Private Equity - Operating Side

Are there any good threads on this area of the business? Would be great to hear some detail on the sort of work that gets done from that end.

I have the opportunity to join a small PE firm that is led by a PE operating expert (top PE experience.) It doesn't seem like they're interested in picking up more than a few companies and building them up, so I'd like to know more about what I would possibly be getting myself into.

Thanks.

There are definitely some threads on here and you are welcome to PM or ask specific questions in this thread as it is right up my alley. Spent most of my career making highly concentrated sector specific bets and relied heavily on operational restructuring and strategic divestitures to drive returns. What you are getting yourself into really depends on your investment team/boss and your interest in the industry. I really enjoyed my team and my industry so it was a great experience from me and I developed a very marketable skillset.

 
Relinquis:
Yeah, the Audax guys are ex-BainCap.

That make sense. I met a couple of them at a career fair by me, seems like a very solid group.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

Hi

During the summer I worked at a MM PE firm and due to small headcount I got to work on all sides of the deal including a little bit of operations.

Here is my modicum of experience. From an analyst perspective PE firms try to deduce methods to increase the efficiency, scope or scale of a firm. For example would firm X be more efficient if we moved production plant x to location y or should we change how the contract/licensing structure of the products are. It is vastly different every time depending on the company, industry and deal. This only occurs if a PE firm acquires a controlling share of a company or if a company is willing to acquiese operational decisions or inputs.

Usually most firms have a select group of operating directors, that may or may not directly work for the PE firm. The operating directors, especially if controlling shares are acquired, are placed on the BOD of the acquisition. The operating directors then implement the necessary changes that they feel are appropiate. This can be anything from changing management, to changing production methods, to attractive new clients depending on depths of connections.

An interesting scenerio is when a PE firm owns multiple firms in the same industry. My firm did. Here the PE firm might attempt to find cross synergies between the companies by either combining ops or implementing each others comparative advantages but keeping the firms seperate entities. The firms might be kept seperate entitites if the core market segments are just vastly different.

I don't have much experience so take everything I say with a grain of salt but that's my 2 cents.

 

I also work at a PE shop where the headcount is lean so I am doing some portfolio management (especially on one company we recently purchased).

A huge value add is actually sitting in on their calls and looking at how they're looking at bolt-ons and future acquisitions. We gave them an x amount budget/allowance that they can use for acquisitions so while the process is theirs, we lend our expertise to make sure they do good deals and that they know how to value the company (we help them model out earn out structures and arrive at a firm price). You might be surprised but most companies/corporations have a really really unsophisticated way of doing acquisitions/bolt ons where they can pay for a small company with near to zero due diligence and with a simple 1 page P&L model.

However the most interesting part of managing a company is looking at new initiatives and capex spend. So instead of just looking at a financial statement and seeing 100 million in capex, you get to actually work with management in how to allocate that effectively. It helps a lot for information based companies to have a very solid plan where you will contact them every day or week and see the progress they're making on a new initiative such as expanding to a new country or a new product.

The product stuff is interesting but my favorite is expanding the company overseas. That's when you get to travel and help with the smallest details such as which building to rent out as well as big picture things like working with that country's local government with regards to regulations/taxes/etc.

Anyways, there's a million things you do in running a company so I won't list it all here but I find that managing companies (30% of my time) is just as interesting as looking at new deals (70% of my time). However, you might want to look at operationally focused PE firms if you want to ONLY do portfolio management where they actually split up investment team vs. operations team.

Or you can go to a shop where you do a bit of both which happens I think in most mid market PE shops. The megafunds a majority of the time will be focused on just modeling/acquisitions at the junior levels since the seniors will take care of actually "running" the company.

 
Best Response

The old "operations" myth. Operations in PE will consist of:

--Add-On acquisitions --Occasionally helping with budgeting and analyzing big capex projects (especially if financing is needed) --Sitting on calls / going to board meetings

You won't be doing really "operational" things. People have this idea in their head that you'll be some sort of business demi-god who does the deal and then runs the company. That's not the case. Not for the Associates, not for the VPs, not for the Partners. The job of running the company goes to the company. You provide help with things that are in your wheel-house, not in theirs.

This is not to say that you won't learn a ton of stuff, but it's almost always going to be around financials.

As a side note, I think deep-down, we all want to be doing things, creating things as opposed to buying things and looking at them as abstract spreadsheets. Hence the constant bubbling up interest in PE for "operational experience."

 

PE usually use specialist consultants (post deal team, 100 days...) or very experienced ex-CEOs to run these operational changes. A number of PE now pay for operational due diligence work to be done during the deal due diligence to help them identify future sources of operational savings. This space is getting more and more active and some firms have now their own small operational team in house. This has been reinforced by the recent debt crisis when no one could sell anything and PE firms had to sit on some crappy investment whose EBTIDA was melting every quarter...

 

I've been curious about portfolio arms of megafunds, e.g. TPG Ops Group, KKR Capstone. How do these places compare to MBB in terms of:

  1. Day-to-day work
  2. Pay
  3. Promotion curve (i.e. is it as structured a career path leading to partner or out or is it more industry-style with unpredictable tenure between promotions)
  4. Recruitment (requirements, selectivity) - i.e. how difficult it is to lateral to one of these from MBB.
  5. [This forum's favorite] Prestige - aren't you seen as a second-class citizen who wasn't good enough to make it to the investment team?

Would anyone care to chime in?

 

There are countless examples of PE/HF guys becoming so enamored with a particular portfolio company or a portfolio company becoming such a substantial portion of their portfolio that they get very involved in the day to day operations and decision making process, which can obviously be rife with potential conflicts of interest and lead to contentious issues with company management. My shop had two internal groups that worked collaboratively during the entire deal cycle. One group focused on the typical financial engineering aspects of private equity (acquisition due diligence, capital raising, financing, etc.) while the other group was comprised of former industry operating professionals who advised on strategic action plans, SG&A reduction, forecasting/budgeting, etc. We also hired the standard management consultants to come in during various phases of due diligence.

My point is, that there are opportunities in PE whereby you can participate in various facets of the traditional PE deal cycle and the operations of a portfolio company. Our analyst/associate groups definitely worked closely with the operational group and directly with senior level executives within the portfolio company on tasks such as: capital budgeting, strategic partnerships, marketing campaigns, opportunistic dispositions of assets, advising on PP&E related decisions, etc. It definitely offered a unique perspective.

 

Really depends on the fund you join. I think in general, the smaller the size of the business, the more operational involved you can potentially get. This is largely also due to SMEs being good candidates for organic growth through expansion or growth via M&A. I think Audax is a good example of such operationally oriented fund in the US.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

Operationally involved can be a pretty broad term in and of itself.

For example, large-cap buyout funds tend to look at the strategic direction of a firm and make investments based on how they can add value to an existing strategy, or retool the business to capitalize on a new strategy.

Whereas for middle-market firms, especially at the lower end of the defintion, PE firms can add value by adding MIS, streamlining processes, etc...pretty much implementing plans that allow a business to scale up and function like a larger organisation.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
 

Omnis vero dolore et quasi repudiandae. Perspiciatis voluptatem hic iure modi illo dicta. Nihil natus neque laboriosam repudiandae quos.

 

Cumque voluptatem pariatur eum fugit assumenda molestias voluptatum. Et saepe voluptatem dolores aut. Omnis fugit assumenda pariatur optio qui impedit. Deleniti consequatur voluptatem dolor vitae. Minus qui qui eveniet.

Dicta delectus eligendi aut nam voluptas exercitationem. Molestiae inventore non enim est. Nihil quod molestias quis autem ea. Ea maxime quidem unde corrupti.

Quibusdam dolor at error id placeat ipsum. Dolorum consequatur eaque ipsam qui. Animi porro rerum vitae debitis temporibus dolorem deserunt.

Non neque culpa ducimus velit. Et enim ipsum dolorum cupiditate sit quam. Magnam aliquid nihil quia sequi eius accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”