Seattle Turns Away From Micro-Housing

Although not the most popular option. Micro-Housing has provided a cheap and affordable living option for college students, young professionals, and beginning families. Rather than living in the suburbs or cramped with roommates in cities people can live alone in centrally-located apartments that are slightly smaller than the average hotel room, and often have shared common spaces.

Seattle has become the leading developer for Micro-Housing. However, due to strict regulations and NIMBY opposition, the once innovative and affordable housing option has been killed in a pricey market.

Some detail as to why is as follows:


" But the units have become so burdened by design reviews, parking mandates, micromanagement of layout, and location limits, that they make little economic sense for developers, and few are built. In this respect, they have become de facto “illegal.”

In 2013, Seattle's housing market growth was made up of about 25% Micro-Housing.


"But once this growth was recognized by local media and residents, the anti-development pitchforks came out and the regulations rolled in. In September of 2014, King County Superior Court ruled, writes Neiman, “that all current pod-style micro-housing projects must go through the design review process, a time-consuming series of meetings with community members and a citizen panel that comment on plans.” This increased expenses and delays, forcing many developers to instead build Small Efficiency Dwelling Units (SEDU), a one-up from micro-units that must have 220 square feet of floor space.

If anyone knows or has had experience living in these micro units, please comment and describe your experience as to how effective the living experience was.

Source

 

Nobis est dolor ut necessitatibus vero. Quia error aut qui non. Aspernatur eum sit at nihil enim qui possimus ad.

Aut minus accusamus molestiae. Nostrum consectetur quod dolore quasi blanditiis labore. Nostrum illum nihil quia impedit accusantium eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”