Advice Needed: Private Equity Co-investing vs Private Equity Secondary
I recently received two offers, both of which are from private equity fund of funds. One of them is a role in the private equity co-investment team while the other is for the private equity secondary team. I would like to seek opinion as for which one is a better option in terms of career prospect.
Thank you very much!
it depends on two things: (1) what you ultimately want to do and (2) which firms your received offers from.
i know this space very well.
Hi, Wannabeneachbum,
The secondary offer is from an established FoF with AUM above $20bn. Its latest secondary fund, raised in 2008, is about $2bn. The co-investment role is from a much smaller FoF with about $6-7bn AUM.
The comp level of both offers are the same. In terms of work life balance, the secondary role requires a longer working hours, 60 hr/wk usually while the co-investment role is more laid-back with about 50 hrs expected. Both does not require weekend work.
PE secondatry is gaining popularity these days so i feel it may be the next big thing within the PE industry. On the other hand, co-investing is more similar to direct PE investing and thus I think may offer better exit in the future since you can either continue doing co-investing role in FoF or with an institutional investor or jump to direct investing.
So I am very torn now and would like to know what your thoughts about this.
Secondaries do not provide very good exit opps into direct PE as most people in direct PE have no idea what secondaries entails. Secondaries will continue to grow as AUM in the PE industry and the # of institutions that invest in PE increase. It is really its own animal. You can make a lot of money doing secondaries if you wanted to make a career out of it. Not sure what you did before secondaries, so depending on what that is, you may still have career options. How much are the offers for? If you want to PM me the names of the firms, I will give you my thoughts on them. I am not in fund of funds, but I know most of the secondaries and co-investment players very well. Some firms have much stronger reputations than others...
Go for co-investing. Better exit opps by far. What's your background? Depending on what you did before you may still be able to get into direct PE but it's going to be a lot easier coming from the co-investment standpoint.
PE Secondaries vs FoF vs Co-Invest (Originally Posted: 06/27/2013)
I am curious if anyone has a perspective on PE secondaries vs. FoF vs. co-invest experience and exit ops (bschool, jumping to direct before or after). From what I've seen, PE secondaries place very well into bschools and some middle market primary shops afterwards but I don't have a basis for comparison.
Interested as well
I just finished my first year at an M7 b-school and have a few classmates who came from PE secondaries shops. Obviously this number is less than the amount of students who come from a direct background, but I think this is more due to the fact that there are just more applicants from the direct side. In my experience, I have seen more people jump from traditional buyside to secondaries and have not really seen many peers jump from secondaries straight to direct. As an associate in secondaries, you develop some applicable skills, including the financial modeling and really thinking deeply about valuation. You do conduct diligence, but from what I have heard from friends in that world, you tend to leverage the sponsor's diligence a lot. Again, this is third-degree information from speaking with friends in the space.
A lot of very prominent firms engage in both FoF investing and co-investing in individual deals (think Adams Street or CPP). When you think about it, this actually makes a lot of sense, since these firms have deep relationships through their investments in these traditional PE firms and have a significant capital base, so they are usually the first to receive the call when a deal needs to be filled out with additional capital. The firms who are invested in the strong, consistently returning funds in the space usually do pretty well from a returns perspective. From what I hear, pay is not quite as high as traditional PE, but work life is better because you leverage a lot of the sponsor's diligence and usually are not the lead on the deal. There are a lot more firms who are LPs in PE funds looking to significantly build out a direct investing presence. Again, this experience has some overlap with direct PE investing, but you aren't the lead on any processes, so that may serve as a setback in trying to move to traditional PE.
I don't have any intel on firms that might engage exclusively in direct co-investing (no FoF business). My guess is that these firms may have trouble competing for deals, since the first call is usually made to the guys outlined above.
Went through final round with a top secondary - will post more when I hear back
Update: slowest process ever and fairly disorganized
How were the questions - interested, as I have a first round with a smaller secondaries shop. Were there many technical (accounting/LBO) questions that you faced during the finals?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
How were the questions - interested, as I have a first round with a smaller secondaries shop. Were there many technical (accounting/LBO) questions that you faced during the finals?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
Secondaries and co-investment funds: what's the deal? (Originally Posted: 10/13/2009)
a decent amount of talk on this forum re: fund of funds, but what about secondaries and co-invest? better experience than fof? better exit ops?
any insight would be appreciated.
...
I believe secondaries and co-invest are highly regarded in the marketplace - particularly if one is at a top firm like HarbourVest Partners, Coller Capital, etc. One side of secondaries bears a very close resemblance to direct investing in that groups evaluate portfolio companies on a granular level and perform very similar diligence and modeling as do the direct firms. The other side of secondaries - the structuring of LP-interest transactions - is a bit higher level and is more transaction-oriented. All in all, working in secondaries gives you an unparalleled view of the marketplace as well as highly relevant experience, so at the junior level, it could be a great opportunity to explore the world of PE before getting an MBA and choosing a direct shop.
Co-invest is also very similar to direct investing, but you typically don't have to do as much diligence since you aren't putting as much skin in the game, and you trust the other investors, and in situations where you aren't taking the current equity owners out - you can trust their incentives are aligned with yours.
From my perspective, Direct, Secondaries, and Co-invest are more interesting than FoF, but I don't have any experience in FoF so I can't really say.
I know a guy who moved from a PE FoF/Secondaries firm to a Direct middle market buyout firm in Chicago. You won't have a shot at the Blackstones, Carlyles of the world though if you work at a PE FoF/Secondary/Co-invest fund.
FoF skillsets - Co-invest vs. Secondaries vs. Fund Investment (Originally Posted: 12/13/2012)
I'll be joining a FoF out of undergrad (2yr analyst program) soon but group placement is determined later.
I was wondering if anybody could compare and contrast the skillset needed between these three different groups so I know what to focus on to best position myself for the group that I want.
I know these will be difficult, but my long term goals after the program are either: - network hard and try for MM PE - network hard and try to jump into banking as a 2nd or 3rd year analyst ---> MM PE - b-school then MM PE
Thanks guys.
Based on your goals, do:
Pretty simple. If you get stuck into a pure FoF role you're going to be screwed so make sure you gun hard for coinvesting.
You will only really have a shot at PE if you get on a deal team, which is ideally co-invest or secondaries. My experience is that most FoF's dont hire recent grads to the deal teams though...they want 2 yr IB
I
Thanks - what kind of skills/modelling are most applicable to coinvset and secondaries? Trying to find ways to stand out during training to get placed into one of them.
Aliquid blanditiis assumenda ut earum accusantium deserunt. Ut odit laborum voluptas porro aliquid. Cumque dolores corporis voluptas deserunt est veritatis. Aperiam minus minima debitis nesciunt deleniti. Voluptatum consectetur et error delectus sint omnis quam. Exercitationem et vel rerum sunt dolor.
Qui officiis modi est. Mollitia possimus ipsam quod quia voluptas hic ratione. Dolor ipsam quidem adipisci omnis molestias.
Ducimus eos eveniet dignissimos quae quia ex quidem. Et modi laudantium id qui repudiandae dolorem. Et animi repellendus asperiores voluptatibus. Consectetur maiores ea aperiam illo quam dolorem. Minima debitis quia fuga quis quis sint. Illo aliquam omnis ut placeat corrupti. Ex facere ratione praesentium quos a.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Adipisci saepe ut aut et ad temporibus enim. Voluptatem nulla dignissimos magnam beatae quod voluptas. Ut aut ut voluptatem quaerat praesentium. Id qui tempore vel enim nesciunt beatae. Similique eos consequuntur voluptas eligendi.