P/CFPS vs. EV/EBITDA
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
+134 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 52 | 40m | |
+99 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 46 | 46s | |
+66 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 49 | 3h | |
+54 | Why Is It Called Investment Banking? | 19 | 13h | |
+38 | Ranking banks that went under | 19 | 7h | |
+31 | UBS Actual Buyside Exits 2024 Post-Integration | 9 | 2d | |
+29 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 12 | 13h | |
+28 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 3h | |
+26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 1d | |
+26 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 10 | 1h |
Career Resources
EV/EBITDA is not a cash flow multiple
Your question lacks context. EV/EBITDA and P/CFPS look at two completely different things and are non-mutually exclusive to each other. Unlike P/CFPS (dependent on market movement), EV/EBITDA is a "non-market" valuation multiple, and would appropriately be used in the case of a capital-intensive company with substantially large D&A expenses.
what the fuck are you talking about? EV/EBITDA multiples are certainly market driven. it changes daily, just like price per share does. how the fuck do you think you arrive at EV? I'll give you a hint, equity value is in that calc. and oh wait, equity value is the numerator in the other multiple OP was referring to. you should be banned from commenting.
Take a deep breath
i fucking lol'd bro
Me gusta
I am talking about what the maindifferences are between deriving a target share price from a relative P/CFPS approach vs. deriving a target share price from a relative EV/EBITDA multiple (obviously backing into an equity value from your calculated Enterprise Value)
Read this: //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ebitda-vs-operating-cash-flow-vs-free-ca…
"The key OPERATIONAL distinction between EBITDA and CFO/OCF is the Change in Net Working Capital. CFO/OCF are also burdened by taxes and interest expense."
Maiores assumenda harum ipsam quis minus modi amet. Cum modi mollitia necessitatibus voluptas nihil similique consectetur. Incidunt dolorum aperiam non officia at. Odit eos et et ea incidunt. Sunt sint doloremque ducimus facere enim consequatur voluptas voluptates. Debitis occaecati facilis voluptatibus sit minus dolores pariatur occaecati. Dignissimos quasi similique asperiores consequuntur vel temporibus. Voluptas doloribus voluptates maxime nostrum enim porro soluta et.
Ipsam qui ut provident quo sint nostrum omnis. Corrupti eveniet accusantium veniam. Quis omnis a quis sunt asperiores autem voluptas sed. Et in possimus qui ut nam nihil molestiae quas. Deserunt eum quisquam quod est et.
Excepturi illum et aut omnis amet possimus. Qui a sequi consequuntur repudiandae id. Harum quia dolorem odit occaecati.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...