Prop trading firm vs a hedge fund

Hi everyone!

Currently I have offers from a relatively good proprietary trading firm (say, DRW, SIG, Optiver) and a medium-sized hedge fund. I really like both of them and it's very hard to decide which is better.

Which of them is better for long-term?
Is it possible/common to move from a hedge fund to a prop firm (and vice versa)?
Also which department of a prop trading firm is more promising: Gamma arbitrage, Arbitrage trading, index/equity market making?
What is the difference between arbitrage groups in a hedge fund and a prop trading firm?

Thx in advance

 
runningcitylikediddy:
top prop > medium sized HF

And standing out a good prop shop will make you very valuable to large HF. I would imagine the money is pretty similar except you may get a higher base salary at the HF. If you're good at what you do and confident in that start with the prop shop and build a reputation for yourself....nothing is more attractive to a big HF than someone who has consistently made money.

 
Best Response
m.c.trader:
runningcitylikediddy:
top prop > medium sized HF

And standing out a good prop shop will make you very valuable to large HF. I would imagine the money is pretty similar except you may get a higher base salary at the HF. If you're good at what you do and confident in that start with the prop shop and build a reputation for yourself....nothing is more attractive to a big HF than someone who has consistently made money.

I've heard of very few people at prop firms like DRW, jump, optiver, etc., making the switch to a BB or an elite hedge fund. That could be because they're making enough money at their firm and enjoy the job, so moving over may not make sense.

 
mmonkey:
mcmoran23:
Does anyone know how easy it is to move around from one prop. firm to another (for market making) in Chicago ?

If you're good, yes it is easy.

Yea, it's easy to move, but probably expensive from the buyout in your contract and the non-compete clause.

 

A buyout is a cost of leaving the firm before your contract ends. You generally would have to pay your total salary back to the firm for your last 3-12 months of employment. This prevents alot of people from moving from firm to firm. All the firms have non-compete clauses but some firms are alot harsher than others.

 

Does every firm have such contract ? Does that mean they cannot let you go as well ?

Because of non-compete clauses, would you say one is better off working at his most desired location and firm for his very first job ? One might accept a job at a location or firm that is not his first choice, and this non-compete clause can create a big problem later on.

Thanks again.

 
The Tripster:
A buyout is a cost of leaving the firm before your contract ends. You generally would have to pay your total salary back to the firm for your last 3-12 months of employment. This prevents alot of people from moving from firm to firm. All the firms have non-compete clauses but some firms are alot harsher than others.

Not really sure where you're getting this from. Most of the contracts that I've seen/heard about have been at will meaning you can leave at any time, or your employer can terminate you at any time. If you leave for another trading company, your company can enforce the noncompete if they want, but if they do they have to pay your base salary (no bonus is my understanding) for the length of the noncompete

 

I'm not sure on this. I know that management wanted the individual to pay and not the other company cause that would make it too easy for profitable traders to leave to go to the competitor to get a better deal for only 15-30K.

 

Thx for your opinions.

Can anyone comment on these questions:

Which of them is better for long-term? Is it possible/common to move from a hedge fund to a prop firm (and vice versa)? Also which department of a prop trading firm is more promising: Gamma arbitrage, Arbitrage trading, index/equity market making? What is the difference between arbitrage groups in a hedge fund and a prop trading firm?

Thx in advance

 

I know this is an old thread, but I was in a similar position during my senior year in college. I ended up turning down top prop firms (jane street, drw, sig, optiver, imc, peak 6, tibra, allston) for a BB S&T desk. I'm now in my 4th year there. My basic reasoning then was as follows. I knew that the first job out of college is actually the most important because it sets the trajectory of your career in terms of future professional opportunities and grad school placement. Although from a cultural and fit standpoint I liked the laid-back culture of the prop shops more, I believed that a S&T desk at a well-known BB would just give me more opportunities. I get contacted a lot by buyside desks, other sellside desks, and prop shops, regarding jobs. And I've been lucky enough to have gotten interview invites at every top MBA and MFin program I applied to this year. From talking to my buddies at top prop shops, although they're doing well financially, they just don't have the same type of career flexibilities and admission prospects as I do.

 

Advantages sellside - highly flexible expense account ("CLIENT OUTING") Disadvantages sellside - being poor on a relative basis

Advantages sellside - interns/intern bashing. Viral competitive games, like mustache contests Disadvantages buyside - getting bashed by CIO and getting blown up by greedy LPs

Advantages sellside - being able to blame your P&L fups on risk and research Disadvantages buyside - not being able to blame your P&L fups on risk and research

 

I don't work on a prop desk, but I can take a crack at compensation.

It would only make sense that, if you're good, compensation would be competitive vs. a HF. I believe this applies on every desk. You will be paid just enough to make it difficult for you to leave your current firm. Remember that you can leverage your offers. If a bank wants to keep you bad enough, it'll pony up the cash.

 

Quia nihil omnis quasi maiores occaecati molestiae. Est maxime ut dicta non sit commodi deserunt quae. Reiciendis et magnam tempore laudantium dolores repellat perspiciatis. Ad animi cupiditate ullam id rerum et.

Est et aut unde rem sunt officiis aut. Fuga quos commodi velit. Ut voluptates vel voluptate et. Delectus dolorem eveniet sunt. Aperiam ipsum voluptas illum voluptatem minima provident.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”