Recruiting decisions - sometimes it's not you, it's us

I’ve seen a large number of posts where people look good on paper, feel like they nailed the interview, they did everything the WSO interview guide told them to do, but they still get a ding. That’s followed by some degree of introspective angst – “what am I doing wrong?”

Often, it’s because candidates are competing against people with similar or better credentials or screwed something up in the interview. Tough luck.

But sometimes – and not infrequently – the interviewers may think the candidate is great, but not what they are looking for.

It’s not you, it’s us.

Specifically, when we’re interviewing, we’re often looking for someone who complements our team’s skillset or addresses a deficiency.

Some examples:

1. Our team may be mostly guys and straying into too much locker room banter or chest beating. The few women on the team may be feeling alienated. We need to balance it out. So we’ll have a bias towards recruiting a female candidate or less overtly alpha.

2. Our team may be a front office team with a lot of extroverted sales personalities, but we need some numbers geeks or desk jockeys who will be happy modeling and preparing pitchbooks. We need those guys to be less extroverted, less ambitious to make sales, more happy to do the desk work supporting the sales team. So a candidate who would be an excellent sales guy is not what we’re looking for and will get a ding.

This applies even to summer interns. For example, for the two SA positions in my team for this year, we’d picked one outgoing, extroverted female candidate and that fed into our choice of SA #2, where we chose a guy with a geekier background and personality over other candidates who were comparable to SA #1. We thought that combination was what we needed for the team.

Unless you’ve got an insider who knows the score, you won’t know what the interviewers are looking for. And they are unlikely to tell you in the interview or afterwards. And, in the case of the SA example I gave, what we were looking for only evolved once we’d seen the candidates and made a decision on #1.

So, if you’ve been dinged and can’t put your finger on why, maybe it’s not you, it’s us.

 

Accusantium omnis quis inventore nam repellendus ea. Ea minus ipsum qui necessitatibus voluptatem incidunt molestiae est. Quod vitae inventore quasi aperiam nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”