Round 2 HBS dings

Expected it after not getting an interview two weeks ago, although it does grind my gears a little bit that someone from an old case team that I ran circles around got an interview and I didn't.

Any other monkeys want to commiserate?

 

MBA admissions to any specific school = crap shoot. If you're good, you'll get into a good school though. Also, HBS tends to like kids who do everything right early on with high undergrad GPA rather than late bloomers that take chances and pulled it together with job performance/GMAT One of the smartest kids I know in finance with a stellar resume (gs -> PE megafund) got rejected from HBS this year so you're in good company.

 
burnt tangerine:
770 GMAT and MBB experience... that sucks

Did you apply to Stanford?

Reading this post and the post below it makes me smile. Potential full ride to Cornell with a non-target sub 3 gpa, and 700 GMAT, while the 770 MBB guy is getting dinged. I'm assuming OP didn't apply to Cornell, but I'd be curious what the results were if he did.

 
shorttheworld:
got into cornell with an invite to their scholarship weekend, lets go full ride!!! wiating on duke and yale

congrats STW

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

Petergibbons - I'm at MBB too, with some insanely cool case experience and a promotion under my belt. Got dinged from HBS flat out in R2 as well - stings to not get an interview, huh? Now I'm waiting on Stanford for an interview invite, and I've interviewed at Wharton... That's why I applied to multiple schools I guess, but I'm still pretty surprised that most people (90+% anecdotally) at my shop got interviews and I got a flat ding.

Now I'm trying to figure out whether (assuming I get in) I should go to Wharton. Great school, but it worries me that there's a lot of poison around about W being H/S' safety school. I have a top 3 undergrad, I don't really need the HBS/Stanford "glow", but I don't want to be seen as having an inferiority complex for the rest of my life - I've dealt with not being at Harvard before and I managed just fine!

 
bleedblue82:
Great school, but it worries me that there's a lot of poison around about W being H/S' safety school. I have a top 3 undergrad, I don't really need the HBS/Stanford "glow", but I don't want to be seen as having an inferiority complex for the rest of my life - I've dealt with not being at Harvard before and I managed just fine!

Is this for real?

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 
duffmt6:
bleedblue82:
Great school, but it worries me that there's a lot of poison around about W being H/S' safety school. I have a top 3 undergrad, I don't really need the HBS/Stanford "glow", but I don't want to be seen as having an inferiority complex for the rest of my life - I've dealt with not being at Harvard before and I managed just fine!

Is this for real?

I understand his sentiment. I myself will only be applying to HBS when I make my B school apps. Even a Stanford admit would not make me happy.

As for W, that is definitely a HBS/GSB reject school. Though still a great school of course, but when you're at the top of everything else (e.g. top ugrad to top BB job to top buyside fund etc), W definitely seems like a step down.

 

I've definitely met people at my firm from Wharton with an HBS inferiority complex. People who are 5+ years out, absolute rockstars (i.e. top 10% of their class, early promotions) who still talk about their HBS ding with bitterness.

Life, liberty and the pursuit of Starwood Points
 

duffmt6 - not sure which part of my post you're responding to. To be clear, I think Wharton's a great school - I have friends there who love it who came from PE, MBB, etc., and colleagues here who attended and enjoyed themselves. From an education and reputation standpoint, I'd be thrilled to go there and I really hope I get in.

HOWEVER - I think it's fairly undeniable that Wharton gets the "Princeton" treatment. That is to say, people talk about silly shit like how there's Harvard and Yale, then Princeton, then everyone else. Is it true? No. Is it possible that there's some influence in public perception of Princeton, the #1 school in USN that still comes in third when the public discusses the Ivy trio? Yeah, probably.

My point is just that - if I'm lucky enough to get into Wharton - I just want to do my due diligence to know that I'm not going to get sandbagged because some tool recruiter at Awesome VC, Inc is all over HBS and Stanford grads and can't stand those "3rd best HBS reject" Wharton kids.

I'm sure this comes off as exceptionally douchey, but for the people on this board who share a similar background I'm sure you get what I'm saying... my opinion of Wharton is really high, but that's not what matters when I'm spending $200K, losing out on $300K+ of income and my next promotion where I am.

 

This doesn't make sense to me. Princeton as the neglected of HYP? If anything, Princeton always seemed above H/Y from an undergrad perspective given that its been ranked #1 the most and has such an emphasis on undergrad education.

Also, who do you know who says there's H/Y and then Princeton?

dollas
 
Best Response

I understand bleedblue's perspective.

I'm an associate at a large PE fund, and the associates here definitely consider Wharton to be their back-up school. Not that they wouldn't go there if it is the only place they were admitted, but they definitely consider there to be a substantial gap between H/S and Wharton.

The reason is that all the top PE shops primarily recruit at H and S (although some certainly do at W as well). Also, nearly all the partners went to H or S. So the perception is that if you want to get a VP job at a large fund, you need to get into H or S.

I came to PE from MBB, where this attitude was definitely not present. I worked at MBB in Chicago, so lots of people would go to Kellogg or Booth. Some people even chose Kellogg or Booth over Harvard because of location and better experience (Kellogg is easily the most fun program, even if Harvard wins on other metrics, including prestige, alumni network, recruiting, etc.). Anyway, I was shocked when I started at my current fund and realized that most associates felt that it was H/S or bust.

However, I reject the notion that W is a "back-up school", even if some people at my fund (and other large funds) consider it as such. I think such an attitude reveals arrogance and obsession with prestige, two character traits I hope I don't develop. I plan to apply to H/S, but will also be applying to Wharton, Kellogg, and Booth. Would be happy to go to any of those schools. The experience, recruiting, and alumni at any of those schools are fantastic, and being admitted to any of them is a major accomplishment.

All that said, I would estimate that a large % of Wharton students were rejected by HBS. I'm sure there is significant overlap between the two schools' applicant pools. I'm sure some students choose Wharton over HBS each year (perhaps for the Lauder program, or for scholarship money, or location), but my guess is most Wharton students would go to HBS if they were admitted. Just a hunch. But that doesn't make Wharton a sub-par program in any way.

Marrying the third-hottest supermodel in the world should certainly not be considered a failure, even if the first and second hottest turned you down.

 
DagwoodDeluxe:

I understand bleedblue's perspective.

I'm an associate at a large PE fund, and the associates here definitely consider Wharton to be their back-up school. Not that they wouldn't go there if it is the only place they were admitted, but they definitely consider there to be a substantial gap between H/S and Wharton.

The reason is that all the top PE shops primarily recruit at H and S (although some certainly do at W as well). Also, nearly all the partners went to H or S. So the perception is that if you want to get a VP job at a large fund, you need to get into H or S.

I came to PE from MBB, where this attitude was definitely not present. I worked at MBB in Chicago, so lots of people would go to Kellogg or Booth. Some people even chose Kellogg or Booth over Harvard because of location and better experience (Kellogg is easily the most fun program, even if Harvard wins on other metrics, including prestige, alumni network, recruiting, etc.). Anyway, I was shocked when I started at my current fund and realized that most associates felt that it was H/S or bust.

However, I reject the notion that W is a "back-up school", even if some people at my fund (and other large funds) consider it as such. I think such an attitude reveals arrogance and obsession with prestige, two character traits I hope I don't develop. I plan to apply to H/S, but will also be applying to Wharton, Kellogg, and Booth. Would be happy to go to any of those schools. The experience, recruiting, and alumni at any of those schools are fantastic, and being admitted to any of them is a major accomplishment.

All that said, I would estimate that a large % of Wharton students were rejected by HBS. I'm sure there is significant overlap between the two schools' applicant pools. I'm sure some students choose Wharton over HBS each year (perhaps for the Lauder program, or for scholarship money, or location), but my guess is *most* Wharton students would go to HBS if they were admitted. Just a hunch. But that doesn't make Wharton a sub-par program in any way.

Marrying the third-hottest supermodel in the world should certainly not be considered a failure, even if the first and second hottest turned you down.

http://ayainsight.co/ Curating the best advice and making it actionable.
 

Hmm, good call New Guy on "I myself" - I always thought this was wrong. Whatever it still annoys me.

On H/S/W - I think Dagwood's supermodel analogy is awesome. Either way, I often hear H/S/W spoken in the same breath these days, especially by young people. I don't think there is any illusion that someone who went to Wharton can't do the work that someone who went to Harvard or Stanford can. If anything there may be slightly different networks at each school, with Harvard having the network edge.

 

I'm generalising, but there tend to be more Wharton guys at the senior levels in REPE than Harvard & Stanford. Maybe its because of the programme/school or the fact that RE is heavily skewed to finance as opposed to general business.

Another factor is that a lot of the senior guys at the top REPE funds or RE hedge funds attended Wharton for Undergrad... in this niche Wharton is definitely not second fiddle to HBS/Stanford.

I'd still go to HBS over Wharton though, simply for the overall branding... I haven't met anyone from Stanford at a senior level in REPE, would take Wharton over GSB if my REPE career was my only focus.

 
Relinquis:
I'm generalising, but there tend to be more Wharton guys at the senior levels in REPE than Harvard & Stanford. Maybe its because of the programme/school or the fact that RE is heavily skewed to finance as opposed to general business.

Another factor is that a lot of the senior guys at the top REPE funds or RE hedge funds attended Wharton for Undergrad... in this niche Wharton is definitely not second fiddle to HBS/Stanford.

I'd still go to HBS over Wharton though, simply for the overall branding... I haven't met anyone from Stanford at a senior level in REPE, would take Wharton over GSB if my REPE career was my only focus.

Wharton ugrad > Wharton MBA so not a relevant comparison (prestige wise)

As for RE, yes Wharton MBA has a very good specialist RE programme so it makes sense for its alumni to be plentiful in the REPE business.

 
petergibbons:
Expected it after not getting an interview two weeks ago, although it does grind my gears a little bit that someone from an old case team that I ran circles around got an interview and I didn't.

Any other monkeys want to commiserate?

Well this is just fkn depressing after looking at your experience and GMAT.... Had a friend from undergrad that got into HBS with a GMAT, and no experience in corporate/ibanking/anything that stands out... Though she did start a non-profit that aimed to reduce tuna consumption (slaps) in our local market (Hawaii, again SLAPS)...

 

Voluptates soluta exercitationem cupiditate esse ad fugiat non. Aut et reprehenderit excepturi non temporibus quae non voluptas. Dolor facere expedita inventore quia similique illum. Fuga non perferendis excepturi dolores similique expedita reiciendis. Quidem omnis distinctio sapiente aut sit et et.

 

Vel deserunt adipisci aliquam nam est. Vel aliquid itaque minus et porro iste qui. Omnis nihil necessitatibus voluptates molestiae ut aspernatur quos molestias. Hic ducimus perferendis provident voluptate et. Fuga sed odio quasi voluptatem impedit maxime qui. Alias voluptatem voluptas et dolorem quaerat voluptatibus consequatur. Exercitationem qui corporis voluptas ut.

Enim et earum at perspiciatis. Velit eum repudiandae illum id totam. Earum odit quos qui dignissimos quibusdam. Nostrum quibusdam sapiente aut ut rerum. Odit mollitia sunt sapiente minima voluptatem fugit. Dolor aliquam et pariatur ducimus.

Inventore suscipit rerum neque explicabo. Ipsum odit sequi sed quia velit totam. Ut illum amet et repellat sunt quibusdam saepe.

Ut libero autem fugiat asperiores exercitationem. Ab exercitationem cum suscipit porro dolorem qui consequatur eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”