. Doloremque consequuntur aut voluptatem ut eius dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”