the NU kids ive met are generally pretty lackluster...you'll find them at places like lehman and below. Generally seem less intelligent than most of the other kids in analyst classes. Cornell feeds much better. My perception is new york based however and its entirely possible that NUs cream of the crop stay in chicago offices...

 

Brown is a Goldman Sachs feeder.

But Northwestern's pretty good too...you should take a look at their career center website. It'll tell you which companies recruit most there.

"We are lawyers! We sue people! Occasionally, we get aggressive and garnish wages, but WE DO NOT ABDUCT!" -Boston Legal-
 

all students can pursue IBD opportunities at NU i believe (since it doesnt have an ugrad b program)

have a friend who goes to NU...they are the best feeder for chicago offices. obviously place significantly fewer in NY offices, but nonetheless still do (maybe 1-2 a year in each BB for NY offices). possibly upwards of 3 per chicago office.

 

Thats still a tiny tiny tiny amount. Three per BB office in Chicago?

So no more than 20 kids goto BBs in Chicago ever year?

 

Also i heard that even though there is no ugrad bschool at NU, all the ibanking jobs are taking up by kids in this program called MMSS (Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences).

 

MMSS kids have a clear advantage because of their extensive quant background, but everyone has the opportunity to interview (and MMSS kids are known for being lonely asians without personalities) and can land a job at a BB. My friend works at a BB and was not an MMSS major; its all about the interview.

20 per year sounds like a fair ballpark estimate. You must remember that NU isn't a Wharton/Stern--its not a school designed to train kids to become ibankers.

Keep in mind that Chicago offices are small (7-10 analysts per class) so that having 3 come from any one school (even Wharton/Harvard) is a significant percentage.

 

Mike are you an NU student? I find these numbers really paltry. There are at least 600 students every year graduating from NU who majored in Econ, MMSS, Applied Math, or Industrial (Management) Engineering who are all gunning for these BB spots. If only 20 people get in, that means 580 people are without employoment. Factor in consulting jobs and other high profile business gigs you have at least half of these students unemployed.

Damn that sucks ass.

Must even be worse at state schools.

 

No am i not, but I have a friend who goes there.

Ibanking is one of the hardest industries to get into. A couple things to note however:

  1. Lots of kids end up in lower boutique banks
  2. Lots of kids end up going to grad school (a significantly larger percentage than your state school/Wharton types)

I imagine it must be ten times worse at state schools without great undergrad business programs.

 

Do whatever interest you and do it well. Grads from Northwestern will be reviewing your resume and transcript, so if it's a hard major, they will know it. A 3.5 will give you consideration but if you want to stand out aim for 3.7+.

Northwestern is well represented but not a "top target". There were plenty from NU at the bank I worked at in NY in summers 2007-08. And I've heard NU places well in Chicago offices of BBs.

Good luck.


Chase Us, Break In! http://chasingconsultantsbreakingbankers.blogspot.com/

 

NW is a non-target except regionally. That is, you will have recruiting for regional banks and regional offices for the Midwest at the undergrad level. Its not as hopeless as say UIC or some other random college in the area, however if you want to go to BB in NYC you will have a very tough time.

As to GPA, always aim for above 3.5 because it is the cut off that is used for years to come at all levels. Many Pre-MBA positions have a 3.5 cutoff and some jobs five to ten years out will still look at your GPA. Get as high as you can, a 3.7 should be your aim if you eventually want to get into business school as well.

Don't worry about banking with your major, worry about the major you want and what you are gonna do with it. If you are in a mathematical modeling major, why do you want to make pitch books all day. Look into S&T and quant roles, they care less about GPA and more about course work.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

Ditto Power-monkey. If you can keep you GPA above 3.5 in MMSS (I'm an MMSS alum) then you are golden for interviews with any ibank or consulting firm which interviews on campus. Do not drop out if you can keep a good GPA. MMSS is known in the Chicago area. It's true that you're less likely to get NYC offers but you should have your pick of Chicago offers. Don't be sad if you don't make it to nyc right away. I started out in consulting at a Chicago office and now I'm at a mega LBO shop.

 

I think they're comprable and I don't know if Cornell has a program of MMSS' quality. My thought is why make such a drastic move - unless you're miserable at NU. MMSS can get you into a top tier consulting/finance analyst program and you can write your own ticket from there. If all you care about is winding up in NYC after you graduate then Cornell may give you slightly better odds ... but it might not be a game changer...

 

If you like NU, then STAY there. If you are miserable at NU, then look at your options. Are you miserable in the program and would be happier doing something else?

College should be the most fun, most memorable portion of your LIFE. Working sucks, working at an IB sucks even more. In college, I binge drank 5 days a week, got to sleep in whenever I wanted, and any all nighters were because I wanted to. You are still in college, enjoy it.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

I actually did some research, and I found that while NW as only about 600 alum in NYC finance, most of their IB placement is there. I still think I'm more interested in Chicago consulting (Bain, McKinsey), which NW seems to be good for. Any thoughts?

 

Bump. Does anyone know if you have to do MMSS to get recruited by Chicago banks/consultancy firms? I likely wouldn't get in nor would I really want to do it. I would likely get the FinEcon certificate though. Not sure how it affects recruiting. Any recent NU alums want to weigh in?

 

I'm pretty certain that there are more than a dozen IB SA offers. No concrete evidence, just know that of my few friends that are interested 2 of us have offers and I'm sure there are a lot more between Chicago and NY. Not everyone will list "Incoming BB/MM/EB IB summer analyst" on LinkedIn or brag about it publicly.

Also keep in mind that UVA's student body is about twice the size of NU's and that most of NU's student body is interested in consulting over IB.

 

I also go to NU and can say it's tough but it's probably more than 12 that get IB SA. Networking is especially important because very few banks recruit for NY where there are obviously way bigger offices. The European banks in particular don't really recruit from NU, but people have gotten in through networking and online apps. Baird/Blair/HL are probably the "easiest" to get due to the size of their Chicago offices. Surprisingly, NU is not a core school for Lincoln or BMO. GS and BAML are 2 that do recruit for any office. A decent amount of recruiting is done in the fall here. A lot of people are interested in trading and consulting as Chicago is way better for those than IB.

 

For being such a powerhouse in the region, it is always surprising that so few people place from Northwestern. Perhaps it's just that few students recruit. I don't have numbers to support it, but I'm sure they do fine on a percentage basis. If you're going for volume, however, you would be better served at Michigan, Indiana University, UChicago, Notre Dame, or Wisconsin.

 

Just came across a different thread where a NU grad posted placement numbers from a couple years ago

Chicago 3 GS/MS/JPM 8 other BBs (DB/CS/Citi/BAML/Barclays etc) 5 Lazard/Greenhill/Evercore/Moelis A few more at reputable middle markets (Blair/Baird/Lincoln)

NYC 2 Blackstone 4 GS/JPM/MS 5 Other BBs 3 Laz/Greenhill/Evercore/Moelis

Does that still seem accurate today? If those numbers are true then we place slightly better than schools like uva/ross considering smaller student pop and most kids gunning for consulting

 

Love seeing this on WSO; alum/analyst here. We place well, my cohort of around 20-25 people (those that really wanted banking) all got offers, split between NY and Chicago. The only thing hurting us is a smaller alumni network because so many kids enjoy doing case interviews for some reason

 
mk1275:

I didn't go to either and don't know #'s, so could be very wrong on this, but contrary to what someone said above, I've seen more analysts from NU in NYC than I have from UChicago. Michigan def trumps both for finance in terms of volume, but I wonder if on a basis of offers vs. number of students interested it's really a better place to be.

Few state schools trump in the offer vs. students interested category just because of their sheer size. Michigan is not an exception.

Best placement in the Midwest is at UChicago. All of the BB's, some PE firms, lots of trading and hedge funds, and a ton of consulting firms have a strong presence here, so you have options. It's a low-key school that doesn't get a whole lot of attention on this forum, Chicago Booth notwithstanding.

 

Northwestern is a great school, but mostly feeds into chicago offices. Does get some recruitment for NYC offices too but not exactly at the same level of its peer schools.

For NYC, I'd say UChicago > NW.

 

I'm a recent NU grad. In terms of placement, roughly 15-20 kids go to Chicago BB or elite boutique and another 10-15 to NYC BB/Elite Boutique. The number of people interested in IB is definitely really small compared to peer schools as most Northwestern kids are interested in consulting (numbers for MBB placement are really good). During my junior recruiting cycle, NU placement was

Chicago 3 GS/MS/JPM 8 other BBs (DB/CS/Citi/BAML/Barclays etc) 5 Lazard/Greenhill/Evercore/Moelis A few more at reputable middle markets (Blair/Baird/Lincoln)

NYC 2 Blackstone 4 GS/JPM/MS 5 Other BBs 3 Laz/Greenhill/Evercore/Moelis

Probably only 40-50 kids seriously interested in IB in any given year compared to 100+ going through consulting recruiting.

 

If the stats above are correct, NU>UChicago. UChicago simply doesn't place that many kids. NU also has a much better representation among Chicago offices apparently....UChicago maybe sends 2 kids to Chicago offices.

 
black mamba22:

^ NU has way more students. UC definitely places more per capita

Based on those numbers NU places slightly better than UChicago for NY offices and places much, much better than UChicago for Chicago offices. UChicago definitely does not place more per capita.

 

My recruiting cycle was also a few years ago (post-crisis though), landscape may have changed since then. I know DB NYC dropped NU as a core school largely due to geographic hassles (why fly out to Chicago for OCR when you have peer schools all around the Northeast).

 
peinvestor2012:

It depends. I know several guys from BBs in Chicago that ended up at HSW, and obviously plenty that went to Booth & Kellogg.

But, I think it would be harder to land a megafund position, pre or post-MBA.

I had always thought first job as a way to get into good MBA, and MBA is a great chance for you to take a little break and see what kind of change you would like to make in your career path.

 

think if youre a good smart candidate youll get a good gig from NU. on the whole i dont think your competition will be very fierce relative to other schools - i have found NU students at BBs to usually be subpar to okay analysts, with obvious notable exceptions of some being absolutely terrible (knew of 3-4 at lower tier BBs who all got laid off) but also a small number of complete superstars (example: heard of an NU grad from GS TMT/FIG who was top bucket and now at TPG after receiving several megafund offers).

 
ricottacheese:

think if youre a good smart candidate youll get a good gig from NU. on the whole i dont think your competition will be very fierce relative to other schools - i have found NU students at BBs to usually be subpar to okay analysts, with obvious notable exceptions of some being absolutely terrible (knew of 3-4 at lower tier BBs who all got laid off) but also a small number of complete superstars (example: heard of an NU grad from GS TMT/FIG who was top bucket and now at TPG after receiving several megafund offers).

Pretty much this. As I said before, only 40-50ish kids gunning for IB in any given recruiting cycle at NU and they are not all rockstars. Most of the high performers at the school lean toward consulting, most likely due to the far more extensive recruiting/selling that MBB does on campus. However, if you know your shit and take all the necessary steps, you can get essentially any gig.

I actually know the guy you're talking about haha, killed it at GS and loving TPG. Another NU kid from his class went CS to Carlyle too.

 

Here are some numbers to give you an idea:

  • For a general consulting industry idea: For the past 4 years, graduates that went into Consulting from Kellogg range in the high 30 (37%-39%), which is the dominant industry for Kellogg grads the other 61-63% go into a variety of other industries)

    • Last year, McKinsey hired 46, Bain hired 38, and BCG hired 34 for full time. MBB alone took 40% of the graduating class of 2013!
  • Last year, McKinsey took 17, Bain took 18, and BCG took 22 for summer Internships.

I think from this Kellogg would definitely be a target for MBB

 
Best Response
freddyflintstone:

Here are some numbers to give you an idea:

- For a general consulting industry idea: For the past 4 years, graduates that went into Consulting from Kellogg range in the high 30 (37%-39%), which is the dominant industry for Kellogg grads the other 61-63% go into a variety of other industries)

- Last year, McKinsey hired 46, Bain hired 38, and BCG hired 34 for full time. MBB alone took 40% of the graduating class of 2013!

- Last year, McKinsey took 17, Bain took 18, and BCG took 22 for summer Internships.

I think from this Kellogg would definitely be a target for MBB

Pretty sure OP was asking about undergrad, not Kellogg.

 

It's good, but not much (if any) better than IU, or even U of I, in the midwest (for undergrad). It's honestly not worth the money IMO, it doesn't set you apart like the Ivy League (I'll throw UofC, Notre Dame, Stanford in the category too), and it costs way more than a top-quality state school (Michigan, Virginia, Indiana, etc.).

Remember too, I don't believe it has an undergrad business program (finance, accounting, marketing majors etc).. Although you may have access to Kellogg, you probably won't find as many direct business network opportunities as you would going to a solid state business school or Ivy. Also, if you know, for instance, you want to do Accounting, having the "Accounting" degree can be a good way to set yourself up for higher junior-level salary compared to having a degree in Economics.

If you're looking to get into Ibanking (especially Chicago market), I'd advise looking at University of Chicago or Notre Dame if possibe, I know they feed Chicago's finance field. Still, I know a few people from Northwestern and they do well.

 

Didn't go to NWU, but this post spews of so much misinformation. I honestly hope OP didn't listen to this moron. NWU definitely outdoes IU and DEFINITELY, DEFINITELY, DEFINITELY outdoes UIUC. It also places a lot better than UND and UoC, so that's that. This site is full of college student bums, I swear.

 

BBs interviewing on campus do not make it a target. Targets send a large number of analysts/summer analysts to bulges, which is why many people refer to HYPS, Wharton, and Berkley, as targets. If just having BBs on campus means your a target, then almost any half-decent college out there would be classified as target. On the other hand, I agree northwestern is a semi target.

 

I have heard recruiters from different firms say something along the lines of "We are recruiting/interviewing at XXX, which makes it a target school".

If you go to the online application for SA positions in ibanking, you will most likely see them refer to two different pools: the schools they interview at (ie the targets), and schools that they "don't have an active presence in".

If they interview on campus, it is a target school. Northwestern is a target school.

To say that HYPS, Wharton, and Berkley are targets because they send more people to BBs would be like arguing which Ivy League schools are superior. Harvard may have an advantage over Brown, but they are both Ivy's.

 

northwestern is a target...wtf is a semitarget...gimme a break.

a target gets recruited on campus and a non target doesn't. how hard is this shit to understand. at least it isnt quantum physics

 
gshell:
How much of a target is NU?
I think it depends on the division.

If you want to do something that involves accounting, UIUC is more of a target. Then again, you're probably looking for something a little more front-office.

From my (limited) experience, most banks recruit at NU, but it's not quite like UC, and it's definitely not like Wharton and some of the other Ivy Leagues.

It's really sad that the Big Ten schools get totally overlooked by the I-Banks even when US News generally claims they have equal if not better programs than the Ivies. If you get hired, make sure to change that. That's what I'll be trying to do.

 

Uhh...is this advice serious? Where the fuck do you guys work? Bank of America? Wtf. Targets HYPS wharton and berkley are targets because they send the most people to bbs. If you want to get into banking, what schools would you go to? One of those, clearly. Yeah, actually, I, and bankers, would argue that these are better schools in terms of recruiting for banking. Some recruiting = target? That's the most retarded statement I've seen on this board.

 

Northwestern is a target, any one who says otherwise is an idiot. If BB's come every year to recruit on campus and they take kids every year that's the definition of a target.

Semi-target? Are you kidding me?

The amount of BS going around this board is ridiculous.

 
Mr. White:
Uhh...is this advice serious? Where the fuck do you guys work? Bank of America? Wtf. Targets HYPS wharton and berkley are targets because they send the most people to bbs. If you want to get into banking, what schools would you go to? One of those, clearly. Yeah, actually, I, and bankers, would argue that these are better schools in terms of recruiting for banking. Some recruiting = target? That's the most retarded statement I've seen on this board.

When I interviewed at GS for a job in trading, I was up against students from NU. If NU (and even my public Big-Ten school) is good enough for GS, it's probably good enough for most banks.

 

Saying Northwestern is a target because BBs come every year to recruit on campus is retarded.

That's like saying Goldman is the same as JPM because they have a 'PRESENCE' in investment bankinng. Fucking idiots.

Yeah, the amount of dumb ass bs going around this board is ridiculous.

 
Mr. White:
Saying Northwestern is a target because BBs come every year to recruit on campus is retarded.

Maybe you're a little confused, but that's the definition of a target school.

Saying Northwestern is a "semi-target" is the same as saying JPM is a "semi-investment bank." Its just wrong.

Northwestern isn't the best school to go to for ibanking (just like JPM isn't the best investment bank) but its still a target school.

 

Actually, I think You're a little confused.

Distinguishing between target, semi-target, and non-target is for purposes of ranking.

Saying JPM is the same as Goldman would be to say that they are both top tier, not that they are both investment banks.

Northwestern isn't the best school to go for ibanking which is why it isn't a target school. Whether or not you consider that a 'semi-target' or a 'non-major target', the issue is simply semantics, but in any case Northwestern is not on par in any sense of the word in terms of ib recruiting with HYPSWB.

Calling all schools that have recruiting a target would essentially classify almost every university as a target. If you think that's true, then sure, give kids the advice NOT to go to HYPSWB because it's all the same.

 
Mr. White:
Actually, I think You're a little confused.

Northwestern isn't the best school to go for ibanking which is why it isn't a target school. Whether or not you consider that a 'semi-target' or a 'non-major target', the issue is simply semantics, but in any case Northwestern is not on par in any sense of the word in terms of ib recruiting with HYPSWB.

Calling all schools that have recruiting a target would essentially classify almost every university as a target. If you think that's true, then sure, give kids the advice NOT to go to HYPSWB because it's all the same.

my friend, you are really confused. a target school gets their students actively recruited by all the top banks. is uva on the same level on harvard. no but their a target school. is howard the same level as harvard. no but their a target school..

please stop misguiding people with this semi target crap. last i remembered, GS sponsors all the career fairs at NU

 

Target = all top banks recruit (NU, HYPSWC, UVA, MICH, ETC.)

Semi-Target = some/few top banks recruit; more back office than front office or even mix of both; larger presence of MM or boutiques (Other State Schools, Tulane, Claremont McKenna, Second tier privates)

Non-target = no ibank presence on campus (Community College)

 
jotah:
Target = all top banks recruit (NU, HYPSWC, UVA, MICH, ETC.)

Semi-Target = some/few top banks recruit; more back office than front office or even mix of both; larger presence of MM or boutiques (Other State Schools, Tulane, Claremont McKenna, Second tier privates)

Non-target = no ibank presence on campus (Community College)

Perfect.

 

I think a target school should be defined by how well-represented the school is at the banks. So let's say you go to a school where ALL top banks visit, make presentations, and interview on campus. Let's say they get all the resumes, select people to interview, etc. But at the end of the day, if the firm hires only 1 or 2 people from that school, I don't know if we can call that a target.

But I still think that "target" goes beyond the elite HYPW.

 

What is the deal with some people on this board? How hard is it to disagree with someone without being condescending?

I think most people agree that if they interview/recruit at your school, then your school is a target.

"If Lehman Brothers has an on-campus presence at your school, please consult the Lehman Brothers recruiter or your career placement office for information on next steps and your school’s specific deadlines. If Lehman Brothers does not visit your campus, we encourage you to forward your resume/CV to the appropriate Lehman Brothers recruiting contact."

If you go search through the careers section at UBS for ibanking internships in nyc, you will that they want students from the following schools to apply seperately:

UChicago Cornell NORTHWESTERN Princeton Wellesley Yale Morehouse/Spelman

I'm assuming that other schools like Wharton and Harvard aren't there right now due to deadlines, but I do remember seeing them a while ago.

 

You can't determine if a school is a target based on if banks recruit there. We are talking about front-office. There are many schools where banks recruit heavily for technology, HR, and operations, that doesn't make them "targets" in the sense that most people on this forum mean.

 
fp175:
You can't determine if a school is a target based on if banks recruit there. We are talking about front-office. There are many schools where banks recruit heavily for technology, HR, and operations, that doesn't make them "targets" in the sense that most people on this forum mean.
One would assume when people talk about a bank "recruiting" there, they mean for IB (look at the forum name, after all).

I would hope no one here is delusional enough to think that just because Lehman recruits at their school for back-office ops, it makes them a target.

 
fp175:
You can't determine if a school is a target based on if banks recruit there. We are talking about front-office. There are many schools where banks recruit heavily for technology, HR, and operations, that doesn't make them "targets" in the sense that most people on this forum mean.
I don't think it makes a difference if it's a well-managed firm. In four years, the guys who are already working for the firm and are capable of making the firm a lot of money will be on the trading floor or in I-Banking in four years.

If you're looking for schools now, look not just as who's getting hired to what division, but also at the intelligence and competence of those getting hired off to the well-run I-Banks. They're the people who'll be lobbying to recruit from your school.

 

Maybe NU is a target for the Chicago office? I think most of the BB's analysts out of NU probably stick around in Chicago - Thus making NU a semi-target.

I think more HYPSM and Wharton cats are targetted for the NY office - which is where you want to be.

 
fp175:
There is very little back-to-front office movement. No one in the middle/back office makes any money; the divisions are not revenue generating. So I don't see how "in four years" some guy doing operations will be on the trading floor. That sounds like a lot of wishful thinking.
Look, if you want to be a trader, and you're really cut out for it, you can always go to work for a Chicago trading firm. They tend to take EVERYONE- but kick 3/4s of their traders back out onto the street in six weeks. (I know this because I watched a trading firm I interned for take in a class of traders.) If you're good, you can be making the trading firm $50 million as a proprietary trader on CBOT contracts in as little as two years. At this point, you get hired into a hedge fund or get hired back at your original bank as a VP in proprietary trading. That is, if they're willing to take a pay cut to come back (Most Chicago trading firms let their traders take home 40%+ of what they make for the firm.)

So I would suggest that any I-Bank that doesn't get its good traders into S&T before they leave for Chicago is a poorly managed firm.

 

The truth is that Northwestern is NOT a target for NYC jobs but plenty make it into front office jobs at major banks in NYC because they are willing to network.

I went to NU and we are THE TARGET (along with UChi) for ANY banking job in Chicago...trust me, not many offices in chicago go to H/Y/P to look for people when you have plenty very intelligent people that can run pitch books in your backyard. This goes both ways however when it comes to NYC coming to NU/Chi.

In my admittedly target major, 70% of my 35-40 classmates went into i-banking in front office roles...about 80% in chicago. The balance went into management consulting at bain/BCG etc. If you are a strong student (3.4+ in a decent major) you can get a front office job at some type i-bank (yes small boutiques account for a large portion of this general statement). A 3.6-3.7+ will get you an interview at most, if not all, bulge brackets. I had a 3.7 and had [available to me] 8 interviews in i-banking, another 8 in consulting, and 4 in trading, senior year.

Northwestern is not a target in the sense a 3.0 gender studies major can work at goldman, but a 3.5 "hard" major has a lot of doors open to them.

I'm not a huge i-banking fan after my summer stint and turned down an offer at a BB in NYC in favor of a buyside job in the midwest.

 

yeah what the fuck is a "semi-target"

if your school is well-known and is known for its smart people, i would consider it a target (yes, like northwestern). college admissions are sometimes tragic, but they should never mean the end of your life

 

yea i realize that I would have no problem finding an ib job in chicago...but i'm mainly interested in wall street. I guess right now my question is should I just save money and go to a lower tier school instead since NU doesn't offer too many opportunities in NY anyway?

 

yeah, no duh. It's a street in lower manhattan. Very good. But what if you work on broad street? If you work in midtown, do you not work on wall street? What about a HF in Greenwich?

And to the other poster, you're right - nobody would say 'I work in wall street'. you work 'on' wall street. Except nobody says I work on wall street anyway, whether you're in Chicago or NY. (except for 1-year analysts explaining where they work to their grandma or some chick at a club and trying to sound cool).

Heard of wall street vs. main street? Where exactly is main street anyway? Wall Street is a metonym. It represents an industry. It refers to the banks/financial institutions that drive the American Capital markets.

Just trying to help you young guys out.

 

Ut et consequatur adipisci laudantium rerum labore. Magnam tenetur quas sed. Veniam quod voluptatem quibusdam consectetur voluptatem. Perspiciatis distinctio eaque id suscipit officiis.

Iure eos eos exercitationem. Libero ipsa consectetur id illo molestiae placeat. Error occaecati ipsam harum enim.

Est quidem consequuntur dolorem doloribus consequuntur. Amet assumenda aut ipsam. Eum et sint animi quas est impedit.

Ipsa harum ad eos veritatis consequatur. Dolores vitae veniam eius quia. Rerum quae et consequatur sed reiciendis molestiae non voluptatibus.

 

Quos quia ad debitis possimus. Minus a doloremque autem reprehenderit recusandae magnam. Voluptatibus fugit et rerum eaque tenetur sit. Voluptatem fugit in nemo fuga eaque ipsum. Impedit velit tempore dolorem non.

Earum omnis aperiam veritatis aut quis. Sunt rerum expedita non qui molestiae saepe et. Illum voluptatem consequatur praesentium atque odio exercitationem unde. Corporis rerum aut molestiae et.

 

Aliquam distinctio aspernatur et eligendi sit eos vel ab. Labore ea est odio est illo repellat.

Omnis velit cupiditate facere eum voluptas ipsum. Laborum pariatur reprehenderit quisquam iure et optio sit autem. Aperiam velit in facere ad tempora quidem ullam. Ratione provident error sunt ut nobis. Sed ut ipsum aut corporis perspiciatis voluptatem.

Qui excepturi ea ducimus quo quo sint. Deleniti non dicta sed qui.

Eveniet facilis qui fuga non. Qui at aut est doloribus eum. Aut reprehenderit necessitatibus fugit est aut fugit ut. Quod ab repudiandae illum eum.

 

Quisquam minima ea nam sint consectetur cumque qui. Ut cum quo eveniet. Est et et laboriosam sint. Et est omnis ipsa error. Neque aut est rem quibusdam iusto quis a. Dolores iste et exercitationem rerum qui suscipit.

Velit odit placeat accusantium dolorem dolore quis. Eveniet et ratione magnam eum molestiae.

Dolorem minus provident labore ut molestiae voluptas. Possimus ut provident a dignissimos. Enim numquam eveniet harum ut iste. Autem quam in illum deleniti.

 

Quidem occaecati rerum nihil porro. Omnis corrupti repellat doloremque aliquam quo modi. Non id enim omnis rerum modi commodi nulla. Ut aperiam libero commodi et sed vel libero.

Dolores non omnis eius omnis. Ut qui odit quia cumque eos quisquam. Deserunt et reiciendis suscipit cum.

Et quos molestiae modi alias minus sed. Aliquam quasi ullam id sint quibusdam deserunt pariatur minima. Et quia ut aut ut veritatis rerum. Molestiae ut et molestias ab consectetur. Odio temporibus aliquam dolorum debitis repellat sunt accusamus voluptatem.

Assumenda ex dolor fuga perspiciatis. Sed esse exercitationem magnam beatae qui eos architecto voluptas.

 

Inventore voluptatem sequi quo earum voluptatem nulla excepturi autem. Aut tempore sunt a harum in consequatur soluta. Laboriosam voluptatem omnis ducimus qui culpa praesentium. Quia totam ea veniam. Sint ipsum voluptates nisi voluptatem.

Porro quia id consequatur delectus aut incidunt soluta. Doloremque necessitatibus dolorem et et in qui atque. Dolor accusantium sapiente quis consequatur vel. Nam quia minima quidem voluptas. Cum iste sint officia laboriosam occaecati. Sequi repellendus quibusdam id animi sapiente sed maxime. Ipsam occaecati voluptatem unde ipsam temporibus incidunt nesciunt fugiat.

Corrupti id est adipisci consequatur debitis a illum. Sunt tempore enim et dolorum.

Neque ad placeat aliquid qui. Distinctio et porro consequatur id sint qui qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”